Go to Vaniquotes | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia


Vanisource - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge


760929 - Conversation - Vrndavana: Difference between revisions

m (1 revision(s))
 
m (Text replacement - "<big>''' Listen to a 'Nectar Drop' created from this Conversation'''</big>]]</div>" to "''' <span style="display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center"><b class="fa fa-solid fa-volume-up" style="font-size: 330%"> </b><big>Listen to a 'Nectar Drop' created from this lecture'''</big></span>]]</div>")
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{CV_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}
[[Category:1976 - Conversations]]
<div class="code">760929rc.vrn</div>
[[Category:1976 - Lectures and Conversations]]
[[Category:1976 - Lectures, Conversations and Letters]]
[[Category:1976-09 - Lectures, Conversations and Letters]]
[[Category:Conversations - India]]
[[Category:Conversations - India, Vrndavana]]
[[Category:Lectures, Conversations and Letters - India]]
[[Category:Lectures, Conversations and Letters - India, Vrndavana]]
[[Category:Conversations with Public Officials]]
[[Category:Conversations with Doctors]]
[[Category:Audio Files 20.01 to 30.00 Minutes]]
<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=Category:Conversations - by Date]]'''[[:Category:Conversations - by Date|Conversations by Date]], [[:Category:1976 - Conversations|1976]]'''</div>
{{RandomImage}}


Prabhupāda: Na taj janeṣu abhijñeṣu. Abhijñaḥ janeṣu, no attachment. Vyāsadeva, Śukadeva Gosvāmī, Nārada Muni, all the ācāryas, Rāmānujācārya, they have no respect for these. They're creating their howling habits, that's all. How there can be peace?


Doctor: Now when the Kṛṣṇa mantras...
<!-- Nectar Drop Code Start -->
<div class="center">
[[Vanipedia:760929 - Conversation - Srila Prabhupada Speaks a Nectar Drop in Vrndavana|''' <span style="display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center"><b class="fa fa-solid fa-volume-up" style="font-size: 330%">&nbsp;</b><big>Listen to a 'Nectar Drop' created from this lecture'''</big></span>]]</div>
<!-- Nectar Drop Link end -->


Prabhupāda: Why do you say Kṛṣṇa panthā?


Doctor: No, mantras. I have come to mantra. Klīṁ kṛṣṇāya govindāya gopījanavallabhāya namaḥ. Is that not a very powerful Kṛṣṇa mantra?
<div class="code">760929R1-VRNDAVAN - September 29, 1976 - 24:40 Minutes</div>


Prabhupāda: Yes.


Doctor: That is better than Hare Kṛṣṇa.
<mp3player>https://s3.amazonaws.com/vanipedia/full/1976/760929R1-VRNDAVAN_mono.mp3</mp3player>


Prabhupāda: No. Hare Kṛṣṇa is therefore called mahā-mantra.


Doctor: Hare Kṛṣṇa Hare Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa Hare Hare.
(Conversation with U.N. Doctor)


Prabhupāda: Hare Rāma Hare Rāma Rāma Rāma Hare Hare.
'''Prabhupāda:''' ''Na taj janeṣu abhijñeṣu. Abhijñaḥ janeṣu'', no attachment. Vyāsadeva, Śukadeva Gosvāmī, Nārada Muni, all the ''ācāryas'', Rāmānujācārya, they have no respect for these. They're creating their howling habits, that's all. How there can be peace?


Doctor: This you regard as the, higher than any other...
'''Doctor:''' Now, when the Kṛṣṇa ''mantras'' . . .


Prabhupāda: Oh yes. Therefore it is called mahā-mantra.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Why do you say Kṛṣṇa ''panthā''?


Doctor: But I was told that the Sudarśana-cakra words, mahamala parakramāyā maha patanivaya bhakta jane kalpanaya,(?) that is a very powerful mantra.
'''Doctor:''' No, ''mantra''s. I have come to ''mantra''. ''Klīṁ kṛṣṇāya govindāya gopījanavallabhāya namaḥ.'' Is that not a very powerful Kṛṣṇa ''mantra''?


Prabhupāda: Yes. Everything in relationship with God is powerful. But the name in this age is the most powerful. Kīrtanād eva kṛṣṇasya mukta-saṅgaḥ paraṁ vrajet [[SB 12.3.51]] .  
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes.


Doctor: And the word om has been praised in the Upaniṣads, but...
'''Doctor:''' That is better than Hare Kṛṣṇa.


Prabhupāda: Om, veda, praṇavaḥ sarva-vedeṣu. Kṛṣṇa says that raso 'ham apsu kaunteya prabhāsmi śaśi-sūryayoḥ praṇavaḥ sarva-vedeṣu [[BG 7.8]] . Praṇava is oṁkāra. Sarva-vedeṣu, "That praṇava I am." That is sound representation of Kṛṣṇa.
'''Prabhupāda:''' No. Hare Kṛṣṇa is therefore called ''mahā-mantra''.


Doctor: Then that one word as a mantra, is it not...
'''Doctor:''' Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare.


Prabhupāda: Yes.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Hare Rāma, Hare Rāma, Rāma Rāma, Hare Hare.


Doctor: ...the highest sort of word?
'''Doctor:''' This you regard as the . . . higher than any other . . .


Prabhupāda: No. If you keep Kṛṣṇa, that "This praṇava is the sound representation of Kṛṣṇa," then it is all right. If you think it is separately powerful than Kṛṣṇa, that is nāma-aparādha.  
'''Prabhupāda:''' Oh, yes. Therefore it is called ''mahā-mantra''.


Doctor: I understand.
'''Doctor:''' But I was told that the ''Sudarśana-cakra words, mahāmāla parakramāyā maha patanivaya bhakta jane kalpanaya'', that is a very powerful ''mantra''.


Prabhupāda: Yes. If you accept it as Kṛṣṇa says, that "I am praṇava, " if you do remember Kṛṣṇa by chanting oṁkāra, then it is all right.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes. Everything in relationship with God is powerful. But the name in this age is the most powerful: ''kīrtanād eva kṛṣṇasya mukta-saṅgaḥ paraṁ vrajet'' ([[SB 12.3.51|SB 12.3.51]]).


Doctor: Otherwise, om is only given to sannyāsīs?
'''Doctor:''' And the word ''oṁ'' has been praised in the ''Upaniṣads'', but . . .


Prabhupāda: Not necessarily. It is not mentioned there. Anyone chanting Vedic mantra, he has to begin with oṁkāra.  
'''Prabhupāda:''' ''Oṁ, veda, praṇavaḥ sarva-vedeṣu''. Kṛṣṇa says that ''raso 'ham apsu kaunteya prabhāsmi śaśi-sūryayoḥ praṇavaḥ sarva-vedeṣu'' ([[BG 7.8 (1972)|BG 7.8]]). ''Praṇava'' is ''oṁkāra. Sarva-vedeṣu'', "That ''praṇava'' I am." That is sound representation of Kṛṣṇa.


Doctor: All mantras begin with om.  
'''Doctor:''' Then that one word as a ''mantra'', is it not . . .


Prabhupāda: Yes, oṁkāra. So sarva-vedeṣu. Praṇavaḥ sarva-vedeṣu. This is beginning. Just like we take Bhāgavata, oṁ namo bhagavate vāsudevāya.  
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes.


Doctor:  
'''Doctor:''' . . . the highest sort of word?


<div class="conv_verse">
'''Prabhupāda:''' No. If you keep Kṛṣṇa that, "This ''praṇava'' is the sound representation of Kṛṣṇa," then it is all right. If you think it is separately powerful than Kṛṣṇa, that is ''nāma-aparādha''.
etad akṣaraṁ brahma<br />
etad akṣaraṁ param<br />
etad akṣaraṁ jñātvā<br />
yati ceti...(?)
</div>


Prabhupāda: The difficulty is that we consider Kṛṣṇa is different from oṁkāra.  
'''Doctor:''' I understand.


