Go to Vaniquotes | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia


Vanisource - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge


760707 - Conversation A - Baltimore: Difference between revisions

(Created page with '{{CV_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}} <div class="code">760707r3.bal</div> Rūpānuga: ...how you explained that our movement is eternal. Prabhupāda: Hmm? Yes. Rūpānuga: Just so they …')
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{CV_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}
[[Category:1976 - Conversations]]
<div class="code">760707r3.bal</div>
[[Category:1976 - Lectures and Conversations]]
[[Category:1976 - Lectures, Conversations and Letters]]
[[Category:1976-07 - Lectures, Conversations and Letters]]
[[Category:Conversations - USA]]
[[Category:Conversations - USA, Baltimore]]
[[Category:Lectures, Conversations and Letters - USA]]
[[Category:Lectures, Conversations and Letters - USA, Baltimore]]
[[Category:Audio Files 20.01 to 30.00 Minutes]]
<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=Category:Conversations - by Date]]'''[[:Category:Conversations - by Date|Conversations by Date]], [[:Category:1976 - Conversations|1976]]'''</div>
{{RandomImage}}


Rūpānuga: ...how you explained that our movement is eternal.


Prabhupāda: Hmm? Yes.
<div class="code">760707R1-BALTIMORE - July 07, 1976 - 21:59 Minutes</div>


Rūpānuga: Just so they don't think it is only ten years old. (devotees bring in a cake or Prabhupāda distributes, eating, etc.)


Devotees: Jaya.


Prabhupāda: Very nice.
<mp3player>https://s3.amazonaws.com/vanipedia/full/1976/760707R1-BALTIMORE_mono.mp3</mp3player>


Rūpānuga: It is very heavy cake.


Prabhupāda: Hm. Very nice. Ānandamayo 'bhyāsāt (Vedānta-sūtra 1.1.12). This is the movement of ānanda, pleasure only. Kṛṣṇa is ānandamaya, and if you remain with Kṛṣṇa you'll become ānandamaya. A rich man, he's enjoying, and if you remain in association with the rich man, you also enjoy. Where is the difficulty? A very rich man, and his associates, they are also rich men. Is it not? And if you remain with poor man, you are also poor.
Prabhupāda: . . . ''bora bora phet, lanka dinga ke matta kare het'' It was translated by a Mr. Row, a professor in the Presidency College, he translated, "Big, big monkey, big, big belly, Ceylon jumping, melancholy." When the problems of life is read, then they are melancholy, all these big, big scientists. Ceylon jumping melancholy. Hanumān, one monkey, he jumped over the Ceylon. So other monkeys also, they were very much proud that a monkey jumped over the ocean. And as soon as he was challenged, "Can you jump over?" melancholy. Ceylon jumping melancholy. Big, big monkey, big, big belly. These are the translation by Mr. Row, a professor of English in Presidency College. So what is the proposal now?


Rūpānuga: You've explained that the servant in the house of the king, he is almost as good as the king.
Svarūpa Dāmodara: We want to discuss about the journal that we are proposing to have from the Institute.


Prabhupāda: No, he is better than king. King, he eats whatever is offered to him, but they can eat whatever they like. Is it not? Who is restricting them? (aside:) You can open that. Just stand towards there. Yes.
Rūpānuga: So Ravīndra-svarūpa Prabhu is going to be the editor, you approved in Māyāpur. We were thinking if you could give us some idea for a title. Because we were thinking so far that we would have a subtitle, like we have "Back to Godhead" then we have "the Magazine of the Hare Kṛṣṇa Movement." So we would have the subtitle, "Bhaktivedanta Institute" or "Journal of the Bhaktivedanta Institute," but maybe you would like to have a title of the journal. So we wanted to know if you had some hint.


Hari-śauri: Is that, cutting the cake, is that a Vedic..., did they used to do that in Vedic times, or is that a Western invention? We were just wondering about it.
Prabhupāda: Yes. You can title, entitle, ''Sa-vijñāna''.


Prabhupāda: Prasāda distribution. Either you cut or take with hand, the same thing. It doesn't make any difference.
Svarūpa Dāmodara: ''Sa-vijñāna''?


Rūpānuga: On the cake it was marked on one side 1966, on the other side 1976. Like a coin. They make coins celebrating, commemorating.
Devotees: Oh.


Prabhupāda: And the cake is made very nicely. Who has made it?
Prabhupāda: ''Jñānaṁ me paramaṁ guhyaṁ yad vijñāna-samanvitam.'' What is that ''Bhagavad-gītā'' verse? ''Jñānaṁ te 'haṁ pravakṣyāmi tad vijñānam'' . . .


