Go to Vaniquotes | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia


Vanisource - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge


SB 1.18.33: Difference between revisions

m (1 revision(s))
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{SB_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{info
{{info
|speaker=Srngi the brahmana boy
|speaker=Śṛṅgi the brāhmaṇa boy
|listener=boy friends of Srngi the brahmana boy
|listener=boy friends of Śṛṅgi the brāhmaṇa boy
}}
}}
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam - Canto 01 Chapter 18]]
[[Category:Bhagavatam Verses Spoken by Srngi the Brahmana Boy - Vanisource|011833]]
<div style="float:left">'''[[Srimad-Bhagavatam]] - [[SB 1|First Canto]] - [[SB 1.18: Maharaja Pariksit Cursed by a Brahmana Boy|Chapter 18: Mahārāja Parīkṣit Cursed by a Brāhmaṇa Boy]]'''</div>
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.18.32]] '''[[SB 1.18.32]] - [[SB 1.18.34]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.18.34]]</div>
{{CompareVersions|SB|1.18.33|SB 1965|SB 1972-77}}
{{RandomImage}}


==== TEXT 33 ====
==== TEXT 33 ====


 
<div class="verse">
<div id="text">
:aho adharmaḥ pālānāṁ
aho adharmaḥ pālānāṁ<br>
:pīvnāṁ bali-bhujām iva
pīvnāṁ bali-bhujām iva<br>
:svāminy aghaṁ yad dāsānāṁ
svāminy aghaṁ yad dāsānāṁ<br>
:dvāra-pānāṁ śunām iva
dvāra-pānāṁ śunām iva<br>
</div>
</div>


Line 18: Line 23:
==== SYNONYMS ====
==== SYNONYMS ====


 
<div class="synonyms">
<div id="synonyms">
''aho''—just look at; ''adharmaḥ''—irreligion; ''pālānām''—of the rulers; ''pīvnām''—of one who is brought up; ''bali-bhujām''—like the crows; ''iva''—like; ''svāmini''—unto the master; ''agham''—sin; ''yat''—what is; ''dāsānām''—of the servants; ''dvāra-pānām''—keeping watch at the door; ''śunām''—of the dogs; ''iva''—like.
aho—just look at; adharmaḥ—irreligion; pālānām—of the rulers; pīvnām—of one who is brought up; bali-bhujām—like the crows; iva—like; svāmini—unto the master; agham—sin; yat—what is; dāsānām—of the servants; dvāra-pānām—keeping watch at the door; śunām—of the dogs; iva—like.
</div>
</div>


Line 26: Line 30:
==== TRANSLATION ====
==== TRANSLATION ====


 
<div class="translation">
<div id="translation">
[The brāhmaṇa's son, Śṛṅgi, said:] O just look at the sins of the rulers who, like crows and watchdogs at the door, perpetrate sins against their masters, contrary to the principles governing servants.
[The brāhmaṇa's son, Śṛṅgi, said:] O just look at the sins of the rulers who, like crows and watchdogs at the door, perpetrate sins against their masters, contrary to the principles governing servants.
</div>
</div>
Line 34: Line 37:
==== PURPORT ====
==== PURPORT ====


<div class="purport">
The ''brāhmaṇas'' are considered to be the head and brains of the social body, and the ''kṣatriyas'' are considered to be the arms of the social body. The arms are required to protect the body from all harm, but the arms must act according to the directions of the head and brain. That is a natural arrangement made by the supreme order, for it is confirmed in the [[Bhagavad-gita As It Is (1972)|''Bhagavad-gītā'']] that four social orders or castes, namely the ''brāhmaṇas'', the ''kṣatriyas'', the ''vaiśyas'' and the ''śūdras'', are set up according to quality and work done by them. Naturally the son of a ''brāhmaṇa'' has a good chance to become a ''brāhmaṇa'' by the direction of his qualified father, as a son of a medical practitioner has a very good chance to become a qualified medical practitioner. So the caste system is quite scientific. The son must take advantage of the father's qualification and thus become a ''brāhmaṇa'' or medical practitioner, and not otherwise. Without being qualified, one cannot become a ''brāhmaṇa'' or medical practitioner, and that is the verdict of all scriptures and social orders. Herein Śṛṅgi, a qualified son of a great ''brāhmaṇa'', attained the required brahminical power both by birth and by training, but he was lacking in culture because he was an inexperienced boy. By the influence of Kali, the son of a ''brāhmaṇa'' became puffed up with brahminical power and thus wrongly compared Mahārāja Parīkṣit to crows and watchdogs. The King is certainly the watchdog of the state in the sense that he keeps vigilant eyes over the border of the state for its protection and defense, but to address him as a watchdog is the sign of a less-cultured boy. Thus the downfall of the brahminical powers began as they gave importance to birthright without culture. The downfall of the ''brāhmaṇa'' caste began in the age of Kali. And since ''brāhmaṇas'' are the heads of the social order, all other orders of society also began to deteriorate. This beginning of brahminical deterioration was highly deplored by the father of Śṛṅgi, as we will find.
</div>