Doctor: That is a mistake.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes. If you accept it as Kṛṣṇa says that, "I am ''praṇava''," if you do remember Kṛṣṇa by chanting ''oṁkāra'', then it is all right.


Prabhupāda: That is a mistake.
'''Doctor:''' Otherwise, ''oṁ'' is only given to ''sannyāsīs''?


Doctor: But then Kṛṣṇa is not different from Brahman.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Not necessarily. It is not mentioned there. Anyone chanting Vedic ''mantra'', he has to begin with ''oṁkāra''.


Prabhupāda: If you take this oṁkāra as Kṛṣṇa's sound representation, then it is all right.
'''Doctor:''' All ''mantra''s begin with ''oṁ'' and end with ''oṁ''.


Doctor: Then it is as good as chanting Kṛṣṇa.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes, ''oṁkāra''. So ''sarva-vedeṣu.''


Prabhupāda: Yes.
'''Doctor:''' So all the essential ''Vedas''.


Doctor: But it does not give...
'''Prabhupāda:''' ''Praṇavaḥ sarva-vedeṣu''. This is beginning. Just like we take ''Bhāgavatam, oṁ namo bhagavate vāsudevāya.''


Prabhupāda: But because Kṛṣṇa is remembered, if you take oṁkāra as Kṛṣṇa's sound representation then Kṛṣṇa is remembered.
'''Doctor:'''


Doctor: But Kṛṣṇa is three letters. Om is one.
:''etad akṣaraṁ brahma''
:''etad akṣaraṁ param''
:''etad akṣaraṁ jñātvā''
:''yati ceti . . .''


Prabhupāda: That doesn't matter.
'''Prabhupāda:''' The difficulty is that we consider Kṛṣṇa is different from ''oṁkāra''.


Doctor: In the last minute when you are dying you can feel it, easily feel it.
'''Doctor:''' That is a mistake.


Prabhupāda: Kṛṣṇa has many names. Kṛṣṇa has name Govinda. It is not three letters. It is more than that. Kṛṣṇa has so many thousands names. Advaitam acyutam anādim ananta. So therefore Kṛṣṇa advises for the beginners, "Just try to remember Me in this way- raso 'ham apsu kaunteya [[BG 7.8]] —I am the taste of the water." The water you must be drinking twice, thrice, four times. So when you drink water, the taste satisfies your thirst. So if you simply remember, "This taste is Kṛṣṇa," that is Kṛṣṇa conscious.
'''Prabhupāda:''' That is a mistake.


Doctor: When you eat food, that also, the taste is Kṛṣṇa.
'''Doctor:''' But then Kṛṣṇa is not different from Brahman.


Prabhupāda: No, especially of the water. Kṛṣṇa is everything, but specifically he mentions, "The taste of the water I am." So you remember this.
'''Prabhupāda:''' If you take this ''oṁkāra'' as Kṛṣṇa's sound representation, then it is all right.


Doctor: That's very interesting. So every time you drink water...
'''Doctor:''' Then it is as good as chanting "Kṛṣṇa."


Prabhupāda: You can remember Kṛṣṇa. What is the wrong and what is the loss there? But you follow Kṛṣṇa's instruction. Yes, sit down. There is no difficulty to become Kṛṣṇa conscious. (microphone moves)
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes.


Doctor: Why do you tape record?
'''Doctor:''' But it does not give . . .


Hari-śauri: Everything Prabhupāda speaks we tape record and then everyone in the world can listen.
'''Prabhupāda:''' But because Kṛṣṇa is remembered, if you take ''oṁkāra'' as Kṛṣṇa's sound representation then Kṛṣṇa is remembered.


Doctor: Someone said that the word om is given to sannyāsīs and it...
'''Doctor:''' But Kṛṣṇa is three letters. ''Oṁ'' is one.


Prabhupāda: No, Kṛṣṇa does not say.
'''Prabhupāda:''' That doesn't matter.


Doctor: It's not so.
'''Doctor:''' In the last minute when you are dying you can feel it, easily feel it.


Prabhupāda: "Someone," we don't take authority. "Someone." There are so many "someones." We don't care for them. What Kṛṣṇa says we accept. That's all.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Kṛṣṇa has many names. Kṛṣṇa has name Govinda. It is not three letters, it is more than that. Kṛṣṇa has so many thousands names. ''Advaitam acyutam anādim ananta'' (BS 5.33). So therefore Kṛṣṇa advises for the beginners, "Just try to remember Me in this way—''raso 'ham apsu kaunteya'' ([[BG 7.8 (1972)|BG 7.8]]): I am the taste of the water." The water you must be drinking twice, thrice, four times. So when you drink water, the taste satisfies your thirst. So if you simply remember, "This taste is Kṛṣṇa," that is Kṛṣṇa conscious.


Doctor: But this Kaṭha-Upaniṣad praises om.  
'''Doctor:''' When you eat food, that also, the taste is Kṛṣṇa.


<div class="conv_verse">
'''Prabhupāda:''' No, especially of the water. Kṛṣṇa is everything, but specifically He mentions, "The taste of the water I am." So you remember this.
etad ālambanaṁ śreṣṭhaṁ<br />
etad ālambanaṁ param<br />
etad ālambanaṁ jñātvā<br />
brahma-loke mahīyate
</div>


Prabhupāda: Yes, Upaniṣad is giving lesson, counter part of this material world. Because... Just like you are stressing on oṁkāra because you do not give much importance to Kṛṣṇa. In the material world, Kṛṣṇa, they think Kṛṣṇa is one of the historical persons. Avajānanti māṁ mūḍhā mānuṣīṁ tanum āśritam [[BG 9.11]] . So Upaniṣad is teaching us in an indirect way about the importance of Kṛṣṇa. Upa-niṣat. To bring you nearby. Because you have got so many material conceptions, if we say that "Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Personality of Godhead," you may not like it. Therefore... Oṁkāra is Kṛṣṇa. So you are giving lesson on oṁkāra. Although Kṛṣṇa and oṁkāra is not different, but you'll not like Kṛṣṇa. In your present position you'll not like Kṛṣṇa's name.
'''Doctor:''' That's very interesting. So every time you drink water . . .


Doctor: Why?
'''Prabhupāda:''' You can remember Kṛṣṇa. Where is the wrong, and what is the loss there? But you follow Kṛṣṇa's instruction. (someone enters) Yes, sit down. There is no difficulty to become Kṛṣṇa conscious. (microphone moves)


Prabhupāda: No. Therefore you are stressing...
'''Doctor:''' Why do you tape record?


Doctor: No, I have read all this and I am trying to reconcile.
'''Hari-śauri:''' Everything Prabhupāda speaks we tape record, and then everyone in the world can listen.


Prabhupāda: So that is for the neophytes.
'''Doctor:''' Someone said that the word ''oṁ'' is given to ''sannyāsīs'', and it . . .


Doctor: The reconciliation is there. Om is Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa is om.  
'''Prabhupāda:''' No, Kṛṣṇa does not say.


Prabhupāda: So if Kṛṣṇa is... If you are convinced, then where is the objection of Hare Kṛṣṇa?
'''Doctor:''' It's not so.


Doctor: No, no.
'''Prabhupāda:''' "Someone," we don't take authority. "Someone." There are so many "someones." We don't care for them. What Kṛṣṇa says, we accept. That's all.


Prabhupāda: Why should you bring so many objections?
'''Doctor:''' But this ''Kaṭha-Upaniṣad'' praises ''oṁ''.


