CC Madhya 10.166 (1975): Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 05:50, 27 January 2020

Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975) - Madhya-līlā - Chapter 10: The Lord's Return to Jagannātha Purī

Madhya-līlā 10.165 - Madhya-līlā 10.167

Compare Versions: CC 1975 with CC 1996

His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada

TEXT 166

'brahmānanda' nāma tumi-gaura-brahma 'cala'

śyama-varṇa jagannātha vasiyāchena 'acala'

SYNONYMS

brahmānanda—Brahmānanda; nāma tumi—your name; gaura-brahma—the Brahman of the name Gaura; cala—both of them are moving; śyāma-varṇa—of blackish hue; jagannātha—Lord Jagannātha; vasiyāchena—is sitting; acala—without movement.

TRANSLATION

"Both Brahmānanda and Gaurahari are moving, whereas the blackish Lord Jagannātha is sitting tight and immobile."

PURPORT

Brahmānanda Bhāratī wanted to prove that there is no difference between the Supreme Lord and the jīva, while Caitanya Mahāprabhu wanted to prove that He and Brahmānanda Bhāratī were jīvas and that although the jīvas are Brahman, they are many, but the Supreme Lord, the Supreme Brahman, is one. On the other hand, Brahmānanda Bhāratī also wanted to prove that Jagannātha and Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu are one, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but that to fulfill His mission Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu appeared to be moving whereas Lord Jagannātha appeared to be inert. Thus this jolly argument was going on. Finally, Brahmānanda Bhāratī referred the whole matter to Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya for a final decision.

Madhya-līlā 10.165 - Madhya-līlā 10.167

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 <div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Madhya (1975)|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 10 (1975)|Chapter 10: The Lord's Return to Jagannātha Purī]]'''</div>
 <div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 10.165 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 10.165]] '''[[CC Madhya 10.165 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 10.165]] - [[CC Madhya 10.167 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 10.167]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 10.167 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 10.167]]</div>
+{{CompareVersions|CC|Madhya 10.166|CC 1975|CC 1996}}
 {{RandomImage}}
-''Below is the 1996 edition text, ready to be substituted with the 1975 one using the compile form.''
 ==== TEXT 166 ====
 <div class="verse">
-:‘brahmānanda’ nāma tumi-gaura-brahma ‘cala’
+:'brahmānanda' nāma tumi-gaura-brahma 'cala'
-:śyāma-varṇa jagannātha vasiyāchena ‘acala’
+:śyama-varṇa jagannātha vasiyāchena 'acala'
 </div>
@@ Line 25: / Line 24: @@
 <div class="translation">
-“Both Brahmānanda and Gaurahari are moving, whereas the blackish Lord Jagannātha is sitting tight and immobile.”
+"Both Brahmānanda and Gaurahari are moving, whereas the blackish Lord Jagannātha is sitting tight and immobile."
 </div>
@@ Line 32: / Line 31: @@
 <div class="purport">
-Brahmānanda Bhāratī wanted to prove that there is no difference between the Supreme Lord and the jīva, whereas Caitanya Mahāprabhu wanted to prove that He and Brahmānanda Bhāratī were jīvas and that although the jīvas are Brahman, they are many but the Supreme Lord, the Supreme Brahman, is one. On the other hand, Brahmānanda Bhāratī also wanted to prove that Jagannātha and Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu are one, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but that to fulfill His mission Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu appeared to be moving whereas Lord Jagannātha appeared to be inert. Thus this jolly argument was going on. Finally, Brahmānanda Bhāratī referred the whole matter to Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya for a final decision.
+Brahmānanda Bhāratī wanted to prove that there is no difference between the Supreme Lord and the jīva, while Caitanya Mahāprabhu wanted to prove that He and Brahmānanda Bhāratī were jīvas and that although the jīvas are Brahman, they are many, but the Supreme Lord, the Supreme Brahman, is one. On the other hand, Brahmānanda Bhāratī also wanted to prove that Jagannātha and Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu are one, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but that to fulfill His mission Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu appeared to be moving whereas Lord Jagannātha appeared to be inert. Thus this jolly argument was going on. Finally, Brahmānanda Bhāratī referred the whole matter to Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya for a final decision.
 </div>