680626 - Lecture - Montreal: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision(s)) |
RasaRasika (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:1968 - Lectures]] | |||
<div | [[Category:1968 - Lectures and Conversations]] | ||
[[Category:1968 - Lectures, Conversations and Letters]] | |||
[[Category:1968-06 - Lectures, Conversations and Letters]] | |||
[[Category:Lectures - Canada]] | |||
[[Category:Lectures - Canada, Montreal]] | |||
[[Category:Lectures, Conversations and Letters - Canada]] | |||
[[Category:Lectures, Conversations and Letters - Canada, Montreal]] | |||
[[Category:Lectures - General]] | |||
[[Category:Audio Files 20.01 to 30.00 Minutes]] | |||
[[Category:1968 - New Audio - Released in December 2017]] | |||
<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=Category:Lectures - by Date]]'''[[:Category:Lectures - by Date|Lectures by Date]], [[:Category:1968 - Lectures|1968]]'''</div> | |||
{{RandomImage}} | |||
<!-- Nectar Drop Code Start --> | |||
<div class="center">[[Vanipedia:680626 Lecture - Srila Prabhupada Speaks a Nectar Drop in Montreal|''' <span style="display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center"><b class="fa fa-solid fa-volume-up" style="font-size: 330%"> </b><big>Listen to a 'Nectar Drop' created from this lecture'''</big></span>]]</div> | |||
<!-- Nectar Drop Link end --> | |||
<div class="code">680626IP-MONTREAL - June 26, 1968 - 21:43 Minutes</div> | |||
<mp3player>https://s3.amazonaws.com/vanipedia/full/1968/680626IP-MONTREAL.mp3</mp3player> | |||
'''Prabhupāda:''' Everyone is using Kṛṣṇa's . . . nobody has got any property. ''Īśāvāsyam idaṁ sarvam'' ([[ISO 1|Īśo mantra 1]]). Everything belongs to Kṛṣṇa. That is the version in ''Īśopaniṣad''. Now, this American land, now divided into Canada, North America, South America, but originally to whom this land belongs? It belongs to Kṛṣṇa. You have come here and have divided Kṛṣṇa's property and you have named, "This is Canada," "This is North America," "This is South America," and you are claiming proprietorship. But if you are asked, "Are you really proprietor?" No. You have come here, encroached upon others' property. So originally, you are thief. | |||
Actually this is the position, that anyone who is unlawfully claiming something, "It is mine," that is illusion. ''Janasya moho 'yam ahaṁ mameti'' ([[SB 5.5.8]]). This ''ahaṁ mameti'', "It is mine, and it is I. This body, I. And in bodily relation, everything mine," these two things are illusion. ''Ahaṁ mameti''. ''Aham'' means "I." What "I"? This body. And what "mine"? This, "My wife is mine, my children, my home, my country." Why? Because the bodily relationship is there. | |||
So it is very hard task for us to convince them, but the fact is this. Either they accept or not accept, it is our misfortune or their misfortune, but the fact is this, that as Caitanya Mahāprabhu said, or as Lord Kṛṣṇa said, that mamaivāṁśo jīva-bhūtaḥ | So the original platform that, "I am not this body," then every relationship becomes false, illusion. This is stated in the ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'', how this illusion develops. The illusion develops because it is the kingdom of ''māyā''. ''Māyā'' is attracting us. What is that attracting force? That attracting force is for man, woman; and for woman, man. This is attractive. This whole world is going on, not only in the human society but in dog society, cat society, hog society, bird society—everywhere—the woman is attractive for man, and man is attractive for woman. This is ''māyā''. This is ''māyā''. | ||
So ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavata'' says that this attractive feature is pulling on this material existence. Therefore the training is how to detract. In the beginning, the ''brahmacārī'' training is given because to know that this body, woman body, is actually not attractive. What is this attractive? This is made of flesh and blood. Similarly for woman, if I analyze the man's body or woman's, what is there? Flesh and blood. But that flesh and blood is very attractive? | |||
That story, perhaps I have enunciated, that beauty was kept in a pot? Do you remember? Huh? I may repeat that story again, that one girl was very beautiful, and one boy was after him (her). But in India, the boys and girls are not allowed to mix freely unless they are husband and wife. So this girl was married, but she was not very rich. But that boy was very rich, and he was after her. He was always proposing her. And she became perplexed, that "He is rich man. If I don't agree, then he may do some harm to my husband, to me." | |||
So she made a plan that, "All right. I agree to your proposal. You come to my house in such-and-such night. I'll be engaged with you." Oh, he was very . . . in the meantime, he took some purgative pill, strong. So for six, seven days, she simply purged out all the beauty in vomiting and in passing stool. So those vomits and stools were kept in two pots. And naturally, if you pass stool for one day, your feature becomes immediately ugly. That is a fact. So she passed stool and vomiting seven days. Naturally, she became very ugly. | |||
So when the boy came, she was sitting there on the door. The boy was asking, "Where is such-and-such girl?" She said: "Yes, I am. I am here." "No, you are not her. Oh, she is so beautiful, and you are so ugly." "No, I am the same girl." "Why you have become so ugly?" "Because I have extracted my beauty." "Where is that?" "Just see in these two pots. (laughter) So if you like, you can enjoy this beauty." (laughter) | |||
So actually, if we dissect our body, then the beauty things, they are within—some stool, some urine, some intestines, some brains, some muscles, some blood. These will be found. This is called ''māyā''. But that stool, urine, muscle, brains and intestines are so nicely decorated that it has attraction. It has got a full attraction, both for the boys and the girls. | |||
''Bhāgavata'' has said nice that the illusion of this world is that attraction. What is that attraction? False attraction. The man is attracted by woman, one woman is attracted by man. And the business is going on. Especially in this country, I see the girls are attracting by their bodily features in so many ways. You see? So similarly, boys are attracting girls by so many features, especially by nice motorcar and so many things. | |||
So in every society, according to the standard of living, according . . . these attractive features are going on—in birds, beasts . . . and when they are united . . . everyone is trying to attract others. A girl is trying to attract another boy, the boy is trying to attract another girl. These attracting features is going on. And as soon as they are actually attracted and joined together, the illusion becomes doubly knotted. ''Tayor mitha hṛdaya-granthim āhur'' ([[SB 5.5.8]]). ''Hṛdaya-granthim'' means everything is within the heart. | |||