Doctor: Kṛṣṇas tu bhagavān svayam.
:''etad ālambanaṁ śreṣṭhaṁ''
:''etad ālambanaṁ param''
:''etad ālambanaṁ jñātvā''
:''brahma-loke mahīyate''


Prabhupāda: Yes, that is a fact.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes, ''Upaniṣad'' is giving lesson, counterpart of this material world. Because . . . just like you are stressing on ''oṁkāra'' because you do not give much importance to Kṛṣṇa. In the material world, Kṛṣṇa . . . they think Kṛṣṇa is one of the historical person. ''Avajānanti māṁ mūḍhā mānuṣīṁ tanum āśritam'' ([[BG 9.11 (1972)|BG 9.11]]). So ''Upaniṣad'' is teaching us in an indirect way about the importance of Kṛṣṇa. ''Upa-niṣat'': to bring you nearby. Because you have got so many material conception, if we say that, "Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Personality of Godhead," you may not like it. Therefore . . . ''oṁkāra'' is Kṛṣṇa. So you are giving lesson on ''oṁkāra''. Although Kṛṣṇa and ''oṁkāra'' is not different, but you'll not like Kṛṣṇa. In your present position you'll not like Kṛṣṇa's name.


Doctor: Ete cāṁśa-kalāḥ puṁsaḥ kṛṣṇas tu bhagavān svayam [[SB 1.3.28]] .
'''Doctor:''' Why?


Prabhupāda: But because I do not like, therefore Upaniṣads give another chance, that "Chant oṁkāra. " That is the way. Because unless one is completely purified, he cannot understand Kṛṣṇa.
'''Prabhupāda:''' No. Therefore you are stressing . . .


<div class="conv_verse">
'''Doctor:''' No, I have read all this, and I am trying to reconcile.
yeṣāṁ tv anta-gataṁ pāpaṁ<br />
janānāṁ puṇya-karmaṇām<br />
te dvandva-moha-nirmuktā<br />
bhajante māṁ dṛḍha-vratāḥ<br />
[[BG 7.28]]
</div>


Kṛṣṇa bhajana is possible when one is completely free from all kinds of sinful activities. So not every one is freed from sinful activities. Therefore the indirect way. Otherwise, Upaniṣad is Veda.  
'''Prabhupāda:''' Ah. So that is for the neophytes.


Doctor: Based on Vedas. Right.
'''Doctor:''' The reconciliation is there. ''Oṁ'' is Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa is ''oṁ''.


Prabhupāda: Based. Kṛṣṇa says vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyam [[BG 15.15]] . By studying Vedas, Upaniṣads, if you do not understand Kṛṣṇa, that means your study is not complete. Bahūnāṁ janmanām ante jñānavān māṁ prapadyate [[BG 15.15]] . After studying this indirect information of Kṛṣṇa, when one is actually a learned, wise man, he surrenders to Kṛṣṇa. Vāsudevaḥ sarvam iti sa mahātmā sudurlabhaḥ [[BG 15.15]] . That is very rarely found. This is fact. So if one is intelligent, that if only the most intelligent person, after many, many births one has to surrender to Kṛṣṇa, why not do it immediately? Why shall I wait for many, many births? That is intelligence.
'''Prabhupāda:''' So if Kṛṣṇa is . . . if you are convinced, then where is the objection of Hare Kṛṣṇa?


Doctor: Śrī-kṛṣṇas tu śaraṇaṁ mama.  
'''Doctor:''' No, no.


Prabhupāda: Vāsudevaḥ sarvam iti [[BG 7.19]] . That is intelligence. But that intelligence is not possible for ordinary persons. Sa mahātmā sudurlabhaḥ. One who gets this intelligence, such kind of mahātmā, is very, very rarely found. To take it immediately, ah, kṛṣṇas tu bhagavān svayam [[BG 7.19]] . Vāsudevaḥ sarvam iti [[BG 7.19]] . That is very difficult.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Why should you bring so many objections?


<div class="conv_verse">
'''Doctor:''' ''Kṛṣṇas tu bhagavān svayam.''
manuṣyāṇāṁ sahasreṣu<br />
kaścid yatati siddhaye<br />
yatatām api siddhānāṁ<br />
kaścin māṁ vetti tattvataḥ<br />
[[BG 7.3]]
</div>


It is not so easy to understand Kṛṣṇa or to accept Kṛṣṇa as all in all. Vāsudevaḥ sarvam. But if you take it, you are fortunate.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes, that is a fact.


Doctor: And the only way to attain is reciting the name.
'''Doctor:''' ''Ete cāṁśa-kalāḥ puṁsaḥ kṛṣṇas tu bhagavān svayam'' ([[SB 1.3.28|SB 1.3.28]]).


Prabhupāda: Yes. Kṛṣṇa says man-manā bhava mad-bhakto mad-yājī māṁ namaskuru [[BG 18.65]] . Do that. Therefore the temple is there. Everyone may come and see Kṛṣṇa and think of Him. What is the difficulty? But he'll not come. He has concluded Kṛṣṇa is nirākāra. God is nirākāra.  
'''Prabhupāda:''' But because I do not like, therefore ''Upaniṣads'' give another chance that, "Chant ''oṁkāra''." That is the way. Because unless one is completely purified, he cannot understand Kṛṣṇa.


Doctor: Then Kṛṣṇa will not come.
:''yeṣāṁ tv anta-gataṁ pāpaṁ''
:''janānāṁ puṇya-karmaṇām''
:''te dvandva-moha-nirmuktā''
:''bhajante māṁ dṛḍha-vratāḥ''
:([[BG 7.28 (1972)|BG 7.28]])


Prabhupāda: Well now, Kṛṣṇa... You... Whatever you think, that is your business, but Kṛṣṇa is there everywhere.
''Kṛṣṇa-bhajana'' is possible when one is completely free from all kinds of sinful activities. So not everyone is freed from sinful activities. Therefore the indirect way. Otherwise, ''Upaniṣad'' is ''Veda''.


Doctor: He is nirākāra and sākāra.  
'''Doctor:''' Based on ''Vedas''. Right.


Prabhupāda: Nirākāra means He has no material ākāra. That is nirākāra. Ākāra means we have got... Just like I have conception of you. So this ākāra is your material ākāra. It is not your real ākāra. Dehino 'smin yathā dehe [[BG 2.13]] . The real person is within the body, but we have no connection with the real body. We see this outward... Just like seeing his dress, his... That's all.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Based. Kṛṣṇa says, ''vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyam'' ([[BG 15.15 (1972)|BG 15.15]]). By studying ''Vedas'', ''Upaniṣads'', if you do not understand Kṛṣṇa, that means your study is not complete. ''Bahūnāṁ janmanām ante jñānavān māṁ prapadyate'' ([[BG 7.19 (1972)|BG 7.19]]). After studying this indirect information of Kṛṣṇa, when one is actually a learned, wise man, he surrenders to Kṛṣṇa. ''Vāsudevaḥ sarvam iti sa mahātmā sudurlabhaḥ'' ([[BG 7.19 (1972)|BG 7.19]]). That is very rarely found. This is fact. So if one is intelligent, that if only the most intelligent person, after many, many births one has to surrender to Kṛṣṇa, why not do it immediately? Why shall I wait for many, many births? That is intelligence.


Doctor: How to find the...? How to get to the ātman, the inner body?
'''Doctor:''' ''Śrī-kṛṣṇas tu śaraṇaṁ mama.''


Prabhupāda: Yes, that is the first instruction in the Bhagavad-gītā, that first of all, try to understand what is the person. So because we have no eyes to see, indirectly dehino 'smin yathā dehe kaumāram... [[BG 2.13]]. Na hanyate hanyamāne śarīre [[BG 2.13]] . Antavanta ime dehā nityasyoktāḥ śarīriṇaḥ [[BG 2.13]] . So many things. Nainaṁ dahati pāvakaḥ. So many indirect way because we cannot directly perceive.
'''Prabhupāda:''' ''Vāsudevaḥ sarvam iti'' ([[BG 7.19 (1972)|BG 7.19]]). That is intelligence. But that intelligence is not possible for ordinary persons. ''Sa mahātmā sudurlabhaḥ.'' One who gets this intelligence, such kind of ''mahātmā'' is very, very rarely found. To take it immediately, ah, ''kṛṣṇas tu bhagavān svayam'' ([[SB 1.3.28|SB 1.3.28]]), ''vāsudevaḥ sarvam iti'', that is very difficult.


