SB 2.8.27: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision(s)) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{info | {{info | ||
|speaker= | |speaker=Sūta Gosvāmī | ||
|listener=Sages of | |listener=Sages of Naimiṣāraṇya | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam - Canto 02 Chapter 08]] | |||
[[Category:Bhagavatam Verses Spoken by Suta Gosvami - Vanisource|020827]] | |||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Srimad-Bhagavatam]] - [[SB 2|Second Canto]] - [[SB 2.8: Questions by King Pariksit|Chapter 8: Questions by King Parīkṣit]]'''</div> | |||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 2.8.26]] '''[[SB 2.8.26]] - [[SB 2.8.28]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 2.8.28]]</div> | |||
{{RandomImage}} | |||
==== TEXT 27 ==== | ==== TEXT 27 ==== | ||
<div | <div class="verse"> | ||
sūta uvāca | :sūta uvāca | ||
sa upāmantrito rājñā | :sa upāmantrito rājñā | ||
kathāyām iti sat-pateḥ | :kathāyām iti sat-pateḥ | ||
brahmarāto bhṛśaṁ prīto | :brahmarāto bhṛśaṁ prīto | ||
viṣṇurātena saṁsadi | :viṣṇurātena saṁsadi | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 17: | Line 23: | ||
==== SYNONYMS ==== | ==== SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
sūtaḥ | ''sūtaḥ uvāca''—Śrīla Sūta Gosvāmī said; ''saḥ''—he (Śukadeva Gosvāmī); ''upāmantritaḥ''—thus being inquired; ''rājñā''—by the King; ''kathāyām''—in the topics; ''iti''—thus; ''sat-pateḥ''—of the highest truth; ''brahma-rātaḥ''—Śukadeva Gosvāmī; ''bhṛśam''—very much; ''prītaḥ''—pleased; ''viṣṇu-rātena''—by Mahārāja Parīkṣit; ''saṁsadi''—in the meeting. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 24: | Line 30: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div | <div class="translation"> | ||
Sūta Gosvāmī said: Thus Śukadeva Gosvāmī, being invited by Mahārāja Parīkṣit to speak on topics of the Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa with the devotees, was very much pleased. | Sūta Gosvāmī said: Thus Śukadeva Gosvāmī, being invited by Mahārāja Parīkṣit to speak on topics of the Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa with the devotees, was very much pleased. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 31: | Line 37: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div | <div class="purport"> | ||
Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam can be legitimately discussed only among the devotees of the Lord. As the Bhagavad-gītā was authoritatively discussed between Lord Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna (the Lord and the devotee respectively), similarly Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, which is the postgraduate study of the Bhagavad-gītā, can also be discussed between the scholars and devotees like Śukadeva Gosvāmī and Mahārāja Parīkṣit. Otherwise the real taste of the nectar cannot be relished. Śukadeva Gosvāmī was pleased with Mahārāja Parīkṣit because he was not at all tired of hearing the topics of the Lord and was more and more anxious to hear them on and on with interest. Foolish interpreters unnecessarily tackle the Bhagavad-gītā and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam when they have no access to the subject matter. There is no use in nondevotees' meddling with the two topmost Vedic literatures, and therefore Śaṅkarācārya did not touch Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam for commentation. In his commentation on the Bhagavad-gītā, Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya accepted Lord Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but later on he commented from the impersonalist's view. But, being conscious of his position, he did not comment on the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. | ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'' can be legitimately discussed only among the devotees of the Lord. As the ''Bhagavad-gītā'' was authoritatively discussed between Lord Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna (the Lord and the devotee respectively), similarly ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'', which is the postgraduate study of the ''Bhagavad-gītā'', can also be discussed between the scholars and devotees like Śukadeva Gosvāmī and Mahārāja Parīkṣit. Otherwise the real taste of the nectar cannot be relished. Śukadeva Gosvāmī was pleased with Mahārāja Parīkṣit because he was not at all tired of hearing the topics of the Lord and was more and more anxious to hear them on and on with interest. Foolish interpreters unnecessarily tackle the ''Bhagavad-gītā'' and ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'' when they have no access to the subject matter. There is no use in nondevotees' meddling with the two topmost Vedic literatures, and therefore Śaṅkarācārya did not touch ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'' for commentation. In his commentation on the ''Bhagavad-gītā'', Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya accepted Lord Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but later on he commented from the impersonalist's view. But, being conscious of his position, he did not comment on the ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam''. | ||
Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī was protected by Lord Kṛṣṇa (vide Brahma-vaivarta Purāṇa), and therefore he is known as Brahmarāta, and Śrīmān Parīkṣit Mahārāja was protected by Viṣṇu, and thus he is known as Viṣṇurāta. As devotees of the Lord, they are always protected by the Lord. It is clear also in this connection that a Viṣṇurāta should hear Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam from Brahmarāta and no one else because others misrepresent the transcendental knowledge and thus spoil one's valuable time. | Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī was protected by Lord Kṛṣṇa (vide ''Brahma-vaivarta Purāṇa''), and therefore he is known as Brahmarāta, and Śrīmān Parīkṣit Mahārāja was protected by Viṣṇu, and thus he is known as Viṣṇurāta. As devotees of the Lord, they are always protected by the Lord. It is clear also in this connection that a Viṣṇurāta should hear ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'' from Brahmarāta and no one else because others misrepresent the transcendental knowledge and thus spoil one's valuable time. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 2.8.26]] '''[[SB 2.8.26]] - [[SB 2.8.28]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 2.8.28]]</div> | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
__NOEDITSECTION__ |
Revision as of 12:34, 6 June 2021
TEXT 27
- sūta uvāca
- sa upāmantrito rājñā
- kathāyām iti sat-pateḥ
- brahmarāto bhṛśaṁ prīto
- viṣṇurātena saṁsadi
SYNONYMS
sūtaḥ uvāca—Śrīla Sūta Gosvāmī said; saḥ—he (Śukadeva Gosvāmī); upāmantritaḥ—thus being inquired; rājñā—by the King; kathāyām—in the topics; iti—thus; sat-pateḥ—of the highest truth; brahma-rātaḥ—Śukadeva Gosvāmī; bhṛśam—very much; prītaḥ—pleased; viṣṇu-rātena—by Mahārāja Parīkṣit; saṁsadi—in the meeting.
TRANSLATION
Sūta Gosvāmī said: Thus Śukadeva Gosvāmī, being invited by Mahārāja Parīkṣit to speak on topics of the Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa with the devotees, was very much pleased.
PURPORT
Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam can be legitimately discussed only among the devotees of the Lord. As the Bhagavad-gītā was authoritatively discussed between Lord Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna (the Lord and the devotee respectively), similarly Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, which is the postgraduate study of the Bhagavad-gītā, can also be discussed between the scholars and devotees like Śukadeva Gosvāmī and Mahārāja Parīkṣit. Otherwise the real taste of the nectar cannot be relished. Śukadeva Gosvāmī was pleased with Mahārāja Parīkṣit because he was not at all tired of hearing the topics of the Lord and was more and more anxious to hear them on and on with interest. Foolish interpreters unnecessarily tackle the Bhagavad-gītā and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam when they have no access to the subject matter. There is no use in nondevotees' meddling with the two topmost Vedic literatures, and therefore Śaṅkarācārya did not touch Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam for commentation. In his commentation on the Bhagavad-gītā, Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya accepted Lord Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but later on he commented from the impersonalist's view. But, being conscious of his position, he did not comment on the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam.
Śrīla Śukadeva Gosvāmī was protected by Lord Kṛṣṇa (vide Brahma-vaivarta Purāṇa), and therefore he is known as Brahmarāta, and Śrīmān Parīkṣit Mahārāja was protected by Viṣṇu, and thus he is known as Viṣṇurāta. As devotees of the Lord, they are always protected by the Lord. It is clear also in this connection that a Viṣṇurāta should hear Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam from Brahmarāta and no one else because others misrepresent the transcendental knowledge and thus spoil one's valuable time.