If I study, "Oh, what is this attraction?" if I understand how it is simply combination of blood, stool and urine and intestine and muscle and skin and hair and nails, then if I study philosophically, so what is there? Have I got any attraction for all these things? No. So it is all false. Therefore Caitanya Mahāprabhu said that ''ceto-darpaṇa-mārjanam'' ([[CC Antya 20.12|CC Antya 20.12, Śikṣāṣṭaka 1]]), that if we clarify our heart, then we become liberated. So this Hare Kṛṣṇa chanting process is clarifying. So ''tayor mitha hṛdaya-granthim āhur''. As soon as a man and woman is combined together, that means the knot of material attraction becomes doubly tightened. Then they want apartment, ''gṛha''. ''Ato gṛha-kṣetra''. ''Kṣetra'' means . . . of course, nowadays everyone is seeking after employment, but formerly nobody . . . there was no industry, no big business. Everyone has to produce something, foodstuff, out of the ''kṣetra'', field. | |||
So if you become a family man you must have some source of income. That source of income is land, as Rāyarāma was explaining you. Actually the land is the source of income. If you can utilize the land, then there is everything stocked there. This same example can be given: this American land was lying vacant, but since the Europeans took possession of that, at least they have exploited the resources. So everything was on the land. So land is really property. So ''gṛha-kṣetra'', apartment, land. | |||
''Gṛha-kṣetra-suta''. As soon as they have married, they require . . . they at least desire to have a child. At least, the girl wants. Although now the process is different, but the hankering is that girls, women, they want child. That is sentiment. ''Ato gṛha-kṣetra-suta āpta''. ''Āpta'' means relatives. ''Gṛha-kṣetra-sutāpta-vittair'' ([[SB 5.5.8]]). ''Vittair'' means wealth, some bank balance. In this way go on increasing. ''Janasya moho 'yam''. This is the ''moha''; this is illusion. | |||
So this illusion is so strong that we are going on increasing, increasing, increasing, increasing. Nobody is thinking that "I am increasing the requisites of the body, but I am not this body; I am soul. What is the requisition of the soul?" This is . . . (indistinct) . . . they have forgotten. Real interest they have forgotten. The superficial interest. The same example can be given: just like if you simply soap your shirt and coat and do not take care of your real body, or do not feed your body, then how long we shall exist? | |||
My Guru Mahārāja used to give one nice example that a man was drowning. Another man came that, "I shall save this man." So he jumped on the water, and when coming out of the water he brought the shirt and coat, "Now I have saved the man." The social service, or any service which is going on, that is saving the shirt and coat. Nobody is serving the soul. That is the mistake of modern civilization. There are many hospitals to cure the bodily diseases, but there is no hospital to cure the disease of the soul. | |||
So this Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is to cure the disease of the soul. Disease of the soul. Every soul, every person, is mistaken to accept this body as his self or the mind as his self. This is the difference. ''Yasyātma-buddhiḥ kuṇape tri-dhātuke'', ''sa eva go-kharaḥ'' ([[SB 10.84.13]]). Anyone who is accepting this body as self, he's either an ass or a cow. Misconception. | |||
So people are not interested. We are trying, the ''Bhagavad-gītā'' is trying. In the beginning, beginning of the instruction . . . just like Arjuna was identifying himself with this body in the beginning, and he was thinking that "He is my grandfather, he is my son, he is my nephew, he is my . . ." so on, so on. Kṛṣṇa replied him. When Arjuna was unable to make a solution of his problems, he surrendered to Kṛṣṇa and said, ''śiṣyas te 'haṁ śādhi māṁ prapannam'' ([[BG 2.7 (1972)|BG 2.7]]): "I surrender unto You as Your disciple. Please save me from this perplextion." | |||
Then Kṛṣṇa in the first instance replied, ''aśocyān anvaśocas tvaṁ prajṣā-vādāṁś ca bhāṣase'' ([[BG 2.11 (1972)|BG 2.11]]): "My dear Arjuna . . ." Because he accepted Kṛṣṇa as spiritual master, so spiritual master has the right to chide his disciple. So He immediately chided him, that ''aśocyān anvaśocas tvaṁ prajṣā-vādāṁś ca bhāṣase'': "My dear Arjuna, you are talking just like a very learned man, but you are fool number one." That was His first words. Of course, He did not say directly "fool number one," but He said indirectly, that "No learned man speaks like this, as you are speaking." That means, "You are not learned man. You are fool." | |||
He indirectly said, ''nānuśocanti paṇḍitāḥ''. ''Paṇḍita'' means learned. "No learned man speaks like that. But because you are speaking like that, that means you are not learned man. Or in one word, you are fool." Because Kṛṣṇa . . . before Kṛṣṇa, he was speaking that, "If I kill my family members, then such-and-such thing will happen. Then the women will become polluted and there will be unwanted children, ''varṇa-saṅkara''. And as soon as there is ''varṇa-saṅkara'', full of unwanted children, this world will be hell." These are facts. These are facts. The world has become hell due to unwanted children. That is the fact. | |||
So Kṛṣṇa was speaking . . . Arjuna was speaking just like ordinary gentleman on the material field, but Kṛṣṇa, when He took up his charge, He said that, "You are hovering over the material plane. That is not your learning. The learning is when you understand from the spiritual platform." | |||
:''aśocyān anvaśocas tvaṁ'' | |||
:''prajṣā-vādāṁś ca bhāṣase'' | |||
:''gatāsūn agatāsūṁś ca'' | |||
:''nānuśocanti paṇḍitāḥ'' | |||
:([[BG 2.11 (1972)|BG 2.11]]) | |||
"The ''paṇḍitāḥ'', the learned man, he does not lament over the body, either living or dead." Because bodily platform is not the subject matter for understanding of philosophical research. Bodily platform is not very important. The spiritual platform is important, but nobody is discussing about spiritual platform. | |||
Everyone is, all the education centers, the universities, they are, I mean to say, busy studying chemistry, physics and biology, mathematics, at most, little philosophy. That is also on mental speculation, theory. Somebody is giving some theory; somebody's giving theory. But nobody discussing about the eternal spirit soul. That is the defect of this modern civilization. | |||
So it is very hard task for us to convince them, but the fact is this. Either they accept or not accept, it is our misfortune or their misfortune, but the fact is this, that as Caitanya Mahāprabhu said, or as Lord Kṛṣṇa said, that ''mamaivāṁśo jīva-bhūtaḥ'' ([[BG 15.7 (1972)|BG 15.7]]): "All these living entities are My part and parcel." So what is the duty of part and parcel? The part and parcel is . . . of course, the same example—just my this hand is part and parcel of the body. So the duty of the hand is to serve the whole body. That's all. There is no other duty. The hand cannot eat out of his own account. The hand cannot do anything out of its own account. The direction should be from the whole, from me, and then the hand should work. This is the part and parcel duty. | |||