Doctor: Nainaṁ chindanti śastrāṇi nainaṁ dahati pāvakaḥ [[BG 2.23]] .
:''manuṣyāṇāṁ sahasreṣu''
:''kaścid yatati siddhaye''
:''yatatām api siddhānāṁ''
:''kaścin vetti māṁ tattvataḥ''
:([[BG 7.3 (1972)|BG 7.3]])


Prabhupāda: What is called? Definition by negation. Nainaṁ chindanti— negation. So that you can have some idea.
It is not so easy to understand Kṛṣṇa or to accept Kṛṣṇa as all in all. ''Vāsudevaḥ sarvam''. But if you take it, you are fortunate.


Doctor: Of what it is.
'''Doctor:''' And the only way to attain is reciting the name.


Prabhupāda: It is not material. Because matter, chindanti, any matter it can be destroyed. It can be cut into pieces, it can be melted in fire, it can be moistened. So when we cannot understand things, it is given in the definition of negation.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes. Kṛṣṇa says, ''man-manā bhava mad-bhakto mad-yājī māṁ namaskuru'' ([[BG 18.65 (1972)|BG 18.65]]). Do that. Therefore the temple is there. Everyone may come and see Kṛṣṇa and think of Him. What is the difficulty? But he'll not come. He has concluded Kṛṣṇa is ''nirākāra''. God is ''nirākāra''.


Doctor: But then it's much better to worship God in form.
'''Doctor:''' Then Kṛṣṇa will not come.


Prabhupāda: Yes, that is intelligence. If you accept Kṛṣṇa immediately, man-manā bhava mad..., then your life is successful. Kṛṣṇa says man-manā bhava mad-bhakto mad-yājī māṁ namaskuru, mām evaiṣyasi satyaṁ te [[BG 18.65]] , He said. But they are not interested. Avajānanti māṁ mūḍhāḥ [[BG 18.65]] . "Ah, Kṛṣṇa is a historical person. Why shall I think of Him? I shall think of oṁkāra. " You cannot think of oṁkāra. You can hear. And as soon as you think of oṁkāra it comes from? There is no impersonalism. It again becomes personal. So they want to avoid personality and as well as think of Him—it becomes a very troublesome job. Kleśo 'dhikataras teṣām avyaktāsakta-cetasām [[BG 18.65]] . They cannot think of avyakta, impersonal. But they are trying to think of. That is a very troublesome job. Kleśala eva avaśiṣyate.(?) Such attempt means he simply gets the result of his hard endeavor. That's all. He doesn't get any substance.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Well, now, Kṛṣṇa . . . you . . . whatever you think, that is your business, but Kṛṣṇa is there everywhere.


Doctor: So with faith accept the...
'''Doctor:''' He is ''nirākāra'' and ''sākāra''.


Prabhupāda: No faith—it is fact! Faith is blind.
'''Prabhupāda:''' ''Nirākāra'' means He has no material ''ākāra''. That is ''nirākāra. Ākāra'' means we have got . . . just like I have conception of you. So this ''ākāra'' is your material ''ākāra''. It is not your real ''ākāra. Dehino 'smin yathā dehe'' ([[BG 2.13 (1972)|BG 2.13]]). The real person is within the body, but we have no connection with the real body. We see this outward . . . just like seeing his dress, his . . . that's all.


Doctor: Faith is blind.
'''Doctor:''' How to find the . . .? How to get to the ''ātman'', the inner body?


Prabhupāda: Yes. Faith with good knowledge, that is nice. If you have good knowledge of Kṛṣṇa and you have faith, that is very good. But if you... Just like Māyāvādīs, they say, "Imagine Kṛṣṇa as God." They say, "Imagine."
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes, that is the first instruction in the ''Bhagavad-gītā'', that first of all, try to understand what is the person. So because we have no eyes to see, indirectly, ''dehino 'smin yathā dehe kaumāram'' . . . ([[BG 2.13 (1972)|BG 2.13]]). ''Na hanyate hanyamāne śarīre'' ([[BG 2.20 (1972)|BG 2.20]]). ''Antavanta ime dehā nityasyoktāḥ śarīriṇaḥ'' ([[BG 2.18 (1972)|BG 2.18]]). So many things. ''Nainaṁ dahati pāvakaḥ''. So many indirect way because we cannot directly perceive.


Doctor: That is no good.
'''Doctor:''' ''Nainaṁ chindanti śastrāṇi nainaṁ dahati pāvakaḥ'' ([[BG 2.23 (1972)|BG 2.23]]).


Prabhupāda: They are no good. Kalpana. They say, kalpana. Sādhakānāṁ gitarthaya(?) brahma-rūpa-kalpana. Rūpa-kalpana. But Kṛṣṇa's rūpa is not kalpana. It is fact. So kalpana is not faith, it is blind. Let me imagine some form of Kṛṣṇa. And therefore gradually, they come down to the position that any form you imagine as God, that is all right. They have come to this degradation.
'''Prabhupāda:''' What is called? Definition by negation. ''Nainaṁ chindanti''—negation. So that you can have some idea.


Doctor: That you can, any form...
'''Doctor:''' Of what it is.


Prabhupāda: Yes. Any form you imagine that he is God, that will give you success. They say like that.
'''Prabhupāda:''' It is not material. Because matter, ''chindanti'', any matter, it can be destroyed. It can be cut into pieces, it can be melted in fire, it can be moistened. So when we cannot understand things, it is given in the definition of negation.


Doctor: I think I have taken too much of time.
'''Doctor:''' But then it's much better to worship God in form.


Prabhupāda: I am going there at six.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes, that is intelligence. If you accept Kṛṣṇa immediately, ''man-manā bhava mad'' . . . then your life is successful. Kṛṣṇa says, ''man-manā bhava mad-bhakto mad-yājī māṁ namaskuru, mām evaiṣyasi asaṁśaya'' ([[BG 18.65 (1972)|BG 18.65]]), He said. But they are not interested. ''Avajānanti māṁ mūḍhāḥ'' ([[BG 9.11 (1972)|BG 9.11]]). "Ah, Kṛṣṇa is a historical person. Why shall I think of Him? I shall think of ''oṁkāra''." You cannot think of ''oṁkāra''. You can hear. And as soon as you think of ''oṁkāra'', it comes form. There is no impersonality. It again becomes personal. So they want to avoid personality and as well as think of Him—it becomes a very troublesome job. ''Kleśo 'dhikataras teṣām avyaktāsakta-cetasām'' ([[BG 12.5 (1972)|BG 12.5]]). They cannot think of ''avyakta'', impersonal. But they are trying to think of. And that is a very troublesome job. ''Kleśala eva avaśiṣyate''. Such attempt means he simply gets the result of his hard endeavor. That's all. He doesn't get any substance.


Doctor: Words of enlightenment.
'''Doctor:''' So with faith accept the . . .


Hari-śauri: Have you got any of Prabhupāda's books?
'''Prabhupāda:''' No faith—it is fact. Faith is blind.


Doctor: I have got some. I bought all the volumes of translation of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. I have got all of them. But some of them have not arrived from United States, the latest ones. And I have got...
'''Doctor:''' Faith is blind.


Hari-śauri: That's very nice.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes. Faith with good knowledge, that is nice. If you have good knowledge of Kṛṣṇa and you have faith, that is very good. But if you . . . just like Māyāvādīs, they say: "Imagine Kṛṣṇa as God." They say: "Imagine."


