Go to Vaniquotes | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia


Vanisource - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge


660801 - Lecture BG 04.14-19 - New York: Difference between revisions

m (1 revision(s))
 
No edit summary
 
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{BGL_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}
[[Category:1966 - Lectures]]
<div class="lec_code">660801BG.NY</div>
[[Category:1966 - Lectures and Conversations]]
[[Category:1966 - Lectures, Conversations and Letters]]
[[Category:1966-08 - Lectures and Letters]]
[[Category:Lectures - USA]]
[[Category:Lectures - USA, New York]]
[[Category:Lectures, Conversations and Letters - USA]]
[[Category:Lectures, Conversations and Letters - USA, New York]]
[[Category:Lectures - Bhagavad-gita As It Is]]
[[Category:BG Lectures - Chapter 04|0414-19]]
[[Category:Audio Files 60.01 to 90.00 Minutes‎‎]]
[[Category:1966 - Lectures, Conversations and Letters]]
[[Category:1966 - New Audio - Released in June 2019]]
<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=Category:Lectures - by Date]]'''[[:Category:Lectures - by Date|Lectures by Date]], [[:Category:1966 - Lectures|1966]]'''</div>
{{RandomImage}}




Prabhupāda:  
<!-- Nectar Drop Code Start -->
<div class="center">[[Vanipedia:660801 Lecture - Srila Prabhupada Speaks a Nectar Drop in New York|''' <span style="display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: center"><b class="fa fa-solid fa-volume-up" style="font-size: 330%">&nbsp;</b><big>Listen to a 'Nectar Drop' created from this lecture'''</big></span>]]</div>
<!-- Nectar Drop Link end -->


<div class="lec_verse">
...mayā sṛṣṭaṁ<br />
guṇa-karma-vibhāgaśaḥ<br />
tasya kartāram api māṁ<br />
viddhy akartāram avyayam<br />
[[BG 4.13]] </div>


<div class="code">660801BG.NY - August 01, 1966</div>


This verse was being discussed in our last meeting, that there are four divisions of men in the human society, and that division is natural. That is not artificial because the whole material nature is working under the influence of three modes of nature: goodness, passion and ignorance. You cannot classify the whole human race into one. So long we are in the material world, it is not possible to make everyone on the same standard. It is not possible because each and everyone is working under the influence of different modes of nature. Therefore there must be division, natural division. This point we have discussed.


But when we transcend this material plane, then there is oneness. There is no more division. Then how to transcend? That transcendental nature is Kṛṣṇa consciousness. As soon as we become fully absorbed in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, we are transcendental to these material modes of nature.
<mp3player>https://s3.amazonaws.com/vanipedia/full/1966/660801BG-NEW_YORK.mp3</mp3player>


<div class="lec_verse">
māṁ ca yo 'vyabhicāreṇa<br />
bhakti-yogena sevate<br />
sa guṇān samatītyaitān<br />
brahma-bhūyāya kalpate<br />
[[BG 14.26]] </div>


'''Prabhupāda:'''


You'll find in the Bhagavad-gītā, in the Fourteenth Chapter: "Anyone who is fully engaged in the Kṛṣṇa consciousness activities, he is at once in the transcendental position."
:''na māṁ karmāṇi limpanti''
:''na me karma-phale spṛhā''
:''iti māṁ yo 'bhijānāti''
:''karmabhir na sa badhyate''
:([[BG 4.14 (1972)|BG 4.14]])


Brahma-bhūyāya kalpate. We are, by nature, we are not matter. We are Brahman. Ahaṁ brahmāsmi. The propaganda of Śaṅkarācārya was mainly based on this understanding, that "We should not think that we are the products of this material nature." We are not products of material nature. It is by some accident, by freaks of nature, by misfortune or some way or other, we are now in contact with it. But actually I am spirit, Brahman. So that Brahman nature has to be invoked, has to be...
Now . . .


We are... Actually, just like a diseased person, he has to be brought into the healthy condition of life, to cure the disease. So just a man, when he's diseased and when he's healthy, from external feature, the same. Just like I am now healthy. So my external feature—I have got two hands and two legs and face and so many things—the same body, when I am in the diseased condition, you'll find the same hands, the same legs and mouth and everything, but the condition is different. I'll speak something nonsense because the condition has changed in the diseased condition. Similarly, in our diseased condition... This material life is our diseased condition.
(aside) You can come please forward. Yes. Yes. Come forward. There is . . . sit down.


So when we are in the healthy condition, that is called Brahman. That is called Brahman condition, healthy. So that Brahman condition can at once be regained as soon as we engaged ourself fully, cent percent, in the activities of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. That is clearly mentioned in the Bhagavad-gītā, in the Fourteenth Chapter you'll find. Māṁ ca yaḥ avyabhicāreṇa bhakti-yogena sevate: "Anyone who renders the transcendental loving service unto Me," sa guṇān samatītya etān, "that person immediately transcends the modes of material nature." Samatītya. Sama. Samyag atītya, "perfectly transcending." Samatītya.  
''Karmabhir sa na badhyate''. Now, the whole world is bound by his own ''karma'', action. Everyone, every living entity . . . in the ''Brahma-saṁhitā'' there is a nice verse about this . . .


Then, transcending the material nature, then he becomes zero? No. That is the real nature. Now, the philosophy which preaches that "After our liberation, after nirvāṇa of this material existence, there is zero," oh, that is very dangerous theory because we are not attracted by zero. That is our nature, living entity. Now, suppose I am suffering from some disease and there are so many ailments, and if some doctor comes: "Oh, let me finish your ailments by killing you," oh, will you agree? You'll say, "No, no, better let me suffer from the disease. I don't want to be killed." Is it not? Will you agree? Suppose you have got too much suffering, miseries of life, and I suggest, "All right, let me cut your throat and kill you, and everything will be finished." "Oh, no, no, no, I'm not agreeable to that." That is the sane man's statement. "Oh, I am not going to be killed for ending my miseries." That is the nature. So the theory that "After making end of all these material miseries, there is nothing, void," oh, that is not attractive. That is not attractive at all.
There is a nice verse, ''yas tu'' . . . beginning from the germ . . . there is a germ which is called ''indra-gopa''. You know that among the living entities, the germs are in very minute form. You cannot see even with your microscope. In a, in a space of one millimeter, you can find millions of germs. That is scientific truth. So beginning from the germs, which are called . . .


And that is not the fact. Real fact is that I am sac-cid-ānanda-vigraha [Bs. 5.1] , part and parcel of the Supreme. The Supreme Lord is sac-cid-ānanda-vigraha, and I am qualitatively one with Him. I am also, although I am small... Just like a particle of the sea water, that is also salty. That is also salty. The taste of a small drop of sea water is the same as the taste of the big, vast, big ocean of the, Atlantic Ocean. So the quality is the same. Similarly, I may be small. I may be a spiritual atom. My position is that I am spiritual atom, and the Supreme Spirit is all, the greatest, but that does not mean I am different from the quality. I am of the same quality. So I am not void. Na hanyate hanyamāne śarīre [[BG 2.20]] .  
Beginning from the germs up to the heavenly kingdom . . . the king of heaven is called Indra, and the smallest, minutest germ, it is also called ''indra-gopa'' in Sanskrit language. So in the ''Brahma-saṁhitā'' (Bs 5.54) it is said that, "Beginning from this indra up to that Indra . . ." That means "Beginning from the germ which is known as ''indra-gopa'' up to the point of the king who is also known as Indra, all of them are bound up by the reaction of his own ''karma'', or his own work."


If by frustration one commits suicide, oh, that is not the end of his miseries. He creates another misery. He creates another misery by committing suicide. Just like here, in the state law, if somebody attempts suicide and takes some poison, and if by treatment of the physician he's all right, he's again under the law, to be punished. Perhaps you know it. After curing him from that poisonous effect, he is under criminal code of the state: "Why you have attempted suicide?" Similarly, in the laws of nature, if you commit suicide, that is another criminal act. So suicidal policy, to end this misery of life, is not all. We must have, I mean to say, greater life.
Every work which you are doing, good or bad, we have to suffer or enjoy the reaction of our work. And so long we have to suffer or enjoy the reaction of our work, as long as we shall go on like this, so long we have to accept this material body. This material body is just given to us by the arrangement of nature's law for the exact status of suffering or enjoyment.


In the Bhagavad-gītā you have read—already we have discussed— paraṁ dṛṣṭvā nivartate. Paraṁ dṛṣṭvā nivartate: [[BG 9.59]] "One has to end this miserable life after finding out a life of bliss and knowledge and eternity." That should be our... We should not be trying only to end these miseries of life, expecting something void. No. Therefore Lord Kṛṣṇa... This cātur-varṇyaṁ mayā sṛṣṭam [[BG 9.59]] , these divisions of human society, is created by the Lord because to elevate ourself from the clutches of this deluding māyā, or illusion. So just like one has to be educated from the lower class to the postgraduate class, similarly, this division of labor is there just to elevate one from the lowest stage of consciousness to the highest stage of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. So that is a cooperation. That is a cooperation.
Just like you have seen different animals, they have got different process of eating. Say for tiger. Tiger, they have bodies made for eating raw flesh and raw blood. So all the body is so made that they have got particular nails and jaws and teeth so that they can do that.


Just like my body. My body, there are different parts of my body. The head is the most important part of my body. The next important part is my arms. The next important part is my belly. And the next important part is my legs. But although the head is the most important part of my body, there is no question of neglecting the lowest part of my body, the legs. Similarly, although there are divisions in the human society, four divisions, according to the different modes of nature... The highest class is called the brāhmaṇa, or the most intellectual class. And the next class is called the kṣatriya, just the administrative class. And the next is the vaiśya, or the mercantile, productive class. And the next is the śūdras, or the laborer class. So all of them, they are required. But if they cooperate for Kṛṣṇa consciousness, so there is no strife between these higher and lower classes.
Similarly, you can see the hog. They have to eat the stool. Oh, they have got a particular shape of mouth so that they can easily do that. Now, we are human being. We are meant for taking vegetables and fruits. Now, our teeth is just like knife which can cut the vegetables and the fruits.


We find in the present social, I mean to say, status of our life, we are actually existing in four divisions, but there is no cooperation. Practically, everyone is dissatisfied. Take for example the strife between the capitalist class and the laborer class. They, they are trying in different way. There is no compromise. There is always friction. And especially in a country like India, oh, there is always friction, and other countries also. So they are not satisfied. Recently also, in your country also, there was strike by the bus drivers and the subway drivers and administration. So there is always strike. Why? This is due to lack of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. This is due to lack of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. There cannot be any cooperation unless there is Kṛṣṇa consciousness. So Kṛṣṇa consciousness is an essential fact for harmonizing even the present material society. That is required. Kṛṣṇa consciousness is so important thing, that cooperation...
So all these bodies, I mean to say . . . I am giving particular stress to the body. A king's body, a poor man's body. A poor man, he has to work very hard. His body is very sturdy. He can work very nicely. But a son of very aristocratic family or king, oh, his body is very delicate. He cannot work. He can apply his brain in something else.


The same example can be said here also, that the leg, the hands, and the belly and the mouth—what they are? They are cooperating. Cooperating for what? Cooperating for maintaining this body. This is the common interest. And how it is cooperated? To supply everything to the stomach. The brain is working, earning some money, the hand is fetching something and cooking, and the mouth is chewing, and the leg is going, but the whole function is targeted to fulfill the demands of the stomach. If these parts of the body non-cooperate with the stomach, they'll become feeble and weak and there will be no capacity to work.
So, so long we are . . . these bodies are made according to the different status of our work we have done in our past life. And next body is being prepared according to the work which we are doing now. But here Kṛṣṇa says that as soon as one can understand the transcendental nature of Kṛṣṇa's activities, he becomes free from the reaction of activities.


Similarly, Kṛṣṇa consciousness means that in whatever division I may be... I may be the brāhmaṇa, I may be the kṣatriya, I may be the vaiśya, or the śūdra. That doesn't matter. But if we cooperate for Kṛṣṇa consciousness, there will be perfect peace in the world. This is a fact. So this idea of Kṛṣṇa consciousness is very important factor, although people are, I mean to say, they are unknown to this fact, although it is stated in the Bhagavad-gītā.  
Now, here is the question, that because we are now preparing ourself to have our spiritual body or spiritual life developed, and being freed from this material existence, therefore our duty should be such so that we may not be entangled again into this material body. That can be made possible if we are Kṛṣṇa conscious. If we study Kṛṣṇa, what is Kṛṣṇa, what are His transcendental activities, how His energies are acting in this material world or spiritual world, all this . . . it is a great science. Kṛṣṇa is a great science.


In the world, Bhagavad-gītā is very popular book. They are reading Bhagavad-gītā. And in Dr. Radhakrishnan's book we understand that Bhagavad-gītā has been so important book throughout the whole world that there is a sect in Germany who are called Indo-German religious sect. Perhaps some of you may know. They are acting on the principle of Bhagavad-gītā. So actually, in the Bhagavad-gītā, the most important part is Kṛṣṇa consciousness. In every verse, in every chapter, in every conclusion, you'll find Kṛṣṇa, the speaker of Bhagavad-gītā is giving stress on His personal self.
So if we study Kṛṣṇa science with great attention, then the result will be that we shall be free from the reaction of our activities. This is clearly said here, na mam ''karmāṇi limpanti na me karma-phale spṛhā'' ([[BG 4.14 (1972)|BG 4.14]]). The Lord has nothing to do. He is full. He has nothing to do. But why He does? Just to set example. Set example. He's not bound up by the works which He is doing in the material world. This science has to be learned. Na me karma-phale spṛhā. And anyone who understands this transcendental nature of Kṛṣṇa, he is also becoming free from the reaction of ''karma''.


