SB 1.1.19: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision(s)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{info | {{info | ||
|speaker=Sages of | |speaker=Sages of Naimiṣāraṇya | ||
|listener= | |listener=Sūta Gosvāmī | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam - Canto 01 Chapter 01]] | |||
[[Category:Bhagavatam Verses Spoken by the Sages of Naimisaranya - Vanisource|010119]] | |||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Srimad-Bhagavatam]] - [[SB 1|First Canto]] - [[SB 1.1: Questions by the Sages|Chapter 1: Questions by the Sages]]'''</div> | |||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.1.18]] '''[[SB 1.1.18]] - [[SB 1.1.20]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.1.20]]</div> | |||
{{CompareVersions|SB|1.1.19|SB 1962|SB 1972-77}} | |||
{{RandomImage}} | |||
==== TEXT 19 ==== | ==== TEXT 19 ==== | ||
<div | <div class="verse"> | ||
vayaṁ tu na vitṛpyāma | :vayaṁ tu na vitṛpyāma | ||
uttama-śloka-vikrame | :uttama-śloka-vikrame | ||
yac-chṛṇvatāṁ rasa-jñānāṁ | :yac-chṛṇvatāṁ rasa-jñānāṁ | ||
svādu svādu pade pade | :svādu svādu pade pade | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 23: | ||
==== SYNONYMS ==== | ==== SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
''vayam''—we; ''tu''—but; ''na''—not; ''vitṛpyāmaḥ''—shall be at rest; ''uttama-śloka''—the Personality of Godhead, who is glorified by transcendental prayers; ''vikrame''—adventures; ''yat''—which; ''śṛṇvatām''—by continuous hearing; ''rasa''—humor; ''jñānām''—those who are conversant with; ''svādu''—relishing; ''svādu''—palatable; ''pade pade''—at every step. | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 24: | Line 30: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div | <div class="translation"> | ||
We never tire of hearing the transcendental pastimes of the Personality of Godhead, who is glorified by hymns and prayers. Those who have developed a taste for transcendental relationships with Him relish hearing of His pastimes at every moment. | We never tire of hearing the transcendental pastimes of the Personality of Godhead, who is glorified by hymns and prayers. Those who have developed a taste for transcendental relationships with Him relish hearing of His pastimes at every moment. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 37: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div | <div class="purport"> | ||
There is a great difference between mundane stories, fiction, or history and the transcendental pastimes of the Lord. The histories of the whole universe contain references to the pastimes of the incarnations of the Lord. The Rāmāyaṇa, the Mahābhārata, and the Purāṇas are histories of bygone ages recorded in connection with the pastimes of the incarnations of the Lord and therefore remain fresh even after repeated readings. For example, anyone may read Bhagavad-gītā or the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam repeatedly throughout his whole life and yet find in them new light of information. Mundane news is static whereas transcendental news is dynamic, inasmuch as the spirit is dynamic and matter is static. Those who have developed a taste for understanding the transcendental subject matter are never tired of hearing such narrations. One is quickly satiated by mundane activities, but no one is satiated by transcendental or devotional activities. Uttama-śloka indicates that literature which is not meant for nescience. Mundane literature is in the mode of darkness or ignorance, whereas transcendental literature is quite different. Transcendental literature is above the mode of darkness, and its light becomes more luminous with progressive reading and realization of the transcendental subject matter. The so-called liberated persons are never satisfied by the repetition of the words ahaṁ brahmāsmi. Such artificial realization of Brahman becomes hackneyed, and so to relish real pleasure they turn to the narrations of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. Those who are not so fortunate turn to altruism and worldly philanthropy. This means the Māyāvāda philosophy is mundane, whereas the philosophy of Bhagavad-gītā and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is transcendental. | There is a great difference between mundane stories, fiction, or history and the transcendental pastimes of the Lord. The histories of the whole universe contain references to the pastimes of the incarnations of the Lord. The ''Rāmāyaṇa'', the ''Mahābhārata'', and the ''Purāṇas'' are histories of bygone ages recorded in connection with the pastimes of the incarnations of the Lord and therefore remain fresh even after repeated readings. For example, anyone may read ''Bhagavad-gītā'' or the ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'' repeatedly throughout his whole life and yet find in them new light of information. Mundane news is static whereas transcendental news is dynamic, inasmuch as the spirit is dynamic and matter is static. Those who have developed a taste for understanding the transcendental subject matter are never tired of hearing such narrations. One is quickly satiated by mundane activities, but no one is satiated by transcendental or devotional activities. ''Uttama-śloka'' indicates that literature which is not meant for nescience. Mundane literature is in the mode of darkness or ignorance, whereas transcendental literature is quite different. Transcendental literature is above the mode of darkness, and its light becomes more luminous with progressive reading and realization of the transcendental subject matter. The so-called liberated persons are never satisfied by the repetition of the words ''ahaṁ brahmāsmi''. Such artificial realization of Brahman becomes hackneyed, and so to relish real pleasure they turn to the narrations of the ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam''. Those who are not so fortunate turn to altruism and worldly philanthropy. This means the Māyāvāda philosophy is mundane, whereas the philosophy of ''Bhagavad-gītā'' and ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'' is transcendental. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.1.18]] '''[[SB 1.1.18]] - [[SB 1.1.20]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.1.20]]</div> | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | |||
Revision as of 07:51, 29 April 2021
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
TEXT 19
- vayaṁ tu na vitṛpyāma
- uttama-śloka-vikrame
- yac-chṛṇvatāṁ rasa-jñānāṁ
- svādu svādu pade pade
SYNONYMS
vayam—we; tu—but; na—not; vitṛpyāmaḥ—shall be at rest; uttama-śloka—the Personality of Godhead, who is glorified by transcendental prayers; vikrame—adventures; yat—which; śṛṇvatām—by continuous hearing; rasa—humor; jñānām—those who are conversant with; svādu—relishing; svādu—palatable; pade pade—at every step.
TRANSLATION
We never tire of hearing the transcendental pastimes of the Personality of Godhead, who is glorified by hymns and prayers. Those who have developed a taste for transcendental relationships with Him relish hearing of His pastimes at every moment.
PURPORT
There is a great difference between mundane stories, fiction, or history and the transcendental pastimes of the Lord. The histories of the whole universe contain references to the pastimes of the incarnations of the Lord. The Rāmāyaṇa, the Mahābhārata, and the Purāṇas are histories of bygone ages recorded in connection with the pastimes of the incarnations of the Lord and therefore remain fresh even after repeated readings. For example, anyone may read Bhagavad-gītā or the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam repeatedly throughout his whole life and yet find in them new light of information. Mundane news is static whereas transcendental news is dynamic, inasmuch as the spirit is dynamic and matter is static. Those who have developed a taste for understanding the transcendental subject matter are never tired of hearing such narrations. One is quickly satiated by mundane activities, but no one is satiated by transcendental or devotional activities. Uttama-śloka indicates that literature which is not meant for nescience. Mundane literature is in the mode of darkness or ignorance, whereas transcendental literature is quite different. Transcendental literature is above the mode of darkness, and its light becomes more luminous with progressive reading and realization of the transcendental subject matter. The so-called liberated persons are never satisfied by the repetition of the words ahaṁ brahmāsmi. Such artificial realization of Brahman becomes hackneyed, and so to relish real pleasure they turn to the narrations of the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. Those who are not so fortunate turn to altruism and worldly philanthropy. This means the Māyāvāda philosophy is mundane, whereas the philosophy of Bhagavad-gītā and Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is transcendental.