And Caitanya Mahāprabhu says, ''jīvera svarūpa haya nitya kṛṣṇa dāsa'' ([[CC Madhya 20.108-109|CC Madhya 20.108]]). Just like my hand, my leg or my tongue, they are all servants of me and the whole, similarly everyone, every living entity, is the eternal servant of the Supreme, supreme controller. So the duty of everyone is to serve Him. That is natural life. That is natural. Any other position is diseased condition. In other words, who is not acting in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, he is diseased. The treatment is this Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare. | |||
Just like when a man is bitten by a serpent, there is some ''mantra''. Of course, I do not know whether you have got this experience, but India there are experts who, simply by chanting ''mantra'', he can give life to a man who is bitten by serpent. ''Mantrauṣadhi-vaśaḥ sarpaḥ'' (Cāṇakya Paṇḍita). ''Mantra'' and ''auṣadhi''. ''Auṣadhi'' means there are herbs. Of course, these things are now gone, but there, still there are persons. So even the ''mantra'' can give a so-called dead man bitten by serpent, similarly, we are bitten by the serpent of ''māyā'', and this ''mantra'', Hare Kṛṣṇa, will raise him to consciousness, Kṛṣṇa consciousness. This is . . . (break) | |||
Now you can speak. | Now you can speak. | ||
Janārdana: The predicament of mankind... [ | '''Janārdana:''' The predicament of mankind . . . (break) | ||
'''Prabhupāda:''' There is nice verse in which it is stated that: | |||
:''sarvasya cāhaṁ hṛdi sanniviṣṭo'' | |||
:''mattaḥ smṛtir jṣānam apohanaṁ ca'' | |||
:''vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyaṁ'' | |||
:''vedānta-vid vedānta-kṛd cāham'' | |||
:([[BG 15.15 (1972)|BG 15.15]]) | |||
The purport of this verse is that "I am situated in everyone's heart." ''Sarvasya cāhaṁ hṛdi sanniviṣṭo''. ''Īśvaraḥ sarva-bhūtānāṁ hṛd-deśe 'rjuna'' ([[BG 18.61 (1972)|BG 18.61]]). Everyone's heart, Kṛṣṇa is there, or the Paramātmā is there. And ''mattaḥ smṛtir jṣānam apohanaṁ ca'': and all the speculation or real understanding or forgetfulness or real knowledge, they are coming, being initiated from Him. Mattaḥ: "from Me." ''Smṛtir'' means memory; ''jṣāna'' means knowledge. ''Apohanaṁ ca'': "forgetfulness." Everything is . . . forgetfulness is also from Him. Knowledge is also from Him. Memory is also from Him. | |||
And ''vedais'', ''vedais'' means all books of knowledge. ''Vedaiś ca sarvair''. ''Sarvair'' means all varieties. It is not that simply the four ''Vedas'', as we accept in India, ''Sāma'', ''Yajur'', ''Ṛg'', ''Atharva''. No. Any authorized scripture, that is ''Vedas''. Any authorized scripture. ''Vedaiś ca sarvair''. "All kinds of ''Vedas'', they are searching after Me." The knowledge . . . actually, the destination of knowledge, as Śrīman Janārdana . . . | |||
What we are searching after? He has summarized that we are searching after happiness. That's a fact. But we do not know where the happiness is there. That is our . . . searching, I am . . . subject matter of searching is happiness. Everyone in this material world is after happiness. But unfortunately, one has no information where is the happiness. | |||
That remembrance can be . . . where is the happiness? That can be had from the Supersoul, who is sitting with you within your heart. Within your heart. Because Kṛṣṇa says that "I am sitting in everyone's heart as Supersoul, and from Me, intelligence, memory, knowledge, forgetfulness—everything—is being happened." | |||
Now the question is why one is in forgetfulness and why one is in Kṛṣṇa consciousness? Is it a fact that Kṛṣṇa is dealing with different persons differently, that one is being fully in Kṛṣṇa consciousness and another is in different consciousness, or forgetting Kṛṣṇa? ''Apohanam''. That is also due to Kṛṣṇa. Why? Because Kṛṣṇa is very merciful. The "why" answer can be given that Kṛṣṇa is very merciful. How merciful? One is given forgetfulness. How Kṛṣṇa is merciful? | |||
Yes, He's merciful. How is it? Because he wanted to forget Kṛṣṇa. He wanted to forget Kṛṣṇa, so Kṛṣṇa will give him such sources of forgetfulness that he'll never be able to understand what is Kṛṣṇa. "You enjoy. You want to forget Kṛṣṇa, or God? All right. I'll give you intelligence so that you will never be able to understand what is God." Not exactly memory . . . because living entity, sometimes by good association will come . . . | |||
So this is not Kṛṣṇa's partiality. He has given everyone a little quantity of independence. Just like these boys who have come here, that is out of independence. They are playing, but out of independence they have come. And they may sit down for some time and out of independence may go away. So this independence is there even in the ant, even in the worm and everywhere, because we are part and parcel of God and God is fully independent. | |||
But we cannot be fully independent. Just like in the state. You are belonging to an independent state, but that does not mean that you can do anything and everything. You have no such independence. There is state law and order. Similarly, as in the state we are independent citizens, but if we violate law and order, then we shall be punished. It is very simple thing. | |||
" | But the rascal civilization, they say God is dead. How God can be dead? The law of God are acting so nicely. How God can be dead? That means he wanted to forget God, so he has come to the conclusion, "God is dead." He has come to this conclusion. While, on the other hand, who wants God, they are perfectly visioning that "Next life I am going to meet God face to face." This intelligence is given to him by God also. That is also stated in the ''Bhagavad-gītā''. | ||
:''teṣāṁ satata-yuktānāṁ'' | |||
:''bhajatāṁ prīti-pūrvakam'' | |||
:''dadāmi buddhi-yogaṁ taṁ'' | |||
:''yena mām upayanti te'' | |||
:([[BG 10.10 (1972)|BG 10.10]]) | |||
So | So actually, although we have got independence, we have got consciousness, we have got power of thinking, of understanding, but it is limited. Therefore we don't agree with one another. However I may be big philosopher, I may be very big philosopher, very logician, but as soon as another big logician, another big philosopher comes, he defeats me. That is the way. And every philosopher, every logician is trying to defeat your theory, as you are trying to defeat others' theories. This is going on. | ||