Māṁ hi pārtha vyapāśritya ye 'pi syuḥ... [[BG 9.32]]. Mām, this mām. Mām means "Me," "Unto Me." Kṛṣṇa says, "Unto Me." But there are many miscreants who are interpreting this mām as "everyone," as "everyone." Just like when I say, "I want a glass of water," does it mean that you want a glass of water? No. My individuality, "I want a glass of water." But they are making, by jugglery of words, that when I say, "I want a glass of water," that means, "everyone wants a glass of water." Is it a fact? Similarly, when Kṛṣṇa says, "I," they identify with the "I" themselves. That is their interpretation. That is misinterpretation.
:''evaṁ jñātvā kṛtaṁ karma''
:''pūrvair api mumukṣubhiḥ''
:''kuru karmaiva tasmāt tvaṁ''
:''pūrvaiḥ pūrvataraṁ kṛtam''
:([[BG 4.15 (1972)|BG 4.15]])


Bhagavad-gītā... Therefore, although Bhagavad-gītā is very popular in the world, due to this misinterpretation of so many scholars, they have been not properly understood. That is a fact. The Bhagavad-gītā explains, very nicely explains, that this cātur-varṇyaṁ mayā sṛṣṭaṁ guṇa-karma-vibhāgaśaḥ [[BG 4.13]] , that this division of human society into four classes, that is established by Kṛṣṇa. But He is out of it. He's not one of us. He does not belong to this cātur-varṇyam. Suppose when Kṛṣṇa comes in incarnation, in His body, it does not mean that He belongs to either of these classes, either to the brāhmaṇas...  
Now, the whole spiritual process is to follow the example of the previous ''ācāryas'' who have attained, I mean to . . . success.


Just like Kṛṣṇa appeared Himself as the son of Devakī or Vasudeva. Vasudeva was belonging to the royal family, kṣatriya. So Kṛṣṇa played the part just like a kṣatriya. Kṣatriya means administrative class. But that does not mean that Kṛṣṇa belongs to the kṣatriya class. It is to be understood. There are daśa-avatāras. There are many incarnations of Kṛṣṇa. Just like the first avatāra, incarnation, is called Matsyāvatāra.
(aside) These boys, wherefrom they come? They disturb.


<div class="lec_verse">
:''evaṁ jñātvā kṛtaṁ karma''
pralaya-payodhi-jale dhṛtavān asi vedaṁ<br />
:''pūrvair api mumukṣubhiḥ''
vihita-vahitra-caritram akhedam<br />
:''kuru karmaiva tasmāt tvaṁ''
keśava dhṛta-mīna-śarīra jaya jagadīśa hare ** </div>
:''pūrvaiḥ pūrvataraṁ kṛtam''
:([[BG 4.15 (1972)|BG 4.15]])


Now, there are . . . Arjuna . . . Kṛṣṇa is advising Arjuna that "If you act and follow in the footprints of the previous ''ācāryas'' and previous great devotees and kings who have done in their life ''karma-yoga'', acting for Kṛṣṇa, if we follow that principle, then you shall also become free from the reaction of activities." Because Arjuna was very much afraid for being entangled in the reaction of his fighting, Kṛṣṇa therefore assures that "You shall not be . . . if you follow, if you act, if you fight for My sake, then you will not be entangled by the reaction of ''karma''." ''Kiṁ karma kim akarmeti'' . . .


Keśava, Kṛṣṇa, appeared just like a fish. He appeared Himself in the fish community. Oh, but that does not mean that He was fish. If you say, if you think that, taking a fish, "Oh, it is the generation of Kṛṣṇa..." Of course, everything is Kṛṣṇa, from another point of view.
:''kiṁ karma kim akarmeti''
:''kavayo 'py atra mohitāḥ''
:''tat te karma pravakṣyāmi''
:''yaj jñātvā mokṣyase 'śubhāt''
:([[BG 4.16 (1972)|BG 4.16]])


So similarly, Kṛṣṇa... Because in the previous verse we have discussed. Simply by knowing the transcendental nature of Kṛṣṇa, one becomes liberated. How you can understand Kṛṣṇa? By His transcendental nature. That is being described in this verse. Tasya kartāram api. Tasya kartāram api māṁ viddhi: "Although I have established these divisions of the human society into four classes, so I am not one of them." This has to be understood. Means as soon as we make it a mistake that "Oh, Kṛṣṇa, He appeared in the royal family of Vasudeva, so He belonged to the kṣatriya community, or the administrative class," no. Then you can understand the transcendental nature of Kṛṣṇa.
Now, people are misled what is ''karma'', what is actually work, and what is not work, ''akarma''. ''Kiṁ karma kim akarmeti kavayo 'pi''. ''Kavayaḥ'' means great sages, great saintly persons, great philosophers. They are also sometimes bewildered to understand what class of activities are genuine and what class of activities are non genuine.


And if you have got any doubt, you can ask, you can understand. But as soon as you understand it rightly, you become a liberated person. That is the secret. As soon as you understand the fact as it is, the transcendental nature of Kṛṣṇa, oh, you step forward to your liberation. So similarly, these things are being described one after another. The next śloka,
Therefore Kṛṣṇa says that, "I shall teach you what are genuine activities and what are non genuine activities." ''Tat te karma pravakṣyāmi yaj jñātvā mokṣyase aśubhāt. Yaj jñātvā'': "If you understand the principle of working, then you shall get free from the bondage, material bondage."


<div class="lec_verse">
We have to work in such a way that we may . . . may not be entangled with this material bondage. Otherwise, as we have explained, this body is our material bondage, and it is the result of our activities. So we have to perform our activities so nicely and so cautiously so that I may not be entangled, I may be free even in this life, and ''tyaktvā dehaṁ punar janma naiti'' ([[BG 4.9 (1972)|BG 4.9]]): I can, after leaving this present body, I'll have no more to come into this material world. This science is being taught by Kṛṣṇa to Arjuna. And the whole activity, the whole activity is that if we engage ourself, as we find it in the Eleventh Chapter, last verse:
na māṁ karmāṇi limpanti<br />
na me karma-phale spṛhā<br />
iti māṁ yo 'bhijānāti<br />
karmabhir na sa badhyate<br />
[[BG 4.14]] </div>


:''mat-karma-kṛn mat-paramo''
:''mad-bhaktaḥ saṅga-varjitaḥ''
:''nirvairaḥ sarva-bhūteṣu''
:''yaḥ sa mām eti pāṇḍava''
:([[BG 11.55 (1972)|BG 11.55]])


Just see. Na māṁ karmāṇi limpanti. Karmāṇi. Just like we are acting something. Anything we are doing, there is some reaction. There is some reaction. In every action there is some reaction.
Now, this one verse is sufficient to teach the essence of ''Śrīmad Bhagavad-gītā'', that "Anyone who is engaged in My work," "in My work," ''mat-karma-kṛt'' . . . then what is that, "My work"? That, "My work" is explained in the last word of the . . . and the last instruction of the ''Bhagavad-gītā'', that ''sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja'' ([[BG 18.66 (1972)|BG 18.66]]). Arjuna is taught—and with the example of Arjuna, every one of us is taught—that we have to work only which is sanctioned by Kṛṣṇa. ''Sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja'' ([[BG 18.66 (1972)|BG 18.66]]).


Just like I am speaking here. This vibration is being recorded all over the universe, this sound vibration. You know the radio message, how it is transmitted in the modern world. Similarly, as I am speaking, so whatever I am doing, that is immediately recorded and there will be some reaction. Just like the sound vibration, it reacts who has got some radio machine, there is reacting, similarly, every, any action, either good action or bad action, it will have reaction. That is the law of nature. You cannot be free from the reaction of my action.
That is the . . . that is the mission of human life. But we do not know that. We do not know that. And because we do not know that, we engage ourself with so many work which is concerned with the bodily and material conception of life. So ''mat-karma-kṛt''. So one has to do what Kṛṣṇa desires, just like Arjuna did. Kṛṣṇa desired that he should fight. Arjuna did not like to fight, but because Kṛṣṇa desired, he accepted to fight. This is Kṛṣṇa's work. That we have to select.


But here Kṛṣṇa says, na māṁ karmāṇi limpanti. There is no reaction of the activities of Kṛṣṇa. Just like Kṛṣṇa was commanding over Arjuna in the battlefield of Kurukṣetra, and practically He was ordering that "You must fight. You must kill the enemy." Now, this act of Kṛṣṇa's has no reaction on Him. One should understand it. Na māṁ karmāṇi limpanti [[BG 4.14]] .  
Now, what is the work at the present moment for us, Kṛṣṇa's work? Kṛṣṇa is not present now to dictate that, "This is My work." Just like Arjuna was fortunate enough. He was personally present before Arjuna. Lord Kṛṣṇa was personally present, and He was directing. But that does not mean that we have no direction. We have direction. We have direction. In the ''Bhagavad-gītā'' you'll find that anyone who preaches the gospel of ''Bhagavad-gītā'' to the people of the world, he is the most dear, the dearest person in the world to Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa accepts him the dearest person.


If there is any difficulty to understand, we may consult persons who are in the understanding. We may consult books. We may consult authorities. That we can do because inquiry is always allowed. Tad viddhi praṇipātena paripraśnena sevayā [[BG 4.34]] . The, I mean to say, the transcendental inquiry is never forbidden. A sincere person, one can make inquiry. But fact is this. If I cannot understand in my present condition, that is my misunderstanding. But the fact is this that Kṛṣṇa, when He comes, He is not any, like any one of us. He's transcendental. Neither any act which He does, it has got reaction. And He says, na me karma-phale spṛhā, "I have no desire for any fruitive activities."
So therefore our duty is to preach the principles of this ''Bhagavad-gītā'', to make people Kṛṣṇa conscious. People are suffering for want of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Therefore each and every one of us should be engaged in the preaching work of Kṛṣṇa consciousness for the benefit of the whole world.


Just like we want to do something. Suppose I want to do some business. And what is the idea? Because I want to make some profit out of the business, and if there is sufficient profit, I shall be gainer, I shall be rich man, I shall be able to enjoy life and so on, so on, so many things, I have got background. So I have my desires whenever I do something. We conditioned souls, whenever we do something, there is some desire behind it. And what is that desire? For enjoyment. That's all.
Lord Caitanya, whose picture you see in the front of our this store, Lord Caitanya very nicely preached this philosophy of Kṛṣṇa consciousness.


But Kṛṣṇa says, na me karma-phale spṛhā. Because He has nothing to desire. He is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. He is full with everything. Now, sometimes Kṛṣṇa is misunderstood that Kṛṣṇa, in His boyhood, He had so many girlfriends. Perhaps you may know, who has written, gone through Kṛṣṇa's life. Or in His youthhood, He married sixteen thousand wives. This is described in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. He had 16,108 wives. So sometimes who does not understand Kṛṣṇa, they think, "Oh, Kṛṣṇa was so sensuous. Oh, He kept sixteen thousand wives." No, that is not the fact. What was the fact? The fact is Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme Lord... We have got different relationship with the Supreme Lord constitutionally, every one of us.
:''āmāra ājñāya guru hañā tāra' ei deśa''
:''yāre dekha tāre kaha 'kṛṣṇa'-upadeśa''
:([[CC Madhya 7.128]])


The relationship, as we experience in this material world... Just like you are my brother, or she is my sister, or he is my father, he is my, so many relationship we have got. So all these relationships are calculated into five. There are... Practically, there are twelve relationships. Seven relationships are contra, against. Just like you are my enemy. I want to kill you. You want to kill me. That is also one of the relationships, but this is contra. This is not favorable. This is called vivarta. Hāsya, something I see in you, I begin to laugh, or something you see in me, you begin to laugh. So there are different... Altogether, there are twelve relationships in every activities of our life. Out of that, five relationships is very favorable. Not five exactly, but... Yes, five.
The Lord says, ''āmāra ājñāya''. Because He came with this mission, to preach Kṛṣṇa consciousness, so He says: "Just take My order, and all of you, you become the spiritual master." ''Guru hañā''. Anyone who teaches people Kṛṣṇa consciousness, never mind what, what he is and where he is, he should be understood the spiritual master.


Just like I am sitting here on this dais. So I have got some relationship. What is that relationship? That this dais is giving me service silently. There is relationship. I am comfortably sitting here. So this is one relationship. The next relationship is that one wants to serve me or I want to serve him. Out of love, I want... Oh. Just like some of you: "Swamiji, I have brought some fruits for you." This is out of love. That means you want to serve me. So this relationship with the dais and that relationship, to come, and that relationship, to come and bring forth some fruit for me, that is higher. That is called dāsya, or friendship. So the silent relationship, the servitude relationship, the friendly relationship, then paternal relationship, then conjugal relationship.
So Lord Kṛṣṇa, Lord Caitanya gives order to everyone that ''āmāra ājñāya guru hañā tāra' ei deśa'': "Every country, every, I mean to say, province, you go everywhere and just preach this Kṛṣṇa consciousness."