<div id="purport">
 
The brāhmaṇas are considered to be the head and brains of the social body, and the kṣatriyas are considered to be the arms of the social body. The arms are required to protect the body from all harm, but the arms must act according to the directions of the head and brain. That is a natural arrangement made by the supreme order, for it is confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā that four social orders or castes, namely the brāhmaṇas, the kṣatriyas, the vaiśyas and the śūdras, are set up according to quality and work done by them. Naturally the son of a brāhmaṇa has a good chance to become a brāhmaṇa by the direction of his qualified father, as a son of a medical practitioner has a very good chance to become a qualified medical practitioner. So the caste system is quite scientific. The son must take advantage of the father's qualification and thus become a brāhmaṇa or medical practitioner, and not otherwise. Without being qualified, one cannot become a brāhmaṇa or medical practitioner, and that is the verdict of all scriptures and social orders. Herein Śṛṅgi, a qualified son of a great brāhmaṇa, attained the required brahminical power both by birth and by training, but he was lacking in culture because he was an inexperienced boy. By the influence of Kali, the son of a brāhmaṇa became puffed up with brahminical power and thus wrongly compared Mahārāja Parīkṣit to crows and watchdogs. The King is certainly the watchdog of the state in the sense that he keeps vigilant eyes over the border of the state for its protection and defense, but to address him as a watchdog is the sign of a less-cultured boy. Thus the downfall of the brahminical powers began as they gave importance to birthright without culture. The downfall of the brāhmaṇa caste began in the age of Kali. And since brāhmaṇas are the heads of the social order, all other orders of society also began to deteriorate. This beginning of brahminical deterioration was highly deplored by the father of Śṛṅgi, as we will find.
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.18.32]] '''[[SB 1.18.32]] - [[SB 1.18.34]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.18.34]]</div>
</div>
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__{{SB_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}
__NOEDITSECTION__

Revision as of 02:58, 3 May 2021



His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada



TEXT 33

aho adharmaḥ pālānāṁ
pīvnāṁ bali-bhujām iva
svāminy aghaṁ yad dāsānāṁ
dvāra-pānāṁ śunām iva


SYNONYMS

aho—just look at; adharmaḥ—irreligion; pālānām—of the rulers; pīvnām—of one who is brought up; bali-bhujām—like the crows; iva—like; svāmini—unto the master; agham—sin; yat—what is; dāsānām—of the servants; dvāra-pānām—keeping watch at the door; śunām—of the dogs; iva—like.


TRANSLATION

[The brāhmaṇa's son, Śṛṅgi, said:] O just look at the sins of the rulers who, like crows and watchdogs at the door, perpetrate sins against their masters, contrary to the principles governing servants.


PURPORT

The brāhmaṇas are considered to be the head and brains of the social body, and the kṣatriyas are considered to be the arms of the social body. The arms are required to protect the body from all harm, but the arms must act according to the directions of the head and brain. That is a natural arrangement made by the supreme order, for it is confirmed in the Bhagavad-gītā that four social orders or castes, namely the brāhmaṇas, the kṣatriyas, the vaiśyas and the śūdras, are set up according to quality and work done by them. Naturally the son of a brāhmaṇa has a good chance to become a brāhmaṇa by the direction of his qualified father, as a son of a medical practitioner has a very good chance to become a qualified medical practitioner. So the caste system is quite scientific. The son must take advantage of the father's qualification and thus become a brāhmaṇa or medical practitioner, and not otherwise. Without being qualified, one cannot become a brāhmaṇa or medical practitioner, and that is the verdict of all scriptures and social orders. Herein Śṛṅgi, a qualified son of a great brāhmaṇa, attained the required brahminical power both by birth and by training, but he was lacking in culture because he was an inexperienced boy. By the influence of Kali, the son of a brāhmaṇa became puffed up with brahminical power and thus wrongly compared Mahārāja Parīkṣit to crows and watchdogs. The King is certainly the watchdog of the state in the sense that he keeps vigilant eyes over the border of the state for its protection and defense, but to address him as a watchdog is the sign of a less-cultured boy. Thus the downfall of the brahminical powers began as they gave importance to birthright without culture. The downfall of the brāhmaṇa caste began in the age of Kali. And since brāhmaṇas are the heads of the social order, all other orders of society also began to deteriorate. This beginning of brahminical deterioration was highly deplored by the father of Śṛṅgi, as we will find.



... more about "SB 1.18.33"
Śṛṅgi the brāhmaṇa boy +
boy friends of Śṛṅgi the brāhmaṇa boy +