Tarkaḥ apratiṣṭhaḥ . This process of argument and logic, gymnasium, is imperfect always. You cannot realize what is the ultimate goal of life. Tarkaḥ apratiṣṭhaḥ śrutayo vibhinnā. Śruta means Vedas or books of knowledge. There are different kinds of theories and doctrines. So if you read those books, unless you are very nicely directed, that will create also perplexity. Śrutayo vibhinnam. And so far philosophical speculation is concerned, the Bhāgavata says that nāsau muni yasya mataṁ na bhinnam. Muni means mental speculator. So you cannot find any mental speculator who is not differing from another mental speculator. So tarkaḥ apratiṣṭhaḥ, the path of so-called logic and argument, is not perfect. Then, simply if you study different books of knowledge, that will also not give you perfect knowledge. If you consult so-called mental speculators, their different views, then dharmasya tattvaṁ nihitaṁ guhāyām. The ultimate goal of life is very confidential and mysterious. And how to know it? Mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ [[CC Madhya 17.186]] . Mahājana means the perfect realized souls who have realized, you have to follow them. That's all. Mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ. Therefore this process of Kṛṣṇa consciousness is accepting the mahājana, the authority. The first authority is Kṛṣṇa. From Kṛṣṇa, Arjuna is hearing. There is no question about it. Now if you simply understand as Arjuna understood, then you have got the perfect knowledge. And if you speculate, if you try to comment in your own nonsense way, then you are misled immediately. So this is the way. Mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ | So as Śrīman Janārdana said, the knowledge which you are searching in different ways, that is impossible to come to the conclusion. Because we are searching with . . . however I may accept this method or that method or that method, but accepting the method means employing my senses. But the senses are imperfect. Either I accept this or that, I have to work with my senses. There are no other instruments. So when senses are imperfect, so whatever method you accept, that will be imperfect. | ||
Then which method will be perfect? That method will be perfect, as it is stated in the ''Bhagavad-gītā'', ''mattaḥ smṛtir jṣānam apohanaṁ ca'' ([[BG 15.15 (1972)|BG 15.15]]). When Kṛṣṇa from within yourself will give you right direction, then you'll come to the ultimate destination. Otherwise, whatever . . . however a great philosopher, scientist or anything you may be, you'll simply hover on the material, mental plane. That's all. | |||
So either you call perfect knowledge or you call happiness, anything, what you call, if you want to know the ultimate goal of your life perfectly, you have to follow a different method. A different method. That method is called ''avaroha-panthā''. There are . . . all methods of acquiring knowledge can be divided into two groups. One group is called ''āroha-panthā'', or research, inductive process, and another method is called deductive process, or ''avaroha-panthā''. The knowledge coming from the supreme source, that is called ''avaroha-panthā'', and the knowledge which is being sought after by using our imperfect senses, that is called ''āroha-panthā''. Ascending process and descending process. | |||
So by ascending process, we can never come to the real knowledge. That is not possible, because our senses are imperfect. How we can ascend? Just like people are trying to ascend to the higher planetary system, but the instrument, sputnik, itself is imperfect. How you can go there? You can go 25,000 miles, again come back. ''Punar mūṣiko bhava''. So this is going on. Because we are imperfect in every respect, so therefore we have to receive knowledge from the perfect. That is the process, real process. | |||
If your knowledge . . . just like Janārdana suggested three processes: one by applying our senses, another by accepting knowledge from others, and another, rejection. Two ways. Or skepticism, make void. So this is out of frustration. So make the mind void: no more thinking. And knowledge by imperfect senses, that will always remain imperfect. And knowledge from others, that is real goal. But provided you receive that knowledge from the perfect. | |||
As we have given several times the example, just like a child wants to know who is his father. Now if he searches out "Who is my father?" he asks everybody, "Are you my father? Are you my father? Are you my father?" he will have to go on searching. Then again if he asks his neighbor, "Who is my father?" the neighbor also may not know and may give him misinformation. So that is also not possible. But if he goes to his mother and his mother is sincere and perfect, she can give, "My dear boy, he is your father." That is perfect. | |||
So neither by researching one can find out his father, neither by employing his imperfect senses. But if he receives the knowledge from the sincere mother, then the knowledge is perfect. And he has no other alternative to know who is his father except the source of a sincere mother. Similarly, the ''Bhāgavat'' says, ''acintyāḥ khalu ye bhāvā na tāṁs tarkeṇa yojayet'': things which are beyond your power of realization, don't try to understand by your so-called logic and argument. All nonsense. All nonsense. ''Tarkaḥ apratiṣṭhaḥ''. This process of argument and logic, gymnasium, is imperfect always. You cannot realize what is the ultimate goal of life. | |||
''Tarkaḥ apratiṣṭhaḥ śrutayo vibhinnā''. ''Śruta'' means ''Vedas'' or books of knowledge. There are different kinds of theories and doctrines. So if you read those books, unless you are very nicely directed, that will create also perplexity. ''Śrutayo vibhinnam''. And so far philosophical speculation is concerned, the ''Bhāgavata'' says that ''nāsau muni yasya mataṁ na bhinnam''. ''Muni'' means mental speculator. So you cannot find any mental speculator who is not differing from another mental speculator. | |||
So ''tarkaḥ apratiṣṭhaḥ'', the path of so-called logic and argument, is not perfect. Then, simply if you study different books of knowledge, that will also not give you perfect knowledge. If you consult so-called mental speculators, their different views, then ''dharmasya tattvaṁ nihitaṁ guhāyām''. The ultimate goal of life is very confidential and mysterious. And how to know it? ''Mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ'' ([[CC Madhya 17.186]]). ''Mahājana'' means the perfect realized souls who have realized, you have to follow them. That's all. ''Mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ''. | |||
Therefore this process of Kṛṣṇa consciousness is accepting the ''mahājana'', the authority. The first authority is Kṛṣṇa. From Kṛṣṇa, Arjuna is hearing. There is no question about it. Now if you simply understand as Arjuna understood, then you have got the perfect knowledge. And if you speculate, if you try to comment in your own nonsense way, then you are misled immediately. So this is the way. ''Mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ''. ''Mahājana'' means those who are perfect personalities. That will give you. That will do. | |||
