CC Adi 17.257 (1975): Difference between revisions
(Vanibot #0027: CCMirror - Mirror CC's 1996 edition to form a basis for 1975) |
(Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revise links, localize and redirect them to the de facto address) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Adi (1975)|Ādi-līlā]] - [[CC Adi 17 (1975)|Chapter 17: The Pastimes of Lord Caitanya Mahāprabhu in His Youth]]'''</div> | <div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Adi (1975)|Ādi-līlā]] - [[CC Adi 17 (1975)|Chapter 17: The Pastimes of Lord Caitanya Mahāprabhu in His Youth]]'''</div> | ||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Adi 17.256 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 17.256]] '''[[CC Adi 17.256 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 17.256]] - [[CC Adi 17.258 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 17.258]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Adi 17.258 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 17.258]]</div> | <div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Adi 17.256 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 17.256]] '''[[CC Adi 17.256 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 17.256]] - [[CC Adi 17.258 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 17.258]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Adi 17.258 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 17.258]]</div> | ||
{{CompareVersions|CC|Adi 17.257|CC 1975|CC 1996}} | |||
{{RandomImage}} | {{RandomImage}} | ||
==== TEXT 257 ==== | ==== TEXT 257 ==== | ||
Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
<div class="synonyms"> | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
prabhura—of the Lord; nindāya—in accusation; sabāra—of everyone; buddhi—the intelligence; haila—became; nāśa—spoiled; su-paṭhita—well-studied; vidyā—knowledge; | prabhura—of the Lord; nindāya—in accusation; sabāra—of everyone; buddhi—the intelligence; haila—became; nāśa—spoiled; su-paṭhita—well-studied; vidyā—knowledge; kārao—everyone's; nā—does not; haya—become; prakāśa—manifest. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 25: | Line 24: | ||
<div class="translation"> | <div class="translation"> | ||
When all the students thus resolved, criticizing Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, their intelligence was spoiled. Thus although they were learned scholars, because of this offense the essence of knowledge was not | When all the students thus resolved, criticizing Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, their intelligence was spoiled. Thus although they were learned scholars, because of this offense the essence of knowledge was not manifest in them. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 32: | Line 31: | ||
<div class="purport"> | <div class="purport"> | ||
In the Bhagavad-gītā it is said, māyayāpahṛta-jñānā āsuraṁ bhāvam āśritāḥ: when one becomes inimical to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, adopting an atheistic attitude (āsuraṁ bhāvam), even if one is a learned scholar the essence of knowledge does not become | In the Bhagavad-gītā it is said, māyayāpahṛta-jñānā āsuraṁ bhāvam āśritāḥ: when one becomes inimical to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, adopting an atheistic attitude (āsuraṁ bhāvam), even if one is a learned scholar the essence of knowledge does not become manifest in him; in other words, the essence of his knowledge is stolen by the illusory energy of the Lord. In this connection Śrī Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura quotes a mantra from the Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad (6.23): | ||
:yasya deve parā bhaktir yathā deve tathā gurau | :yasya deve parā bhaktir | ||
:tasyaite kathitā hy arthāḥ prakāśante mahātmanaḥ | :yathā deve tathā gurau | ||
:tasyaite kathitā hy arthāḥ | |||
:prakāśante mahātmanaḥ | |||
The purport of this verse is that one who is unflinchingly devoted to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu, and similarly devoted to the spiritual master, with no ulterior motive, becomes a master of all knowledge. In the heart of such a devotee, the real essence of the Vedic knowledge becomes | The purport of this verse is that one who is unflinchingly devoted to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu, and similarly devoted to the spiritual master, with no ulterior motive, becomes a master of all knowledge. In the heart of such a devotee, the real essence of the Vedic knowledge becomes manifest. This essence is nothing but surrender unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead (vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyaḥ). Only unto one who fully surrenders to the spiritual master and the Supreme Lord does the essence of Vedic knowledge become manifest, not to anyone else. This same principle is emphasized by Śrī Prahlāda Mahārāja in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam ([[SB 7.5.23-24|7.5.24]]): | ||
:iti puṁsārpitā viṣṇau bhaktiś cen nava-lakṣaṇā | :iti puṁsārpitā viṣṇau | ||
: | :bhaktiś cen nava-lakṣaṇā | ||
:kriyeta bhagavaty addhā | |||
:tan manye 'dhītam uttamam | |||