So these relationships which we find here in this material world, they are reflections of the original relationship with Kṛṣṇa. Because in the Vedānta-sūtra you find, janmādy asya yataḥ: [[SB 1.1.1]] "Everything, whichever you find in this material world, that is born from the Absolute Truth." So in the Absolute Truth, there is the relationships, these relationships, which we are experiencing here. But they are perverted. Perverted. Because suppose I accept somebody as master, and I am serving, and as soon as the salary stops, my service is also stopped. Therefore it is perverted. Or I am... There is a girl I love, or there is a man I love. Oh, as soon as there is some misunderstanding, we break. So that relationship, that conjugal relationship, that paternal relationship, that friendly relationship.
:''āmāra ājñāya guru hañā tāra' ei deśa''
:''yāre dekha tāre kaha 'kṛṣṇa'-upadeśa''
:([[CC Madhya 7.128]])


Just like you'll find in the Bhagavad-gītā that Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna, they are in relationship of friendship. Now, when Kṛṣṇa, when Kṛṣṇa says that "I told this yoga, Bhagavad-gītā yoga to the sun-god, say, some millions of years before," and Arjuna, just to represent our interest, he said, "Oh, Kṛṣṇa, You are my contemporary. How is that You spoke Bhagavad-gītā forty millions of years before to sun-god?" So Kṛṣṇa answered that bahūni me janmāni tava cārjuna: "Both you and Myself, we were born many times, but you have forgotten. I remember." That is the distinction.
''Kṛṣṇa-upadeśa'' means this ''Bhagavad-gītā'', the instruction given by Kṛṣṇa. That is ''kṛṣṇa-upadeśa''. And ''kṛṣṇa-upadeśa'' is also ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam''. ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'' is full of instruction by which one can become Kṛṣṇa conscious.


Now, here we see that the friendship of Kṛṣṇa is going on not in this birth, but perpetually that friendship is there. But in the material world, the friendship, it will exist for few years and then break. Therefore it is reflection. It is not real. If you make your friendship with Kṛṣṇa, that will never break. If you make your master Kṛṣṇa, you'll never be cheated. If you love Kṛṣṇa as your son, He'll never die. Similarly, if you love Kṛṣṇa as your lover or husband, He will be the best husband, the best lover. There will be no divorce. That is Kṛṣṇa consciousness. So similarly, there are many... Because Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Lord, He has unlimited... He is unlimited, and He has unlimited number of devotees. Now, some of them are trying to love Him as lover or husband.
Similarly, in the ''Bhagavad-gītā'' also, we receive the instruction how we can become Kṛṣṇa conscious. So Lord Caitanya selects these very two particular books, ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'' and ''Bhagavad-gītā'', and He asks everyone, in any part of the world, to take up this matter very seriously and preach in the world. That is the direct order of Kṛṣṇa.


Now, what Kṛṣṇa will do? In the previous verse we have read that ye yathā māṁ prapadyante tāṁs tathaiva bhajāmy aham: [[BG 4.11]] "Anyone who wants Me in some sort of relationship, I accept that. I accept that." So the fact is that these wives of Kṛṣṇa—that is the real fact—in their previous life they made tremendous penance to achieve Kṛṣṇa as their husband. Just like in the Bhāgavata there is a verse. Śukadeva Gosvāmī's describing... These things are very sublime things. Of course, if you kindly hear them attentively, you'll feel sublime pleasure undoubtedly.
So if we take up this missionary work, to preach ''Bhagavad-gītā'' as it is, without any interpretation and without any motive behind it, as it is, as Kṛṣṇa said . . . we should present as it is. People misrepresent ''Bhagavad-gītā'' by their own interpretation. That should not be done. ''Bhagavad-gītā'' as it is should be presented before the people of the world. They are suffering for want of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, and as soon as they become Kṛṣṇa conscious, their life becomes happy. So this is the mission of this Society, International Society for Krishna Consciousness.


In the Bhāgavata, when Kṛṣṇa was playing with boys... Just like boys play, Kṛṣṇa, when He was playing just like a boy... So the Śukadeva Gosvāmī describes that attitude: itthaṁ satāṁ brahma-sukhānubhūtyā dāsyaṁ gatānāṁ para-daivatena [[SB 10.12.11]] . The purport is that, that "Here is a thing, these boys, these boys who are playing with Kṛṣṇa, that for many, many lives they undergone penances to have Kṛṣṇa as their playmate. Now they are enjoying life." So the playmates of Kṛṣṇa, they are not ordinary persons. They underwent many, many births' tapasya, or penances. Just like one has to seek the favor of the Supreme Lord by penances, by tapasya, so they desired like that, and Kṛṣṇa has accepted, "All right. Come on. Let us play." And what is that play? Kṛṣṇa is playing with the boys just like boys play. They say, sometimes make some one body's defeated. So when the, he became, he has to carry the other boy on his shoulder, so many manufactured playing things.
As Kṛṣṇa advises, ''saṅga-varjitaḥ'': "You should not have any attraction or any attachment for these worldly activities." If you have got attachment or attraction for these material activities, then you cannot have Kṛṣṇa . . . you cannot become Kṛṣṇa conscious. But that does not mean you should be inimical to the people of the world. No. It is your duty to give them the highest instruction, spiritual instruction, that "You become Kṛṣṇa conscious." And try your best. Try your best.


So similarly, sometimes Kṛṣṇa was being defeated. So He has to carry other boy on His shoulder. These things were being done. Because we have no idea of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, therefore we take it as trifling. But Kṛṣṇa consciousness is so sublime that all perfection of our desires are there. Whatever we are desiring, whatever desires we have got constitutionally, all those desires will be perfectly fulfilled when we are in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. You see? So Kṛṣṇa, here He says that na me karma-phale spṛhā. Kṛṣṇa did not require any friend to play with Him.
''Nirvairaḥ''. You should not be anyone's enemy. Others may become your enemy. Because it is quite natural. Anyone who comes with the message of the Supreme Lord, there are persons who become his enemy. Just like Lord Jesus Christ, he came. His only fault was that he was preaching the message of God, and people—some people, not all people—become his enemy, and he was crucified.


Neither Kṛṣṇa had any desire of having a single wife. We require wife. Why do we take the responsibility of wife? Because we have got some desire to fulfill. That's all. But He is complete in Himself, pūrṇa. A poor man can desire that "Oh, if I would have bank balance, say, one thousand dollars in the bank, I would have been happy." But a rich man, who has got millions of dollars in the bank, does he desire for one hundred dollars in the bank? He has no such desire.
So this is the world. Anyone who comes as a most, I mean to say, beneficial friend of the world, people take him as the enemy, and they do the same mistake again so that they are bound up again by their own work and they remain in this material world to repeat birth and death, one after another, one after another.


Similarly, if Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, why He should have desire for His? He is full. Rather, He fulfills others' desires. That is the thing. "Man proposes; God disposes." Why God should have desire? Otherwise He's imperfect. So Kṛṣṇa has... Here He says, na me karma-phale spṛhā: "Oh, I have no desire to fulfill." Because He is full. Whatever He wants... Parāsya śakti... In the Vedic literature, you'll find. Parāsya śaktir vividhaiva śrūyate, svābhāvikī jñāna-bala-kriyā ca [[CC Madhya 13.65, purport]] . The Supreme Brahman, He has got different, diverse energies. As soon as He desires, everything is done immediately.
So we should be very much cautious. We should not miss this chance of this human body to become Kṛṣṇa consciousness . . . to become conscious of Kṛṣṇa. So therefore we must know how to work. How to work. ''Kiṁ karma kim akarmeti'' ([[BG 4.16 (1972)|BG 4.16]]).


If I have to manufacture this stand, oh, I'll have to arrange for so many things. I'll have to go to the brass smith and ask him and give him some money and so many things. But the parāsya śaktir... If I have got... Even a, even a yogi, even a yogi, there is a prāpti-siddhi. You have heard the name of yoga. The yoga system is not so plaything as we have got so many branches in America. They are playthings.
If we do not know how to work, then we shall be entangled in these material activities. Therefore Kṛṣṇa says ''saṅga-varjitaḥ''. Of course, a Kṛṣṇa conscious person, he also acts just like another material actor, but because he works in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, therefore he's not bound up.


Actually, the yoga system is so perfect that they get eight kinds of perfection before achieving the real perfection. And what is that perfection, the eight kinds of...? Aṇimā, laghimā-siddhi, prāpti, īśitā, vaśitā, like that. Aṇimā-siddhi means when a yogi is, is not exactly perfect, when he's on the way of perfection, he gets this opportunity. He becomes... He can become the smallest. If you pack a yogi in a room and lock him, he'll come out. He'll come out.
Just like take the example of Arjuna. He also fought just like ordinary military man, but because he fought in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, therefore he was not bound up by the reaction of such fighting. Fighting is not necessary. Fighting is not necessary. Peace, peace is necessary. But sometimes peace is disturbed. At that time, fighting is also necessary. You cannot . . . you cannot absolutely give up the process of fighting in this material world. That is not possible. Because there are persons who will create trouble. Just like we are experiencing. We are not going to do any harm to anybody, but sometimes they are coming and creating disturbance.


In Benares, India, there was a Trailinga Swami, yogi. He was sitting on the street naked. So government took objection, "Oh, you are sitting... It is obscene. You cannot." "Oh, I'll sit." Then he was put into the custody. So he came out. He was locked. That is not a very old story, say, about hundred years before, that Trailinga Swami. So thrice, four times, he was put into the custody, and he came out. So this is the first siddhi, first perfection.
So these disturbing elements are there, and this is always there. The material nature is like that. Therefore fighting cannot be abolished in the . . . when it is necessary, absolutely necessary. In the Battle of Kurukṣetra, Lord Kṛṣṇa advocated this fighting because it was absolutely necessary.


Similarly, a yogi also, if he wants... Perhaps I cited this story. In my childhood I had my teacher and he had his spiritual master, a great yogi. So my teacher used to narrate the story of his spiritual master, that one day he went to the spiritual master, and the spiritual master asked him, "Well, what do you want to eat?" And they replied that "I want fresh pomegranates from Afghanistan." "All right, sit." So in the room they saw the, a branch of pomegranates just with juices just like somebody has snatched the branch from the tree, and it was there. Yogis, they can perform such wonderful things. If I want this thing, I have to endeavor for it, but a yogi can at once make it. These are some of the preliminary perfections of yogi.
So anything—it does not matter what it is—when it is sanctioned by Kṛṣṇa, it has no reaction. That is the real work. Other, anything which we do which may be very good work in the estimation of this material world, but that is bound to make you entangled in this material world. This secret one should learn.


So Kṛṣṇa is called Yogeśvara. He is the... You'll find in the Bhagavad-gītā, He's described as Yogeśvara. He's the master of all yogic principles. So for Him, why there shall be desire for enjoyment. He's so perfect that He hasn't got to marry, He hasn't got to keep a girlfriend. He's so perfect. So this is the nature of Kṛṣṇa we have to understand. Then why He married? He married just to fulfill the desires of His devotees. Those devotees who wanted Kṛṣṇa as their husband, so He accepted them. And when He played the part of a husband, He played very perfectly. Just like when He played the part of a friend, of the boyfriend, He played it very perfectly. When He played the part of a small boy of Yaśodā, He played it perfectly.
''karmaṇo hy api boddhavyaṁ''
''boddhavyaṁ ca vikarmaṇaḥ''
''akarmaṇaś ca boddhavyaṁ''
''gahanā karmaṇo gatiḥ''
([[BG 4.17 (1972)|BG 4.17]])


Just like He was creating disturbances, when He was, say, three years old. Just like children, two year, two years old, they create always disturbance with mother. They don't leave the company of mother. At the same time, they create disturb. So Kṛṣṇa was doing that. Now, the mother decided, "Now, I shall bind You with ropes. You are creating so much disturbance." And he took, she took a stick, and: "If You create disturbance, then I'll beat You." Oh, Kṛṣṇa began to cry. So there is description in the Bhāgavata by Kuntī that "The person who is the object of frightening for everyone, He was afraid of the stick of Yaśodā." Why? He was perfectly playing the childhood.
''Karmaṇo gatiḥ'', the path of ''karma'', is very intricate. Therefore one should understand what is actually ''karma'' and what is ''akarma'' and what is ''vikarma''. And knowing this, one should perform ''karma''. But one thing is that if we simply engage ourself in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, then everything becomes clear. Otherwise, we have to make discrimination, "What I should do, what I should not do, so that I may not be entangled."


So this is the Kṛṣṇa's life. So one has to understand this thing. He was not need. Here just exactly the same thing, as He says, that na me karma-phale spṛhā: "I have no desire. I no..." Why He shall be desire? He is full. Desire, a needy person has desire. But a man who is full, why he shall be desire? Na māṁ karmāṇi limpanti na me ka... iti māṁ yo 'bhijānāti [[BG 4.14]] .  
Just like in ordinary life we, whatever we do, we sometimes, we may unconsciously doing something which is against the law, and therefore we become bound up by the laws of the state, and sometimes we are in trouble. So similarly, in the laws of nature also, the laws of nature is very strict. There is no excuse. The laws of nature is very stringent. Just like the fire. Fire, it burns. That is natural. This is the law of nature. So even a child touches fire, the fire does not excuse that, "Because it is child, oh, his hand may be . . . may not be burned." No. That is not possible. So we have to make our work very cautiously. We have to select our work very cautiously. Otherwise, the stringent laws of nature will react, and we shall be bound by the laws of material nature and suffer.