Now, there are, according to Vedic system, there are twelve ''mahājanas''. They are all in agreement that the supreme power is the Absolute Personality of Godhead. And they have become all devotees, they have served, they have prescribed rules and regulations. You can . . . so if we follow these rules and regulations and the ''mahājana'', and many . . . as it is stated in ''Bhāgavatam'', that those who have followed, they have got perfection. You can get also perfection; there is no doubt about it. Simply you have to follow the footprints of the ''ācāryas''. Then your life will be perfect. | |||
Thank you. If there is any question, you can ask. | Thank you. If there is any question, you can ask. | ||
Guest: What is the best time to (indistinct)? | '''Guest:''' What is the best time to . . . (indistinct) | ||
'''Devotee:''' Early in the morning . . . (indistinct) | |||
'''Guest:''' How do you know how to follow the footsteps of the ''mahājanas''? | |||
'''Prabhupāda:''' There is a ''paramparā'', or disciplic succession, of ''mahājanas''. Just like Kṛṣṇa is the original authority. Now the ''paramparā'' system is there. From Kṛṣṇa, Brahmā heard; from Brahma, Nārada. If we do not go so far . . . now, Kṛṣṇa spoke to Arjuna. Arjuna is ''mahājana'' therefore. | |||
It is stated in the ''Bhagavad-gītā'' that "Because you are My devotee, you are in full Kṛṣṇa consciousness; therefore I am speaking to you this confidential ''yoga'' system, ''Bhagavad-gītā''." ''Bhakto 'si priyo 'si me'' ([[BG 4.3 (1972)|BG 4.3]]). ''Rahasyaṁ hy etad uttamam''. "The process was there. Now it is lost. So I am speaking to you again the old system because you are My devotee." | |||
Similarly those, or one person who is accepting the version of Arjuna, as Arjuna understood Kṛṣṇa, he is ''mahājana'', and you have to follow him. That's all. If somebody is speaking something against as Arjuna understood, he is not a ''mahājana'', he's a rascal. The simple test. And you go to the Tenth Chapter, ''Bhagavad-gītā''. | |||
Arjuna says, "Kṛṣṇa," ''sarvam etad ṛtaṁ manye yan vadasi keśava'' ([[BG 10.14 (1972)|BG 10.14]]), "whatever You are speaking, I accept it in toto, without any minus." This is ''mahājana''. Not that according to my whims, I cut something, I accept something. No. One who is accepting the version of Arjuna or Kṛṣṇa, he is ''mahājana''. You can follow him. That's all. It is simple thing. | |||
You haven't got to find out who is ''mahājana''. The ''mahājana'' means who is following another ''mahājana'', say follow Arjuna. He is ''mahājana''. (break) . . . to read ''Bhagavad-gītā'' and try to understand how Arjuna understood it, then you get . . . and anyone following the footprints of Arjuna, he's ''mahājana''. (end) |
Latest revision as of 05:52, 19 January 2024
Prabhupāda: Everyone is using Kṛṣṇa's . . . nobody has got any property. Īśāvāsyam idaṁ sarvam (Īśo mantra 1). Everything belongs to Kṛṣṇa. That is the version in Īśopaniṣad. Now, this American land, now divided into Canada, North America, South America, but originally to whom this land belongs? It belongs to Kṛṣṇa. You have come here and have divided Kṛṣṇa's property and you have named, "This is Canada," "This is North America," "This is South America," and you are claiming proprietorship. But if you are asked, "Are you really proprietor?" No. You have come here, encroached upon others' property. So originally, you are thief.
Actually this is the position, that anyone who is unlawfully claiming something, "It is mine," that is illusion. Janasya moho 'yam ahaṁ mameti (SB 5.5.8). This ahaṁ mameti, "It is mine, and it is I. This body, I. And in bodily relation, everything mine," these two things are illusion. Ahaṁ mameti. Aham means "I." What "I"? This body. And what "mine"? This, "My wife is mine, my children, my home, my country." Why? Because the bodily relationship is there.
So the original platform that, "I am not this body," then every relationship becomes false, illusion. This is stated in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, how this illusion develops. The illusion develops because it is the kingdom of māyā. Māyā is attracting us. What is that attracting force? That attracting force is for man, woman; and for woman, man. This is attractive. This whole world is going on, not only in the human society but in dog society, cat society, hog society, bird society—everywhere—the woman is attractive for man, and man is attractive for woman. This is māyā. This is māyā.
So Śrīmad-Bhāgavata says that this attractive feature is pulling on this material existence. Therefore the training is how to detract. In the beginning, the brahmacārī training is given because to know that this body, woman body, is actually not attractive. What is this attractive? This is made of flesh and blood. Similarly for woman, if I analyze the man's body or woman's, what is there? Flesh and blood. But that flesh and blood is very attractive?
That story, perhaps I have enunciated, that beauty was kept in a pot? Do you remember? Huh? I may repeat that story again, that one girl was very beautiful, and one boy was after him (her). But in India, the boys and girls are not allowed to mix freely unless they are husband and wife. So this girl was married, but she was not very rich. But that boy was very rich, and he was after her. He was always proposing her. And she became perplexed, that "He is rich man. If I don't agree, then he may do some harm to my husband, to me."
So she made a plan that, "All right. I agree to your proposal. You come to my house in such-and-such night. I'll be engaged with you." Oh, he was very . . . in the meantime, he took some purgative pill, strong. So for six, seven days, she simply purged out all the beauty in vomiting and in passing stool. So those vomits and stools were kept in two pots. And naturally, if you pass stool for one day, your feature becomes immediately ugly. That is a fact. So she passed stool and vomiting seven days. Naturally, she became very ugly.
So when the boy came, she was sitting there on the door. The boy was asking, "Where is such-and-such girl?" She said: "Yes, I am. I am here." "No, you are not her. Oh, she is so beautiful, and you are so ugly." "No, I am the same girl." "Why you have become so ugly?" "Because I have extracted my beauty." "Where is that?" "Just see in these two pots. (laughter) So if you like, you can enjoy this beauty." (laughter)
So actually, if we dissect our body, then the beauty things, they are within—some stool, some urine, some intestines, some brains, some muscles, some blood. These will be found. This is called māyā. But that stool, urine, muscle, brains and intestines are so nicely decorated that it has attraction. It has got a full attraction, both for the boys and the girls.
Bhāgavata has said nice that the illusion of this world is that attraction. What is that attraction? False attraction. The man is attracted by woman, one woman is attracted by man. And the business is going on. Especially in this country, I see the girls are attracting by their bodily features in so many ways. You see? So similarly, boys are attracting girls by so many features, especially by nice motorcar and so many things.