Prabhupāda: You are staying in New Delhi?
'''Doctor:''' That is no good.


Doctor: I stay in the Hague, and come to New Delhi when there are no cases.
'''Prabhupāda:''' They are no good. ''Kalpana''. They say ''kalpana. Sādhakānāṁ gitarthaya brahma-rūpa-kalpana. Rūpa-kalpana''. But Kṛṣṇa's rūpa is not ''kalpana''; it is fact. So ''kalpana'' is not faith, it is blind. "Let me imagine some form of Kṛṣṇa." And therefore gradually, they come down to the position that any form you imagine as God, that is all right. They have come to this degradation.


Prabhupāda: Hague?
'''Doctor:''' That you can, any form . . .


Doctor: Holland.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes. Any form you imagine that he is God, that will give you success. They say like that.


Prabhupāda: Holland. That is the international court?
'''Doctor:''' I think I have taken too much of time.


Doctor: Yes, the court case located, the headquarters.
'''Prabhupāda:''' I am going there at six.


Prabhupāda: I went somewhere. That is also international. In Geneva, I think. Is there any...?
'''Doctor:''' Words of enlightenment.


Doctor: Geneva is another headquarters of the, of the United Nations. New York, Geneva. But the court is in the Hague.
'''Hari-śauri:''' Have you got any of Prabhupāda's books?


Prabhupāda: So I went to that place in Geneva.
'''Doctor:''' I have got some. I bought all the volumes of translation of ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam''. I have got all of them. But some of them have not arrived from United States, the latest ones. And I have got . . .


Doctor: Geneva has got so many specialized agencies of the United Nations, like the I.L.O. and so on.
'''Hari-śauri:''' ''Bhagavad-gītā''. That's very nice.


Prabhupāda: Do you think United Nations is making any tangible progress?
'''Prabhupāda:''' You are staying in New Delhi?


Doctor: Sir, it at least brings people together under one umbrella to discuss. If you did not have that...
'''Doctor:''' I stay in the Hague and come to New Delhi when there are no cases.


Prabhupāda: But discussion, that I have already explained.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Hague?


Doctor: Sir, maybe, but if you don't discuss, you'll fight. Because if aim we don't meet at all then they will have the struggle.
'''Doctor:''' Holland.


Prabhupāda: No. If you have no idea how to come to the conclusion, ciraṁ vicinvan. You can forever go on discussing, you'll never come... You do not know what is the aim. Na te viduḥ svārtha-gatiṁ hi viṣṇuṁ durāśayā ye bahir-artha-māninaḥ [[SB 7.5.31]] .
'''Prabhupāda:''' Holland. That is the international court?


Doctor: Maybe so, but if two people instead of coming to blows come together to talk, it is a step in the right direction.
'''Doctor:''' Yes, the court case located, the headquarters.


Prabhupāda: No right direction because he does not know what is the aim.
'''Prabhupāda:''' I went somewhere, that is also international. In Geneva, I think. Is there any . . .?


Doctor: They both want to have peace so they at least try to...
'''Doctor:''' Geneva is another headquarters of the . . . of the United Nations. New York, Geneva. But the court is in the Hague.


Prabhupāda: Everyone wants that. But if he does not know how to attain peace, then go on discussing forever. That is going on.
'''Prabhupāda:''' So I went to that place in Geneva.


Doctor: But it is still a step in the right direction...
'''Doctor:''' Geneva has got so many specialized agencies of the United Nations, like the I.L.O. and so on.


Prabhupāda: I don't think there is any advancement.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Do you think United Nation is making any tangible progress?


Doctor: ...otherwise what is the aim?
'''Doctor:''' Sir, it at least brings people together under one umbrella to discuss. If you did not have that . . .


Prabhupāda: Otherwise, there is, but you don't take. How it can be done? In the Bhagavad-gītā it is stated
'''Prabhupāda:''' But discussion, that I have already explained.


<div class="conv_verse">
'''Doctor:''' Sir, maybe, but if you don't discuss, you'll fight. Because if aim we don't meet at all, then they will have the struggle.
bhoktāraṁ yajña-tapasāṁ<br />
sarva-loka-maheśvaram<br />
suhṛdaṁ sarva-bhūtānāṁ<br />
jñātvā māṁ śāntim ṛcchati<br />
[[BG 5.29]]
</div>


This is the process. But if you don't take it...
'''Prabhupāda:''' No. If you have no idea how to come to the conclusion, ''ciraṁ vicinvan'' ([[SB 10.14.29|SB 10.14.29]]), you can forever go on discussing, you'll never come . . . you do not know what is the aim. ''Na te viduḥ svārtha-gatiṁ hi viṣṇuṁ durāśayā ye bahir-artha-māninaḥ'' ([[SB 7.5.31|SB 7.5.31]]).


Doctor: But if that realization does not dawn... Till that realization...
'''Doctor:''' May be so, but if two people instead of coming to blows come together to talk, it is a step in the right direction.


Prabhupāda: Then you go on barking. That is another thing.
'''Prabhupāda:''' No right direction, because he does not know what is the aim.


Doctor: (laughs) It's better to bark than to bite.
'''Doctor:''' They both want to have peace, so they at least try to . . .


Prabhupāda: Then that is your satisfaction. You can do that peacefully.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Everyone wants that. But if he does not know how to attain peace, then you'll go on discussing forever. That is going on.


Doctor: One day after barking they will come to a conclusion.
'''Doctor:''' But it is still a step in the right direction . . .


Prabhupāda: No that is... Let it be known, fact, that that will never come. If you do not know what is the aim. That is stated, durāśayā ye bahir-artha-māninaḥ. This is, means, a bad hope, that by this external exhibition of manipulation of energy, they will come to peace. It is not possible. Na te viduḥ svārtha-gatiṁ hi viṣṇuṁ durāśayā ye bahir-artha-māninaḥ adānta-gobhir... [[SB 7.5.31]]. Andhā yathāndhair upanīyamānāḥ. This kind of leading is made by the blind leaders. If the leaders are blind and the followers are blind, what result will be there?
'''Prabhupāda:''' I don't think there is any advancement.


Doctor: That is true, sir, but that stage has not come. One day it will come. But till that stage and that realization of...
'''Doctor:''' . . . otherwise, what is the aim?


Prabhupāda: No, stage is there. But if the obstinate persons, they do not take it... Here it is clearly said... Just like Kṛṣṇa says, sarva-loka-maheśvaram: [[BG 5.29]] "I am the proprietor of all the lands, all the planets." So how can you say no? There must be someone proprietor.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Otherwise, there is; but you don't take, how it can be done? In the ''Bhagavad-gītā'' it is stated:


Doctor: But then God Himself has created the ego in man.
:''bhoktāraṁ yajña-tapasāṁ''
:''sarva-loka-maheśvaram''
:''suhṛdaṁ sarva-bhūtānāṁ''
:''jñātvā māṁ śāntim ṛcchati''
:([[BG 5.29 (1972)|BG 5.29]])


Prabhupāda: No, no. He has created...
This is the process. But if you don't take it . . .


Doctor: God is the creator. He's also the creator of the ego of man.
'''Doctor:''' But if that realization does not dawn . . . 'till that realization . . .


Prabhupāda: He has created ego. That is a fact, but you are utilizing the ego in a different way.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Then you go on barking. That is another thing.


Doctor: Because the realization is not there.
'''Doctor:''' (laughs) It's better to bark than to fight.


Prabhupāda: He is giving the intelligence but you are not accepting.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Then that is your satisfaction. You can do that peacefully.


Doctor: Maybe so.
'''Doctor:''' One day after barking they will come to a conclusion.