Vṛṣākapi: This one girl, her name is Lalitā-sakhī. She stayed up all night.
Pradyumna:


Rūpānuga: And then it was decorated by Ambujākṣa, who is an artist.
:''jñānaṁ te 'haṁ sa-vijñānam''
:''idaṁ vakṣyāmy aśeṣataḥ''
:''yaj jñātvā neha bhūyo 'nyaj''
:''jñātavyam avaśiṣyate''
:([[BG 7.2 (1972)|BG 7.2]])


Prabhupāda: Woman should be expert in cooking. That is their natural tendency. They should be educated how to cook nicely, how to please the husband, how to take care of the children. This is Vedic civilization. In the beginning a woman, childhood, she's trained up by the mother. Then as soon as she is married, formerly, child-marriage, so she's transferred to the care of mother-in-law. There she is trained up. Then she becomes very good housewife, takes care of household affairs, husband, children, and home becomes happy. What is this nonsense, divorce? There is no such thing in the Vedic civilization, divorce. You must accept whatever God has given you as husband or wife, you must. They had no thinking even, idea of divorce. One may not agree with the husband. That is natural. Sometimes we do not agree. But there is no question of divorce. When this divorce system was introduced?
Prabhupāda: Yes.
 
Pradyumna: Seventh Chapter.
 
Rūpānuga: That is good, Śrīla Prabhupāda. That is a very nice title.
 
Svarūpa Dāmodara: What about a subtitle?
 
Pradyumna: "I shall now declare unto you in full this knowledge, both phenomenal and noumenal, by knowing which there shall remain nothing further to be known."
 
Prabhupāda: Yes. Nothing further to be known.
 
Pradyumna: ''Sa-vijñānam''
 
Rūpānuga: ''Sa-vijñānam''. So we can say "''Sa-vijñānam'', Journal of the Bhaktivedanta Institute." Is that all right?
 
Prabhupāda: Yes. ''Sa-vijñānam.''
 
Svarūpa Dāmodara: Do we need some sort of translation maybe?


Rūpānuga: Comparatively recent. Because for many years the Catholic Church forbade it. When did it begin?
Devotee: On the inside cover we can have this verse . . .


Pradyumna: Henry the Eighth, the King of England.
Prabhupāda: You can give this verse.


Prabhupāda: Oh, he's the rascal.
Devotee: Give the verse on the inside. That can be the motto.


Pradyumna: He had many wives, he wanted to divorce his wife and he could not under Catholic Church, so he started his own church, Church of England.
Prabhupāda: Is that nice title?


Prabhupāda: Because many wives were not allowed?
Pradyumna: Scientific.


Hari-śauri: No, they had a system, one wife, but he got fed up with them. He chopped off the heads of two of them and then... It was considered a bit outrageous. So then he wanted to divorce and have another wife after the third or fourth one.
Svarūpa Dāmodara: Yes, sound very . . .


Prabhupāda: So he used to cut them, the head?
Rūpānuga: It's a very good title.


Hari-śauri: Yes, two of them he did. And then the Catholic Church excommunicated him.
Svarūpa Dāmodara: So in this journal we can publish from different disciplines of knowledge, from any branch of knowledge and principle.


Prabhupāda: Therefore in Vedic civilization they keep, they have more than one wife. So what is the use of killing? Why one should kill? We find from the history, Dhruva Mahārāja's mother and stepmother, there were some critical words, and Dhruva Mahārāja became very, very angry. So the critical words and wives, different wives, that may be, but why one should cut off the head? Dhruva Mahārāja's mother said when Dhruva Mahārāja began to cry before the mother, mother said "My dear child, what can I do? How can I help you? Your father does not care for me, even as maidservant, what to speak of I am queen, I am the senior queen. So this gentleman does not care of me even as maidservant. How can I help you? If God helps you, then..." That was her statement. So that does not mean because the king did not like, she should be beheaded. What is this nonsense? If he is,(?)... may be... After all, he is king. He may not like first wife. Actually, there was no scarcity of comfort, but liking may not be, but that does not mean that she shouldn't be accepted as wife. Kings were allowed to marry more than one wife. Why to accept another wife means another wife should be killed? What is this? Everything nonsense. King can marry more than one wife. And at the time of marriage they were given so many woman. Because the woman population is greater than the man, always. So when the King is married, along with the queen, many other friends of the queen they would go with the king. They live in the same palace, same palace. Sometimes they had children, dāsī-putra. Just like Vidura. Vidura was not queen's son. One of these women friends. So that was allowed.
Devotee: Science, philosophy, economics, sociology. For the scholarly, academic community.


