CC Adi 7.113: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision(s)) |
(Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | [[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - Adi-lila Chapter 07|C113]] | ||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta]] - [[CC Adi|Ādi-līlā]] - [[CC Adi 7|Chapter 7: Lord Caitanya in Five Features]]'''</div> | |||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Adi 7.112|Ādi-līlā 7.112]] '''[[CC Adi 7.112|Ādi-līlā 7.112]] - [[CC Adi 7.114|Ādi-līlā 7.114]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Adi 7.114|Ādi-līlā 7.114]]</div> | |||
{{CompareVersions|CC|Adi 7.113|CC 1975|CC 1996}} | |||
{{RandomImage}} | |||
==== TEXT 113 ==== | ==== TEXT 113 ==== | ||
<div | <div class="verse"> | ||
cid-ānanda—teṅho, tāṅra sthāna, parivāra | :cid-ānanda—teṅho, tāṅra sthāna, parivāra | ||
tāṅre kahe—prākṛta-sattvera vikāra | :tāṅre kahe—prākṛta-sattvera vikāra | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 12: | Line 16: | ||
==== SYNONYMS ==== | ==== SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
cit- | ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=cit&tab=syno_o&ds=1 cit]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=ānanda&tab=syno_o&ds=1 ānanda]'' — spiritual bliss; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=teṅho&tab=syno_o&ds=1 teṅho]'' — He is personally; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=tāṅra&tab=syno_o&ds=1 tāṅra]'' — His; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=sthāna&tab=syno_o&ds=1 sthāna]'' — abode; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=parivāra&tab=syno_o&ds=1 parivāra]'' — entourage; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=tāṅre&tab=syno_o&ds=1 tāṅre]'' — unto Him; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kahe&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kahe]'' — someone says; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=prākṛta&tab=syno_o&ds=1 prākṛta]'' — material; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=sattvera&tab=syno_o&ds=1 sattvera]'' — goodness; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=vikāra&tab=syno_o&ds=1 vikāra]'' — transformation. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 19: | Line 23: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div | <div class="translation"> | ||
“The Supreme Personality of Godhead is full of spiritual potencies. Therefore His body, name, fame and entourage are all spiritual. The Māyāvādī philosopher, due to ignorance, says that these are all merely transformations of the material mode of goodness. | “The Supreme Personality of Godhead is full of spiritual potencies. Therefore His body, name, fame and entourage are all spiritual. The Māyāvādī philosopher, due to ignorance, says that these are all merely transformations of the material mode of goodness. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 26: | Line 30: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div | <div class="purport"> | ||
In the Seventh Chapter of the Bhagavad-gītā the Supreme Personality of Godhead has classified His energies in two distinct divisions—namely, prākṛta and aprākṛta, or parā-prakṛti and aparā-prakṛti. In the Viṣṇu Purāṇa the same distinction is made. The Māyāvādī philosophers cannot understand these two prakṛtis, or natures—material and spiritual—but one who is actually intelligent can understand them. Considering the many varieties and activities in material nature, why should the Māyāvādī philosophers deny the spiritual varieties of the spiritual world? The Bhāgavatam (10.2.32) says: | In the Seventh Chapter of the [[Bhagavad-gita As It Is (1972)|''Bhagavad-gītā'']] the Supreme Personality of Godhead has classified His energies in two distinct divisions—namely, ''prākṛta'' and ''aprākṛta'', or ''parā-prakṛti'' and ''aparā-prakṛti''. In the ''Viṣṇu Purāṇa'' the same distinction is made. The Māyāvādī philosophers cannot understand these two ''prakṛtis'', or natures—material and spiritual—but one who is actually intelligent can understand them. Considering the many varieties and activities in material nature, why should the Māyāvādī philosophers deny the spiritual varieties of the spiritual world? The [[Srimad-Bhagavatam|''Bhāgavatam'']] ([[SB 10.2.32|10.2.32]]) says: | ||
:ye ’nye ’ravindākṣa vimukta-māninas | :''ye ’nye ’ravindākṣa vimukta-māninas'' | ||
:tvayy asta-bhāvād aviśuddha-buddhayaḥ | :''tvayy asta-bhāvād aviśuddha-buddhayaḥ'' | ||
The intelligence of those who think themselves liberated but have no information of the spiritual world is not yet clear. In this verse the term aviśuddha-buddhayaḥ refers to unclean intelligence. Due to unclean intelligence or a poor fund of knowledge, the Māyāvādī philosophers cannot understand the distinction between material and spiritual varieties; therefore they cannot even think of spiritual varieties because they take it for granted that all variety is material. | The intelligence of those who think themselves liberated but have no information of the spiritual world is not yet clear. In this verse the term ''aviśuddha-buddhayaḥ'' refers to unclean intelligence. Due to unclean intelligence or a poor fund of knowledge, the Māyāvādī philosophers cannot understand the distinction between material and spiritual varieties; therefore they cannot even think of spiritual varieties because they take it for granted that all variety is material. | ||
Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, therefore, explains in this verse that Kṛṣṇa—the Supreme Personality of Godhead, or the Absolute Truth—has a spiritual body that is distinct from material bodies, and thus His name, abode, entourage and qualities are all spiritual. The material mode of goodness has nothing to do with spiritual varieties. Māyāvādī philosophers, however, cannot clearly understand spiritual varieties; therefore they imagine a negation of the material world to be the spiritual world. The material qualities of goodness, passion and ignorance cannot act in the spiritual world, which is therefore called nirguṇa, as clearly indicated in the Bhagavad-gītā ([[BG trai-guṇya-viṣayā vedā nistrai-guṇyo bhavārjuna | Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, therefore, explains in this verse that Kṛṣṇa—the Supreme Personality of Godhead, or the Absolute Truth—has a spiritual body that is distinct from material bodies, and thus His name, abode, entourage and qualities are all spiritual. The material mode of goodness has nothing to do with spiritual varieties. Māyāvādī philosophers, however, cannot clearly understand spiritual varieties; therefore they imagine a negation of the material world to be the spiritual world. The material qualities of goodness, passion and ignorance cannot act in the spiritual world, which is therefore called ''nirguṇa'', as clearly indicated in the [[Bhagavad-gita As It Is (1972)|''Bhagavad-gītā'']] ([[BG 2.45 (1972)|2.45]]) ''trai-guṇya-viṣayā vedā nistrai-guṇyo bhavārjuna''). The material world is a manifestation of the three modes of material nature, but one has to become free from these modes to come to the spiritual world, where their influence is completely absent. Now Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu will disassociate Lord Śiva from Māyāvāda philosophy in the following verse. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Adi 7.112|Ādi-līlā 7.112]] '''[[CC Adi 7.112|Ādi-līlā 7.112]] - [[CC Adi 7.114|Ādi-līlā 7.114]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Adi 7.114|Ādi-līlā 7.114]]</div> | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | |||
Latest revision as of 19:13, 19 February 2024
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
TEXT 113
- cid-ānanda—teṅho, tāṅra sthāna, parivāra
- tāṅre kahe—prākṛta-sattvera vikāra
SYNONYMS
cit-ānanda — spiritual bliss; teṅho — He is personally; tāṅra — His; sthāna — abode; parivāra — entourage; tāṅre — unto Him; kahe — someone says; prākṛta — material; sattvera — goodness; vikāra — transformation.
TRANSLATION
“The Supreme Personality of Godhead is full of spiritual potencies. Therefore His body, name, fame and entourage are all spiritual. The Māyāvādī philosopher, due to ignorance, says that these are all merely transformations of the material mode of goodness.
PURPORT
In the Seventh Chapter of the Bhagavad-gītā the Supreme Personality of Godhead has classified His energies in two distinct divisions—namely, prākṛta and aprākṛta, or parā-prakṛti and aparā-prakṛti. In the Viṣṇu Purāṇa the same distinction is made. The Māyāvādī philosophers cannot understand these two prakṛtis, or natures—material and spiritual—but one who is actually intelligent can understand them. Considering the many varieties and activities in material nature, why should the Māyāvādī philosophers deny the spiritual varieties of the spiritual world? The Bhāgavatam (10.2.32) says:
- ye ’nye ’ravindākṣa vimukta-māninas
- tvayy asta-bhāvād aviśuddha-buddhayaḥ
The intelligence of those who think themselves liberated but have no information of the spiritual world is not yet clear. In this verse the term aviśuddha-buddhayaḥ refers to unclean intelligence. Due to unclean intelligence or a poor fund of knowledge, the Māyāvādī philosophers cannot understand the distinction between material and spiritual varieties; therefore they cannot even think of spiritual varieties because they take it for granted that all variety is material.
Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, therefore, explains in this verse that Kṛṣṇa—the Supreme Personality of Godhead, or the Absolute Truth—has a spiritual body that is distinct from material bodies, and thus His name, abode, entourage and qualities are all spiritual. The material mode of goodness has nothing to do with spiritual varieties. Māyāvādī philosophers, however, cannot clearly understand spiritual varieties; therefore they imagine a negation of the material world to be the spiritual world. The material qualities of goodness, passion and ignorance cannot act in the spiritual world, which is therefore called nirguṇa, as clearly indicated in the Bhagavad-gītā (2.45) trai-guṇya-viṣayā vedā nistrai-guṇyo bhavārjuna). The material world is a manifestation of the three modes of material nature, but one has to become free from these modes to come to the spiritual world, where their influence is completely absent. Now Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu will disassociate Lord Śiva from Māyāvāda philosophy in the following verse.