Go to Vaniquotes | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia


Vanisource - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge


SB 1.5.14: Difference between revisions

m (1 revision(s))
 
(Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{SB_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{info
{{info
|speaker=Narada Muni
|speaker=Nārada Muni
|listener=Srila Vyasadeva
|listener=Śrīla Vyāsadeva
}}
}}
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam - Canto 01 Chapter 05]]
[[Category:Bhagavatam Verses Spoken by Narada Muni - Vanisource|010514]]
<div style="float:left">'''[[Srimad-Bhagavatam]] - [[SB 1|First Canto]] - [[SB 1.5: Narada's Instructions on Srimad-Bhagavatam for Vyasadeva|Chapter 5: Nārada's Instructions on Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam for Vyāsadeva]]'''</div>
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.5.13]] '''[[SB 1.5.13]] - [[SB 1.5.15]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.5.15]]</div>
{{CompareVersions|SB|1.5.14|SB 1962|SB 1972-77}}
{{RandomImage}}


==== TEXT 14 ====
==== TEXT 14 ====


<div id="text">
<div class="verse">
tato 'nyathā kiñcana yad vivakṣataḥ<br>
:tato 'nyathā kiñcana yad vivakṣataḥ
pṛthag dṛśas tat-kṛta-rūpa-nāmabhiḥ<br>
:pṛthag dṛśas tat-kṛta-rūpa-nāmabhiḥ
na karhicit kvāpi ca duḥsthitā matir<br>
:na karhicit kvāpi ca duḥsthitā matir
labheta vātāhata-naur ivāspadam<br>
:labheta vātāhata-naur ivāspadam
</div>
</div>


Line 17: Line 23:
==== SYNONYMS ====
==== SYNONYMS ====


<div id="synonyms">
<div class="synonyms">
tataḥ—from that; anyathā—apart; kiñcana—something; yat—whatsoever; vivakṣataḥ—desiring to describe; pṛthak—separately; dṛśaḥ—vision; tat-kṛta—reactionary to that; rūpa—form; nāmabhiḥ—by names; na karhicit—never; kvāpi—any; ca—and; duḥsthitā matiḥ—oscillating mind; labheta—gains; vāta-āhata—troubled by the wind; nauḥ—boat; iva—like; āspadam—place.
''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=tataḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 tataḥ]'' — from that; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=anyathā&tab=syno_o&ds=1 anyathā]'' — apart; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kiñcana&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kiñcana]'' — something; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=yat&tab=syno_o&ds=1 yat]'' — whatsoever; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=vivakṣataḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 vivakṣataḥ]'' — desiring to describe; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=pṛthak&tab=syno_o&ds=1 pṛthak]'' — separately; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=dṛśaḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 dṛśaḥ]'' — vision; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=tat&tab=syno_o&ds=1 tat]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kṛta&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kṛta]'' — reactionary to that; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=rūpa&tab=syno_o&ds=1 rūpa]'' — form; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=nāmabhiḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 nāmabhiḥ]'' — by names; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=na&tab=syno_o&ds=1 na] [//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=karhicit&tab=syno_o&ds=1 karhicit]'' — never; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kvāpi&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kvāpi]'' — any; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=ca&tab=syno_o&ds=1 ca]'' — and; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=duḥsthitā&tab=syno_o&ds=1 duḥsthitā] [//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=matiḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 matiḥ]'' — oscillating mind; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=labheta&tab=syno_o&ds=1 labheta]'' — gains; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=vāta&tab=syno_o&ds=1 vāta]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=āhata&tab=syno_o&ds=1 āhata]'' — troubled by the wind; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=nauḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 nauḥ]'' — boat; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=iva&tab=syno_o&ds=1 iva]'' — like; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=āspadam&tab=syno_o&ds=1 āspadam]'' — place.
</div>
</div>


Line 24: Line 30:
==== TRANSLATION ====
==== TRANSLATION ====


<div id="translation">
<div class="translation">
Whatever you desire to describe that is separate in vision from the Lord simply reacts, with different forms, names and results, to agitate the mind as the wind agitates a boat which has no resting place.
Whatever you desire to describe that is separate in vision from the Lord simply reacts, with different forms, names and results, to agitate the mind as the wind agitates a boat which has no resting place.
</div>
</div>
Line 31: Line 37:
==== PURPORT ====
==== PURPORT ====