Rūpānuga: They were raised with the real sons.
Prabhupāda: Yes, socially you can preach how this ''cātur-varṇyaṁ mayā sṛṣṭaṁ guṇa-karma-vibhāgaśaḥ'' ([[BG 4.13 (1972)|BG 4.13]]), how it is scientific. In the society, if there is . . . actually we have. Just like why these, maybe so-called scientists, but why the scientists are given so much importance? Because there is a brain. So if you make everyone equal, all ''śūdras'', then who will be the brain? The brain is required. That is ''brāhmaṇa''. So this, not this brain; this brain is ''śūdra'' brain for everyone. But when the . . . but just like here is Dr. Svarūpa Dāmodara, or you are here. So you are not scientist from the very birth. You have been trained up how to become a scientist. Similarly, the birth is there. Whatever you may be, it doesn't matter. But you have to be trained up how to become first-class brain. That is ''brāhmaṇa''. You have to become truthful, you have to become controller of the senses, you have to become fully aware of things, of God, everything, full knowledge, then you become brain. People give scientists so much importance because there is brain. Brain, in the society, there must be brain. So without brain, how the society can go on? If you simply produce motor mechanic, then?


Prabhupāda: Oh, yes.
Brain must be there. Just like this is brain: Sanātana Gosvāmī is asking, ''ke āmi, kene āmāya jāre tāpa-traya''. This is brain. "I don't want some uncomfortable situation, but why it is enforced?" So when you make research into that, that is brain. And if we remain like animal, "All right, they are dragging me to the slaughterhouse, that's all right, let me go," that is not brain. Brain means that I am seeking after perfect happiness; why I am not allowed to have this perfect happiness? That is brain. The question, if there is any remedy. They are doing this. Scientific brain means there are so many problems, they are trying to solve it. That requires brain. But because they are fool scientists, they do not know how to make a solution of the ultimate problem. They are making tiny problems, that's all. There is power shortage: all right, let us invent some substitute of petroleum. Brain is being taxed. Again it is finished, again another. ''Punaḥ punaś carvita-carvaṇānām'' ([[SB 7.5.30|SB 7.5.30]]). But they are so dull brain, they do not raise the question that we are making solution of one problem, another problem is ready. That brain they have not. So how long we shall go on solving the problems, another problem, another problem? ''Daivī hy eṣā guṇamayī mama māyā duratyayā'' ([[BG 7.14 (1972)|BG 7.14]]). He does not know that nature will not allow me to live peacefully. So we bring problems after problems. That is material life. ''Duḥkhālayam aśāśvatam'' ([[BG 8.15 (1972)|BG 8.15]]). ''Daivī hy eṣā guṇamayī''. Everything is there. You discuss only ''Bhagavad-gītā'', you'll get so many subject matter to think and write. This is brain. We are solving one problem; another problem is there. So why this is happening? If there is any situation without any problem? That is brain.


Rūpānuga: Treated nicely.
Rūpānuga: We had another practical consideration. We were thinking that could BBT publish the journal? BBT would publish the journal?


Prabhupāda: Yes. Not that because he is born of a dāsī no care should be taken. No, equal. But he cannot inherit the throne, that's all. There was no question. Even Muhammadans, they used to marry more than one wife. Two hundred years ago, one Muslim Nawab of Lucknow, Wazel Dusayet(?), he had hundred and sixty wives. The palaces are still there, Lucknow, hundred and sixty palaces. Why the Nawab? Our Kṛṣṇa, not hundred sixty but another zero, another, hundred sixty thousand, two zeros. Hundred sixty plus two zeros. They were not neglected. But He is God, He expanded Himself also, sixteen thousand forms, so that no wife would feel separation. So if one husband can maintain properly more than one wife, he's allowed. But the wife must be taken care of properly. Not that because I have got more than one wife, one is neglected, one is... No. She must be taken care of.
Prabhupāda: But whether you'll be able to publish regularly.


Vṛṣākapi: We were talking the other day, not in our society though.
Svarūpa Dāmodara: Quarterly, at the beginning.


Prabhupāda: Huh?
Rūpānuga: Four times a year. Every three months.


Vṛṣākapi: Not in the ISKCON society, though.
Prabhupāda: Because it must be very . . . ''sa-vijñānam,'' it must be very scientific.


Prabhupāda: In the Kali-yuga one cannot maintain even one wife, what to speak of more than one. They are afraid to marry one wife. I first heard this, one elderly lady in New York. At that time, I was newcomer. I asked her, "Why don't you get your son married?" "Yes, he can be married, provided he can maintain wife," she said. So these things were unknown to us. In India, whether he'll be able to maintain... Just like I was married when I was third-year student. Where is the income? There is no income, but still I was married.
Rūpānuga: Oh, yes. Without defect.


Hari-śauri: That was formerly the Western system, that the prospective son-in-law would be checked first to see whether he would be able to maintain the girl.
Prabhupāda: That's all right, BBT will publish. Why not?


