Go to Vaniquotes | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia


Vanisource - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge


CC Adi 12.35 (1975)

Revision as of 14:43, 26 January 2020 by Vanibot (talk | contribs) (Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)



His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada



TEXT 35

īśvarera dainya kari' kariyāche bhikṣā
ataeva daṇḍa kari' karāiba śiksā


SYNONYMS

īśvarera—of the Supreme Personality of Godhead; dainya—poverty; kari'-establishing; kariyāche—has done; bhikṣā—begging; ataeva—therefore; danda—punishment; kari'-giving him; karāiba—shall cause; śikṣā—instruction.


TRANSLATION

"But he has made the incarnation of Godhead a poverty-stricken beggar. Therefore I shall punish him for his correction."


PURPORT

To describe a man as an incarnation of God, or Nārāyaṇa, and at the same time present him as poverty-stricken is contradictory, and it is the greatest offense. The Māyāvādī philosophers, engaged in the missionary work of spoiling the Vedic culture by preaching that everyone is God, describe a poverty-stricken man as daridra-nārāyaṇa, or "poor Nārāyaṇa." Lord Caitanya Mahāprabhu never accepted such foolish and unauthorized ideas. He strictly warned, māyāvādi-bhāṣya śunile haya sarva-nāśa: "Anyone who follows the principles of Māyāvāda philosophy is certainly doomed." Such a fool needs to be reformed by punishment.

Although it is contradictory to say that the Supreme Personality of Godhead or His incarnation is poverty-stricken, we find in the revealed scriptures that when the Lord incarnated as Vāmana, He begged some land from Mahārāja Bali. Everyone knows, however, that Vāmanadeva was not at all poverty-stricken. His begging from Mahārāja Bali was a device to favor him. When Mahārāja Bali actually gave the land, Vāmanadeva exhibited His all-powerful position by covering the three worlds with three steps. One should not accept the so-called daridra-nārāyaṇas as incarnations because they are completely unable to show the opulence of the genuine incarnations of God.