Now, just to... I have tried to explain a little portion of the Kṛṣṇa's activities. When He appeared in this world, He showed His activities just to attract us, that "You are frustrated in friendship? Come on. Make friendship with Me. Oh, you are frustrated in getting a good master? Come on. Serve Me. I am, I become your good master. Oh, you are frustrated in the love of your sons? Oh, have Me as your son." Because here we are frustrated with our sons and daughters. We expect something, but when they are grown up, they go in their own way. We are frustrated.
The Lord says that ''karmaṇo hy api boddhavyam''. One should understand how to work and one should understand what is not to be done. ''Akarmaṇaś ca boddhavyam''. ''Karmaṇo hy api boddhavyaṁ boddhavyaṁ ca vikarmaṇaḥ''. ''Karma'', ''akarma'' and ''vikarma''. There are three things. Karma means prescribed duties. Prescribed duties. That is called ''karma''. And ''akarma'' . . . ''vikarma'' means doing against the prescribed duties. That is called ''vikarma''. And ''akarma'' means something doing which has no reaction. That is not . . . of course, in the execution of such work, it appears to be working, but practically it has no reaction. That is ''vikarma''. And that ''vikarma'' is when we act on account of the Supreme. That is when we . . . ''kṛṣṇa-karma-kṛt''. When we work under the direction of Kṛṣṇa, that has no reaction. Otherwise, ''karma'', one should do prescribed duties, and one should not do which is not prescribed.


So accept Kṛṣṇa as son, and He'll be most obedient son just like He was playing the part before Yaśodā. Similarly, accept Kṛṣṇa as husband or lover. You'll never be frustrated. That is the whole philosophy. Anything, whatever desire you have got, you can establish a relationship with Kṛṣṇa in that desire and you'll be happy, perfectly happy, never to be cheated. So na māṁ karmā... iti māṁ yo 'bhijānāti. Anyone who understands this philosophy, this transcendental nature of Kṛṣṇa, then what is the result? Karmabhir na sa badhyate. Because every act... We are bound up by the reaction of our past deeds. So as soon as we understand the transcendental activities of Kṛṣṇa, at once we become free from all reactions.
For example, for example, just like the state. The state has got some laws. Now, suppose if you commit murder, it will be hang . . . you will be hanged. That is the state law. So if you again, against the state law you commit some murder, you will be hanged. This is ''vikarma'', and I should be cautious. But when the state orders, itself that, "You go and fight. Kill the enemy," that is neither ''karma'' nor ''vikarma''. So similarly, when we act under the direction of Kṛṣṇa, that is ''akarma''. That means that ''karma'', that kind of activities, has no reaction. Otherwise, we shall have to act very cautiously so that I may not be entangled with the reaction of my ''karma''.


Because I cannot understand Kṛṣṇa's transcendental activities unless I am actually dovetailed with Kṛṣṇa. Why I shall be interested with your activities unless I have got some specific purpose? So similarly, let us develop this Kṛṣṇa consciousness and gradually we shall have... Now, that is called svarūpa-siddhi. Now, every living entity has got an eternal relationship with Kṛṣṇa because we are part and...
:''karmaṇy akarma yaḥ paśyed''
:''akarmāṇi ca karma yaḥ''
:''sa buddhimān manuṣyeṣu''
:''sa yuktaḥ kṛtsna-karma-kṛt''
:([[BG 4.18 (1972)|BG 4.18]])


Just like my parts and part of the body, it has got a specific relationship with my body. Just like this hand is the part and parcel of my body. It has got a specific position in the body. My ear is the part and parcel of my body. It has got a specific position in this.
Now here is a nice verse. The Lord says, "One who can see ''karmāṇi'', ''akarma'', any work which is being done, but it has no reaction . . ." ''karmāṇi, akarma yaḥ''. "I am doing something, but the ultimate result of that work has no reaction." One who can see like that . . . ''karmaṇy akarma yaḥ paśyed akarmāṇi ca yaḥ karma''. And ''akarmāṇi'' means one who is trying to avoid the reaction of ''karma'', but he is being entangled in ''karma''.


Similarly, every living entity has got a specific position in relationship with Kṛṣṇa. Now, at the present moment, we are covered. We do not know what is our relationship. But as we make advance in Kṛṣṇa consciousness and we develop, "Oh, I have got this relationship with my Kṛṣṇa, as my, as a friend, as a conjugal lover, paternal relationship, master and servant," so many, just like we have got experience. And that is called svarūpa-siddhi. Svarūpa-siddhi means perfection of one's original, constitutional position. Svarūpa-siddhi. That we shall realize. As we make advance in the Kṛṣṇa consciousness, so we gradually...
''Sa buddhimān manuṣyeṣu'' ([[BG 4.18 (1972)|BG 4.18]]): "He is the most intelligent person." ''Sa yuktaḥ kṛtsna-karma-kṛt'', ''sa'': "He is dovetailed with Kṛṣṇa consciousness, and therefore, after doing so many work"—''kṛtsna'' mean all sorts of work—"still, he is free," ''karmaṇy akarma'', "even working."


Just like a man who is diseased. He is diseased, and as he is being cured by treatment, he gets gradually his healthy condition. He can feel, "Yes, I am feeling well. Now I am feeling hunger. Now I am taking food nicely. Oh, yes, I am getting some strength." Similarly, as we make progress in the matter of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, then our original constitutional position becomes revealed. And as soon it is fully revealed, I am free from all these material obligations. Oh, my place is reserved there.
Just see, the Arjuna. Arjuna is fighting, and the other party, Duryodhana, is also fighting. Now, how you can understand that Arjuna is free from reaction but Duryodhana is not free from reaction? The fighting is both . . . both parties are fighting. Externally, ephemerally, we can see simply that they are fighting. But who is bound up by reaction? Who is not bound up reaction? Arjuna is not bound up by reaction. Why? He is fighting under the order of Kṛṣṇa. So we have to see like that, who is working with Kṛṣṇa consciousness.


Thank you very much. Now if there is any question, you can ask. [break] ...become the smallest, aṇimā-siddhi. And the laghimā-siddhi. Laghimā-siddhi is you can become the lightest. You become so light that you can walk over the water. You can fly in the air. That is laghimā-siddhi. Prāpti-siddhi. Prāpti-siddhi means you can get anything you desire immediately. Īśitā. Īśitā means you can have control over so many persons and anything you want to control. You can get that. Vaśitā. There are so many siddhis. But these siddhis are, according to, I mean to say, those who are after Kṛṣṇa consciousness... They do not care for all these siddhis.  
Anyone who is working Kṛṣṇa consciousness, we should see that he is not being bound up. This is called ''karmaṇy akarma''. ''Akarma'' means which has no reaction. So although I see somebody is working, but because he is working in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, therefore it should be understood that his work is not producing any reaction.


I'll cite one story, interesting story, that one person, he was out of home for ten years, and he went to the Himalayas to find out some yogi to get some perfection. Now, after ten years, that particular man came back to his village. That is quite natural, that any person who achieves some success, he wants to show it before his friends and relatives and countrymen. That is quite natural. So he came back to his village, and all the villagers, they assembled, and they were very much anxious to know: "Oh, my dear friend, you have been ten years to learn yoga perfections. So what you have learned, please let us know." So he said that "I am finished the laghimā-siddhi perfection. That means I have learned how to become the lightest." And what is the result? He said, "Oh, I can walk over the river." So everyone was very anxious because people are very inquisitive and curious. So all of them requested him, "All right, let us have some demonstration. Please show that you'll walk over the river." So there were, all the villagers came and requested him. "All right, I shall show tomorrow morning."
So this intelligent vision is recommended here by Kṛṣṇa that ''sa buddhimān'': "Anyone who is working and who can see such work, who can understand such work," ''sa buddhimān manuṣyeṣu'' ([[BG 4.18 (1972)|BG 4.18), "in the human society, he is very intelligent." He is very intelligent. Otherwise, sometimes ''bhakti'', the devotional service of the Lord . . . just like I'll give you a crude example.


So there was an old man. He said, "My dear such-and-such, oh, after working for ten years, you have learned something who is two cents worth." Oh, that man was very angry. "Oh, it is two cent worth, do you think?" "Yes, I think it is two cent worth." "Why?" "Now because you'll walk over the river. All right. But I shall pay to the boatman two cents. I shall walk over the river." (laughter)
Just like a boy, he is flying kite, and he is moving his reel containing the thread. Now, from a distant place, you'll find that he is moving his thread, but, moving his reel, but sometimes, moving his reel he is getting down the kite, and moving his reel he is getting higher and higher the kite. So from distant place, we can see that there is moving of the reel, but the action is different.


So these things are two cents worth in comparison to Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Don't be after them. Suppose you'll learn something to play wonderful. What you'll do with that? How it will help you? Your problem is how to get out this, get out of this material entanglement. Suppose if you play something wonderful in the... There are so many wonderful men here. They are showing. So a man who is after Kṛṣṇa consciousness, they are not after these wonderful things. Because they know it perfectly well that "All this display will not save me." What is that? If I get anything I desire? That may be something wonderful for you, but how do I benefit. Oh, what I want here? I want simply to get myself, get free from these miseries of material existence. That can be done only by Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Not by playing all these wonderful...
Similarly, simply by seeing the movement of a person, that he is also acting, that is not final judgment. We have to see what sort of acting he is doing. If he's acting in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, if we can see a person is acting in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, then we can understand that he's free from the reaction. And if he's not acting in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, but externally, from our material estimation, we can see that, "Oh, he is doing very good work. He's very doing good work . . ."


So one who is serious about Kṛṣṇa consciousness, all these wonderful things, they do not captivate. You see? For them, two cents worth. Two cents. Suppose you can fly in the air. What is that? A rich man pay something to the aeroplane and, say, hundred dollars. He can fly from one place to another. Modern science, modern, has made everything cheap. So don't be after this perfection, material perfection. Any kind of material perfection will not solve our real problem. Our real problem is how to get rid of this material entanglement, the threefold miseries, birth after birth, I am going, repeating transmigration of, repetition of, getting one birth after... These are the problems.
Just like Arjuna, when he first refused to work, refused to fight that, "My dear Kṛṣṇa, it is not possible for me to fight with my relatives, brothers. I am not going to fight," but from material estimation, this conclusion, this decision of Arjuna, is very good. Very good. So materially, from material standing of, standpoint of view, that he is not going to commit nonviolence . . . violence—he is nonviolent—he's very good man. But from spiritual point of view, it is not so. From spiritual point of view, it is not so.


So Kṛṣṇa says, tyaktvā dehaṁ punar janma naiti mām eti kaunteya: [[BG 4.9]] "After leaving this body, no more birth in this miserable world. He comes unto Me." We should stick to that point. And that will make us successful in our Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Anything, any more questions? [break] ...very ideal prayer to follow. What to ask from Kṛṣṇa? That is the goal of every living being. What is that? He says,
So one has to see. Simply by external features, that one is working and one is not working, that we cannot . . . what is the standard of work? Under what consciousness he's working? If he's working in material consciousness, then he's being bound up. However good may be that work, he's being bound up.


<div class="lec_verse">
Now, what is the binding reaction of good material work? Just try to understand. Good material work . . . suppose you have done most charitable work, munificent work, and you have started so many, I mean to say, philanthropic institution. That's all right. These are . . . from material estimation, these things are very good work. But you are being bound up. You are being bound up. In which way you are being bound up? That these things are called ''puṇya-karma'', pious work. When you do pious work, you get four results. What are the four results? ''Janma-aiśvarya-śruta-śrī'' ([[SB 1.8.26]])
na dhanaṁ na janaṁ na sundarīṁ<br />
kavitāṁ vā jagad-īśa kāmaye<br />
mama janmani janmanīśvare<br />
bhavatād bhaktir ahaitukī tvayi<br />
[[CC Antya 20.29 , Siksastaka 4]] </div>


''Janma-aiśvarya-śruta-śrī''. If you do pious work, you can get reaction in four ways. You can get your birth in a very nice family, just like in the family of a ''brāhmaṇa'', in the family of a rich man. For pious work, one can get his ''janma''. And ''aiśvarya''. ''Aiśvarya'' means you can become very rich man by pious work. ''Janmaiśvarya-śruta'' ([[SB 1.8.26]]).


Lord Caitanya prays, "My Lord, Jagadīśvara..." Jagadīśvara means the Lord of the Universe. "I pray unto You. I don't want any wealthy condition. I don't want any wealth." Na dhanam. Dhanam means wealth. Na janam. "I don't want any number of followers." Here, in this material existence, we aspire after money, after followers and after woman. That is... These are our desires. And Lord Caitanya says that, "I don't want wealth. I don't want any number of followers, neither I want any beautiful wife." Then what is the use of your coming to God? Oh, mama janmani janmanīśvare bhavatād bhaktir ahaitukī [[CC Antya 20.29 , Siksastaka 4]] . "I simply pray that birth af... I do not think that in this very birth I will be liberated. Even there is my birth, I don't mind. But let me have Your unconditional service. That's all."
''Śruta'' means you can become very learned scholar. These are the results of pious work. ''Janmaiśvarya-śruta'', and ''śrī'': you can become very beautiful by pious work. These are the results of pious work.