Prabhupāda: No, that is everywhere. But expectation, he is educated, he'll be able. The first thing is in due time, either the girl or the boy must be married, that is Indian system. In due time. Boy not exceeding twenty years or twenty-five years, at most, and girl not exceeding fifteen years, sixteen years, must be. Saṁskāra, this is one of the saṁskāras. Just like garbhādhāna-saṁskāra, this is also one saṁskāra, and marriage is also saṁskāra. Must be married. Daśa-vidha-saṁskāra, ten kinds of saṁskāras, out of which marriage is one of the saṁskāras. And kanyā-dāya. Kanyā-dāya, dāya means by law the father is bound to get his daughter married, by law. He cannot escape the responsibility. This is father's duty.
Rūpānuga: We can provide the copying work and all the graphs and things, and then they would lay it out and do everything, like with your books.


Rūpānuga: You gave the example that if sometimes the man becomes bankrupt he goes to court and the judge says, "You must take this money you have left to your creditors and be satisfied," and he can escape in that way. But the one duty that a father has is getting the daughter married; that he cannot escape.
Prabhupāda: Oh, yes. Just like other things. And it will be BBT property. That's all.


Prabhupāda: No, therefore it is called dāya, dāya-bhāk, legally he is bound. He may not get his son married, but the daughter must be married. This is father's duty.
Rūpānuga: Your property.


Rūpānuga: It is sinful, actually considered sinful, if he doesn't do that.
Svarūpa Dāmodara: We can also do it for the books, Śrīla Prabhupāda, isn't it? It will be published by BBT, but coming out from Bhaktivedanta Institute.


Prabhupāda: Yes. Because without father the daughter cannot be properly married. Daughter or son, everyone, if the father, mother, by their supervision, the boys and girls get married, that is very good. They see how they will be happy. And without father, mother, simply by lusty desires, that selection may be wrong and that becomes actually happened. Therefore there is divorce.
Devotee: That will be good for the Institute if the name is on that book.


Rūpānuga: In this country the father and the mother, they tell the daughter that "You go out and bring a husband home. You go out and find a young boy and bring him home." And they make them go out in the street to find a husband.
Prabhupāda: That's all right. From Bhaktivedanta publisher. Yes, that's all right. You can do something like that, there is no harm. But this world is a problem, but we want solution of the problem but we do not know how to solve it. Is it not? Do the scientists know?


Prabhupāda: I know that. Sometimes they are advised to do business. I know that. When, in our society, in the beginning, I started marriage, the father, mother, did not like it. Nowadays it has become custom, in India also, let the girl have many friends, but don't marry unless you find out a suitable man. Society degrades. Actually the Indian system is that when the girl is utmost twelve years, not more than that, ten to twelve years, she must be married. And the father would see, not necessarily in every case the boy is rich man or educated. If he's healthy and if he can work, he'll "Take charge." Then fortune, faith.
Svarūpa Dāmodara: They are trying. (laughter)


Rūpānuga: That is responsible.
Prabhupāda: Not a single problem they have solved. Can you cite that this big problem they have solved?


Vṛṣākapi: How should we do this in our ISKCON society with these young girls?
Rūpānuga: In fact you have said that they are creating a new problem each time.


Prabhupāda: Of course, we are not very much concerned with the social affairs, but still, if we can organize society, that will be very good. That will be peaceful.
Prabhupāda: That is the nature. You cannot solve the problem. You will create problem. If you don't live natural life, then you will create problem. Just like the other than . . . creatures, other than human beings, they have no problem, because they are living naturally. So our human beings should also live natural life. Then his only problem is this birth, death, old age, and . . . that he will be able to solve. That is the difference. The birds and beasts, they are living natural life, but they have no capacity to solve the problem. They are living a natural life. But the human being has the capacity to solve the problem. Real problem is birth, death, old age and disease. But they do not touch the real problem. Hmm? They avoid it because they cannot solve it.


Puṣṭa Kṛṣṇa: Might be possible on the farms.
Svarūpa Dāmodara: They keep it for the future. They postpone.


Prabhupāda: Yes.
Prabhupāda: That is postdated check. "You take this million dollar check." "When shall I use it?" "After millions year you can cash it." This kind of propaganda no sane man will accept.
 
Svarūpa Dāmodara: That's like chemical evolution. Million years it will happen.
 
Prabhupāda: Billion.
 
Svarūpa Dāmodara: Yes, in a million years.