Prabhupāda: Yes. That is the difficulty. He has come to give you instruction, yadā yadā hi dharmasya glānir bhavati [[BG 4.7]] . When you forget, there is glānir, discrepancies, in the discharge of your duties, He comes to give you instruction, but you don't accept. Now what, can be done? The teacher is giving you instruction, but you don't accept. Then how you'll be educated? This is going on. Mūḍho 'yaṁ nābhijānāti loko mām ajam avyayam [[BG 4.7]] . They do not accept. They will write comments on Bhagavad-gītā in their own way. You see? Therefore we are presenting Bhagavad-gītā As It Is. Yes. As it is. Don't comment in your own way. You'll not get any profit. Take for example any law, government law. Can I comment in my own way?
'''Prabhupāda:''' No, that is . . . let it be known, fact, that that will never come, if you do not know what is the aim. That is stated in the . . . ''durāśayā ye bahir-artha-māninaḥ.'' This is, means, a bad hope, that by this external exhibition of manipulation of energy, they will come to peace. It is not possible. ''Na te viduḥ svārtha-gatiṁ hi viṣṇuṁ durāśayā ye bahir-artha-māninaḥ adānta-gobhir'' . . . ([[SB 7.5.31|SB 7.5.31]]). ''Andhā yathāndhair upanīyamānāḥ.'' This kind of leading is made by the blind leaders. If the leaders are blind and the followers are blind, what result will be there?


Doctor: No.
'''Doctor:''' That is true, sir, but that stage has not come. One day it will come. But till that stage and that realization of . . .


Prabhupāda: Then why you comment on Bhagavad-gītā?  
'''Prabhupāda:''' No, stage is there. But if the obstinate persons, they do not take it . . . here it is clearly said . . . just like Kṛṣṇa says, ''sarva-loka-maheśvaram'' ([[BG 5.29 (1972)|BG 5.29]]): "I am the proprietor of all the lands, all the planets." So how can you say no? There must be someone proprietor.


Doctor: The law is meant for obedience.
'''Doctor:''' But then God Himself has created the ego in man.


Prabhupāda: That's all. Similarly, if you accept Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Lord then whatever He has said... Just like Arjuna says, sarvam etad ṛtaṁ manye yan māṁ vadasi keśava [[BG 10.14]] . "Whatever you are saying Keśava, I accept them in toto. " That is acceptance. (end)
'''Prabhupāda:''' No, no. He has created . . .


{{CV_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}
'''Doctor:''' God is the creator. He's also the creator of the ego of man.
 
'''Prabhupāda:''' He has created ego. That is a fact. But you are utilizing the ego in a different way.
 
'''Doctor:''' Because the realization is not there.
 
'''Prabhupāda:''' He is giving the intelligence, but you are not accepting.
 
'''Doctor:''' Maybe so.
 
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes. That is the difficulty. He has come to give you instruction, ''yadā yadā hi dharmasya glānir bhavati'' ([[BG 4.7 (1972)|BG 4.7]]). When you forget—there is ''glānir'', discrepancies, in the discharge of your duties—He comes to give you instruction, but you don't accept. Now what can be done? The teacher is giving you instruction, but you don't accept. Then how you'll be educated? This is going on. ''Mūḍho nābhijānāti loko mām ajam avyayam'' ([[BG 7.25 (1972)|BG 7.25]]). They do not accept. They will write comments on ''Bhagavad-gītā'' in their own way. You see? Therefore we are presenting ''Bhagavad-gītā'' as it is. Yes. As it is. Don't comment in your own way. You'll not get any profit. Take, for example, any law, government law. Can I comment in my own way?
 
'''Doctor:''' No.
 
'''Prabhupāda:''' Then why you comment on ''Bhagavad-gītā''?
 
'''Doctor:''' The law is meant for obedience.
 
'''Prabhupāda:''' That's all. Similarly, if you accept Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Lord, then whatever He has said . . . just like Arjuna says, ''sarvam etad ṛtaṁ manye yan māṁ vadasi keśava'' ([[BG 10.14 (1972)|BG 10.14]]): "Whatever you are saying, Keśava, I accept them in total." That is acceptance.
 
'''Doctor:''' (laughs) Along this note, I'll . . . (break) (end)

Latest revision as of 04:04, 8 November 2023

His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada




760929R1-VRNDAVAN - September 29, 1976 - 24:40 Minutes



(Conversation with U.N. Doctor)

Prabhupāda: Na taj janeṣu abhijñeṣu. Abhijñaḥ janeṣu, no attachment. Vyāsadeva, Śukadeva Gosvāmī, Nārada Muni, all the ācāryas, Rāmānujācārya, they have no respect for these. They're creating their howling habits, that's all. How there can be peace?

Doctor: Now, when the Kṛṣṇa mantras . . .

Prabhupāda: Why do you say Kṛṣṇa panthā?

Doctor: No, mantras. I have come to mantra. Klīṁ kṛṣṇāya govindāya gopījanavallabhāya namaḥ. Is that not a very powerful Kṛṣṇa mantra?

Prabhupāda: Yes.

Doctor: That is better than Hare Kṛṣṇa.

Prabhupāda: No. Hare Kṛṣṇa is therefore called mahā-mantra.

Doctor: Hare Kṛṣṇa, Hare Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa Kṛṣṇa, Hare Hare.

Prabhupāda: Hare Rāma, Hare Rāma, Rāma Rāma, Hare Hare.

Doctor: This you regard as the . . . higher than any other . . .

Prabhupāda: Oh, yes. Therefore it is called mahā-mantra.

Doctor: But I was told that the Sudarśana-cakra words, mahāmāla parakramāyā maha patanivaya bhakta jane kalpanaya, that is a very powerful mantra.

Prabhupāda: Yes. Everything in relationship with God is powerful. But the name in this age is the most powerful: kīrtanād eva kṛṣṇasya mukta-saṅgaḥ paraṁ vrajet (SB 12.3.51).

Doctor: And the word oṁ has been praised in the Upaniṣads, but . . .

Prabhupāda: Oṁ, veda, praṇavaḥ sarva-vedeṣu. Kṛṣṇa says that raso 'ham apsu kaunteya prabhāsmi śaśi-sūryayoḥ praṇavaḥ sarva-vedeṣu (BG 7.8). Praṇava is oṁkāra. Sarva-vedeṣu, "That praṇava I am." That is sound representation of Kṛṣṇa.

Doctor: Then that one word as a mantra, is it not . . .

Prabhupāda: Yes.

Doctor: . . . the highest sort of word?

Prabhupāda: No. If you keep Kṛṣṇa that, "This praṇava is the sound representation of Kṛṣṇa," then it is all right. If you think it is separately powerful than Kṛṣṇa, that is nāma-aparādha.

Doctor: I understand.

Prabhupāda: Yes. If you accept it as Kṛṣṇa says that, "I am praṇava," if you do remember Kṛṣṇa by chanting oṁkāra, then it is all right.

Doctor: Otherwise, oṁ is only given to sannyāsīs?

Prabhupāda: Not necessarily. It is not mentioned there. Anyone chanting Vedic mantra, he has to begin with oṁkāra.

Doctor: All mantras begin with oṁ and end with oṁ.

Prabhupāda: Yes, oṁkāra. So sarva-vedeṣu.

Doctor: So all the essential Vedas.

Prabhupāda: Praṇavaḥ sarva-vedeṣu. This is beginning. Just like we take Bhāgavatam, oṁ namo bhagavate vāsudevāya.

Doctor:

etad akṣaraṁ brahma
etad akṣaraṁ param
etad akṣaraṁ jñātvā
yati ceti . . .

Prabhupāda: The difficulty is that we consider Kṛṣṇa is different from oṁkāra.

Doctor: That is a mistake.

Prabhupāda: That is a mistake.

Doctor: But then Kṛṣṇa is not different from Brahman.

