Go to Vaniquotes | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia


Vanisource - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge


670304 - Letter to Satsvarupa written from San Francisco: Difference between revisions

m (1 revision(s))
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{LE_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}
[[Category:1967 - Letters]]
[[Category:1967-03 - Lectures, Conversations and Letters]]
[[Category:1967 - Lectures, Conversations and Letters]]
[[Category:Letters Written from - USA]]
[[Category:Letters Written from - USA, San Francisco]]
[[Category:Lectures, Conversations and Letters - USA]]
[[Category:Lectures, Conversations and Letters - USA, San Francisco]]
[[Category:Satsvarupa - Letters]]
[[Category:1967 - Letters with Scans of the Originals]]
[[Category:1967 - Letters with Scans of the Originals - checked]]
[[Category: Letters - Signed, 1967]]
[[Category: Letters - With Added Handwriting]]
{{LetterScan|670304_-_Letter_Note_to_Satsvarupa.jpg|Letter to Satsvarupa}}


My Dear Satsvarupa


In your previous letter you informed me that you are not going to pay a farthing unless you are in possession of the house. So you must follow the determination. You should not sign the check if you are not satisfied yourself. ACB
 
{{LE_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}
Note to Satsvarupa.
 
My Dear Satsvarupa<br />
In your previous letter you informed me that you are not going to pay a farthing unless you are ''[handwritten]'' in possession of the house. So you must follow the determination. You should not sign the check if you are not satisfied yourself.<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[[File:SP Initial.png|130px]]

Latest revision as of 16:53, 17 February 2021

Letter to Satsvarupa



Note to Satsvarupa.

My Dear Satsvarupa
In your previous letter you informed me that you are not going to pay a farthing unless you are [handwritten] in possession of the house. So you must follow the determination. You should not sign the check if you are not satisfied yourself.