So in every society, according to the standard of living, according . . . these attractive features are going on—in birds, beasts . . . and when they are united . . . everyone is trying to attract others. A girl is trying to attract another boy, the boy is trying to attract another girl. These attracting features is going on. And as soon as they are actually attracted and joined together, the illusion becomes doubly knotted. Tayor mitha hṛdaya-granthim āhur (SB 5.5.8). Hṛdaya-granthim means everything is within the heart.
If I study, "Oh, what is this attraction?" if I understand how it is simply combination of blood, stool and urine and intestine and muscle and skin and hair and nails, then if I study philosophically, so what is there? Have I got any attraction for all these things? No. So it is all false. Therefore Caitanya Mahāprabhu said that ceto-darpaṇa-mārjanam (CC Antya 20.12, Śikṣāṣṭaka 1), that if we clarify our heart, then we become liberated. So this Hare Kṛṣṇa chanting process is clarifying. So tayor mitha hṛdaya-granthim āhur. As soon as a man and woman is combined together, that means the knot of material attraction becomes doubly tightened. Then they want apartment, gṛha. Ato gṛha-kṣetra. Kṣetra means . . . of course, nowadays everyone is seeking after employment, but formerly nobody . . . there was no industry, no big business. Everyone has to produce something, foodstuff, out of the kṣetra, field.
So if you become a family man you must have some source of income. That source of income is land, as Rāyarāma was explaining you. Actually the land is the source of income. If you can utilize the land, then there is everything stocked there. This same example can be given: this American land was lying vacant, but since the Europeans took possession of that, at least they have exploited the resources. So everything was on the land. So land is really property. So gṛha-kṣetra, apartment, land.
Gṛha-kṣetra-suta. As soon as they have married, they require . . . they at least desire to have a child. At least, the girl wants. Although now the process is different, but the hankering is that girls, women, they want child. That is sentiment. Ato gṛha-kṣetra-suta āpta. Āpta means relatives. Gṛha-kṣetra-sutāpta-vittair (SB 5.5.8). Vittair means wealth, some bank balance. In this way go on increasing. Janasya moho 'yam. This is the moha; this is illusion.
So this illusion is so strong that we are going on increasing, increasing, increasing, increasing. Nobody is thinking that "I am increasing the requisites of the body, but I am not this body; I am soul. What is the requisition of the soul?" This is . . . (indistinct) . . . they have forgotten. Real interest they have forgotten. The superficial interest. The same example can be given: just like if you simply soap your shirt and coat and do not take care of your real body, or do not feed your body, then how long we shall exist?
My Guru Mahārāja used to give one nice example that a man was drowning. Another man came that, "I shall save this man." So he jumped on the water, and when coming out of the water he brought the shirt and coat, "Now I have saved the man." The social service, or any service which is going on, that is saving the shirt and coat. Nobody is serving the soul. That is the mistake of modern civilization. There are many hospitals to cure the bodily diseases, but there is no hospital to cure the disease of the soul.
So this Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is to cure the disease of the soul. Disease of the soul. Every soul, every person, is mistaken to accept this body as his self or the mind as his self. This is the difference. Yasyātma-buddhiḥ kuṇape tri-dhātuke, sa eva go-kharaḥ (SB 10.84.13). Anyone who is accepting this body as self, he's either an ass or a cow. Misconception.
So people are not interested. We are trying, the Bhagavad-gītā is trying. In the beginning, beginning of the instruction . . . just like Arjuna was identifying himself with this body in the beginning, and he was thinking that "He is my grandfather, he is my son, he is my nephew, he is my . . ." so on, so on. Kṛṣṇa replied him. When Arjuna was unable to make a solution of his problems, he surrendered to Kṛṣṇa and said, śiṣyas te 'haṁ śādhi māṁ prapannam (BG 2.7): "I surrender unto You as Your disciple. Please save me from this perplextion."
Then Kṛṣṇa in the first instance replied, aśocyān anvaśocas tvaṁ prajṣā-vādāṁś ca bhāṣase (BG 2.11): "My dear Arjuna . . ." Because he accepted Kṛṣṇa as spiritual master, so spiritual master has the right to chide his disciple. So He immediately chided him, that aśocyān anvaśocas tvaṁ prajṣā-vādāṁś ca bhāṣase: "My dear Arjuna, you are talking just like a very learned man, but you are fool number one." That was His first words. Of course, He did not say directly "fool number one," but He said indirectly, that "No learned man speaks like this, as you are speaking." That means, "You are not learned man. You are fool."
He indirectly said, nānuśocanti paṇḍitāḥ. Paṇḍita means learned. "No learned man speaks like that. But because you are speaking like that, that means you are not learned man. Or in one word, you are fool." Because Kṛṣṇa . . . before Kṛṣṇa, he was speaking that, "If I kill my family members, then such-and-such thing will happen. Then the women will become polluted and there will be unwanted children, varṇa-saṅkara. And as soon as there is varṇa-saṅkara, full of unwanted children, this world will be hell." These are facts. These are facts. The world has become hell due to unwanted children. That is the fact.
So Kṛṣṇa was speaking . . . Arjuna was speaking just like ordinary gentleman on the material field, but Kṛṣṇa, when He took up his charge, He said that, "You are hovering over the material plane. That is not your learning. The learning is when you understand from the spiritual platform."
- aśocyān anvaśocas tvaṁ
- prajṣā-vādāṁś ca bhāṣase
- gatāsūn agatāsūṁś ca
- nānuśocanti paṇḍitāḥ
- (BG 2.11)
"The paṇḍitāḥ, the learned man, he does not lament over the body, either living or dead." Because bodily platform is not the subject matter for understanding of philosophical research. Bodily platform is not very important. The spiritual platform is important, but nobody is discussing about spiritual platform.
Everyone is, all the education centers, the universities, they are, I mean to say, busy studying chemistry, physics and biology, mathematics, at most, little philosophy. That is also on mental speculation, theory. Somebody is giving some theory; somebody's giving theory. But nobody discussing about the eternal spirit soul. That is the defect of this modern civilization.
So it is very hard task for us to convince them, but the fact is this. Either they accept or not accept, it is our misfortune or their misfortune, but the fact is this, that as Caitanya Mahāprabhu said, or as Lord Kṛṣṇa said, that mamaivāṁśo jīva-bhūtaḥ (BG 15.7): "All these living entities are My part and parcel." So what is the duty of part and parcel? The part and parcel is . . . of course, the same example—just my this hand is part and parcel of the body. So the duty of the hand is to serve the whole body. That's all. There is no other duty. The hand cannot eat out of his own account. The hand cannot do anything out of its own account. The direction should be from the whole, from me, and then the hand should work. This is the part and parcel duty.