Prabhupāda: If you take this oṁkāra as Kṛṣṇa's sound representation, then it is all right.

Doctor: Then it is as good as chanting "Kṛṣṇa."

Prabhupāda: Yes.

Doctor: But it does not give . . .

Prabhupāda: But because Kṛṣṇa is remembered, if you take oṁkāra as Kṛṣṇa's sound representation then Kṛṣṇa is remembered.

Doctor: But Kṛṣṇa is three letters. Oṁ is one.

Prabhupāda: That doesn't matter.

Doctor: In the last minute when you are dying you can feel it, easily feel it.

Prabhupāda: Kṛṣṇa has many names. Kṛṣṇa has name Govinda. It is not three letters, it is more than that. Kṛṣṇa has so many thousands names. Advaitam acyutam anādim ananta (BS 5.33). So therefore Kṛṣṇa advises for the beginners, "Just try to remember Me in this way—raso 'ham apsu kaunteya (BG 7.8): I am the taste of the water." The water you must be drinking twice, thrice, four times. So when you drink water, the taste satisfies your thirst. So if you simply remember, "This taste is Kṛṣṇa," that is Kṛṣṇa conscious.

Doctor: When you eat food, that also, the taste is Kṛṣṇa.

Prabhupāda: No, especially of the water. Kṛṣṇa is everything, but specifically He mentions, "The taste of the water I am." So you remember this.

Doctor: That's very interesting. So every time you drink water . . .

Prabhupāda: You can remember Kṛṣṇa. Where is the wrong, and what is the loss there? But you follow Kṛṣṇa's instruction. (someone enters) Yes, sit down. There is no difficulty to become Kṛṣṇa conscious. (microphone moves)

Doctor: Why do you tape record?

Hari-śauri: Everything Prabhupāda speaks we tape record, and then everyone in the world can listen.

Doctor: Someone said that the word oṁ is given to sannyāsīs, and it . . .

Prabhupāda: No, Kṛṣṇa does not say.

Doctor: It's not so.

Prabhupāda: "Someone," we don't take authority. "Someone." There are so many "someones." We don't care for them. What Kṛṣṇa says, we accept. That's all.

Doctor: But this Kaṭha-Upaniṣad praises oṁ.

etad ālambanaṁ śreṣṭhaṁ
etad ālambanaṁ param
etad ālambanaṁ jñātvā
brahma-loke mahīyate

Prabhupāda: Yes, Upaniṣad is giving lesson, counterpart of this material world. Because . . . just like you are stressing on oṁkāra because you do not give much importance to Kṛṣṇa. In the material world, Kṛṣṇa . . . they think Kṛṣṇa is one of the historical person. Avajānanti māṁ mūḍhā mānuṣīṁ tanum āśritam (BG 9.11). So Upaniṣad is teaching us in an indirect way about the importance of Kṛṣṇa. Upa-niṣat: to bring you nearby. Because you have got so many material conception, if we say that, "Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Personality of Godhead," you may not like it. Therefore . . . oṁkāra is Kṛṣṇa. So you are giving lesson on oṁkāra. Although Kṛṣṇa and oṁkāra is not different, but you'll not like Kṛṣṇa. In your present position you'll not like Kṛṣṇa's name.

Doctor: Why?

Prabhupāda: No. Therefore you are stressing . . .

Doctor: No, I have read all this, and I am trying to reconcile.

Prabhupāda: Ah. So that is for the neophytes.

Doctor: The reconciliation is there. Oṁ is Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa is oṁ.

Prabhupāda: So if Kṛṣṇa is . . . if you are convinced, then where is the objection of Hare Kṛṣṇa?

Doctor: No, no.

Prabhupāda: Why should you bring so many objections?

Doctor: Kṛṣṇas tu bhagavān svayam.

Prabhupāda: Yes, that is a fact.

Doctor: Ete cāṁśa-kalāḥ puṁsaḥ kṛṣṇas tu bhagavān svayam (SB 1.3.28).

Prabhupāda: But because I do not like, therefore Upaniṣads give another chance that, "Chant oṁkāra." That is the way. Because unless one is completely purified, he cannot understand Kṛṣṇa.

yeṣāṁ tv anta-gataṁ pāpaṁ
janānāṁ puṇya-karmaṇām
te dvandva-moha-nirmuktā
bhajante māṁ dṛḍha-vratāḥ
(BG 7.28)

Kṛṣṇa-bhajana is possible when one is completely free from all kinds of sinful activities. So not everyone is freed from sinful activities. Therefore the indirect way. Otherwise, Upaniṣad is Veda.

Doctor: Based on Vedas. Right.

Prabhupāda: Based. Kṛṣṇa says, vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyam (BG 15.15). By studying Vedas, Upaniṣads, if you do not understand Kṛṣṇa, that means your study is not complete. Bahūnāṁ janmanām ante jñānavān māṁ prapadyate (BG 7.19). After studying this indirect information of Kṛṣṇa, when one is actually a learned, wise man, he surrenders to Kṛṣṇa. Vāsudevaḥ sarvam iti sa mahātmā sudurlabhaḥ (BG 7.19). That is very rarely found. This is fact. So if one is intelligent, that if only the most intelligent person, after many, many births one has to surrender to Kṛṣṇa, why not do it immediately? Why shall I wait for many, many births? That is intelligence.

Doctor: Śrī-kṛṣṇas tu śaraṇaṁ mama.

Prabhupāda: Vāsudevaḥ sarvam iti (BG 7.19). That is intelligence. But that intelligence is not possible for ordinary persons. Sa mahātmā sudurlabhaḥ. One who gets this intelligence, such kind of mahātmā is very, very rarely found. To take it immediately, ah, kṛṣṇas tu bhagavān svayam (SB 1.3.28), vāsudevaḥ sarvam iti, that is very difficult.

manuṣyāṇāṁ sahasreṣu
kaścid yatati siddhaye
yatatām api siddhānāṁ
kaścin vetti māṁ tattvataḥ
(BG 7.3)

It is not so easy to understand Kṛṣṇa or to accept Kṛṣṇa as all in all. Vāsudevaḥ sarvam. But if you take it, you are fortunate.

Doctor: And the only way to attain is reciting the name.

Prabhupāda: Yes. Kṛṣṇa says, man-manā bhava mad-bhakto mad-yājī māṁ namaskuru (BG 18.65). Do that. Therefore the temple is there. Everyone may come and see Kṛṣṇa and think of Him. What is the difficulty? But he'll not come. He has concluded Kṛṣṇa is nirākāra. God is nirākāra.

Doctor: Then Kṛṣṇa will not come.

Prabhupāda: Well, now, Kṛṣṇa . . . you . . . whatever you think, that is your business, but Kṛṣṇa is there everywhere.

Doctor: He is nirākāra and sākāra.

Prabhupāda: Nirākāra means He has no material ākāra. That is nirākāra. Ākāra means we have got . . . just like I have conception of you. So this ākāra is your material ākāra. It is not your real ākāra. Dehino 'smin yathā dehe (BG 2.13). The real person is within the body, but we have no connection with the real body. We see this outward . . . just like seeing his dress, his . . . that's all.

Doctor: How to find the . . .? How to get to the ātman, the inner body?

Prabhupāda: Yes, that is the first instruction in the Bhagavad-gītā, that first of all, try to understand what is the person. So because we have no eyes to see, indirectly, dehino 'smin yathā dehe kaumāram . . . (BG 2.13). Na hanyate hanyamāne śarīre (BG 2.20). Antavanta ime dehā nityasyoktāḥ śarīriṇaḥ (BG 2.18). So many things. Nainaṁ dahati pāvakaḥ. So many indirect way because we cannot directly perceive.

Doctor: Nainaṁ chindanti śastrāṇi nainaṁ dahati pāvakaḥ (BG 2.23).