Puṣṭa Kṛṣṇa: Away from the bad social environment of the cities.
Prabhupāda: Then the answer is the chicken is better than you. He can give you life within seven days. Dr. Chicken is better. They are shameless. Not ordinary, because ordinary human being will become shameful to speak something nonsense. But they are shameless. In that Bengali, ''duḥkhānkata''. One man, one ear was cut off. So in order to hide his cut-off ear he was keeping this side to the river side and this side to the habitation side and then again his two ears were cut out. Then there is no question of hiding. Both of them were cut out. So these people are ''duḥkhānkata''. When both the ears cut out, there is no shame. They will go on talking all nonsense. Because they accept, they are accepted. So many millions of years have passed in the history, nobody could do that, and they are giving hope that life will come after millions of years. Why million? Here is a chicken, he can give life within five days. What credit you'll get after millions of years? But they are ''duḥkhānkata'', so shameless they can speak such nonsense and still pass on as scientists. ''Tibocham'', I think. ''Duḥkhānkata''. No shame. You do not feel that why you are talking nonsense. Am I right or wrong? Here is a chicken, insignificant animal, he is giving life within five days, and we are talking of millions of years, and still we are scientist, Dr. Frog.


Prabhupāda: The system is the boys and girls should be married earlier, and they should work, and there should be no divorce. But whether your country law will allow, that is another difficulty. You may introduce something, but the state law may not approve of it.
Svarūpa Dāmodara: We are going to use that example in our preaching.


Puṣṭa Kṛṣṇa: I don't think there is any minimum age for marriage, simply the parents have to give their consent under a certain age. There's no minimum age.
Prabhupāda: And the thing is that these person, they are holding the . . . ''andhā yathāndhair upanīyamānāḥ'' ([[SB 7.5.31|SB 7.5.31]]). A blind man, he has no eyes, and still, he's leader of other blind men. Is it possible? A blind man, he is blind man, he has no knowledge, and still, he's leading other blind men. This is a very dangerous position. He has no actually knowledge, simply speculating, putting theories and formulas, and they are leaders of the society.


Hari-śauri: There is in England. In a lot of countries now there's a minimum age. No, they cannot be married under that age. Women sixteen, men eighteen.
Rūpānuga: We have to stop this.


Puṣṭa Kṛṣṇa: But with parents' consent.
Prabhupāda: Yes, otherwise people are misled. It is not the duty of education to mislead people. The real knowledge should be given. They should know that. To become a great misleader and take some title, that is not good.


Rūpānuga: ISKCON parents, if the girl is fifteen, like you said, fifteen, then the ISKCON parent may give permission, that is legal. Not only that, but our own men, as I have done in Virginia, I have registered as minister in the state, and I can perform marriages. So our own men can register to perform marriages.
Svarūpa Dāmodara: The other morning you were . . . Śrīla Prabhupāda was mentioning about the Institute, the Bhaktivedanta Institute. So is there anything else that Your Divine Grace wants to . . .?


Prabhupāda: Another difficulty is the boy and the girl, they also do not stick. That is another difficulty.
Prabhupāda: Institute, you have got sufficient subject matter as I was describing, this original source of life and the planetary system, as you are going to make planetarium. Who can say about so many planets in the sky? Who has got sufficient knowledge? They cannot even give . . . they think that moon is the nearest planet, but we do not think like that. But still they are unable to give sufficient knowledge about the moon. It is not vacant. It cannot be vacant. We don't find any part of the world vacant. There is living entities. This earth planet is part of the universe, and the moon is also part of the universe. If it is not vacant, how that can be vacant? You have got dust there, here we have got dust—you have got rocks there, here we have got rocks. And why it is vacant? We find in the dust also there is life. When we walk on the beach, it is simply sand, there are so many crabs. They are immediately flying, running, "Oh, here is a man coming. Enter into the hole." So even the dust, in the sand, there is life. So why not there? In the water there is life, within the sand there is life, in the air there is life—everywhere there is life. Why it should be vacant? Hmm? What is the opinion of the scientists? How . . .? We are layman, talking like layman, but why there should not be life? And in the ''śāstra'' we get there is life. Not only moon; every planet is full of living entities. ''Jagat-kīrṇa''. There is human being, there is animal, everything. How it can be vacant, God's creation?


Rūpānuga: That is the biggest one.
Svarūpa Dāmodara: They say they cannot see, so . . .


Vṛṣākapi: Every father, he wants his son to stay brahmacārī and become sannyāsa. So who will be willing to give up their son for marriage at a young age? (pause)
Prabhupāda: See . . . you cannot see your father; that does not means there is no father who begot you. That is no . . . they cannot see . . . do they say like that?


Prabhupāda: Hmm. (laughter)
Svarūpa Dāmodara: They cannot see that, so they cannot prove by experiment, so . . .


Hari-śauri: You were saying the other day, actually the only solution is if everybody chants.
Prabhupāda: What experiment?


Prabhupāda: That is the only solution.
Svarūpa Dāmodara: Just from experience also.


Puṣṭa Kṛṣṇa: We were experiencing it just now, everyone was so happy chanting.
Ravīndra-svarūpa: They go and look, and that's all they can do. They want to go and see for themselves, so they say they have gone to the moon planet, and they say: "We have not found life."