"A person who directly applies these nine principles [hearing, chanting, remembering, etc.] in the service of the Lord is to be understood as a greatly learned man who has assimilated the Vedic literature very well, for the goal of studying the Vedic literature is to understand the supremacy of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa." Śrīdhara Svāmī confirms in his commentary that first one must surrender to the spiritual master; then the process of devotional service will develop. It is not a fact that only one who diligently pursues an academic career can become a devotee. Even with no academic career, if one has full faith in the spiritual master and the Supreme Personality of Godhead, he develops in spiritual life and real knowledge of the Vedas. The example of Mahārāja Khaṭvāṅga confirms this. One who surrenders is understood to have learned the subject matter of the Vedas very nicely. One who adopts this Vedic process of surrender learns devotional service and is certainly successful. One who is very much proud, however, is unable to surrender either to the spiritual master or to the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Thus he cannot understand the essence of any Vedic literature. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam ([[SB 11.11.18|Bhāg. 11.11.18]]) declares: | |||
:śabda-brahmaṇi niṣṇāto na niṣṇāyāt pare yadi | :śabda-brahmaṇi niṣṇāto | ||
:śramas tasya śrama-phalo hy adhenum iva rakṣataḥ | :na niṣṇāyāt pare yadi | ||
:śramas tasya śrama-phalo | |||
:hy adhenum iva rakṣataḥ | |||
"If one is learned in Vedic literature but is not a devotee of Lord Viṣṇu, his work is a useless waste of labor, just like the keeping of a cow that does not give milk." | |||
Anyone who does not follow the surrendering process but is simply interested in an academic career cannot make any advancement. His profit is only his labor for nothing. If one is expert in the study of the Vedas but does not surrender to a spiritual master or Viṣṇu, all his cultivation of knowledge is but a waste of time and labor. | Anyone who does not follow the surrendering process but is simply interested in an academic career cannot make any advancement. His profit is only his labor for nothing. If one is expert in the study of the Vedas but does not surrender to a spiritual master or Viṣṇu, all his cultivation of knowledge is but a waste of time and labor. |
Latest revision as of 14:20, 18 September 2020
TEXT 257
- prabhura nindāya sabāra buddhi haila nāśa
- supaṭhita vidyā kārao nā haya prakāśa
SYNONYMS
prabhura—of the Lord; nindāya—in accusation; sabāra—of everyone; buddhi—the intelligence; haila—became; nāśa—spoiled; su-paṭhita—well-studied; vidyā—knowledge; kārao—everyone's; nā—does not; haya—become; prakāśa—manifest.
TRANSLATION
When all the students thus resolved, criticizing Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, their intelligence was spoiled. Thus although they were learned scholars, because of this offense the essence of knowledge was not manifest in them.
PURPORT
In the Bhagavad-gītā it is said, māyayāpahṛta-jñānā āsuraṁ bhāvam āśritāḥ: when one becomes inimical to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, adopting an atheistic attitude (āsuraṁ bhāvam), even if one is a learned scholar the essence of knowledge does not become manifest in him; in other words, the essence of his knowledge is stolen by the illusory energy of the Lord. In this connection Śrī Bhaktisiddhānta Sarasvatī Ṭhākura quotes a mantra from the Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad (6.23):
- yasya deve parā bhaktir
- yathā deve tathā gurau
- tasyaite kathitā hy arthāḥ
- prakāśante mahātmanaḥ
The purport of this verse is that one who is unflinchingly devoted to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu, and similarly devoted to the spiritual master, with no ulterior motive, becomes a master of all knowledge. In the heart of such a devotee, the real essence of the Vedic knowledge becomes manifest. This essence is nothing but surrender unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead (vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyaḥ). Only unto one who fully surrenders to the spiritual master and the Supreme Lord does the essence of Vedic knowledge become manifest, not to anyone else. This same principle is emphasized by Śrī Prahlāda Mahārāja in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (7.5.24):
- iti puṁsārpitā viṣṇau
- bhaktiś cen nava-lakṣaṇā
- kriyeta bhagavaty addhā
- tan manye 'dhītam uttamam
"A person who directly applies these nine principles [hearing, chanting, remembering, etc.] in the service of the Lord is to be understood as a greatly learned man who has assimilated the Vedic literature very well, for the goal of studying the Vedic literature is to understand the supremacy of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa." Śrīdhara Svāmī confirms in his commentary that first one must surrender to the spiritual master; then the process of devotional service will develop. It is not a fact that only one who diligently pursues an academic career can become a devotee. Even with no academic career, if one has full faith in the spiritual master and the Supreme Personality of Godhead, he develops in spiritual life and real knowledge of the Vedas. The example of Mahārāja Khaṭvāṅga confirms this. One who surrenders is understood to have learned the subject matter of the Vedas very nicely. One who adopts this Vedic process of surrender learns devotional service and is certainly successful. One who is very much proud, however, is unable to surrender either to the spiritual master or to the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Thus he cannot understand the essence of any Vedic literature. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (Bhāg. 11.11.18) declares:
- śabda-brahmaṇi niṣṇāto
- na niṣṇāyāt pare yadi
- śramas tasya śrama-phalo
- hy adhenum iva rakṣataḥ
"If one is learned in Vedic literature but is not a devotee of Lord Viṣṇu, his work is a useless waste of labor, just like the keeping of a cow that does not give milk."
Anyone who does not follow the surrendering process but is simply interested in an academic career cannot make any advancement. His profit is only his labor for nothing. If one is expert in the study of the Vedas but does not surrender to a spiritual master or Viṣṇu, all his cultivation of knowledge is but a waste of time and labor.