That should be the standard of prayer. The more we shall have wonderful things in the material world, the more we shall be entangled. We are just trying to get free from this entanglement and go back to Kṛṣṇa, where going I'll have no more to come back in this miserable world. That should be the aim and object of life.
Similarly, just the opposite: if you do vicious work, then you, you have to go to the lower-class family or even the animal family, lower-class birth, or become a fool, illiterate, and become not very good-looking. So many things. These are the reaction of pious and vicious work.


Suppose if I decided, or anyone of you have decided, that "I shall leave this place, New York. I have no fascination for this city." Then anything you offer him, "Oh, I give you such-and-such thing. You remain here for such-and-su..." No. He doesn't care for anything. Paraṁ dṛṣṭvā nivartate. He has got some information, some other place. He has decided to go there. So he has no, I mean to say, anxiety or desire for anything. So our desire should be—that is perfect desire—that we must leave this body. We must leave this material existence. Duḥkhālayam aśāśvatam [[BG 8.15]] . Unless you understand this fact, that this material existence is... (end—incomplete)
Now, taking it for granted that I am doing all pious work, that's all right. And I am getting my birth in a very rich family or very pure family, just like ''brāhmiṇ'' family or something like that. I am getting myself very good education. I am very beautiful to see. And I am very rich man, all these. But our point is that suppose if you are rich man, suppose if you are very learned man, but you are not free from the stringent laws of material world. The whole point of vision should be targeted there that, "I am not going to be under the stricture of this material world." If we miss that point, then we shall be captivated by this aristocratic family or good education or beautiful body or richness. We shall be . . .


{{BGL_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}
One should understand that "In spite of having all these facilities of material life, I am not free from four things: ''janma-mṛtyu-jarā-vyādhi'' ([[BG 13.8-12 (1972)|BG 13.9]])."
 
''Janma-mṛtyu-jarā-vyādhi''. "I am not free from four, four these things, material laws of nature." What is that? "I am not free from repeated birth and death. I am not free from old age. I am not free from diseases."
 
Therefore Kṛṣṇa has recommended in the ''Bhagavad-gītā that ābrahma-bhuvanāl lokāḥ punar āvartino 'rjuna'' ([[BG 8.16 (1972)|BG 8.16]]): "My dear Arjuna, if you go up to the highest planet, which is called Brahmaloka, where there is long duration of life and all other enjoyments—they are thousands and thousands times better than enjoyment here—but still, ''ābrahma-bhuvanāl lokāḥ punar āvartino 'rjuna'', then you have to come again. The repetition of birth and death is there also. Therefore your aim should be ''mad-dhāma . . . yad gatvā na nivartante tad dhāma paramaṁ mama'' ([[BG 15.6 (1972)|BG 15.6]]): "You have to go back to My planet, My kingdom. That will make you perfect."
 
So this work, good work or bad work from the material point of view, may be superficially very good. But what . . . how long I shall remain a rich man? How long I shall remain a beautiful man? This is not my permanent life. Suppose if my life is for hundred years, say. I can remain a rich man, I can remain a learned man, I can remain a beautiful man, say, for fifty or sixty or hundred years. But your life is not for hundred years or sixty years or thousands years or millions of years. You are eternal. You have to attain your eternal life. That is the whole problem.
 
But, that problem you have to solve. That problem can be solved when you are Kṛṣṇa conscious, so that by Kṛṣṇa conscious, when you leave this body, you will no more have to come to this material world and accept this material body or suffer and enjoy thereof. That is the point. The point is very difficult for common men, but this is the point. This is the point. I have to avoid this material existence altogether. That is the point. It is . . . it is not the question of improving my material condition. That is not the solution.
 
If I . . . just like in a prison house, if you want to improve your condition, you become a very good prisoner, and the government gives you A-class status. There are three classes of status in prison life. Some are suffering the prison life in the A-class status. Some of them are suffering in the B-class status. There are also classes. Just like when some political leader is put into prison, they are given A-class status. But a sane man, a sane man should not be satisfied by becoming an A-class prisoner, A-class prisoner.
 
So we are, in this material world, some of us are in the A-class prisoner, some of us are B-class prisoner, some of us are C-class prisoner. So to become an A-class prisoner from C-class prisoner is not the solution of our problem. The problem should be solved that, "Let me become completely free, completely free from the prison life." That is the whole problem.
 
:''karmaṇy akarma yaḥ paśyed''
:''akarmāṇi ca karma yaḥ''
:''sa buddhimān manuṣyeṣu''
:''sa yuktaḥ kṛtsna-karma-kṛt''
:([[BG 4.18 (1972)|BG 4.18]])
 
"Anyone who can understand the process of ''karma'', the process of work, in this way, he is the most intelligent person in this world." Most intelligent person. Not that a person who has passed M.A., Ph.D. examination from the university de . . . offering country. The person who understands this problem of life, he is the most intelligent person. That we should learn. He is the most intelligent person.
 
:''yasya sarve samārambhāḥ''
:''kāma-saṅkalpa-varjitāḥ''
:''jñānāgni-dagdha-karmāṇaṁ''
:''tam āhuḥ paṇḍitaṁ budhāḥ''
:([[BG 4.19 (1972)|BG 4.19]])
 
''Paṇḍita''. ''Paṇḍita'' means learned, and ''budha'' means one who is well-versed. He is called ''budha''. ''Budha'', this very term you'll find in another place of ''Bhagavad-gītā'', in the Tenth Chapter, ''budhā bhāva-samanvitāḥ''.
 
:''ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavo''
:''mattaḥ sarvaṁ pravartate''
:''iti matvā bhajante māṁ''
:''budhā bhāva-samanvitāḥ''
:([[BG 10.8 (1972)|BG 10.8]])
 
That ''budha'' you'll find in the Tenth Chapter, and the same ''budha'', ''paṇḍita'', ''paṇḍita'' and ''budha''. ''Paṇḍita'', according to ''Bhagavad-gītā'', ''paṇḍita'', ''paṇḍita'' means learned man. The Sanskrit word ''paṇḍita'' means . . . and ''budha'' is "well-versed."
 
Now who is well-versed? And who is ''paṇḍita''? A very learned man from . . . by academic education may not be a learned man according to the view of ''Bhagavad-gītā''. ''Bhagavad-gītā'' says: "He is the learned man who can see everyone on the equal footing, equal level."
 
:''vidyā-vinaya-sampanne''
:''brāhmaṇe gavi hastini''
:''śuni caiva śva-pāke ca''
:''paṇḍitāḥ sama-darśinaḥ''
:([[BG 5.18 (1972)|BG 5.18]])
 
A ''paṇḍita'', ''paṇḍita'' can see . . . ''paṇḍita'' means a learned man can see that "Here is a learned ''brāhmiṇ''." In India, according to Vedic civilization, a learned ''brāhmiṇ'' is considered to be the topmost man in human society. So therefore He is taking the example that "Here is a very learned ''brāhmiṇ''." ''Vidyā-vinaya-sampanne brāhmaṇe''. Not only he is ''brāhmiṇ'', but he is very gentle. ''Vidyā'' means . . . what is the result of ''vidyā''? Education means one becomes gentleman. That is the result of ''vidyā''. If one is not a gentleman, then his learning is not accepted according to the Vedic literature. So ''paṇḍita'' means that one who is learned and gentle.
 
So another ''paṇḍita'' sees ''vidyā-vinaya-sampanne'', a ''brāhmiṇ'', learned and gentle, ''vidyā-vinaya-sampanne brāhmaṇe gavi'', and a cow, ''vidyā-vinaya-sampanne gavi ha'' . . . and an elephant, and ''śva-pāke ''. . . ''śva-pāke ca śuni ceta''. ''Śva-pāke'' means there is a class of men who eats dog. They are counted amongst the lower class in India. ''Śva-pāke ca śuni ca''. ''Śuni'' ca means dog. So dog also, not taken very good animal in the society. But a ''paṇḍita''—either a dog, either a cow, either an elephant, either a, a, I mean to say, dog-eater, or a learned ''brāhmaṇa''—he sees all of them on the same level. That is ''paṇḍita''.
 
Why he sees on the same level? Do you mean to say that a learned ''brāhmiṇ'', a high-class ''brāhmiṇ'', he is just like as good as a dog? No. A learned ''brāhmin'' is not as good as a dog. But how, how, then, the ''paṇḍita'' sees on the equal footing? Oh, because he does not see on the skin, but he sees on the spirit. Therefore he's ''paṇḍita''. One who has learned this art, to see in any living being only the spirit he sees, that "Here is a living being. He's a spiritual spark. He's a spirit soul. But he has got a different covering, body, only."
 
Just like in the ''Bhagavad-gītā'' it is said that ''vāsāṁsi jīrṇāni'' ([[BG 2.22 (1972)|BG 2.22]]): "This body is just like our dress." Suppose a very learned man has come in a shabby dress. Do you think that he should be dishonored? If he's known, of course.
 
Just like our this ''sannyāsī'' dress. It is not very costly dress. It is a loincloth. It is very cheap. But sometimes people misunderstand that "Here is a beggar." And sometimes we are respected. So simply by dress we should not see any living entity. Whether . . . either he's a dog, or he's a, in the estimation of the society, a lower-class man, or a very high-class man, or a cow, but we shall see that, "Here is a spirit soul." Anyone who can understand the spiritual vision of life, he is ''paṇḍita''. He is ''paṇḍita''.
 
And according to Cāṇakya Paṇḍita . . . Cāṇakya, he was a great politician, and he says . . . now, what is the standard of education? Standard of education. Now, he has given very nice, three words, three words for standard of education, who is perfect in education. He says:
 
:''mātṛvat para-dāreṣu''
:''para-dravyeṣu loṣṭravat''
:''ātmavat sarva-bhūteṣu''
:''yaḥ paśyati sa paṇḍitaḥ''
:(Cāṇakya Paṇḍita)
 
''Paṇḍita''. This ''paṇḍita''. This ''paṇḍita'', explanation of ''paṇḍita''. Now, who is a ''paṇḍita''? Now, ''mātṛvat para-dāreṣu'': "He is the learned man who sees all women as his mother." Except one's married wife, one should see every woman as his mother. ''Mātṛvat''. ''Mātṛ'' means mother. ''Vat'' means just like. ''Mātṛvat para-dāreṣu''. ''Para-dāreṣu'' means other women except one's own wife, married wife.
 
''Mātṛvat para-dāreṣu para-dravyeṣu loṣṭravat'': "And other's property should be accepted just like refused garbage in the street." Just like we don't care for all the garbages. Simply if others' money or others' property is there, sometimes we hanker, we should think, "Oh, this all nonsense, just like garbage." ''Mātṛvat para-dāreṣu para-dravyeṣu loṣṭravat, ātmavat sarva-bhūteṣu''. And ''loṣṭra'' means that rubbles, just like stone rubbles. You see? There are so many rubbles and, er, strewn over the street. Nobody cares for that. Similarly, if others' money is thrown over the street, nobody . . . he should not care. He should not collect: "Oh, here is some money. Let me take."
 
So ''mātṛvat para-dāreṣu para-dravyeṣu loṣṭravat, ātmavat sarva-bhūteṣu''. And he should see everyone . . . this ''ātmavat sarva-bhūteṣu'' was preached by Lord Buddha, this philosophy. This one philosophy was, I mean to say, taught throughout the whole world by Lord Buddha, that there should be no animal killing. ''Ātmavat sarva-bhūteṣu''. No living entity should be given suffer, even by words. That is real life. ''Ātmavat . . . yaḥ paśyati''. One who has such vision of life, he is called learned. He is called learned—not by educational qualifications. One who has acquired . . . ''phalena paricīyate''. Education is understood, how far a man is educated, by his behavior. By his vision of life it will be estimated, not by the degrees. ''Ātmavat sarva-bhūteṣu yaḥ paśyati sa paṇḍitaḥ''.
 
Similarly, here also, here also the word ''paṇḍita'', ''paṇḍita'', has been used. So I have just given you some explanation of ''paṇḍita'' from different angle of vision. And ''budha'' also. ''Budha''. In the ''Bhagavad-gītā'' you'll find the definition of ''budha''. ''Budha'' means well versed. Well versed. Well versed means who has got . . . studied lots of books of knowledge. He is called ''budha''. Now, how one becomes ''budha''? By studying, one should have concluded this. What is that conclusion? That is stated in the ''Bhagavad-gītā'' by Lord Kṛṣṇa, ''ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavaḥ''.
 
:''ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavo''
:''mattaḥ sarvaṁ pravartate''
:''iti matvā bhajante māṁ''
:''budhā bhāva-samanvitāḥ''
:([[BG 10.8 (1972)|BG 10.8]])
 
The well-versed person is he who has understood that Kṛṣṇa is the original fountainhead of all emanations. All emanations, whatever we see, they are all emanations from Kṛṣṇa. That is the sci . . . one who has understood this, this fact, this transcendental fact, he is well versed, ''budha''.
 
''Ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavo mattaḥ sarvaṁ pravartate'': "And everything is coming out of Me." Just like the sunshine is coming out of the sun. Nobody knows for how many years, how millions and millions of years, the sunshine is coming out of the sun. But still, the sun is still as it is. Similarly, the all the energies—the material energy, spiritual energy, lower energy, higher energy—everything is coming out of Kṛṣṇa.
 