Prabhupāda: If one can remain without marriage, that is first-class.
Prabhupāda: We say you have not gone. I have not seen you, that you have gone there; you say only. How can I believe?


Rūpānuga: Women also?
Vipina: They show you pictures, and it was on the TV.


Prabhupāda: Women also. What is the use of this material husband? Make Kṛṣṇa husband. Kṛṣṇa's prepared to become everything—love Him as husband, love Him as son, love Him, friend. Kṛṣṇa is prepared.
Prabhupāda: That is also, you have made picture. I have not gone and seen that. How can I believe you? The same argument. You say that you have gone to moon planet, but I have not seen that you have gone there. How can I believe you?


Rūpānuga: I have see in our society that if the preaching is strong amongst the leaders and there's serious chanting, leaders see that everyone is chanting and happily engaged, that there is no disturbance. If the preaching is weak, there is sexual disturbance.
Vipina: Is there some other way we can argue with them, Prabhupāda?


Prabhupāda: Then the material desire becomes prominent.
Prabhupāda: No, no, that's . . . answer this question, that you say you have not seen. I say yes, that's all right, because you did not see, therefore you don't believe. But I did not see you also that you have gone to moon planet. How can I believe you?


Rūpānuga: Then everyone becomes lusty. (end)
Ravīndra-svarūpa: How is it possible to deceive so many people?


{{CV_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}
Prabhupāda: Whether it is not possible or possible, but if you put this argument, that I have not seen, that I can say that I have . . . (end)

Revision as of 03:53, 10 June 2020

His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada



760707R1-BALTIMORE - July 07, 1976 - 21:59 Minutes



Prabhupāda: . . . bora bora phet, lanka dinga ke matta kare het It was translated by a Mr. Row, a professor in the Presidency College, he translated, "Big, big monkey, big, big belly, Ceylon jumping, melancholy." When the problems of life is read, then they are melancholy, all these big, big scientists. Ceylon jumping melancholy. Hanumān, one monkey, he jumped over the Ceylon. So other monkeys also, they were very much proud that a monkey jumped over the ocean. And as soon as he was challenged, "Can you jump over?" melancholy. Ceylon jumping melancholy. Big, big monkey, big, big belly. These are the translation by Mr. Row, a professor of English in Presidency College. So what is the proposal now?

Svarūpa Dāmodara: We want to discuss about the journal that we are proposing to have from the Institute.

Rūpānuga: So Ravīndra-svarūpa Prabhu is going to be the editor, you approved in Māyāpur. We were thinking if you could give us some idea for a title. Because we were thinking so far that we would have a subtitle, like we have "Back to Godhead" then we have "the Magazine of the Hare Kṛṣṇa Movement." So we would have the subtitle, "Bhaktivedanta Institute" or "Journal of the Bhaktivedanta Institute," but maybe you would like to have a title of the journal. So we wanted to know if you had some hint.

Prabhupāda: Yes. You can title, entitle, Sa-vijñāna.

Svarūpa Dāmodara: Sa-vijñāna?

Devotees: Oh.

Prabhupāda: Jñānaṁ me paramaṁ guhyaṁ yad vijñāna-samanvitam. What is that Bhagavad-gītā verse? Jñānaṁ te 'haṁ pravakṣyāmi tad vijñānam . . .

Pradyumna:

jñānaṁ te 'haṁ sa-vijñānam
idaṁ vakṣyāmy aśeṣataḥ
yaj jñātvā neha bhūyo 'nyaj
jñātavyam avaśiṣyate
(BG 7.2)

Prabhupāda: Yes.

Pradyumna: Seventh Chapter.

Rūpānuga: That is good, Śrīla Prabhupāda. That is a very nice title.

Svarūpa Dāmodara: What about a subtitle?

Pradyumna: "I shall now declare unto you in full this knowledge, both phenomenal and noumenal, by knowing which there shall remain nothing further to be known."

Prabhupāda: Yes. Nothing further to be known.

Pradyumna: Sa-vijñānam

Rūpānuga: Sa-vijñānam. So we can say "Sa-vijñānam, Journal of the Bhaktivedanta Institute." Is that all right?

Prabhupāda: Yes. Sa-vijñānam.

Svarūpa Dāmodara: Do we need some sort of translation maybe?

Devotee: On the inside cover we can have this verse . . .

Prabhupāda: You can give this verse.

Devotee: Give the verse on the inside. That can be the motto.

Prabhupāda: Is that nice title?

Pradyumna: Scientific.

Svarūpa Dāmodara: Yes, sound very . . .

Rūpānuga: It's a very good title.

Svarūpa Dāmodara: So in this journal we can publish from different disciplines of knowledge, from any branch of knowledge and principle.

