CC Antya 2.95: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision(s)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | [[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - Antya-lila Chapter 02|C095]] | ||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta]] - [[CC Antya|Antya-līlā]] - [[CC Antya 2|Chapter 2: The Chastisement of Junior Haridāsa]]'''</div> | |||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Antya 2.94|Antya-līlā 2.94]] '''[[CC Antya 2.94|Antya-līlā 2.94]] - [[CC Antya 2.96|Antya-līlā 2.96]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Antya 2.96|Antya-līlā 2.96]]</div> | |||
{{CompareVersions|CC|Antya 2.95|CC 1975|CC 1996}} | |||
{{RandomImage}} | |||
==== TEXT 95 ==== | ==== TEXT 95 ==== | ||
<div class="verse"> | |||
<div | :vaiṣṇava hañā yebā śārīraka-bhāṣya śune | ||
vaiṣṇava hañā yebā śārīraka-bhāṣya śune | :sevya-sevaka-bhāva chāḍi’ āpanāre ‘īśvara’ māne | ||
sevya-sevaka-bhāva chāḍi’ āpanāre ‘īśvara’ māne | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 13: | Line 16: | ||
==== SYNONYMS ==== | ==== SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div class="synonyms"> | |||
<div | ''vaiṣṇava hañā''—being a Vaiṣṇava; ''yebā''—anyone who; ''śārīraka-bhāṣya''—the Māyāvāda commentary Śārīraka-bhāṣya; ''śune''—listens to; ''sevya-sevaka-bhāva''—the Kṛṣṇa conscious attitude that the Lord is the master and the living entity is His servant; ''chāḍi’''—giving up; ''āpanāre''—himself; ''īśvara''—the Supreme Lord; ''māne''—considers. | ||
vaiṣṇava | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 21: | Line 23: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div class="translation"> | |||
<div | |||
“When a Vaiṣṇava listens to the Śārīraka-bhāṣya, the Māyāvāda commentary upon the Vedānta-sūtra, he gives up the Kṛṣṇa conscious attitude that the Lord is the master and the living entity is His servant. Instead, he considers himself the Supreme Lord. | “When a Vaiṣṇava listens to the Śārīraka-bhāṣya, the Māyāvāda commentary upon the Vedānta-sūtra, he gives up the Kṛṣṇa conscious attitude that the Lord is the master and the living entity is His servant. Instead, he considers himself the Supreme Lord. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div class="purport"> | |||
The philosophers known as ''kevalādvaita-vādīs'' generally occupy themselves with hearing the ''Śārīraka-bhāṣya'', a commentary by Śaṅkarācārya advocating that one impersonally consider oneself the Supreme Lord. Such Māyāvāda philosophical commentaries upon the ''Vedānta-sūtra'' are simply imaginary, but there are other commentaries on the ''Vedānta-sūtra''. The commentary by Śrīla Rāmānujācārya, known as ''Śrī-bhāṣya'', establishes the ''viśiṣṭādvaita-vāda'' philosophy. Similarly, in the Brahma-sampradāya, Madhvācārya’s ''Pūrṇaprajña-bhāṣya'' establishes ''śuddha-dvaita-vāda''. In the Kumāra-sampradāya, or Nimbārka-sampradāya, Śrī Nimbārka establishes the philosophy of ''dvaitādvaita-vāda'' in the ''Pārijāta-saurabha-bhāṣya''. And in the Viṣṇu-svāmi-sampradāya, or Rudra-sampradāya, which comes from Lord Śiva, Viṣṇu Svāmī has written a commentary called ''Sarvajña-bhāṣya'', which establishes ''śuddhādvaita-vāda''. | |||