So one who has understood this science, the Kṛṣṇa science, ''budhā bhāva-samanvitāḥ'', then what he becomes? His sign that . . . what is the sign that he has understood? Oh, he becomes a devotee of Kṛṣṇa. He becomes completely Kṛṣṇa consciousness. That is the sign of being well versed, well versed. And this is the sign of becoming the ''paṇḍita'', the learned. ''Paṇḍita'', learned. So:
 
:''yasya sarve samārambhāḥ''
:''kāma-saṅkalpa-varjitāḥ''
:''jñānāgni-dagdha-karmāṇaṁ''
:''tam āhuḥ paṇḍitaṁ budhāḥ''
:([[BG 4.19 (1972)|BG 4.19]])
 
One who has who is learned enough, one who has got this knowledge, that "We have to work in Kṛṣṇa consciousness," and he has no more lust to enjoy this material world, one who has no more lust, ''kāma-saṅkalpa-varjitāḥ'' . . . everything what we do in this material world, we have got a determination that, "I shall enjoy the fruits of this work like this, the fruits of that work in that way." That is called ''kāma-saṅkalpa'', determination of lust. So one who is free from such lust, ''kāma-saṅkalpa-varjitāḥ'' . . .
 
And how it is possible? ''Jñānāgni-dagdha-karmāṇam''. ''Jñānāgni''. Just like fire, fire burns everything which you put into it. Similarly, one has developed . . . one who has developed the sense, the real knowledge that, "My life's mission, the . . . is only to go back to Kṛṣṇa and become Kṛṣṇa consciousness," that is the highest type of knowledge. They're just like fire. So in that fire of highest type of knowledge, all lust is burned aside. ''Jñāna-agni-dagdha'', ''tam āhuḥ paṇḍitaṁ budhāḥ''. And he's a learned, he's well versed. That is the explanation of this ''Bhagavad-gītā''.
 
And let us stop here. You have . . . if there is any question, you can put.
 
'''Guest (1):''' If you're rich . . . were you saying if you're rich, you get knowledge . . . you get knowledge easier because you're rich?
 
'''Prabhupāda:''' No, no, no. I said that by your pious work you get four results. By your pious work . . . because every work, we have, we are just today discussing what is real work and what are the reaction of the work and what is not, I mean to say, prescribed work. These things are we have discussed. Now, so far the pious work, which is called, in Sanskrit language, which is called ''puṇya-karma'', we get four results, four kinds of results.
 
By pious work, we get very good birth. Good birth means to take one's birth in aristocratic family or in rich family. That is, materially concerned, very good birth. So by pious work, one can become a good birth, can get his birth in a good family. And he can become a rich man also. Just, just like in this world we see, somebody is working very little, but he's gaining much.
 
Another body is working very hard the whole day—still, he's not getting much. Why? Because due to his pious work, he is getting very easily riches. So richness is also result of pious work. And similarly, one student is becoming very quickly a scholar—another, he cannot. So this is also result of pious work. Similarly, beauty is also due to pious work. I discussed this point. And what was your point?
 
'''Guest (1):''' Do you get more wisdom quicker or it's more to come by if you have a lot of money?
 
'''Prabhupāda:''' Not necessarily. I don't say that. That is different thing. But richness is due . . .
 
'''Guest (1):''' I understood what you said before.
 
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes. Not necessarily that because a man is very rich, therefore he has got a very good brain also. No, not necessarily. Neither good brain can produce richness. Even there is one man, he's very intelligent man, but in the field of activities, he remains a poor man.
 
So neither intelligence is the cause of richness, nor richness is the cause of intelligence. These are two different things. But if one is pious, then his, as reaction of his pious acts, he becomes rich, he becomes wealthy, he becomes beautiful, he becomes learned. These things are stated in the scriptures. ''Janmaiśvarya-śruta-śrībhiḥ'' ([[SB 1.8.26]]). ''Janma-aiśvarya'', four things, ''janma-aiśvarya-śruta'' . . . ''janma'' means birth, ''aiśvarya'' means richness, and ''śruta'' means education. (sirens) Is that point clear?
 
Is that point clear?
 
(aside) Please hear. Stop! Don't talk. We are talking seriously. Don't disturb.
 
Is that point clear?
 
'''Guest (1):''' Yes. Yeah thank you.
 
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes. Any other question?
 
'''Young woman:''' If one is really pious, why should he care about materialistic things such as beauty and wealth?
 
'''Prabhupāda:''' Hmm? If one is pious, why he should . . .?
 
'''Young woman:''' Why should he care about things like beauty and wealth?
 
'''Prabhupāda:''' Oh. So war is not always impious. Do you understand? Sometimes war, fighting . . . so far, so far the Vedic conception of life is concerned, there are four classes, four classes: the intelligent class, the administrator class, the mercantile class . . . not only Vedic religion, this division is all over the world. There are four classes of men.
 
So for administrative class of men, it is a duty to protect the weak. Sometimes law and order requires violence. Just like the government maintains military, police force, because sometimes they are required. So when government employs some police force, some military force, that does not means impious. That is required.
 
Similarly, fighting or violence is not always impious. But a responsible person, he does not take violence unnecessarily. He considers things very nicely, and when there is no other alternative than to use violence, then he uses violence. Just like the government sometimes takes violence on the citizens. It is not the objective of the government to . . . (end)

Latest revision as of 02:14, 29 January 2024

His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada




660801BG.NY - August 01, 1966



Prabhupāda:

na māṁ karmāṇi limpanti
na me karma-phale spṛhā
iti māṁ yo 'bhijānāti
karmabhir na sa badhyate
(BG 4.14)

Now . . .

(aside) You can come please forward. Yes. Yes. Come forward. There is . . . sit down.

Karmabhir sa na badhyate. Now, the whole world is bound by his own karma, action. Everyone, every living entity . . . in the Brahma-saṁhitā there is a nice verse about this . . .

There is a nice verse, yas tu . . . beginning from the germ . . . there is a germ which is called indra-gopa. You know that among the living entities, the germs are in very minute form. You cannot see even with your microscope. In a, in a space of one millimeter, you can find millions of germs. That is scientific truth. So beginning from the germs, which are called . . .

Beginning from the germs up to the heavenly kingdom . . . the king of heaven is called Indra, and the smallest, minutest germ, it is also called indra-gopa in Sanskrit language. So in the Brahma-saṁhitā (Bs 5.54) it is said that, "Beginning from this indra up to that Indra . . ." That means "Beginning from the germ which is known as indra-gopa up to the point of the king who is also known as Indra, all of them are bound up by the reaction of his own karma, or his own work."

Every work which you are doing, good or bad, we have to suffer or enjoy the reaction of our work. And so long we have to suffer or enjoy the reaction of our work, as long as we shall go on like this, so long we have to accept this material body. This material body is just given to us by the arrangement of nature's law for the exact status of suffering or enjoyment.

Just like you have seen different animals, they have got different process of eating. Say for tiger. Tiger, they have bodies made for eating raw flesh and raw blood. So all the body is so made that they have got particular nails and jaws and teeth so that they can do that.

Similarly, you can see the hog. They have to eat the stool. Oh, they have got a particular shape of mouth so that they can easily do that. Now, we are human being. We are meant for taking vegetables and fruits. Now, our teeth is just like knife which can cut the vegetables and the fruits.

So all these bodies, I mean to say . . . I am giving particular stress to the body. A king's body, a poor man's body. A poor man, he has to work very hard. His body is very sturdy. He can work very nicely. But a son of very aristocratic family or king, oh, his body is very delicate. He cannot work. He can apply his brain in something else.

So, so long we are . . . these bodies are made according to the different status of our work we have done in our past life. And next body is being prepared according to the work which we are doing now. But here Kṛṣṇa says that as soon as one can understand the transcendental nature of Kṛṣṇa's activities, he becomes free from the reaction of activities.

Now, here is the question, that because we are now preparing ourself to have our spiritual body or spiritual life developed, and being freed from this material existence, therefore our duty should be such so that we may not be entangled again into this material body. That can be made possible if we are Kṛṣṇa conscious. If we study Kṛṣṇa, what is Kṛṣṇa, what are His transcendental activities, how His energies are acting in this material world or spiritual world, all this . . . it is a great science. Kṛṣṇa is a great science.

So if we study Kṛṣṇa science with great attention, then the result will be that we shall be free from the reaction of our activities. This is clearly said here, na mam karmāṇi limpanti na me karma-phale spṛhā (BG 4.14). The Lord has nothing to do. He is full. He has nothing to do. But why He does? Just to set example. Set example. He's not bound up by the works which He is doing in the material world. This science has to be learned. Na me karma-phale spṛhā. And anyone who understands this transcendental nature of Kṛṣṇa, he is also becoming free from the reaction of karma.

evaṁ jñātvā kṛtaṁ karma
pūrvair api mumukṣubhiḥ
kuru karmaiva tasmāt tvaṁ
pūrvaiḥ pūrvataraṁ kṛtam
(BG 4.15)

Now, the whole spiritual process is to follow the example of the previous ācāryas who have attained, I mean to . . . success.

(aside) These boys, wherefrom they come? They disturb.

evaṁ jñātvā kṛtaṁ karma
pūrvair api mumukṣubhiḥ
kuru karmaiva tasmāt tvaṁ
pūrvaiḥ pūrvataraṁ kṛtam
(BG 4.15)

Now, there are . . . Arjuna . . . Kṛṣṇa is advising Arjuna that "If you act and follow in the footprints of the previous ācāryas and previous great devotees and kings who have done in their life karma-yoga, acting for Kṛṣṇa, if we follow that principle, then you shall also become free from the reaction of activities." Because Arjuna was very much afraid for being entangled in the reaction of his fighting, Kṛṣṇa therefore assures that "You shall not be . . . if you follow, if you act, if you fight for My sake, then you will not be entangled by the reaction of karma." Kiṁ karma kim akarmeti . . .

kiṁ karma kim akarmeti
kavayo 'py atra mohitāḥ
tat te karma pravakṣyāmi
yaj jñātvā mokṣyase 'śubhāt
(BG 4.16)

Now, people are misled what is karma, what is actually work, and what is not work, akarma. Kiṁ karma kim akarmeti kavayo 'pi. Kavayaḥ means great sages, great saintly persons, great philosophers. They are also sometimes bewildered to understand what class of activities are genuine and what class of activities are non genuine.

Therefore Kṛṣṇa says that, "I shall teach you what are genuine activities and what are non genuine activities." Tat te karma pravakṣyāmi yaj jñātvā mokṣyase aśubhāt. Yaj jñātvā: "If you understand the principle of working, then you shall get free from the bondage, material bondage."

We have to work in such a way that we may . . . may not be entangled with this material bondage. Otherwise, as we have explained, this body is our material bondage, and it is the result of our activities. So we have to perform our activities so nicely and so cautiously so that I may not be entangled, I may be free even in this life, and tyaktvā dehaṁ punar janma naiti (BG 4.9): I can, after leaving this present body, I'll have no more to come into this material world. This science is being taught by Kṛṣṇa to Arjuna. And the whole activity, the whole activity is that if we engage ourself, as we find it in the Eleventh Chapter, last verse:

mat-karma-kṛn mat-paramo
mad-bhaktaḥ saṅga-varjitaḥ
nirvairaḥ sarva-bhūteṣu
yaḥ sa mām eti pāṇḍava
(BG 11.55)

Now, this one verse is sufficient to teach the essence of Śrīmad Bhagavad-gītā, that "Anyone who is engaged in My work," "in My work," mat-karma-kṛt . . . then what is that, "My work"? That, "My work" is explained in the last word of the . . . and the last instruction of the Bhagavad-gītā, that sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja (BG 18.66). Arjuna is taught—and with the example of Arjuna, every one of us is taught—that we have to work only which is sanctioned by Kṛṣṇa. Sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja (BG 18.66).

That is the . . . that is the mission of human life. But we do not know that. We do not know that. And because we do not know that, we engage ourself with so many work which is concerned with the bodily and material conception of life. So mat-karma-kṛt. So one has to do what Kṛṣṇa desires, just like Arjuna did. Kṛṣṇa desired that he should fight. Arjuna did not like to fight, but because Kṛṣṇa desired, he accepted to fight. This is Kṛṣṇa's work. That we have to select.

Now, what is the work at the present moment for us, Kṛṣṇa's work? Kṛṣṇa is not present now to dictate that, "This is My work." Just like Arjuna was fortunate enough. He was personally present before Arjuna. Lord Kṛṣṇa was personally present, and He was directing. But that does not mean that we have no direction. We have direction. We have direction. In the Bhagavad-gītā you'll find that anyone who preaches the gospel of Bhagavad-gītā to the people of the world, he is the most dear, the dearest person in the world to Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa accepts him the dearest person.

So therefore our duty is to preach the principles of this Bhagavad-gītā, to make people Kṛṣṇa conscious. People are suffering for want of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Therefore each and every one of us should be engaged in the preaching work of Kṛṣṇa consciousness for the benefit of the whole world.

Lord Caitanya, whose picture you see in the front of our this store, Lord Caitanya very nicely preached this philosophy of Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

āmāra ājñāya guru hañā tāra' ei deśa
yāre dekha tāre kaha 'kṛṣṇa'-upadeśa
(CC Madhya 7.128)

The Lord says, āmāra ājñāya. Because He came with this mission, to preach Kṛṣṇa consciousness, so He says: "Just take My order, and all of you, you become the spiritual master." Guru hañā. Anyone who teaches people Kṛṣṇa consciousness, never mind what, what he is and where he is, he should be understood the spiritual master.

