CC Madhya 5.23 (1975): Difference between revisions
(Vanibot #0027: CCMirror - Mirror CC's 1996 edition to form a basis for 1975) |
(Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revise links, localize and redirect them to the de facto address) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Madhya (1975)|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 5 (1975)|Chapter 5: The Activities of Sākṣi-gopāla]]'''</div> | <div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Madhya (1975)|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 5 (1975)|Chapter 5: The Activities of Sākṣi-gopāla]]'''</div> | ||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 5.22 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 5.22]] '''[[CC Madhya 5.22 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 5.22]] - [[CC Madhya 5.24 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 5.24]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 5.24 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 5.24]]</div> | <div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 5.22 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 5.22]] '''[[CC Madhya 5.22 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 5.22]] - [[CC Madhya 5.24 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 5.24]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 5.24 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 5.24]]</div> | ||
{{CompareVersions|CC|Madhya 5.23|CC 1975|CC 1996}} | |||
{{RandomImage}} | {{RandomImage}} | ||
==== TEXT 23 ==== | ==== TEXT 23 ==== | ||
Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
<div class="synonyms"> | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
kanyā-dāna-pātra—a bridegroom suitable for | kanyā-dāna-pātra—a bridegroom suitable for one's daughter; āmi—I; nā—not; ha-i—am; tomāra—of you; kṛṣṇa-prītye—only for satisfaction of Kṛṣṇa; kari—I do; tomāra—of you; sevā—of service; vyavahāra—activities. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 25: | Line 24: | ||
<div class="translation"> | <div class="translation"> | ||
"Sir, I am not a suitable bridegroom for your daughter. I render service to you only for the satisfaction of Kṛṣṇa. | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 32: | Line 31: | ||
<div class="purport"> | <div class="purport"> | ||
Both brāhmaṇas were pure Vaiṣṇavas. The younger man took special care of the older one simply to please Kṛṣṇa. In Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam ([[SB 11.19.20-24| | Both brāhmaṇas were pure Vaiṣṇavas. The younger man took special care of the older one simply to please Kṛṣṇa. In Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam ([[SB 11.19.20-24|11.19.21]]) Kṛṣṇa says, mad-bhakta-pūjābhyadhikā: "It is better to render service to My devotee." Thus, according to the Gauḍīya-Vaiṣṇava philosophy of Caitanya Mahāprabhu, it is better to be a servant of the servant of God. One should not try to serve Kṛṣṇa directly. A pure Vaiṣṇava serves a servant of Kṛṣṇa and identifies himself as a servant of a servant of Kṛṣṇa. This is pleasing to Lord Kṛṣṇa. Śrīla Narottama dāsa Ṭhākura confirms this philosophy: chāḍiyā vaiṣṇava-sevā nistāra pāyeche kebā. Unless one serves a liberated Vaiṣṇava, he cannot attain liberation by directly serving Kṛṣṇa. He must serve the servant of Kṛṣṇa. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 16:22, 18 September 2020
TEXT 23
- kanyā-dāna-pātra āmi nā ha-i tomāra
- kṛṣṇa-prītye kari tomāra sevā-vyavahāra
SYNONYMS
kanyā-dāna-pātra—a bridegroom suitable for one's daughter; āmi—I; nā—not; ha-i—am; tomāra—of you; kṛṣṇa-prītye—only for satisfaction of Kṛṣṇa; kari—I do; tomāra—of you; sevā—of service; vyavahāra—activities.
TRANSLATION
"Sir, I am not a suitable bridegroom for your daughter. I render service to you only for the satisfaction of Kṛṣṇa.
PURPORT
Both brāhmaṇas were pure Vaiṣṇavas. The younger man took special care of the older one simply to please Kṛṣṇa. In Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (11.19.21) Kṛṣṇa says, mad-bhakta-pūjābhyadhikā: "It is better to render service to My devotee." Thus, according to the Gauḍīya-Vaiṣṇava philosophy of Caitanya Mahāprabhu, it is better to be a servant of the servant of God. One should not try to serve Kṛṣṇa directly. A pure Vaiṣṇava serves a servant of Kṛṣṇa and identifies himself as a servant of a servant of Kṛṣṇa. This is pleasing to Lord Kṛṣṇa. Śrīla Narottama dāsa Ṭhākura confirms this philosophy: chāḍiyā vaiṣṇava-sevā nistāra pāyeche kebā. Unless one serves a liberated Vaiṣṇava, he cannot attain liberation by directly serving Kṛṣṇa. He must serve the servant of Kṛṣṇa.