Go to Vaniquotes | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia


Vanisource - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge


SB 1.7.43: Difference between revisions

m (1 revision(s))
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{SB_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{info
{{info
|speaker=Queen Draupadi
|speaker=Queen Draupadī
|listener=Lord Krsna the Supreme Personality of Godhead and Arjuna
|listener=Lord Kṛṣṇa the Supreme Personality of Godhead and Arjuna
}}
}}
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam - Canto 01 Chapter 07]]
[[Category:Bhagavatam Verses Spoken by Queen Draupadi - Vanisource|010743]]
<div style="float:left">'''[[Srimad-Bhagavatam]] - [[SB 1|First Canto]] - [[SB 1.7: The Son of Drona Punished|Chapter 7: The Son of Droṇa Punished]]'''</div>
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.7.42]] '''[[SB 1.7.42]] - [[SB 1.7.44]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.7.44]]</div>
{{CompareVersions|SB|1.7.43|SB 1964|SB 1972-77}}
{{RandomImage}}


==== TEXT 43 ====
==== TEXT 43 ====


<div id="text">
<div class="verse">
uvāca cāsahanty asya<br>
:uvāca cāsahanty asya
bandhanānayanaṁ satī<br>
:bandhanānayanaṁ satī
mucyatāṁ mucyatām eṣa<br>
:mucyatāṁ mucyatām eṣa
brāhmaṇo nitarāṁ guruḥ<br>
:brāhmaṇo nitarāṁ guruḥ
</div>
</div>


Line 17: Line 23:
==== SYNONYMS ====
==== SYNONYMS ====


<div id="synonyms">
<div class="synonyms">
uvāca—said; ca—and; asahantī—being unbearable for her; asya—his; bandhana—being bound; ānayanam—bringing him; satī—the devoted; mucyatām mucyatām—just get him released; eṣaḥ—this; brāhmaṇaḥ—a brāhmaṇa; nitarām—our; guruḥ—teacher.
''uvāca''—said; ''ca''—and; ''asahantī''—being unbearable for her; ''asya''—his; ''bandhana''—being bound; ''ānayanam''—bringing him; ''satī''—the devoted; ''mucyatām mucyatām''—just get him released; ''eṣaḥ''—this; ''brāhmaṇaḥ''—a ''brāhmaṇa''; ''nitarām''—our; ''guruḥ''—teacher.
</div>
</div>


Line 24: Line 30:
==== TRANSLATION ====
==== TRANSLATION ====


<div id="translation">
<div class="translation">
She could not tolerate Aśvatthāmā's being bound by ropes, and being a devoted lady, she said: Release him, for he is a brāhmaṇa, our spiritual master.
She could not tolerate Aśvatthāmā's being bound by ropes, and being a devoted lady, she said: Release him, for he is a brāhmaṇa, our spiritual master.
</div>
</div>
Line 31: Line 37:
==== PURPORT ====
==== PURPORT ====


<div id="purport">
<div class="purport">
As soon as Aśvatthāmā was brought before Draupadī, she thought it intolerable that a brāhmaṇa should be arrested like a culprit and brought before her in that condition, especially when the brāhmaṇa happened to be a teacher's son.
As soon as Aśvatthāmā was brought before Draupadī, she thought it intolerable that a ''brāhmaṇa'' should be arrested like a culprit and brought before her in that condition, especially when the ''brāhmaṇa'' happened to be a teacher's son.


