SB 2.7.7: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision(s)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{info | {{info | ||
|speaker=Lord | |speaker=Lord Brahmā | ||
|listener= | |listener=Nārada Muni | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam - Canto 02 Chapter 07|S07]] | |||
[[Category:Bhagavatam Verses Spoken by Lord Brahma - Vanisource|020707]] | |||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Srimad-Bhagavatam]] - [[SB 2|Second Canto]] - [[SB 2.7: Scheduled Incarnations with Specific Functions|Chapter 7: Scheduled Incarnations with Specific Functions]]'''</div> | |||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 2.7.6]] '''[[SB 2.7.6]] - [[SB 2.7.8]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 2.7.8]]</div> | |||
{{RandomImage}} | |||
==== TEXT 7 ==== | ==== TEXT 7 ==== | ||
<div | <div class="verse"> | ||
kāmaṁ dahanti kṛtino nanu roṣa-dṛṣṭyā | :kāmaṁ dahanti kṛtino nanu roṣa-dṛṣṭyā | ||
roṣaṁ dahantam uta te na dahanty asahyam | :roṣaṁ dahantam uta te na dahanty asahyam | ||
so 'yaṁ yad antaram alaṁ praviśan bibheti | :so 'yaṁ yad antaram alaṁ praviśan bibheti | ||
kāmaḥ kathaṁ nu punar asya manaḥ śrayeta | :kāmaḥ kathaṁ nu punar asya manaḥ śrayeta | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 16: | Line 22: | ||
==== SYNONYMS ==== | ==== SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
''kāmam''—lust; ''dahanti''—chastise; ''kṛtinaḥ''—great stalwarts; ''nanu''—but; ''roṣa-dṛṣṭyā''—by wrathful glance; ''roṣam''—wrath; ''dahantam''—being overwhelmed; ''uta''—although; ''te''—they; ''na''—cannot; ''dahanti''—subjugate; ''asahyam''—intolerable; ''saḥ''—that; ''ayam''—Him; ''yat''—because; ''antaram''—within; ''alam''—however; ''praviśan''—entering; ''bibheti''—is afraid of; ''kāmaḥ''—lust; ''katham''—how; ''nu''—as a matter of fact; ''punaḥ''—again; ''asya''—His; ''manaḥ''—mind; ''śrayeta''—take shelter of. | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 23: | Line 29: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div | <div class="translation"> | ||
Great stalwarts like Lord Śiva can, by their wrathful glances, overcome lust and vanquish him, yet they cannot be free from the overwhelming effects of their own wrath. Such wrath can never enter into the heart of Him [the Lord], who is above all this. So how can lust take shelter in His mind? | Great stalwarts like Lord Śiva can, by their wrathful glances, overcome lust and vanquish him, yet they cannot be free from the overwhelming effects of their own wrath. Such wrath can never enter into the heart of Him [the Lord], who is above all this. So how can lust take shelter in His mind? | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 30: | Line 36: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div | <div class="purport"> | ||
When Lord Śiva was engaged in severely austere meditation, Cupid, the demigod of lust, threw his arrow of sex desire. Lord Śiva, thus being angry at him, glanced at Cupid in great wrath, and at once the body of Cupid was annihilated. Although Lord Śiva was so powerful, he was unable to get free from the effects of such wrath. But in the behavior of Lord Viṣṇu there is no incident of such wrath at any time. On the contrary, Bhṛgu Muni tested the tolerance of the Lord by purposely kicking His chest, but instead of being angry at Bhṛgu Muni the Lord begged his pardon, saying that Bhṛgu Muni's leg might have been badly hurt because His chest is too hard. The Lord has the sign of the foot of bhṛgupāda as the mark of tolerance. The Lord, therefore, is never affected by any kind of wrath, so how can there be any place for lust, which is less strong than wrath? When lust or desire is not fulfilled, there is the appearance of wrath, but in the absence of wrath how can there be any place for lust? The Lord is known as āpta-kāma, or one who can fulfill His desires by Himself. He does not require anyone's help to satisfy His desires. The Lord is unlimited, and therefore His desires are also unlimited. All living entities but the Lord are limited in every respect; how then can the limited satisfy the desires of the unlimited? The conclusion is that the Absolute Personality of Godhead has neither lust nor anger, and even if there is sometimes a show of lust and anger by the Absolute, it should be considered an