A Vaiṣṇava should study the commentaries on the ''Vedānta-sūtra'' written by the four ''sampradāya-ācāryas'', namely Śrī Rāmānujācārya, Madhvācārya, Viṣṇu Svāmī and Nimbārka, for these commentaries are based upon the philosophy that the Lord is the master and that all living entities are His eternal servants. One interested in studying Vedānta philosophy properly must study these commentaries, especially if he is a Vaiṣṇava. These commentaries are always adored by Vaiṣṇavas. The commentary by Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī is elaborately given in the ''Adi-līlā'', Chapter Seven, text 101. The Māyāvāda commentary ''Śārīraka-bhāṣya'' is like poison for a Vaiṣṇava. It should not be touched at all. Śrīla Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura remarks that even a ''mahā-bhāgavata'', or highly elevated devotee who has surrendered himself unto the lotus feet of Kṛṣṇa, sometimes falls down from pure devotional service if he hears the Māyāvāda philosophy of the ''Śārīraka-bhāṣya''. This commentary should therefore be shunned by all Vaiṣṇavas. | |||
</div> | |||
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Antya 2.94|Antya-līlā 2.94]] '''[[CC Antya 2.94|Antya-līlā 2.94]] - [[CC Antya 2.96|Antya-līlā 2.96]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Antya 2.96|Antya-līlā 2.96]]</div> | |||
</div> | __NOTOC__ | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
Revision as of 18:34, 10 October 2021
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
TEXT 95
- vaiṣṇava hañā yebā śārīraka-bhāṣya śune
- sevya-sevaka-bhāva chāḍi’ āpanāre ‘īśvara’ māne
SYNONYMS
vaiṣṇava hañā—being a Vaiṣṇava; yebā—anyone who; śārīraka-bhāṣya—the Māyāvāda commentary Śārīraka-bhāṣya; śune—listens to; sevya-sevaka-bhāva—the Kṛṣṇa conscious attitude that the Lord is the master and the living entity is His servant; chāḍi’—giving up; āpanāre—himself; īśvara—the Supreme Lord; māne—considers.
TRANSLATION
“When a Vaiṣṇava listens to the Śārīraka-bhāṣya, the Māyāvāda commentary upon the Vedānta-sūtra, he gives up the Kṛṣṇa conscious attitude that the Lord is the master and the living entity is His servant. Instead, he considers himself the Supreme Lord.
PURPORT
The philosophers known as kevalādvaita-vādīs generally occupy themselves with hearing the Śārīraka-bhāṣya, a commentary by Śaṅkarācārya advocating that one impersonally consider oneself the Supreme Lord. Such Māyāvāda philosophical commentaries upon the Vedānta-sūtra are simply imaginary, but there are other commentaries on the Vedānta-sūtra. The commentary by Śrīla Rāmānujācārya, known as Śrī-bhāṣya, establishes the viśiṣṭādvaita-vāda philosophy. Similarly, in the Brahma-sampradāya, Madhvācārya’s Pūrṇaprajña-bhāṣya establishes śuddha-dvaita-vāda. In the Kumāra-sampradāya, or Nimbārka-sampradāya, Śrī Nimbārka establishes the philosophy of dvaitādvaita-vāda in the Pārijāta-saurabha-bhāṣya. And in the Viṣṇu-svāmi-sampradāya, or Rudra-sampradāya, which comes from Lord Śiva, Viṣṇu Svāmī has written a commentary called Sarvajña-bhāṣya, which establishes śuddhādvaita-vāda.
A Vaiṣṇava should study the commentaries on the Vedānta-sūtra written by the four sampradāya-ācāryas, namely Śrī Rāmānujācārya, Madhvācārya, Viṣṇu Svāmī and Nimbārka, for these commentaries are based upon the philosophy that the Lord is the master and that all living entities are His eternal servants. One interested in studying Vedānta philosophy properly must study these commentaries, especially if he is a Vaiṣṇava. These commentaries are always adored by Vaiṣṇavas. The commentary by Śrīla Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī is elaborately given in the Adi-līlā, Chapter Seven, text 101. The Māyāvāda commentary Śārīraka-bhāṣya is like poison for a Vaiṣṇava. It should not be touched at all. Śrīla Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura remarks that even a mahā-bhāgavata, or highly elevated devotee who has surrendered himself unto the lotus feet of Kṛṣṇa, sometimes falls down from pure devotional service if he hears the Māyāvāda philosophy of the Śārīraka-bhāṣya. This commentary should therefore be shunned by all Vaiṣṇavas.