SB 4.3.1: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision(s)) |
(Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{info | {{info | ||
|speaker= | |speaker=Maitreya Ṛṣi | ||
|listener= | |listener=Vidura | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam - Canto 04 Chapter 03|S01]] | |||
[[Category:Bhagavatam Verses Spoken by Maitreya Rsi - Vanisource|040301]] | |||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Srimad-Bhagavatam]] - [[SB 4|Fourth Canto]] - [[SB 4.3: Talks Between Lord Siva and Sati|Chapter 3: Talks Between Lord Śiva and Satī]]'''</div> | |||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 4.2.35]] '''[[SB 4.2.35]] - [[SB 4.3.2]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 4.3.2]]</div> | |||
{{RandomImage}} | |||
==== TEXT 1 ==== | ==== TEXT 1 ==== | ||
<div | <div class="verse"> | ||
maitreya uvāca | :maitreya uvāca | ||
sadā vidviṣator evaṁ | :sadā vidviṣator evaṁ | ||
kālo vai dhriyamāṇayoḥ | :kālo vai dhriyamāṇayoḥ | ||
jāmātuḥ śvaśurasyāpi | :jāmātuḥ śvaśurasyāpi | ||
sumahān aticakrame | :sumahān aticakrame | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 23: | ||
==== SYNONYMS ==== | ==== SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
maitreyaḥ | ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=maitreyaḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 maitreyaḥ] [//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=uvāca&tab=syno_o&ds=1 uvāca]'' — Maitreya said; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=sadā&tab=syno_o&ds=1 sadā]'' — constantly; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=vidviṣatoḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 vidviṣatoḥ]'' — the tension; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=evam&tab=syno_o&ds=1 evam]'' — in this manner; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kālaḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kālaḥ]'' — time; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=vai&tab=syno_o&ds=1 vai]'' — certainly; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=dhriyamāṇayoḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 dhriyamāṇayoḥ]'' — continued to bear; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=jāmātuḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 jāmātuḥ]'' — of the son-in-law; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=śvaśurasya&tab=syno_o&ds=1 śvaśurasya]'' — of the father-in-law; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=api&tab=syno_o&ds=1 api]'' — even; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=su&tab=syno_o&ds=1 su]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=mahān&tab=syno_o&ds=1 mahān]'' — a very great; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=aticakrame&tab=syno_o&ds=1 aticakrame]'' — passed. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 24: | Line 30: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div | <div class="translation"> | ||
Maitreya continued: In this manner the tension between the father-in-law and son-in-law, Dakṣa and Lord Śiva, continued for a considerably long period. | Maitreya continued: In this manner the tension between the father-in-law and son-in-law, Dakṣa and Lord Śiva, continued for a considerably long period. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 37: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div | <div class="purport"> | ||
The previous chapter has already explained that Vidura questioned the sage Maitreya as to the cause of the misunderstanding between Lord Śiva and Dakṣa. Another question is why the strife between Dakṣa and his son-in-law caused Sati to destroy her body. The chief reason for Satī's giving up her body was that her father, Dakṣa, began another sacrificial performance, to which Lord Śiva was not invited at all. Generally, when any sacrifice is performed, although each and every sacrifice is intended to pacify the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu, all the demigods, especially Lord Brahmā and Lord Śiva and the other principal demigods, such as Indra and Candra, are invited, and they take part. It is said that unless all the demigods are present, no sacrifice is complete. But in the tension between the father-in-law and son-in-law, Dakṣa began another yajña performance, to which Lord Śiva was not invited. Dakṣa was the chief progenitor employed by Lord Brahmā, and he was a son of Brahmā, so he had a high position and was also very proud. | The previous chapter has already explained that Vidura questioned the sage Maitreya as to the cause of the misunderstanding between Lord Śiva and Dakṣa. Another question is why the strife between Dakṣa and his son-in-law caused Sati to destroy her body. The chief reason for Satī's giving up her body was that her father, Dakṣa, began another sacrificial performance, to which Lord Śiva was not invited at all. Generally, when any sacrifice is performed, although each and every sacrifice is intended to pacify the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu, all the demigods, especially Lord Brahmā and Lord Śiva and the other principal demigods, such as Indra and Candra, are invited, and they take part. It is said that unless all the demigods are present, no sacrifice is complete. But in the tension between the father-in-law and son-in-law, Dakṣa began another ''yajña'' performance, to which Lord Śiva was not invited. Dakṣa was the chief progenitor employed by Lord Brahmā, and he was a son of Brahmā, so he had a high position and was also very proud. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 4.2.35]] '''[[SB 4.2.35]] - [[SB 4.3.2]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 4.3.2]]</div> | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | |||
Latest revision as of 21:48, 18 February 2024
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
TEXT 1
- maitreya uvāca
- sadā vidviṣator evaṁ
- kālo vai dhriyamāṇayoḥ
- jāmātuḥ śvaśurasyāpi
- sumahān aticakrame
SYNONYMS
maitreyaḥ uvāca — Maitreya said; sadā — constantly; vidviṣatoḥ — the tension; evam — in this manner; kālaḥ — time; vai — certainly; dhriyamāṇayoḥ — continued to bear; jāmātuḥ — of the son-in-law; śvaśurasya — of the father-in-law; api — even; su-mahān — a very great; aticakrame — passed.
TRANSLATION
Maitreya continued: In this manner the tension between the father-in-law and son-in-law, Dakṣa and Lord Śiva, continued for a considerably long period.
PURPORT
The previous chapter has already explained that Vidura questioned the sage Maitreya as to the cause of the misunderstanding between Lord Śiva and Dakṣa. Another question is why the strife between Dakṣa and his son-in-law caused Sati to destroy her body. The chief reason for Satī's giving up her body was that her father, Dakṣa, began another sacrificial performance, to which Lord Śiva was not invited at all. Generally, when any sacrifice is performed, although each and every sacrifice is intended to pacify the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu, all the demigods, especially Lord Brahmā and Lord Śiva and the other principal demigods, such as Indra and Candra, are invited, and they take part. It is said that unless all the demigods are present, no sacrifice is complete. But in the tension between the father-in-law and son-in-law, Dakṣa began another yajña performance, to which Lord Śiva was not invited. Dakṣa was the chief progenitor employed by Lord Brahmā, and he was a son of Brahmā, so he had a high position and was also very proud.