So Lord Kṛṣṇa, Lord Caitanya gives order to everyone that āmāra ājñāya guru hañā tāra' ei deśa: "Every country, every, I mean to say, province, you go everywhere and just preach this Kṛṣṇa consciousness."

āmāra ājñāya guru hañā tāra' ei deśa
yāre dekha tāre kaha 'kṛṣṇa'-upadeśa
(CC Madhya 7.128)

Kṛṣṇa-upadeśa means this Bhagavad-gītā, the instruction given by Kṛṣṇa. That is kṛṣṇa-upadeśa. And kṛṣṇa-upadeśa is also Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is full of instruction by which one can become Kṛṣṇa conscious.

Similarly, in the Bhagavad-gītā also, we receive the instruction how we can become Kṛṣṇa conscious. So Lord Caitanya selects these very two particular books, Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam and Bhagavad-gītā, and He asks everyone, in any part of the world, to take up this matter very seriously and preach in the world. That is the direct order of Kṛṣṇa.

So if we take up this missionary work, to preach Bhagavad-gītā as it is, without any interpretation and without any motive behind it, as it is, as Kṛṣṇa said . . . we should present as it is. People misrepresent Bhagavad-gītā by their own interpretation. That should not be done. Bhagavad-gītā as it is should be presented before the people of the world. They are suffering for want of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, and as soon as they become Kṛṣṇa conscious, their life becomes happy. So this is the mission of this Society, International Society for Krishna Consciousness.

As Kṛṣṇa advises, saṅga-varjitaḥ: "You should not have any attraction or any attachment for these worldly activities." If you have got attachment or attraction for these material activities, then you cannot have Kṛṣṇa . . . you cannot become Kṛṣṇa conscious. But that does not mean you should be inimical to the people of the world. No. It is your duty to give them the highest instruction, spiritual instruction, that "You become Kṛṣṇa conscious." And try your best. Try your best.

Nirvairaḥ. You should not be anyone's enemy. Others may become your enemy. Because it is quite natural. Anyone who comes with the message of the Supreme Lord, there are persons who become his enemy. Just like Lord Jesus Christ, he came. His only fault was that he was preaching the message of God, and people—some people, not all people—become his enemy, and he was crucified.

So this is the world. Anyone who comes as a most, I mean to say, beneficial friend of the world, people take him as the enemy, and they do the same mistake again so that they are bound up again by their own work and they remain in this material world to repeat birth and death, one after another, one after another.

So we should be very much cautious. We should not miss this chance of this human body to become Kṛṣṇa consciousness . . . to become conscious of Kṛṣṇa. So therefore we must know how to work. How to work. Kiṁ karma kim akarmeti (BG 4.16).

If we do not know how to work, then we shall be entangled in these material activities. Therefore Kṛṣṇa says saṅga-varjitaḥ. Of course, a Kṛṣṇa conscious person, he also acts just like another material actor, but because he works in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, therefore he's not bound up.

Just like take the example of Arjuna. He also fought just like ordinary military man, but because he fought in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, therefore he was not bound up by the reaction of such fighting. Fighting is not necessary. Fighting is not necessary. Peace, peace is necessary. But sometimes peace is disturbed. At that time, fighting is also necessary. You cannot . . . you cannot absolutely give up the process of fighting in this material world. That is not possible. Because there are persons who will create trouble. Just like we are experiencing. We are not going to do any harm to anybody, but sometimes they are coming and creating disturbance.

So these disturbing elements are there, and this is always there. The material nature is like that. Therefore fighting cannot be abolished in the . . . when it is necessary, absolutely necessary. In the Battle of Kurukṣetra, Lord Kṛṣṇa advocated this fighting because it was absolutely necessary.

So anything—it does not matter what it is—when it is sanctioned by Kṛṣṇa, it has no reaction. That is the real work. Other, anything which we do which may be very good work in the estimation of this material world, but that is bound to make you entangled in this material world. This secret one should learn.

karmaṇo hy api boddhavyaṁ boddhavyaṁ ca vikarmaṇaḥ akarmaṇaś ca boddhavyaṁ gahanā karmaṇo gatiḥ (BG 4.17)

Karmaṇo gatiḥ, the path of karma, is very intricate. Therefore one should understand what is actually karma and what is akarma and what is vikarma. And knowing this, one should perform karma. But one thing is that if we simply engage ourself in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, then everything becomes clear. Otherwise, we have to make discrimination, "What I should do, what I should not do, so that I may not be entangled."

Just like in ordinary life we, whatever we do, we sometimes, we may unconsciously doing something which is against the law, and therefore we become bound up by the laws of the state, and sometimes we are in trouble. So similarly, in the laws of nature also, the laws of nature is very strict. There is no excuse. The laws of nature is very stringent. Just like the fire. Fire, it burns. That is natural. This is the law of nature. So even a child touches fire, the fire does not excuse that, "Because it is child, oh, his hand may be . . . may not be burned." No. That is not possible. So we have to make our work very cautiously. We have to select our work very cautiously. Otherwise, the stringent laws of nature will react, and we shall be bound by the laws of material nature and suffer.

The Lord says that karmaṇo hy api boddhavyam. One should understand how to work and one should understand what is not to be done. Akarmaṇaś ca boddhavyam. Karmaṇo hy api boddhavyaṁ boddhavyaṁ ca vikarmaṇaḥ. Karma, akarma and vikarma. There are three things. Karma means prescribed duties. Prescribed duties. That is called karma. And akarma . . . vikarma means doing against the prescribed duties. That is called vikarma. And akarma means something doing which has no reaction. That is not . . . of course, in the execution of such work, it appears to be working, but practically it has no reaction. That is vikarma. And that vikarma is when we act on account of the Supreme. That is when we . . . kṛṣṇa-karma-kṛt. When we work under the direction of Kṛṣṇa, that has no reaction. Otherwise, karma, one should do prescribed duties, and one should not do which is not prescribed.

For example, for example, just like the state. The state has got some laws. Now, suppose if you commit murder, it will be hang . . . you will be hanged. That is the state law. So if you again, against the state law you commit some murder, you will be hanged. This is vikarma, and I should be cautious. But when the state orders, itself that, "You go and fight. Kill the enemy," that is neither karma nor vikarma. So similarly, when we act under the direction of Kṛṣṇa, that is akarma. That means that karma, that kind of activities, has no reaction. Otherwise, we shall have to act very cautiously so that I may not be entangled with the reaction of my karma.

karmaṇy akarma yaḥ paśyed
akarmāṇi ca karma yaḥ
sa buddhimān manuṣyeṣu
sa yuktaḥ kṛtsna-karma-kṛt
(BG 4.18)

Now here is a nice verse. The Lord says, "One who can see karmāṇi, akarma, any work which is being done, but it has no reaction . . ." karmāṇi, akarma yaḥ. "I am doing something, but the ultimate result of that work has no reaction." One who can see like that . . . karmaṇy akarma yaḥ paśyed akarmāṇi ca yaḥ karma. And akarmāṇi means one who is trying to avoid the reaction of karma, but he is being entangled in karma.

Sa buddhimān manuṣyeṣu (BG 4.18): "He is the most intelligent person." Sa yuktaḥ kṛtsna-karma-kṛt, sa: "He is dovetailed with Kṛṣṇa consciousness, and therefore, after doing so many work"—kṛtsna mean all sorts of work—"still, he is free," karmaṇy akarma, "even working."

Just see, the Arjuna. Arjuna is fighting, and the other party, Duryodhana, is also fighting. Now, how you can understand that Arjuna is free from reaction but Duryodhana is not free from reaction? The fighting is both . . . both parties are fighting. Externally, ephemerally, we can see simply that they are fighting. But who is bound up by reaction? Who is not bound up reaction? Arjuna is not bound up by reaction. Why? He is fighting under the order of Kṛṣṇa. So we have to see like that, who is working with Kṛṣṇa consciousness.

Anyone who is working Kṛṣṇa consciousness, we should see that he is not being bound up. This is called karmaṇy akarma. Akarma means which has no reaction. So although I see somebody is working, but because he is working in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, therefore it should be understood that his work is not producing any reaction.

So this intelligent vision is recommended here by Kṛṣṇa that sa buddhimān: "Anyone who is working and who can see such work, who can understand such work," sa buddhimān manuṣyeṣu ([[BG 4.18 (1972)|BG 4.18), "in the human society, he is very intelligent." He is very intelligent. Otherwise, sometimes bhakti, the devotional service of the Lord . . . just like I'll give you a crude example.

Just like a boy, he is flying kite, and he is moving his reel containing the thread. Now, from a distant place, you'll find that he is moving his thread, but, moving his reel, but sometimes, moving his reel he is getting down the kite, and moving his reel he is getting higher and higher the kite. So from distant place, we can see that there is moving of the reel, but the action is different.

Similarly, simply by seeing the movement of a person, that he is also acting, that is not final judgment. We have to see what sort of acting he is doing. If he's acting in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, if we can see a person is acting in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, then we can understand that he's free from the reaction. And if he's not acting in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, but externally, from our material estimation, we can see that, "Oh, he is doing very good work. He's very doing good work . . ."

Just like Arjuna, when he first refused to work, refused to fight that, "My dear Kṛṣṇa, it is not possible for me to fight with my relatives, brothers. I am not going to fight," but from material estimation, this conclusion, this decision of Arjuna, is very good. Very good. So materially, from material standing of, standpoint of view, that he is not going to commit nonviolence . . . violence—he is nonviolent—he's very good man. But from spiritual point of view, it is not so. From spiritual point of view, it is not so.

So one has to see. Simply by external features, that one is working and one is not working, that we cannot . . . what is the standard of work? Under what consciousness he's working? If he's working in material consciousness, then he's being bound up. However good may be that work, he's being bound up.

Now, what is the binding reaction of good material work? Just try to understand. Good material work . . . suppose you have done most charitable work, munificent work, and you have started so many, I mean to say, philanthropic institution. That's all right. These are . . . from material estimation, these things are very good work. But you are being bound up. You are being bound up. In which way you are being bound up? That these things are called puṇya-karma, pious work. When you do pious work, you get four results. What are the four results? Janma-aiśvarya-śruta-śrī (SB 1.8.26)

Janma-aiśvarya-śruta-śrī. If you do pious work, you can get reaction in four ways. You can get your birth in a very nice family, just like in the family of a brāhmaṇa, in the family of a rich man. For pious work, one can get his janma. And aiśvarya. Aiśvarya means you can become very rich man by pious work. Janmaiśvarya-śruta (SB 1.8.26).

Śruta means you can become very learned scholar. These are the results of pious work. Janmaiśvarya-śruta, and śrī: you can become very beautiful by pious work. These are the results of pious work.

Similarly, just the opposite: if you do vicious work, then you, you have to go to the lower-class family or even the animal family, lower-class birth, or become a fool, illiterate, and become not very good-looking. So many things. These are the reaction of pious and vicious work.

Now, taking it for granted that I am doing all pious work, that's all right. And I am getting my birth in a very rich family or very pure family, just like brāhmiṇ family or something like that. I am getting myself very good education. I am very beautiful to see. And I am very rich man, all these. But our point is that suppose if you are rich man, suppose if you are very learned man, but you are not free from the stringent laws of material world. The whole point of vision should be targeted there that, "I am not going to be under the stricture of this material world." If we miss that point, then we shall be captivated by this aristocratic family or good education or beautiful body or richness. We shall be . . .

One should understand that "In spite of having all these facilities of material life, I am not free from four things: janma-mṛtyu-jarā-vyādhi (BG 13.9)."

Janma-mṛtyu-jarā-vyādhi. "I am not free from four, four these things, material laws of nature." What is that? "I am not free from repeated birth and death. I am not free from old age. I am not free from diseases."

Therefore Kṛṣṇa has recommended in the Bhagavad-gītā that ābrahma-bhuvanāl lokāḥ punar āvartino 'rjuna (BG 8.16): "My dear Arjuna, if you go up to the highest planet, which is called Brahmaloka, where there is long duration of life and all other enjoyments—they are thousands and thousands times better than enjoyment here—but still, ābrahma-bhuvanāl lokāḥ punar āvartino 'rjuna, then you have to come again. The repetition of birth and death is there also. Therefore your aim should be mad-dhāma . . . yad gatvā na nivartante tad dhāma paramaṁ mama (BG 15.6): "You have to go back to My planet, My kingdom. That will make you perfect."

So this work, good work or bad work from the material point of view, may be superficially very good. But what . . . how long I shall remain a rich man? How long I shall remain a beautiful man? This is not my permanent life. Suppose if my life is for hundred years, say. I can remain a rich man, I can remain a learned man, I can remain a beautiful man, say, for fifty or sixty or hundred years. But your life is not for hundred years or sixty years or thousands years or millions of years. You are eternal. You have to attain your eternal life. That is the whole problem.

But, that problem you have to solve. That problem can be solved when you are Kṛṣṇa conscious, so that by Kṛṣṇa conscious, when you leave this body, you will no more have to come to this material world and accept this material body or suffer and enjoy thereof. That is the point. The point is very difficult for common men, but this is the point. This is the point. I have to avoid this material existence altogether. That is the point. It is . . . it is not the question of improving my material condition. That is not the solution.