Devotee: Science, philosophy, economics, sociology. For the scholarly, academic community.

Prabhupāda: Yes, socially you can preach how this cātur-varṇyaṁ mayā sṛṣṭaṁ guṇa-karma-vibhāgaśaḥ (BG 4.13), how it is scientific. In the society, if there is . . . actually we have. Just like why these, maybe so-called scientists, but why the scientists are given so much importance? Because there is a brain. So if you make everyone equal, all śūdras, then who will be the brain? The brain is required. That is brāhmaṇa. So this, not this brain; this brain is śūdra brain for everyone. But when the . . . but just like here is Dr. Svarūpa Dāmodara, or you are here. So you are not scientist from the very birth. You have been trained up how to become a scientist. Similarly, the birth is there. Whatever you may be, it doesn't matter. But you have to be trained up how to become first-class brain. That is brāhmaṇa. You have to become truthful, you have to become controller of the senses, you have to become fully aware of things, of God, everything, full knowledge, then you become brain. People give scientists so much importance because there is brain. Brain, in the society, there must be brain. So without brain, how the society can go on? If you simply produce motor mechanic, then?

Brain must be there. Just like this is brain: Sanātana Gosvāmī is asking, ke āmi, kene āmāya jāre tāpa-traya. This is brain. "I don't want some uncomfortable situation, but why it is enforced?" So when you make research into that, that is brain. And if we remain like animal, "All right, they are dragging me to the slaughterhouse, that's all right, let me go," that is not brain. Brain means that I am seeking after perfect happiness; why I am not allowed to have this perfect happiness? That is brain. The question, if there is any remedy. They are doing this. Scientific brain means there are so many problems, they are trying to solve it. That requires brain. But because they are fool scientists, they do not know how to make a solution of the ultimate problem. They are making tiny problems, that's all. There is power shortage: all right, let us invent some substitute of petroleum. Brain is being taxed. Again it is finished, again another. Punaḥ punaś carvita-carvaṇānām (SB 7.5.30). But they are so dull brain, they do not raise the question that we are making solution of one problem, another problem is ready. That brain they have not. So how long we shall go on solving the problems, another problem, another problem? Daivī hy eṣā guṇamayī mama māyā duratyayā (BG 7.14). He does not know that nature will not allow me to live peacefully. So we bring problems after problems. That is material life. Duḥkhālayam aśāśvatam (BG 8.15). Daivī hy eṣā guṇamayī. Everything is there. You discuss only Bhagavad-gītā, you'll get so many subject matter to think and write. This is brain. We are solving one problem; another problem is there. So why this is happening? If there is any situation without any problem? That is brain.

Rūpānuga: We had another practical consideration. We were thinking that could BBT publish the journal? BBT would publish the journal?

Prabhupāda: But whether you'll be able to publish regularly.

Svarūpa Dāmodara: Quarterly, at the beginning.

Rūpānuga: Four times a year. Every three months.

Prabhupāda: Because it must be very . . . sa-vijñānam, it must be very scientific.

Rūpānuga: Oh, yes. Without defect.

Prabhupāda: That's all right, BBT will publish. Why not?

Rūpānuga: We can provide the copying work and all the graphs and things, and then they would lay it out and do everything, like with your books.

Prabhupāda: Oh, yes. Just like other things. And it will be BBT property. That's all.

Rūpānuga: Your property.

Svarūpa Dāmodara: We can also do it for the books, Śrīla Prabhupāda, isn't it? It will be published by BBT, but coming out from Bhaktivedanta Institute.

Devotee: That will be good for the Institute if the name is on that book.

Prabhupāda: That's all right. From Bhaktivedanta publisher. Yes, that's all right. You can do something like that, there is no harm. But this world is a problem, but we want solution of the problem but we do not know how to solve it. Is it not? Do the scientists know?

Svarūpa Dāmodara: They are trying. (laughter)

Prabhupāda: Not a single problem they have solved. Can you cite that this big problem they have solved?

Rūpānuga: In fact you have said that they are creating a new problem each time.

Prabhupāda: That is the nature. You cannot solve the problem. You will create problem. If you don't live natural life, then you will create problem. Just like the other than . . . creatures, other than human beings, they have no problem, because they are living naturally. So our human beings should also live natural life. Then his only problem is this birth, death, old age, and . . . that he will be able to solve. That is the difference. The birds and beasts, they are living natural life, but they have no capacity to solve the problem. They are living a natural life. But the human being has the capacity to solve the problem. Real problem is birth, death, old age and disease. But they do not touch the real problem. Hmm? They avoid it because they cannot solve it.

Svarūpa Dāmodara: They keep it for the future. They postpone.

Prabhupāda: That is postdated check. "You take this million dollar check." "When shall I use it?" "After millions year you can cash it." This kind of propaganda no sane man will accept.