Prabhupāda: What is called? Definition by negation. Nainaṁ chindanti—negation. So that you can have some idea.

Doctor: Of what it is.

Prabhupāda: It is not material. Because matter, chindanti, any matter, it can be destroyed. It can be cut into pieces, it can be melted in fire, it can be moistened. So when we cannot understand things, it is given in the definition of negation.

Doctor: But then it's much better to worship God in form.

Prabhupāda: Yes, that is intelligence. If you accept Kṛṣṇa immediately, man-manā bhava mad . . . then your life is successful. Kṛṣṇa says, man-manā bhava mad-bhakto mad-yājī māṁ namaskuru, mām evaiṣyasi asaṁśaya (BG 18.65), He said. But they are not interested. Avajānanti māṁ mūḍhāḥ (BG 9.11). "Ah, Kṛṣṇa is a historical person. Why shall I think of Him? I shall think of oṁkāra." You cannot think of oṁkāra. You can hear. And as soon as you think of oṁkāra, it comes form. There is no impersonality. It again becomes personal. So they want to avoid personality and as well as think of Him—it becomes a very troublesome job. Kleśo 'dhikataras teṣām avyaktāsakta-cetasām (BG 12.5). They cannot think of avyakta, impersonal. But they are trying to think of. And that is a very troublesome job. Kleśala eva avaśiṣyate. Such attempt means he simply gets the result of his hard endeavor. That's all. He doesn't get any substance.

Doctor: So with faith accept the . . .

Prabhupāda: No faith—it is fact. Faith is blind.

Doctor: Faith is blind.

Prabhupāda: Yes. Faith with good knowledge, that is nice. If you have good knowledge of Kṛṣṇa and you have faith, that is very good. But if you . . . just like Māyāvādīs, they say: "Imagine Kṛṣṇa as God." They say: "Imagine."

Doctor: That is no good.

Prabhupāda: They are no good. Kalpana. They say kalpana. Sādhakānāṁ gitarthaya brahma-rūpa-kalpana. Rūpa-kalpana. But Kṛṣṇa's rūpa is not kalpana; it is fact. So kalpana is not faith, it is blind. "Let me imagine some form of Kṛṣṇa." And therefore gradually, they come down to the position that any form you imagine as God, that is all right. They have come to this degradation.

Doctor: That you can, any form . . .

Prabhupāda: Yes. Any form you imagine that he is God, that will give you success. They say like that.

Doctor: I think I have taken too much of time.

Prabhupāda: I am going there at six.

Doctor: Words of enlightenment.

Hari-śauri: Have you got any of Prabhupāda's books?

Doctor: I have got some. I bought all the volumes of translation of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. I have got all of them. But some of them have not arrived from United States, the latest ones. And I have got . . .

Hari-śauri: Bhagavad-gītā. That's very nice.

Prabhupāda: You are staying in New Delhi?

Doctor: I stay in the Hague and come to New Delhi when there are no cases.

Prabhupāda: Hague?

Doctor: Holland.

Prabhupāda: Holland. That is the international court?

Doctor: Yes, the court case located, the headquarters.

Prabhupāda: I went somewhere, that is also international. In Geneva, I think. Is there any . . .?

Doctor: Geneva is another headquarters of the . . . of the United Nations. New York, Geneva. But the court is in the Hague.

Prabhupāda: So I went to that place in Geneva.

Doctor: Geneva has got so many specialized agencies of the United Nations, like the I.L.O. and so on.

Prabhupāda: Do you think United Nation is making any tangible progress?

Doctor: Sir, it at least brings people together under one umbrella to discuss. If you did not have that . . .

Prabhupāda: But discussion, that I have already explained.

Doctor: Sir, maybe, but if you don't discuss, you'll fight. Because if aim we don't meet at all, then they will have the struggle.

Prabhupāda: No. If you have no idea how to come to the conclusion, ciraṁ vicinvan (SB 10.14.29), you can forever go on discussing, you'll never come . . . you do not know what is the aim. Na te viduḥ svārtha-gatiṁ hi viṣṇuṁ durāśayā ye bahir-artha-māninaḥ (SB 7.5.31).

Doctor: May be so, but if two people instead of coming to blows come together to talk, it is a step in the right direction.

Prabhupāda: No right direction, because he does not know what is the aim.

Doctor: They both want to have peace, so they at least try to . . .

Prabhupāda: Everyone wants that. But if he does not know how to attain peace, then you'll go on discussing forever. That is going on.

Doctor: But it is still a step in the right direction . . .

Prabhupāda: I don't think there is any advancement.

Doctor: . . . otherwise, what is the aim?

Prabhupāda: Otherwise, there is; but you don't take, how it can be done? In the Bhagavad-gītā it is stated:

bhoktāraṁ yajña-tapasāṁ
sarva-loka-maheśvaram
suhṛdaṁ sarva-bhūtānāṁ
jñātvā māṁ śāntim ṛcchati
(BG 5.29)

This is the process. But if you don't take it . . .

Doctor: But if that realization does not dawn . . . 'till that realization . . .

Prabhupāda: Then you go on barking. That is another thing.

Doctor: (laughs) It's better to bark than to fight.

Prabhupāda: Then that is your satisfaction. You can do that peacefully.

Doctor: One day after barking they will come to a conclusion.

Prabhupāda: No, that is . . . let it be known, fact, that that will never come, if you do not know what is the aim. That is stated in the . . . durāśayā ye bahir-artha-māninaḥ. This is, means, a bad hope, that by this external exhibition of manipulation of energy, they will come to peace. It is not possible. Na te viduḥ svārtha-gatiṁ hi viṣṇuṁ durāśayā ye bahir-artha-māninaḥ adānta-gobhir . . . (SB 7.5.31). Andhā yathāndhair upanīyamānāḥ. This kind of leading is made by the blind leaders. If the leaders are blind and the followers are blind, what result will be there?

Doctor: That is true, sir, but that stage has not come. One day it will come. But till that stage and that realization of . . .

Prabhupāda: No, stage is there. But if the obstinate persons, they do not take it . . . here it is clearly said . . . just like Kṛṣṇa says, sarva-loka-maheśvaram (BG 5.29): "I am the proprietor of all the lands, all the planets." So how can you say no? There must be someone proprietor.

Doctor: But then God Himself has created the ego in man.

Prabhupāda: No, no. He has created . . .

Doctor: God is the creator. He's also the creator of the ego of man.

Prabhupāda: He has created ego. That is a fact. But you are utilizing the ego in a different way.

Doctor: Because the realization is not there.

Prabhupāda: He is giving the intelligence, but you are not accepting.

Doctor: Maybe so.

Prabhupāda: Yes. That is the difficulty. He has come to give you instruction, yadā yadā hi dharmasya glānir bhavati (BG 4.7). When you forget—there is glānir, discrepancies, in the discharge of your duties—He comes to give you instruction, but you don't accept. Now what can be done? The teacher is giving you instruction, but you don't accept. Then how you'll be educated? This is going on. Mūḍho nābhijānāti loko mām ajam avyayam (BG 7.25). They do not accept. They will write comments on Bhagavad-gītā in their own way. You see? Therefore we are presenting Bhagavad-gītā as it is. Yes. As it is. Don't comment in your own way. You'll not get any profit. Take, for example, any law, government law. Can I comment in my own way?

Doctor: No.

Prabhupāda: Then why you comment on Bhagavad-gītā?

Doctor: The law is meant for obedience.

Prabhupāda: That's all. Similarly, if you accept Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Lord, then whatever He has said . . . just like Arjuna says, sarvam etad ṛtaṁ manye yan māṁ vadasi keśava (BG 10.14): "Whatever you are saying, Keśava, I accept them in total." That is acceptance.

Doctor: (laughs) Along this note, I'll . . . (break) (end)