SB 3.30.32: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision(s)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{info | {{info | ||
|speaker=Lord Kapiladeva the Supreme Personaliy of Godhead | |speaker=Lord Kapiladeva the Supreme Personaliy of Godhead | ||
|listener=Devahūti, mother of Lord Kapiladeva | |listener=Devahūti, mother of Lord Kapiladeva | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam - Canto 03 Chapter 30]] | |||
[[Category:Bhagavatam Verses Spoken by Lord Kapila - Vanisource|033032]] | |||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Srimad-Bhagavatam]] - [[SB 3|Third Canto]] - [[SB 3.30: Description by Lord Kapila of Adverse Fruitive Activities|Chapter 30: Description by Lord Kapila of Adverse Fruitive Activities]]'''</div> | |||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 3.30.31]] '''[[SB 3.30.31]] - [[SB 3.30.33]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 3.30.33]]</div> | |||
{{RandomImage}} | |||
==== TEXT 32 ==== | ==== TEXT 32 ==== | ||
<div | <div class="verse"> | ||
daivenāsāditaṁ tasya | :daivenāsāditaṁ tasya | ||
śamalaṁ niraye pumān | :śamalaṁ niraye pumān | ||
bhuṅkte kuṭumba-poṣasya | :bhuṅkte kuṭumba-poṣasya | ||
hṛta-vitta ivāturaḥ | :hṛta-vitta ivāturaḥ | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 16: | Line 22: | ||
==== SYNONYMS ==== | ==== SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
''daivena''—by the arrangement of the Supreme Personality of Godhead; ''āsāditam''—obtained; ''tasya''—his; ''śamalam''—sinful reaction; ''niraye''—in a hellish condition; ''pumān''—the man; ''bhuṅkte''—undergoes; ''kuṭumba-poṣasya''—of maintaining a family; ''hṛta-vittaḥ''—one whose wealth is lost; ''iva''—like; ''āturaḥ''—suffering. | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 23: | Line 29: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div | <div class="translation"> | ||
Thus, by the arrangement of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the maintainer of kinsmen is put into a hellish condition to suffer for his sinful activities, like a man who has lost his wealth. | Thus, by the arrangement of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the maintainer of kinsmen is put into a hellish condition to suffer for his sinful activities, like a man who has lost his wealth. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 30: | Line 36: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div | <div class="purport"> | ||
The example set herein is that the sinful person suffers just like a man who has lost his wealth. The human form of body is achieved by the conditioned soul after many, many births and is a very valuable asset. Instead of utilizing this life to get liberation, if one uses it simply for the purpose of maintaining his so-called family and therefore performs foolish and unauthorized action, he is compared to a man who has lost his wealth and who, upon losing it, laments. When wealth is lost, there is no use lamenting, but as long as there is wealth, one has to utilize it properly and thereby gain eternal profit. It may be argued that when a man leaves his money earned by sinful activities, he also leaves his sinful activities here with his money. But it is especially mentioned herein that by superior arrangement (daivenāsāditam), although the man leaves behind him his sinfully earned money, he carries the effect of it. When a man steals some money, if he is caught and agrees to return it, he is not freed from the criminal punishment. By the law of the state, even though he returns the money, he has to undergo the punishment. Similarly, the money earned by a criminal process may be left by the man when dying, but by superior arrangement he carries with him the effect, and therefore he has to suffer hellish life. | The example set herein is that the sinful person suffers just like a man who has lost his wealth. The human form of body is achieved by the conditioned soul after many, many births and is a very valuable asset. Instead of utilizing this life to get liberation, if one uses it simply for the purpose of maintaining his so-called family and therefore performs foolish and unauthorized action, he is compared to a man who has lost his wealth and who, upon losing it, laments. When wealth is lost, there is no use lamenting, but as long as there is wealth, one has to utilize it properly and thereby gain eternal profit. It may be argued that when a man leaves his money earned by sinful activities, he also leaves his sinful activities here with his money. But it is especially mentioned herein that by superior arrangement (''daivenāsāditam''), although the man leaves behind him his sinfully earned money, he carries the effect of it. When a man steals some money, if he is caught and agrees to return it, he is not freed from the criminal punishment. By the law of the state, even though he returns the money, he has to undergo the punishment. Similarly, the money earned by a criminal process may be left by the man when dying, but by superior arrangement he carries with him the effect, and therefore he has to suffer hellish life. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 3.30.31]] '''[[SB 3.30.31]] - [[SB 3.30.33]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 3.30.33]]</div> | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | |||
Revision as of 03:25, 10 May 2021
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
TEXT 32
- daivenāsāditaṁ tasya
- śamalaṁ niraye pumān
- bhuṅkte kuṭumba-poṣasya
- hṛta-vitta ivāturaḥ
SYNONYMS
daivena—by the arrangement of the Supreme Personality of Godhead; āsāditam—obtained; tasya—his; śamalam—sinful reaction; niraye—in a hellish condition; pumān—the man; bhuṅkte—undergoes; kuṭumba-poṣasya—of maintaining a family; hṛta-vittaḥ—one whose wealth is lost; iva—like; āturaḥ—suffering.
TRANSLATION
Thus, by the arrangement of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the maintainer of kinsmen is put into a hellish condition to suffer for his sinful activities, like a man who has lost his wealth.
PURPORT
The example set herein is that the sinful person suffers just like a man who has lost his wealth. The human form of body is achieved by the conditioned soul after many, many births and is a very valuable asset. Instead of utilizing this life to get liberation, if one uses it simply for the purpose of maintaining his so-called family and therefore performs foolish and unauthorized action, he is compared to a man who has lost his wealth and who, upon losing it, laments. When wealth is lost, there is no use lamenting, but as long as there is wealth, one has to utilize it properly and thereby gain eternal profit. It may be argued that when a man leaves his money earned by sinful activities, he also leaves his sinful activities here with his money. But it is especially mentioned herein that by superior arrangement (daivenāsāditam), although the man leaves behind him his sinfully earned money, he carries the effect of it. When a man steals some money, if he is caught and agrees to return it, he is not freed from the criminal punishment. By the law of the state, even though he returns the money, he has to undergo the punishment. Similarly, the money earned by a criminal process may be left by the man when dying, but by superior arrangement he carries with him the effect, and therefore he has to suffer hellish life.