Go to Vaniquotes | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia


Vanisource - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge


SB 1.5.12 (1962): Difference between revisions

(Created page with '<div style="float:left">'''Goto SB 1.5.12 Current Edition'''</div> <div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1962 Fifth Chapter - Sri Narada's instruc…')
 
(Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="float:left">'''[[SB 1.5.12|Goto SB 1.5.12 Current Edition]]'''</div>
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam (1962-1965) - Canto 01 Chapter 05]]
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1962 Fifth Chapter - Sri Narada's instructions on Srimad Bhagwatam for Vyasdeva]]'''[[SB 1.5.11 (1962)]] - - - [[SB 1.5.13 (1962)]]'''[[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.5.13 (1962)]]</div>
<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB (1962) Fifth Chapter - Sri Narada's instructions on Srimad Bhagwatam for Vyasdeva]] '''[[SB (1962) Fifth Chapter - Sri Narada's instructions on Srimad Bhagwatam for Vyasdeva]]'''</div>
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.5.11 (1962)]] '''[[SB 1.5.11 (1962)]] - [[SB 1.5.13 (1962)]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.5.13 (1962)]]</div>
{{CompareVersions|SB|1.5.12|SB 1962|SB 1972-77}}
{{RandomImage}}
{{RandomImage}}


Line 6: Line 8:
==== TEXT No. 12 ====
==== TEXT No. 12 ====


<div class="SB65verse">
Naiskarmam api achyuta bhava varjita
Na shovate jnanam alam niranjanam
Kutah punah shaswd abhadram iswarey
Na cha arpitam karma yadi api akaranam
</div>


<div align=center>
''Naiskarmam api achyuta bhava varjita''<br>
''Na shovate jnanam alam niranjanam''<br>
''Kutah punah shaswd abhadram iswarey''<br>
''Na cha arpitam karma yadi api akaranam''<br>
</div>


==== ENGLISH SYNONYMS ====
==== ENGLISH SYNONYMS ====


 
<div class="synonyms">
<div id="synonyms">
Naiskarmam—self-realisation being freed from the reaction of fruitive work, Api—inspite of, Achyuta—the infallible Lord, Bhava—conception, Varjita—devoid of, Na—does not, Shovate—look well, Jnanam—knowledge transcendental, Alam—by the by, Niranjanam—free from designations, Kutah—where is, Punah—again, Saswd—always, Abhadram—uncongeneal, Iswarey—unto the Lord, Na—not, Cha—and, Arpitam—offered, Karama—fruitive work, Yadapi—what is, Akaranam—non-fruitive.
Naiskarmam—self-realisation being freed from the reaction of fruitive work, Api—inspite of, Achyuta—the infallible Lord, Bhava—conception, Varjita—devoid of, Na—does not, Shovate—look well, Jnanam—knowledge transcendental, Alam—by the by, Niranjanam—free from designations, Kutah—where is, Punah—again, Saswd—always, Abhadram—uncongeneal, Iswarey—unto the Lord, Na—not, Cha—and, Arpitam—offered, Karama—fruitive work, Yadapi—what is, Akaranam—non-fruitive.
</div>
</div>
Line 24: Line 25:
==== TRANSLATION ====
==== TRANSLATION ====


 
<div class="translation">
<div id="translation">
Knowledge of self-realisation even though it is freed from all material affinity, does not look well on account of being devoid of the conception of the infallible (God). Where is then any utility of fruitive activities which are naturally painful from the very beginning and transient by nature,—if they are not utilised for the devotional service of the Lord.
Knowledge of self-realisation even though it is freed from all material affinity, does not look well on account of being devoid of the conception of the infallible (God). Where is then any utility of fruitive activities which are naturally painful from the very beginning and transient by nature,—if they are not utilised for the devotional service of the Lord.
</div>
</div>
Line 32: Line 32:
==== PURPORT ====
==== PURPORT ====