<div id="purport">
<div class="purport">
Śrī Vyāsadeva is the editor of all descriptions of the Vedic literatures, and thus he has described transcendental realization in different ways, namely by fruitive activities, speculative knowledge, mystic power and devotional service. Besides that, in his various Purāṇas he has recommended the worship of so many demigods in different forms and names. The result is that people in general are puzzled how to fix their minds in the service of the Lord; they are always disturbed about finding the real path of self-realization. Śrīla Nāradadeva is stressing this particular defect in the Vedic literatures compiled by Vyāsadeva, and thus he is trying to emphasize describing everything in relation with the Supreme Lord, and no one else. In fact, there is nothing existent except the Lord. The Lord is manifested in different expansions. He is the root of the complete tree. He is the stomach of the complete body. Pouring water on the root is the right process to water the tree, as much as feeding the stomach supplies energy to all parts of the body. Therefore, Śrīla Vyāsadeva should not have compiled any Purāṇas other than the Bhāgavata Purāṇa because a slight deviation from that may create havoc for self-realization. If a slight deviation can create such havoc, then what to speak of deliberate expansion of the ideas separate from the Absolute Truth Personality of Godhead. The most defective part of worshiping demigods is that it creates a definite conception of pantheism, ending disastrously in many religious sects detrimental to the progress of the principles of the Bhāgavatam, which alone can give the accurate direction for self-realization in eternal relation with the Personality of Godhead by devotional service in transcendental love. The example of the boat disturbed by whirling wind is suitable in this respect. The diverted mind of the pantheist can never reach the perfection of self-realization, due to the disturbed condition of the selection of object.
Śrī Vyāsadeva is the editor of all descriptions of the Vedic literatures, and thus he has described transcendental realization in different ways, namely by fruitive activities, speculative knowledge, mystic power and devotional service. Besides that, in his various ''Purāṇas'' he has recommended the worship of so many demigods in different forms and names. The result is that people in general are puzzled how to fix their minds in the service of the Lord; they are always disturbed about finding the real path of self-realization. Śrīla Nāradadeva is stressing this particular defect in the Vedic literatures compiled by Vyāsadeva, and thus he is trying to emphasize describing everything in relation with the Supreme Lord, and no one else. In fact, there is nothing existent except the Lord. The Lord is manifested in different expansions. He is the root of the complete tree. He is the stomach of the complete body. Pouring water on the root is the right process to water the tree, as much as feeding the stomach supplies energy to all parts of the body. Therefore, Śrīla Vyāsadeva should not have compiled any ''Purāṇas'' other than the ''Bhāgavata Purāṇa'' because a slight deviation from that may create havoc for self-realization. If a slight deviation can create such havoc, then what to speak of deliberate expansion of the ideas separate from the Absolute Truth Personality of Godhead. The most defective part of worshiping demigods is that it creates a definite conception of pantheism, ending disastrously in many religious sects detrimental to the progress of the principles of the ''Bhāgavatam'', which alone can give the accurate direction for self-realization in eternal relation with the Personality of Godhead by devotional service in transcendental love. The example of the boat disturbed by whirling wind is suitable in this respect. The diverted mind of the pantheist can never reach the perfection of self-realization, due to the disturbed condition of the selection of object.
</div>
</div>
__NOTOC__{{SB_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}
 
 
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.5.13]] '''[[SB 1.5.13]] - [[SB 1.5.15]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.5.15]]</div>
__NOTOC__
__NOEDITSECTION__

Latest revision as of 18:10, 17 February 2024



His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada



TEXT 14

tato 'nyathā kiñcana yad vivakṣataḥ
pṛthag dṛśas tat-kṛta-rūpa-nāmabhiḥ
na karhicit kvāpi ca duḥsthitā matir
labheta vātāhata-naur ivāspadam


SYNONYMS

tataḥ — from that; anyathā — apart; kiñcana — something; yat — whatsoever; vivakṣataḥ — desiring to describe; pṛthak — separately; dṛśaḥ — vision; tat-kṛta — reactionary to that; rūpa — form; nāmabhiḥ — by names; na karhicit — never; kvāpi — any; ca — and; duḥsthitā matiḥ — oscillating mind; labheta — gains; vāta-āhata — troubled by the wind; nauḥ — boat; iva — like; āspadam — place.


TRANSLATION

Whatever you desire to describe that is separate in vision from the Lord simply reacts, with different forms, names and results, to agitate the mind as the wind agitates a boat which has no resting place.


PURPORT

Śrī Vyāsadeva is the editor of all descriptions of the Vedic literatures, and thus he has described transcendental realization in different ways, namely by fruitive activities, speculative knowledge, mystic power and devotional service. Besides that, in his various Purāṇas he has recommended the worship of so many demigods in different forms and names. The result is that people in general are puzzled how to fix their minds in the service of the Lord; they are always disturbed about finding the real path of self-realization. Śrīla Nāradadeva is stressing this particular defect in the Vedic literatures compiled by Vyāsadeva, and thus he is trying to emphasize describing everything in relation with the Supreme Lord, and no one else. In fact, there is nothing existent except the Lord. The Lord is manifested in different expansions. He is the root of the complete tree. He is the stomach of the complete body. Pouring water on the root is the right process to water the tree, as much as feeding the stomach supplies energy to all parts of the body. Therefore, Śrīla Vyāsadeva should not have compiled any Purāṇas other than the Bhāgavata Purāṇa because a slight deviation from that may create havoc for self-realization. If a slight deviation can create such havoc, then what to speak of deliberate expansion of the ideas separate from the Absolute Truth Personality of Godhead. The most defective part of worshiping demigods is that it creates a definite conception of pantheism, ending disastrously in many religious sects detrimental to the progress of the principles of the Bhāgavatam, which alone can give the accurate direction for self-realization in eternal relation with the Personality of Godhead by devotional service in transcendental love. The example of the boat disturbed by whirling wind is suitable in this respect. The diverted mind of the pantheist can never reach the perfection of self-realization, due to the disturbed condition of the selection of object.



... more about "SB 1.5.14"
Nārada Muni +
Śrīla Vyāsadeva +