Go to Vaniquotes | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia


Vanisource - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge


SB 1.6.18 (1962): Difference between revisions

(Created page with '<div style="float:left">'''Goto SB 1.6.18 Current Edition'''</div> <div style="float:right">link='''SB 1.6.17 (1962) - - - [[SB 1.6.19 …')
 
(Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float:left">'''[[SB 1.6.18|Goto SB 1.6.18 Current Edition]]'''</div>
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam (1962-1965) - Canto 01 Chapter 06]]
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=]]'''[[SB 1.6.17 (1962)]] - - - [[SB 1.6.19 (1962)]]'''[[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.6.19 (1962)]]</div>
<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB (1962) Sixth Chapter - Conversation Between Narada & Vyasa]] '''[[SB (1962) Sixth Chapter - Conversation Between Narada & Vyasa]]'''</div>
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.6.17 (1962)]] '''[[SB 1.6.17 (1962)]] - [[SB 1.6.19 (1962)]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.6.19 (1962)]]</div>
{{CompareVersions|SB|1.6.18|SB 1962|SB 1972-77}}
{{RandomImage}}
{{RandomImage}}


Line 6: Line 8:
==== TEXT No. 18 ====
==== TEXT No. 18 ====


<div class="SB65verse">
Rupam bhagavato jat manah kantam suchapaham
apasyan sahasa uttasthe baiklabyad durmanaiva.
</div>


<div align=center>
''Rupam bhagavato jat manah kantam suchapaham''<br>
''apasyan sahasa uttasthe baiklabyad durmanaiva.''<br>
</div>


==== ENGLISH SYNONYMS ====
==== ENGLISH SYNONYMS ====


 
<div class="synonyms">
<div id="synonyms">
Rupam—form, Bhagavoto—of the Personality of Godhead, Jat—as it is, Tat—that, Manah—of the mind, Kantam—as it desires, Suchapaham—vanishing all disparity, Apasyan—with out seeing, Sahasa—all of a sudden, Uttasthe—got up. Baiklabyat—being perturbed, Durmana—having lost the desirable, Iva—as it were.
Rupam—form, Bhagavoto—of the Personality of Godhead, Jat—as it is, Tat—that, Manah—of the mind, Kantam—as it desires, Suchapaham—vanishing all disparity, Apasyan—with out seeing, Sahasa—all of a sudden, Uttasthe—got up. Baiklabyat—being perturbed, Durmana—having lost the desirable, Iva—as it were.
</div>
</div>
Line 22: Line 23:
==== TRANSLATION ====
==== TRANSLATION ====


 
<div class="translation">
<div id="translation">
The transcendental form of the Lord, as it is, is just apt to the mind by its desire and is at once vanishing all disparity of the mind. Having not seen that form again all of a sudden I got up being perturbed in the mind as it happens after losing the desirable.
The transcendental form of the Lord, as it is, is just apt to the mind by its desire and is at once vanishing all disparity of the mind. Having not seen that form again all of a sudden I got up being perturbed in the mind as it happens after losing the desirable.
</div>
</div>
Line 30: Line 30:
==== PURPORT ====
==== PURPORT ====


 
<div class="purport">
<div id="purport">
The Lord is not Formless is experienced by Narada Muni. But His Form is completely different from all forms of our material experience. For the whole duration of our life we go on seeing different cut and forms in the material world but none of them is just apt to the mind neither anyone of them could vanish all disparity of the mind. These are the special features of the transcendental form of the Lord and one who has once seen that Form is satisfied for good and no Form of the material world can any more satisfy the seer. Therefore Formless or impersonal means nothing like the material form neither He is like anyone of the material Personality.
The Lord is not Formless is experienced by Narada Muni. But His Form is completely different from all forms of our material experience. For the whole duration of our life we go on seeing different cut and forms in the material world but none of them is just apt to the mind neither anyone of them could vanish all disparity of the mind. These are the special features of the transcendental form of the Lord and one who has once seen that Form is satisfied for good and no Form of the material world can any more satisfy the seer. Therefore Formless or impersonal means nothing like the material form neither He is like anyone of the material Personality.


Line 38: Line 37:




<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1962 Sixth Chapter - Conversation Between Narada & Vyasa]]'''[[SB 1962 Sixth Chapter - Conversation Between Narada & Vyasa|1962 Sixth Chapter Index]]'''</div>
<div style="float:left">'''[[SB 1.6.18|(Compare SB 1.6.18 Current Edition)]]'''</div>
<div style="float:right">'''[[SB 1.6.19 (1962)]]'''[[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.6.19 (1962)]]</div>
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.6.17 (1962)]] '''[[SB 1.6.17 (1962)]] - [[SB 1.6.19 (1962)]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.6.19 (1962)]]</div>
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
__NOEDITSECTION__

Latest revision as of 11:33, 25 May 2020



His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada



TEXT No. 18

Rupam bhagavato jat manah kantam suchapaham apasyan sahasa uttasthe baiklabyad durmanaiva.


ENGLISH SYNONYMS

Rupam—form, Bhagavoto—of the Personality of Godhead, Jat—as it is, Tat—that, Manah—of the mind, Kantam—as it desires, Suchapaham—vanishing all disparity, Apasyan—with out seeing, Sahasa—all of a sudden, Uttasthe—got up. Baiklabyat—being perturbed, Durmana—having lost the desirable, Iva—as it were.


TRANSLATION

The transcendental form of the Lord, as it is, is just apt to the mind by its desire and is at once vanishing all disparity of the mind. Having not seen that form again all of a sudden I got up being perturbed in the mind as it happens after losing the desirable.


PURPORT

The Lord is not Formless is experienced by Narada Muni. But His Form is completely different from all forms of our material experience. For the whole duration of our life we go on seeing different cut and forms in the material world but none of them is just apt to the mind neither anyone of them could vanish all disparity of the mind. These are the special features of the transcendental form of the Lord and one who has once seen that Form is satisfied for good and no Form of the material world can any more satisfy the seer. Therefore Formless or impersonal means nothing like the material form neither He is like anyone of the material Personality.

As spiritual beings, having eternal relation with that transcendental Form of the Lord we are, life after life, searching after that Form of the Lord and we are not satisfied by any form of material appeasement. Narada Muni got a glympse of this and he got the desirable of life but having not seen the same again he became perturbed in the mind and stood up all of a sudden to search out the lost desirable. What we desire life after life was obtained by Narada Muni and having lost sight of Him again was certainly a great sock for Him.