Svarūpa Dāmodara: That's like chemical evolution. Million years it will happen.

Prabhupāda: Billion.

Svarūpa Dāmodara: Yes, in a million years.

Prabhupāda: Then the answer is the chicken is better than you. He can give you life within seven days. Dr. Chicken is better. They are shameless. Not ordinary, because ordinary human being will become shameful to speak something nonsense. But they are shameless. In that Bengali, duḥkhānkata. One man, one ear was cut off. So in order to hide his cut-off ear he was keeping this side to the river side and this side to the habitation side and then again his two ears were cut out. Then there is no question of hiding. Both of them were cut out. So these people are duḥkhānkata. When both the ears cut out, there is no shame. They will go on talking all nonsense. Because they accept, they are accepted. So many millions of years have passed in the history, nobody could do that, and they are giving hope that life will come after millions of years. Why million? Here is a chicken, he can give life within five days. What credit you'll get after millions of years? But they are duḥkhānkata, so shameless they can speak such nonsense and still pass on as scientists. Tibocham, I think. Duḥkhānkata. No shame. You do not feel that why you are talking nonsense. Am I right or wrong? Here is a chicken, insignificant animal, he is giving life within five days, and we are talking of millions of years, and still we are scientist, Dr. Frog.

Svarūpa Dāmodara: We are going to use that example in our preaching.

Prabhupāda: And the thing is that these person, they are holding the . . . andhā yathāndhair upanīyamānāḥ (SB 7.5.31). A blind man, he has no eyes, and still, he's leader of other blind men. Is it possible? A blind man, he is blind man, he has no knowledge, and still, he's leading other blind men. This is a very dangerous position. He has no actually knowledge, simply speculating, putting theories and formulas, and they are leaders of the society.

Rūpānuga: We have to stop this.

Prabhupāda: Yes, otherwise people are misled. It is not the duty of education to mislead people. The real knowledge should be given. They should know that. To become a great misleader and take some title, that is not good.

Svarūpa Dāmodara: The other morning you were . . . Śrīla Prabhupāda was mentioning about the Institute, the Bhaktivedanta Institute. So is there anything else that Your Divine Grace wants to . . .?

Prabhupāda: Institute, you have got sufficient subject matter as I was describing, this original source of life and the planetary system, as you are going to make planetarium. Who can say about so many planets in the sky? Who has got sufficient knowledge? They cannot even give . . . they think that moon is the nearest planet, but we do not think like that. But still they are unable to give sufficient knowledge about the moon. It is not vacant. It cannot be vacant. We don't find any part of the world vacant. There is living entities. This earth planet is part of the universe, and the moon is also part of the universe. If it is not vacant, how that can be vacant? You have got dust there, here we have got dust—you have got rocks there, here we have got rocks. And why it is vacant? We find in the dust also there is life. When we walk on the beach, it is simply sand, there are so many crabs. They are immediately flying, running, "Oh, here is a man coming. Enter into the hole." So even the dust, in the sand, there is life. So why not there? In the water there is life, within the sand there is life, in the air there is life—everywhere there is life. Why it should be vacant? Hmm? What is the opinion of the scientists? How . . .? We are layman, talking like layman, but why there should not be life? And in the śāstra we get there is life. Not only moon; every planet is full of living entities. Jagat-kīrṇa. There is human being, there is animal, everything. How it can be vacant, God's creation?

Svarūpa Dāmodara: They say they cannot see, so . . .

Prabhupāda: See . . . you cannot see your father; that does not means there is no father who begot you. That is no . . . they cannot see . . . do they say like that?

Svarūpa Dāmodara: They cannot see that, so they cannot prove by experiment, so . . .

Prabhupāda: What experiment?

Svarūpa Dāmodara: Just from experience also.

Ravīndra-svarūpa: They go and look, and that's all they can do. They want to go and see for themselves, so they say they have gone to the moon planet, and they say: "We have not found life."

Prabhupāda: We say you have not gone. I have not seen you, that you have gone there; you say only. How can I believe?

Vipina: They show you pictures, and it was on the TV.

Prabhupāda: That is also, you have made picture. I have not gone and seen that. How can I believe you? The same argument. You say that you have gone to moon planet, but I have not seen that you have gone there. How can I believe you?

Vipina: Is there some other way we can argue with them, Prabhupāda?

Prabhupāda: No, no, that's . . . answer this question, that you say you have not seen. I say yes, that's all right, because you did not see, therefore you don't believe. But I did not see you also that you have gone to moon planet. How can I believe you?

Ravīndra-svarūpa: How is it possible to deceive so many people?

Prabhupāda: Whether it is not possible or possible, but if you put this argument, that I have not seen, that I can say that I have . . . (end)