And Caitanya Mahāprabhu says, jīvera svarūpa haya nitya kṛṣṇa dāsa (CC Madhya 20.108). Just like my hand, my leg or my tongue, they are all servants of me and the whole, similarly everyone, every living entity, is the eternal servant of the Supreme, supreme controller. So the duty of everyone is to serve Him. That is natural life. That is natural. Any other position is diseased condition. In other words, who is not acting in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, he is diseased. The treatment is this Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare.
Just like when a man is bitten by a serpent, there is some mantra. Of course, I do not know whether you have got this experience, but India there are experts who, simply by chanting mantra, he can give life to a man who is bitten by serpent. Mantrauṣadhi-vaśaḥ sarpaḥ (Cāṇakya Paṇḍita). Mantra and auṣadhi. Auṣadhi means there are herbs. Of course, these things are now gone, but there, still there are persons. So even the mantra can give a so-called dead man bitten by serpent, similarly, we are bitten by the serpent of māyā, and this mantra, Hare Kṛṣṇa, will raise him to consciousness, Kṛṣṇa consciousness. This is . . . (break)
Now you can speak.
Janārdana: The predicament of mankind . . . (break)
Prabhupāda: There is nice verse in which it is stated that:
- sarvasya cāhaṁ hṛdi sanniviṣṭo
- mattaḥ smṛtir jṣānam apohanaṁ ca
- vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyaṁ
- vedānta-vid vedānta-kṛd cāham
- (BG 15.15)
The purport of this verse is that "I am situated in everyone's heart." Sarvasya cāhaṁ hṛdi sanniviṣṭo. Īśvaraḥ sarva-bhūtānāṁ hṛd-deśe 'rjuna (BG 18.61). Everyone's heart, Kṛṣṇa is there, or the Paramātmā is there. And mattaḥ smṛtir jṣānam apohanaṁ ca: and all the speculation or real understanding or forgetfulness or real knowledge, they are coming, being initiated from Him. Mattaḥ: "from Me." Smṛtir means memory; jṣāna means knowledge. Apohanaṁ ca: "forgetfulness." Everything is . . . forgetfulness is also from Him. Knowledge is also from Him. Memory is also from Him.
And vedais, vedais means all books of knowledge. Vedaiś ca sarvair. Sarvair means all varieties. It is not that simply the four Vedas, as we accept in India, Sāma, Yajur, Ṛg, Atharva. No. Any authorized scripture, that is Vedas. Any authorized scripture. Vedaiś ca sarvair. "All kinds of Vedas, they are searching after Me." The knowledge . . . actually, the destination of knowledge, as Śrīman Janārdana . . .
What we are searching after? He has summarized that we are searching after happiness. That's a fact. But we do not know where the happiness is there. That is our . . . searching, I am . . . subject matter of searching is happiness. Everyone in this material world is after happiness. But unfortunately, one has no information where is the happiness.
That remembrance can be . . . where is the happiness? That can be had from the Supersoul, who is sitting with you within your heart. Within your heart. Because Kṛṣṇa says that "I am sitting in everyone's heart as Supersoul, and from Me, intelligence, memory, knowledge, forgetfulness—everything—is being happened."
Now the question is why one is in forgetfulness and why one is in Kṛṣṇa consciousness? Is it a fact that Kṛṣṇa is dealing with different persons differently, that one is being fully in Kṛṣṇa consciousness and another is in different consciousness, or forgetting Kṛṣṇa? Apohanam. That is also due to Kṛṣṇa. Why? Because Kṛṣṇa is very merciful. The "why" answer can be given that Kṛṣṇa is very merciful. How merciful? One is given forgetfulness. How Kṛṣṇa is merciful?
Yes, He's merciful. How is it? Because he wanted to forget Kṛṣṇa. He wanted to forget Kṛṣṇa, so Kṛṣṇa will give him such sources of forgetfulness that he'll never be able to understand what is Kṛṣṇa. "You enjoy. You want to forget Kṛṣṇa, or God? All right. I'll give you intelligence so that you will never be able to understand what is God." Not exactly memory . . . because living entity, sometimes by good association will come . . .
So this is not Kṛṣṇa's partiality. He has given everyone a little quantity of independence. Just like these boys who have come here, that is out of independence. They are playing, but out of independence they have come. And they may sit down for some time and out of independence may go away. So this independence is there even in the ant, even in the worm and everywhere, because we are part and parcel of God and God is fully independent.
But we cannot be fully independent. Just like in the state. You are belonging to an independent state, but that does not mean that you can do anything and everything. You have no such independence. There is state law and order. Similarly, as in the state we are independent citizens, but if we violate law and order, then we shall be punished. It is very simple thing.
But the rascal civilization, they say God is dead. How God can be dead? The law of God are acting so nicely. How God can be dead? That means he wanted to forget God, so he has come to the conclusion, "God is dead." He has come to this conclusion. While, on the other hand, who wants God, they are perfectly visioning that "Next life I am going to meet God face to face." This intelligence is given to him by God also. That is also stated in the Bhagavad-gītā.
- teṣāṁ satata-yuktānāṁ
- bhajatāṁ prīti-pūrvakam
- dadāmi buddhi-yogaṁ taṁ
- yena mām upayanti te
- (BG 10.10)
So actually, although we have got independence, we have got consciousness, we have got power of thinking, of understanding, but it is limited. Therefore we don't agree with one another. However I may be big philosopher, I may be very big philosopher, very logician, but as soon as another big logician, another big philosopher comes, he defeats me. That is the way. And every philosopher, every logician is trying to defeat your theory, as you are trying to defeat others' theories. This is going on.
So as Śrīman Janārdana said, the knowledge which you are searching in different ways, that is impossible to come to the conclusion. Because we are searching with . . . however I may accept this method or that method or that method, but accepting the method means employing my senses. But the senses are imperfect. Either I accept this or that, I have to work with my senses. There are no other instruments. So when senses are imperfect, so whatever method you accept, that will be imperfect.
Then which method will be perfect? That method will be perfect, as it is stated in the Bhagavad-gītā, mattaḥ smṛtir jṣānam apohanaṁ ca (BG 15.15). When Kṛṣṇa from within yourself will give you right direction, then you'll come to the ultimate destination. Otherwise, whatever . . . however a great philosopher, scientist or anything you may be, you'll simply hover on the material, mental plane. That's all.