Arjuna arrested Aśvatthāmā knowing perfectly well that he was the son of Droṇācārya. Kṛṣṇa also knew him to be so, but both of them condemned the murderer without consideration of his being the son of a brāhmaṇa. According to revealed scriptures, a teacher or spiritual master is liable to be rejected if he proves himself unworthy of the position of a guru or spiritual master. A guru is called also an ācārya, or a person who has personally assimilated all the essence of śāstras and has helped his disciples to adopt the ways. Aśvatthāmā failed to discharge the duties of a brāhmaṇa or teacher, and therefore he was liable to be rejected from the exalted position of a brāhmaṇa. On this consideration, both Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna were right in condemning Aśvatthāmā. But to a good lady like Draupadī, the matter was considered not from the angle of śāstric vision, but as a matter of custom. By custom, Aśvatthāmā was offered the same respect as offered to his father. It was so because generally the people accept the son of a brāhmaṇa as a real brāhmaṇa, by sentiment only. Factually the matter is different. A brāhmaṇa is accepted on the merit of qualification and not on the merit of simply being the son of a brāhmaṇa.
Arjuna arrested Aśvatthāmā knowing perfectly well that he was the son of Droṇācārya. Kṛṣṇa also knew him to be so, but both of them condemned the murderer without consideration of his being the son of a ''brāhmaṇa''. According to revealed scriptures, a teacher or spiritual master is liable to be rejected if he proves himself unworthy of the position of a guru or spiritual master. A ''guru'' is called also an ''ācārya'', or a person who has personally assimilated all the essence of ''śāstras'' and has helped his disciples to adopt the ways. Aśvatthāmā failed to discharge the duties of a ''brāhmaṇa'' or teacher, and therefore he was liable to be rejected from the exalted position of a ''brāhmaṇa''. On this consideration, both Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna were right in condemning Aśvatthāmā. But to a good lady like Draupadī, the matter was considered not from the angle of ''śāstric'' vision, but as a matter of custom. By custom, Aśvatthāmā was offered the same respect as offered to his father. It was so because generally the people accept the son of a ''brāhmaṇa'' as a real ''brāhmaṇa'', by sentiment only. Factually the matter is different. A ''brāhmaṇa'' is accepted on the merit of qualification and not on the merit of simply being the son of a ''brāhmaṇa''.


But in spite of all this, Draupadī desired that Aśvatthāmā be at once released, and it was all the same a good sentiment for her. This means that a devotee of the Lord can tolerate all sorts of tribulation personally, but still such devotees are never unkind to others, even to the enemy. These are the characteristics of one who is a pure devotee of the Lord.
But in spite of all this, Draupadī desired that Aśvatthāmā be at once released, and it was all the same a good sentiment for her. This means that a devotee of the Lord can tolerate all sorts of tribulation personally, but still such devotees are never unkind to others, even to the enemy. These are the characteristics of one who is a pure devotee of the Lord.
</div>
</div>
__NOTOC__{{SB_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}
 
 
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.7.42]] '''[[SB 1.7.42]] - [[SB 1.7.44]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.7.44]]</div>
__NOTOC__
__NOEDITSECTION__

Revision as of 12:10, 30 April 2021



His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada



TEXT 43

uvāca cāsahanty asya
bandhanānayanaṁ satī
mucyatāṁ mucyatām eṣa
brāhmaṇo nitarāṁ guruḥ


SYNONYMS

uvāca—said; ca—and; asahantī—being unbearable for her; asya—his; bandhana—being bound; ānayanam—bringing him; satī—the devoted; mucyatām mucyatām—just get him released; eṣaḥ—this; brāhmaṇaḥ—a brāhmaṇa; nitarām—our; guruḥ—teacher.


TRANSLATION

She could not tolerate Aśvatthāmā's being bound by ropes, and being a devoted lady, she said: Release him, for he is a brāhmaṇa, our spiritual master.


PURPORT

As soon as Aśvatthāmā was brought before Draupadī, she thought it intolerable that a brāhmaṇa should be arrested like a culprit and brought before her in that condition, especially when the brāhmaṇa happened to be a teacher's son.

Arjuna arrested Aśvatthāmā knowing perfectly well that he was the son of Droṇācārya. Kṛṣṇa also knew him to be so, but both of them condemned the murderer without consideration of his being the son of a brāhmaṇa. According to revealed scriptures, a teacher or spiritual master is liable to be rejected if he proves himself unworthy of the position of a guru or spiritual master. A guru is called also an ācārya, or a person who has personally assimilated all the essence of śāstras and has helped his disciples to adopt the ways. Aśvatthāmā failed to discharge the duties of a brāhmaṇa or teacher, and therefore he was liable to be rejected from the exalted position of a brāhmaṇa. On this consideration, both Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna were right in condemning Aśvatthāmā. But to a good lady like Draupadī, the matter was considered not from the angle of śāstric vision, but as a matter of custom. By custom, Aśvatthāmā was offered the same respect as offered to his father. It was so because generally the people accept the son of a brāhmaṇa as a real brāhmaṇa, by sentiment only. Factually the matter is different. A brāhmaṇa is accepted on the merit of qualification and not on the merit of simply being the son of a brāhmaṇa.

But in spite of all this, Draupadī desired that Aśvatthāmā be at once released, and it was all the same a good sentiment for her. This means that a devotee of the Lord can tolerate all sorts of tribulation personally, but still such devotees are never unkind to others, even to the enemy. These are the characteristics of one who is a pure devotee of the Lord.



... more about "SB 1.7.43"
Queen Draupadī +
Lord Kṛṣṇa the Supreme Personality of Godhead and Arjuna +