absolute benediction. | When Lord Śiva was engaged in severely austere meditation, Cupid, the demigod of lust, threw his arrow of sex desire. Lord Śiva, thus being angry at him, glanced at Cupid in great wrath, and at once the body of Cupid was annihilated. Although Lord Śiva was so powerful, he was unable to get free from the effects of such wrath. But in the behavior of Lord Viṣṇu there is no incident of such wrath at any time. On the contrary, Bhṛgu Muni tested the tolerance of the Lord by purposely kicking His chest, but instead of being angry at Bhṛgu Muni the Lord begged his pardon, saying that Bhṛgu Muni's leg might have been badly hurt because His chest is too hard. The Lord has the sign of the foot of ''bhṛgupāda'' as the mark of tolerance. The Lord, therefore, is never affected by any kind of wrath, so how can there be any place for lust, which is less strong than wrath? When lust or desire is not fulfilled, there is the appearance of wrath, but in the absence of wrath how can there be any place for lust? The Lord is known as ''āpta-kāma'', or one who can fulfill His desires by Himself. He does not require anyone's help to satisfy His desires. The Lord is unlimited, and therefore His desires are also unlimited. All living entities but the Lord are limited in every respect; how then can the limited satisfy the desires of the unlimited? The conclusion is that the Absolute Personality of Godhead has neither lust nor anger, and even if there is sometimes a show of lust and anger by the Absolute, it should be considered an absolute benediction. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 2.7.6]] '''[[SB 2.7.6]] - [[SB 2.7.8]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 2.7.8]]</div> | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | |||
Revision as of 18:11, 19 May 2021
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
TEXT 7
- kāmaṁ dahanti kṛtino nanu roṣa-dṛṣṭyā
- roṣaṁ dahantam uta te na dahanty asahyam
- so 'yaṁ yad antaram alaṁ praviśan bibheti
- kāmaḥ kathaṁ nu punar asya manaḥ śrayeta
SYNONYMS
kāmam—lust; dahanti—chastise; kṛtinaḥ—great stalwarts; nanu—but; roṣa-dṛṣṭyā—by wrathful glance; roṣam—wrath; dahantam—being overwhelmed; uta—although; te—they; na—cannot; dahanti—subjugate; asahyam—intolerable; saḥ—that; ayam—Him; yat—because; antaram—within; alam—however; praviśan—entering; bibheti—is afraid of; kāmaḥ—lust; katham—how; nu—as a matter of fact; punaḥ—again; asya—His; manaḥ—mind; śrayeta—take shelter of.
TRANSLATION
Great stalwarts like Lord Śiva can, by their wrathful glances, overcome lust and vanquish him, yet they cannot be free from the overwhelming effects of their own wrath. Such wrath can never enter into the heart of Him [the Lord], who is above all this. So how can lust take shelter in His mind?
PURPORT
When Lord Śiva was engaged in severely austere meditation, Cupid, the demigod of lust, threw his arrow of sex desire. Lord Śiva, thus being angry at him, glanced at Cupid in great wrath, and at once the body of Cupid was annihilated. Although Lord Śiva was so powerful, he was unable to get free from the effects of such wrath. But in the behavior of Lord Viṣṇu there is no incident of such wrath at any time. On the contrary, Bhṛgu Muni tested the tolerance of the Lord by purposely kicking His chest, but instead of being angry at Bhṛgu Muni the Lord begged his pardon, saying that Bhṛgu Muni's leg might have been badly hurt because His chest is too hard. The Lord has the sign of the foot of bhṛgupāda as the mark of tolerance. The Lord, therefore, is never affected by any kind of wrath, so how can there be any place for lust, which is less strong than wrath? When lust or desire is not fulfilled, there is the appearance of wrath, but in the absence of wrath how can there be any place for lust? The Lord is known as āpta-kāma, or one who can fulfill His desires by Himself. He does not require anyone's help to satisfy His desires. The Lord is unlimited, and therefore His desires are also unlimited. All living entities but the Lord are limited in every respect; how then can the limited satisfy the desires of the unlimited? The conclusion is that the Absolute Personality of Godhead has neither lust nor anger, and even if there is sometimes a show of lust and anger by the Absolute, it should be considered an absolute benediction.