If I . . . just like in a prison house, if you want to improve your condition, you become a very good prisoner, and the government gives you A-class status. There are three classes of status in prison life. Some are suffering the prison life in the A-class status. Some of them are suffering in the B-class status. There are also classes. Just like when some political leader is put into prison, they are given A-class status. But a sane man, a sane man should not be satisfied by becoming an A-class prisoner, A-class prisoner.

So we are, in this material world, some of us are in the A-class prisoner, some of us are B-class prisoner, some of us are C-class prisoner. So to become an A-class prisoner from C-class prisoner is not the solution of our problem. The problem should be solved that, "Let me become completely free, completely free from the prison life." That is the whole problem.

karmaṇy akarma yaḥ paśyed
akarmāṇi ca karma yaḥ
sa buddhimān manuṣyeṣu
sa yuktaḥ kṛtsna-karma-kṛt
(BG 4.18)

"Anyone who can understand the process of karma, the process of work, in this way, he is the most intelligent person in this world." Most intelligent person. Not that a person who has passed M.A., Ph.D. examination from the university de . . . offering country. The person who understands this problem of life, he is the most intelligent person. That we should learn. He is the most intelligent person.

yasya sarve samārambhāḥ
kāma-saṅkalpa-varjitāḥ
jñānāgni-dagdha-karmāṇaṁ
tam āhuḥ paṇḍitaṁ budhāḥ
(BG 4.19)

Paṇḍita. Paṇḍita means learned, and budha means one who is well-versed. He is called budha. Budha, this very term you'll find in another place of Bhagavad-gītā, in the Tenth Chapter, budhā bhāva-samanvitāḥ.

ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavo
mattaḥ sarvaṁ pravartate
iti matvā bhajante māṁ
budhā bhāva-samanvitāḥ
(BG 10.8)

That budha you'll find in the Tenth Chapter, and the same budha, paṇḍita, paṇḍita and budha. Paṇḍita, according to Bhagavad-gītā, paṇḍita, paṇḍita means learned man. The Sanskrit word paṇḍita means . . . and budha is "well-versed."

Now who is well-versed? And who is paṇḍita? A very learned man from . . . by academic education may not be a learned man according to the view of Bhagavad-gītā. Bhagavad-gītā says: "He is the learned man who can see everyone on the equal footing, equal level."

vidyā-vinaya-sampanne
brāhmaṇe gavi hastini
śuni caiva śva-pāke ca
paṇḍitāḥ sama-darśinaḥ
(BG 5.18)

A paṇḍita, paṇḍita can see . . . paṇḍita means a learned man can see that "Here is a learned brāhmiṇ." In India, according to Vedic civilization, a learned brāhmiṇ is considered to be the topmost man in human society. So therefore He is taking the example that "Here is a very learned brāhmiṇ." Vidyā-vinaya-sampanne brāhmaṇe. Not only he is brāhmiṇ, but he is very gentle. Vidyā means . . . what is the result of vidyā? Education means one becomes gentleman. That is the result of vidyā. If one is not a gentleman, then his learning is not accepted according to the Vedic literature. So paṇḍita means that one who is learned and gentle.

So another paṇḍita sees vidyā-vinaya-sampanne, a brāhmiṇ, learned and gentle, vidyā-vinaya-sampanne brāhmaṇe gavi, and a cow, vidyā-vinaya-sampanne gavi ha . . . and an elephant, and śva-pāke . . . śva-pāke ca śuni ceta. Śva-pāke means there is a class of men who eats dog. They are counted amongst the lower class in India. Śva-pāke ca śuni ca. Śuni ca means dog. So dog also, not taken very good animal in the society. But a paṇḍita—either a dog, either a cow, either an elephant, either a, a, I mean to say, dog-eater, or a learned brāhmaṇa—he sees all of them on the same level. That is paṇḍita.

Why he sees on the same level? Do you mean to say that a learned brāhmiṇ, a high-class brāhmiṇ, he is just like as good as a dog? No. A learned brāhmin is not as good as a dog. But how, how, then, the paṇḍita sees on the equal footing? Oh, because he does not see on the skin, but he sees on the spirit. Therefore he's paṇḍita. One who has learned this art, to see in any living being only the spirit he sees, that "Here is a living being. He's a spiritual spark. He's a spirit soul. But he has got a different covering, body, only."

Just like in the Bhagavad-gītā it is said that vāsāṁsi jīrṇāni (BG 2.22): "This body is just like our dress." Suppose a very learned man has come in a shabby dress. Do you think that he should be dishonored? If he's known, of course.

Just like our this sannyāsī dress. It is not very costly dress. It is a loincloth. It is very cheap. But sometimes people misunderstand that "Here is a beggar." And sometimes we are respected. So simply by dress we should not see any living entity. Whether . . . either he's a dog, or he's a, in the estimation of the society, a lower-class man, or a very high-class man, or a cow, but we shall see that, "Here is a spirit soul." Anyone who can understand the spiritual vision of life, he is paṇḍita. He is paṇḍita.

And according to Cāṇakya Paṇḍita . . . Cāṇakya, he was a great politician, and he says . . . now, what is the standard of education? Standard of education. Now, he has given very nice, three words, three words for standard of education, who is perfect in education. He says:

mātṛvat para-dāreṣu
para-dravyeṣu loṣṭravat
ātmavat sarva-bhūteṣu
yaḥ paśyati sa paṇḍitaḥ
(Cāṇakya Paṇḍita)

Paṇḍita. This paṇḍita. This paṇḍita, explanation of paṇḍita. Now, who is a paṇḍita? Now, mātṛvat para-dāreṣu: "He is the learned man who sees all women as his mother." Except one's married wife, one should see every woman as his mother. Mātṛvat. Mātṛ means mother. Vat means just like. Mātṛvat para-dāreṣu. Para-dāreṣu means other women except one's own wife, married wife.

Mātṛvat para-dāreṣu para-dravyeṣu loṣṭravat: "And other's property should be accepted just like refused garbage in the street." Just like we don't care for all the garbages. Simply if others' money or others' property is there, sometimes we hanker, we should think, "Oh, this all nonsense, just like garbage." Mātṛvat para-dāreṣu para-dravyeṣu loṣṭravat, ātmavat sarva-bhūteṣu. And loṣṭra means that rubbles, just like stone rubbles. You see? There are so many rubbles and, er, strewn over the street. Nobody cares for that. Similarly, if others' money is thrown over the street, nobody . . . he should not care. He should not collect: "Oh, here is some money. Let me take."

So mātṛvat para-dāreṣu para-dravyeṣu loṣṭravat, ātmavat sarva-bhūteṣu. And he should see everyone . . . this ātmavat sarva-bhūteṣu was preached by Lord Buddha, this philosophy. This one philosophy was, I mean to say, taught throughout the whole world by Lord Buddha, that there should be no animal killing. Ātmavat sarva-bhūteṣu. No living entity should be given suffer, even by words. That is real life. Ātmavat . . . yaḥ paśyati. One who has such vision of life, he is called learned. He is called learned—not by educational qualifications. One who has acquired . . . phalena paricīyate. Education is understood, how far a man is educated, by his behavior. By his vision of life it will be estimated, not by the degrees. Ātmavat sarva-bhūteṣu yaḥ paśyati sa paṇḍitaḥ.

Similarly, here also, here also the word paṇḍita, paṇḍita, has been used. So I have just given you some explanation of paṇḍita from different angle of vision. And budha also. Budha. In the Bhagavad-gītā you'll find the definition of budha. Budha means well versed. Well versed. Well versed means who has got . . . studied lots of books of knowledge. He is called budha. Now, how one becomes budha? By studying, one should have concluded this. What is that conclusion? That is stated in the Bhagavad-gītā by Lord Kṛṣṇa, ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavaḥ.

ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavo
mattaḥ sarvaṁ pravartate
iti matvā bhajante māṁ
budhā bhāva-samanvitāḥ
(BG 10.8)

The well-versed person is he who has understood that Kṛṣṇa is the original fountainhead of all emanations. All emanations, whatever we see, they are all emanations from Kṛṣṇa. That is the sci . . . one who has understood this, this fact, this transcendental fact, he is well versed, budha.

Ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavo mattaḥ sarvaṁ pravartate: "And everything is coming out of Me." Just like the sunshine is coming out of the sun. Nobody knows for how many years, how millions and millions of years, the sunshine is coming out of the sun. But still, the sun is still as it is. Similarly, the all the energies—the material energy, spiritual energy, lower energy, higher energy—everything is coming out of Kṛṣṇa.

So one who has understood this science, the Kṛṣṇa science, budhā bhāva-samanvitāḥ, then what he becomes? His sign that . . . what is the sign that he has understood? Oh, he becomes a devotee of Kṛṣṇa. He becomes completely Kṛṣṇa consciousness. That is the sign of being well versed, well versed. And this is the sign of becoming the paṇḍita, the learned. Paṇḍita, learned. So:

yasya sarve samārambhāḥ
kāma-saṅkalpa-varjitāḥ
jñānāgni-dagdha-karmāṇaṁ
tam āhuḥ paṇḍitaṁ budhāḥ
(BG 4.19)

One who has who is learned enough, one who has got this knowledge, that "We have to work in Kṛṣṇa consciousness," and he has no more lust to enjoy this material world, one who has no more lust, kāma-saṅkalpa-varjitāḥ . . . everything what we do in this material world, we have got a determination that, "I shall enjoy the fruits of this work like this, the fruits of that work in that way." That is called kāma-saṅkalpa, determination of lust. So one who is free from such lust, kāma-saṅkalpa-varjitāḥ . . .

And how it is possible? Jñānāgni-dagdha-karmāṇam. Jñānāgni. Just like fire, fire burns everything which you put into it. Similarly, one has developed . . . one who has developed the sense, the real knowledge that, "My life's mission, the . . . is only to go back to Kṛṣṇa and become Kṛṣṇa consciousness," that is the highest type of knowledge. They're just like fire. So in that fire of highest type of knowledge, all lust is burned aside. Jñāna-agni-dagdha, tam āhuḥ paṇḍitaṁ budhāḥ. And he's a learned, he's well versed. That is the explanation of this Bhagavad-gītā.

And let us stop here. You have . . . if there is any question, you can put.

Guest (1): If you're rich . . . were you saying if you're rich, you get knowledge . . . you get knowledge easier because you're rich?

Prabhupāda: No, no, no. I said that by your pious work you get four results. By your pious work . . . because every work, we have, we are just today discussing what is real work and what are the reaction of the work and what is not, I mean to say, prescribed work. These things are we have discussed. Now, so far the pious work, which is called, in Sanskrit language, which is called puṇya-karma, we get four results, four kinds of results.

By pious work, we get very good birth. Good birth means to take one's birth in aristocratic family or in rich family. That is, materially concerned, very good birth. So by pious work, one can become a good birth, can get his birth in a good family. And he can become a rich man also. Just, just like in this world we see, somebody is working very little, but he's gaining much.

Another body is working very hard the whole day—still, he's not getting much. Why? Because due to his pious work, he is getting very easily riches. So richness is also result of pious work. And similarly, one student is becoming very quickly a scholar—another, he cannot. So this is also result of pious work. Similarly, beauty is also due to pious work. I discussed this point. And what was your point?

Guest (1): Do you get more wisdom quicker or it's more to come by if you have a lot of money?

Prabhupāda: Not necessarily. I don't say that. That is different thing. But richness is due . . .

Guest (1): I understood what you said before.

Prabhupāda: Yes. Not necessarily that because a man is very rich, therefore he has got a very good brain also. No, not necessarily. Neither good brain can produce richness. Even there is one man, he's very intelligent man, but in the field of activities, he remains a poor man.

So neither intelligence is the cause of richness, nor richness is the cause of intelligence. These are two different things. But if one is pious, then his, as reaction of his pious acts, he becomes rich, he becomes wealthy, he becomes beautiful, he becomes learned. These things are stated in the scriptures. Janmaiśvarya-śruta-śrībhiḥ (SB 1.8.26). Janma-aiśvarya, four things, janma-aiśvarya-śruta . . . janma means birth, aiśvarya means richness, and śruta means education. (sirens) Is that point clear?

Is that point clear?

(aside) Please hear. Stop! Don't talk. We are talking seriously. Don't disturb.

Is that point clear?

Guest (1): Yes. Yeah thank you.

Prabhupāda: Yes. Any other question?

Young woman: If one is really pious, why should he care about materialistic things such as beauty and wealth?

Prabhupāda: Hmm? If one is pious, why he should . . .?

Young woman: Why should he care about things like beauty and wealth?

Prabhupāda: Oh. So war is not always impious. Do you understand? Sometimes war, fighting . . . so far, so far the Vedic conception of life is concerned, there are four classes, four classes: the intelligent class, the administrator class, the mercantile class . . . not only Vedic religion, this division is all over the world. There are four classes of men.

So for administrative class of men, it is a duty to protect the weak. Sometimes law and order requires violence. Just like the government maintains military, police force, because sometimes they are required. So when government employs some police force, some military force, that does not means impious. That is required.

Similarly, fighting or violence is not always impious. But a responsible person, he does not take violence unnecessarily. He considers things very nicely, and when there is no other alternative than to use violence, then he uses violence. Just like the government sometimes takes violence on the citizens. It is not the objective of the government to . . . (end)