So either you call perfect knowledge or you call happiness, anything, what you call, if you want to know the ultimate goal of your life perfectly, you have to follow a different method. A different method. That method is called avaroha-panthā. There are . . . all methods of acquiring knowledge can be divided into two groups. One group is called āroha-panthā, or research, inductive process, and another method is called deductive process, or avaroha-panthā. The knowledge coming from the supreme source, that is called avaroha-panthā, and the knowledge which is being sought after by using our imperfect senses, that is called āroha-panthā. Ascending process and descending process.
So by ascending process, we can never come to the real knowledge. That is not possible, because our senses are imperfect. How we can ascend? Just like people are trying to ascend to the higher planetary system, but the instrument, sputnik, itself is imperfect. How you can go there? You can go 25,000 miles, again come back. Punar mūṣiko bhava. So this is going on. Because we are imperfect in every respect, so therefore we have to receive knowledge from the perfect. That is the process, real process.
If your knowledge . . . just like Janārdana suggested three processes: one by applying our senses, another by accepting knowledge from others, and another, rejection. Two ways. Or skepticism, make void. So this is out of frustration. So make the mind void: no more thinking. And knowledge by imperfect senses, that will always remain imperfect. And knowledge from others, that is real goal. But provided you receive that knowledge from the perfect.
As we have given several times the example, just like a child wants to know who is his father. Now if he searches out "Who is my father?" he asks everybody, "Are you my father? Are you my father? Are you my father?" he will have to go on searching. Then again if he asks his neighbor, "Who is my father?" the neighbor also may not know and may give him misinformation. So that is also not possible. But if he goes to his mother and his mother is sincere and perfect, she can give, "My dear boy, he is your father." That is perfect.
So neither by researching one can find out his father, neither by employing his imperfect senses. But if he receives the knowledge from the sincere mother, then the knowledge is perfect. And he has no other alternative to know who is his father except the source of a sincere mother. Similarly, the Bhāgavat says, acintyāḥ khalu ye bhāvā na tāṁs tarkeṇa yojayet: things which are beyond your power of realization, don't try to understand by your so-called logic and argument. All nonsense. All nonsense. Tarkaḥ apratiṣṭhaḥ. This process of argument and logic, gymnasium, is imperfect always. You cannot realize what is the ultimate goal of life.
Tarkaḥ apratiṣṭhaḥ śrutayo vibhinnā. Śruta means Vedas or books of knowledge. There are different kinds of theories and doctrines. So if you read those books, unless you are very nicely directed, that will create also perplexity. Śrutayo vibhinnam. And so far philosophical speculation is concerned, the Bhāgavata says that nāsau muni yasya mataṁ na bhinnam. Muni means mental speculator. So you cannot find any mental speculator who is not differing from another mental speculator.
So tarkaḥ apratiṣṭhaḥ, the path of so-called logic and argument, is not perfect. Then, simply if you study different books of knowledge, that will also not give you perfect knowledge. If you consult so-called mental speculators, their different views, then dharmasya tattvaṁ nihitaṁ guhāyām. The ultimate goal of life is very confidential and mysterious. And how to know it? Mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ (CC Madhya 17.186). Mahājana means the perfect realized souls who have realized, you have to follow them. That's all. Mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ.
Therefore this process of Kṛṣṇa consciousness is accepting the mahājana, the authority. The first authority is Kṛṣṇa. From Kṛṣṇa, Arjuna is hearing. There is no question about it. Now if you simply understand as Arjuna understood, then you have got the perfect knowledge. And if you speculate, if you try to comment in your own nonsense way, then you are misled immediately. So this is the way. Mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ. Mahājana means those who are perfect personalities. That will give you. That will do.
Now, there are, according to Vedic system, there are twelve mahājanas. They are all in agreement that the supreme power is the Absolute Personality of Godhead. And they have become all devotees, they have served, they have prescribed rules and regulations. You can . . . so if we follow these rules and regulations and the mahājana, and many . . . as it is stated in Bhāgavatam, that those who have followed, they have got perfection. You can get also perfection; there is no doubt about it. Simply you have to follow the footprints of the ācāryas. Then your life will be perfect.
Thank you. If there is any question, you can ask.
Guest: What is the best time to . . . (indistinct)
Devotee: Early in the morning . . . (indistinct)
Guest: How do you know how to follow the footsteps of the mahājanas?
Prabhupāda: There is a paramparā, or disciplic succession, of mahājanas. Just like Kṛṣṇa is the original authority. Now the paramparā system is there. From Kṛṣṇa, Brahmā heard; from Brahma, Nārada. If we do not go so far . . . now, Kṛṣṇa spoke to Arjuna. Arjuna is mahājana therefore.
It is stated in the Bhagavad-gītā that "Because you are My devotee, you are in full Kṛṣṇa consciousness; therefore I am speaking to you this confidential yoga system, Bhagavad-gītā." Bhakto 'si priyo 'si me (BG 4.3). Rahasyaṁ hy etad uttamam. "The process was there. Now it is lost. So I am speaking to you again the old system because you are My devotee."
Similarly those, or one person who is accepting the version of Arjuna, as Arjuna understood Kṛṣṇa, he is mahājana, and you have to follow him. That's all. If somebody is speaking something against as Arjuna understood, he is not a mahājana, he's a rascal. The simple test. And you go to the Tenth Chapter, Bhagavad-gītā.
Arjuna says, "Kṛṣṇa," sarvam etad ṛtaṁ manye yan vadasi keśava (BG 10.14), "whatever You are speaking, I accept it in toto, without any minus." This is mahājana. Not that according to my whims, I cut something, I accept something. No. One who is accepting the version of Arjuna or Kṛṣṇa, he is mahājana. You can follow him. That's all. It is simple thing.
You haven't got to find out who is mahājana. The mahājana means who is following another mahājana, say follow Arjuna. He is mahājana. (break) . . . to read Bhagavad-gītā and try to understand how Arjuna understood it, then you get . . . and anyone following the footprints of Arjuna, he's mahājana. (end)
- 1968 - Lectures
- 1968 - Lectures and Conversations
- 1968 - Lectures, Conversations and Letters
- 1968-06 - Lectures, Conversations and Letters
- Lectures - Canada
- Lectures - Canada, Montreal
- Lectures, Conversations and Letters - Canada
- Lectures, Conversations and Letters - Canada, Montreal
- Lectures - General
- Audio Files 20.01 to 30.00 Minutes
- 1968 - New Audio - Released in December 2017