 
<div class="purport">
<div id="purport">
As referred to above not only ordinary literatures devoid of the transcendental glorification of the Lord, are condemned but also Vedic literatures and speculation on the subject of impersonal Brahman, when they are devoid of devotional service, are also similarly condemned on account of such spiritual vacuum. When speculation on the impersonal Brahman is condemned on the above ground then what to speak about ordinary fruitive work if it is not meant for fulfilling the aim of devotional service. Such speculative knowledge and fruitive work cannot lead one to the goal of perfection. Fruitive work in which almost all people in general are engaged, is always painful either in the beginning or at the end, They can only be fruitful when they are made subservient to the devotional service of the Lord. In the Bhagwat Geeta also this is confirmed that the result of such fruitive work may be offered for the service of the Lord, otherwise they are all meant for material bondage. The bonafide enjoyer, of the fruitive work, is the personality of Godhead and as such fruitive result when it is engaged in the sense gratification of the living beings, all such results become acute sources of trouble for such false enjoyers.
As referred to above not only ordinary literatures devoid of the transcendental glorification of the Lord, are condemned but also Vedic literatures and speculation on the subject of impersonal Brahman, when they are devoid of devotional service, are also similarly condemned on account of such spiritual vacuum. When speculation on the impersonal Brahman is condemned on the above ground then what to speak about ordinary fruitive work if it is not meant for fulfilling the aim of devotional service. Such speculative knowledge and fruitive work cannot lead one to the goal of perfection. Fruitive work in which almost all people in general are engaged, is always painful either in the beginning or at the end, They can only be fruitful when they are made subservient to the devotional service of the Lord. In the Bhagwat Geeta also this is confirmed that the result of such fruitive work may be offered for the service of the Lord, otherwise they are all meant for material bondage. The bonafide enjoyer, of the fruitive work, is the personality of Godhead and as such fruitive result when it is engaged in the sense gratification of the living beings, all such results become acute sources of trouble for such false enjoyers.
</div>
</div>




<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1962 Fifth Chapter - Sri Narada's instructions on Srimad Bhagwatam for Vyasdeva]]'''[[SB 1962 Fifth Chapter - Sri Narada's instructions on Srimad Bhagwatam for Vyasdeva|1962 Fifth Chapter Index]]'''</div>
<div style="float:left">'''[[SB 1.5.12|(Compare SB 1.5.12 Current Edition)]]'''</div>
<div style="float:right">'''[[SB 1.5.13 (1962)]]'''[[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.5.13 (1962)]]</div>
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.5.11 (1962)]] '''[[SB 1.5.11 (1962)]] - [[SB 1.5.13 (1962)]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.5.13 (1962)]]</div>
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
__NOEDITSECTION__

Latest revision as of 11:17, 25 May 2020



His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada



TEXT No. 12

Naiskarmam api achyuta bhava varjita Na shovate jnanam alam niranjanam Kutah punah shaswd abhadram iswarey Na cha arpitam karma yadi api akaranam


ENGLISH SYNONYMS

Naiskarmam—self-realisation being freed from the reaction of fruitive work, Api—inspite of, Achyuta—the infallible Lord, Bhava—conception, Varjita—devoid of, Na—does not, Shovate—look well, Jnanam—knowledge transcendental, Alam—by the by, Niranjanam—free from designations, Kutah—where is, Punah—again, Saswd—always, Abhadram—uncongeneal, Iswarey—unto the Lord, Na—not, Cha—and, Arpitam—offered, Karama—fruitive work, Yadapi—what is, Akaranam—non-fruitive.


TRANSLATION

Knowledge of self-realisation even though it is freed from all material affinity, does not look well on account of being devoid of the conception of the infallible (God). Where is then any utility of fruitive activities which are naturally painful from the very beginning and transient by nature,—if they are not utilised for the devotional service of the Lord.


PURPORT

As referred to above not only ordinary literatures devoid of the transcendental glorification of the Lord, are condemned but also Vedic literatures and speculation on the subject of impersonal Brahman, when they are devoid of devotional service, are also similarly condemned on account of such spiritual vacuum. When speculation on the impersonal Brahman is condemned on the above ground then what to speak about ordinary fruitive work if it is not meant for fulfilling the aim of devotional service. Such speculative knowledge and fruitive work cannot lead one to the goal of perfection. Fruitive work in which almost all people in general are engaged, is always painful either in the beginning or at the end, They can only be fruitful when they are made subservient to the devotional service of the Lord. In the Bhagwat Geeta also this is confirmed that the result of such fruitive work may be offered for the service of the Lord, otherwise they are all meant for material bondage. The bonafide enjoyer, of the fruitive work, is the personality of Godhead and as such fruitive result when it is engaged in the sense gratification of the living beings, all such results become acute sources of trouble for such false enjoyers.