Go to Vaniquotes | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia


Vanisource - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge


CC Madhya 5.28 (1975): Difference between revisions

(Vanibot #0027: CCMirror - Mirror CC's 1996 edition to form a basis for 1975)
 
(Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Madhya (1975)|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 5 (1975)|Chapter 5: The Activities of Sākṣi-gopāla]]'''</div>
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Madhya (1975)|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 5 (1975)|Chapter 5: The Activities of Sākṣi-gopāla]]'''</div>
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 5.27 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 5.27]] '''[[CC Madhya 5.27 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 5.27]] - [[CC Madhya 5.29 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 5.29]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 5.29 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 5.29]]</div>
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 5.27 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 5.27]] '''[[CC Madhya 5.27 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 5.27]] - [[CC Madhya 5.29 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 5.29]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 5.29 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 5.29]]</div>
{{CompareVersions|CC|Madhya 5.28|CC 1975|CC 1996}}
{{RandomImage}}
{{RandomImage}}


''Below is the 1996 edition text, ready to be substituted with the 1975 one using the compile form.''


==== TEXT 28 ====
==== TEXT 28 ====


<div class="verse">
<div class="verse">
:bhīṣmakera icchā,—kṛṣṇe kanyā samarpite
:bhīṣmakera icchā,--kṛṣṇe kanyā samarpite
:putrera virodhe kanyā nārila arpite”
:putrera virodhe kanyā nārila arpite"
</div>
</div>


Line 25: Line 24:


<div class="translation">
<div class="translation">
“King Bhīṣmaka wanted to give his daughter, Rukmiṇī, in charity to Kṛṣṇa, but Rukmī, his eldest son, objected. Therefore he could not carry out his decision.
"King Bhīṣmaka wanted to give his daughter, Rukmiṇī, in charity to Kṛṣṇa, but Rukmī, his eldest son, objected. Therefore he could not carry out his decision."
</div>
</div>


Line 32: Line 31:


<div class="purport">
<div class="purport">
As stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam ([[SB 10.52.25]]):
As stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam ([[SB 10.52.25|10.52.25]]):


:bandhūnām icchatāṁ dātuṁ kṛṣṇāya bhaginīṁ nṛpa
::bandhūnām icchatāṁ dātuṁ
:tato nivārya kṛṣṇa-dviḍ rukmī caidyam amanyata
::kṛṣṇāya bhaginīṁ nṛpa
::tato nivārya kṛṣṇa-dviḍ
::rukmī caidyam amanyata


King Bhīṣmaka of Vidarbha wanted to offer Kṛṣṇa his daughter, Rukmiṇī, but Rukmī, the eldest of his five sons, objected. Therefore Bhīṣmaka withdrew his decision and decided to offer Rukmiṇī to the King of Cedi, Śiśupāla, who was a cousin of Kṛṣṇa’s. However, Rukmiṇī conceived of a trick: she sent a letter to Kṛṣṇa asking Him to kidnap her. Thus in order to please Rukmiṇī, who was His great devotee, Kṛṣṇa kidnapped her. There ensued a great fight between Kṛṣṇa and the opposing party, headed by Rukmiṇī’s brother Rukmī. Rukmī was defeated and, because of his harsh words against Kṛṣṇa, was about to be killed, but he was saved at the request of Rukmiṇī. However, Kṛṣṇa shaved off all of Rukmī’s hair with His sword. Śrī Balarāma did not like this, and so to please Rukmiṇī, Balarāma rebuked Kṛṣṇa.
King Bhīṣmaka of Vidarbha wanted to offer Kṛṣṇa his daughter, Rukmiṇī, but Rukmī, the eldest of his five sons, objected. Therefore he withdrew his decision and decided to offer Rukmiṇī to the King of Cedi, Śiśupāla, who was a cousin of Kṛṣṇa's. However, Rukmiṇī conceived of a trick: she sent a letter to Kṛṣṇa asking Him to kidnap her. Thus in order to please Rukmiṇī, who was His great devotee, Kṛṣṇa kidnapped her. There ensued a great fight between Kṛṣṇa and the opposing party, headed by Rukmiṇī's brother Rukmī. Rukmī was defeated and, because of his harsh words against Kṛṣṇa, was about to be killed, but he was saved at the request of Rukmiṇī. However, Kṛṣṇa shaved off all of Rukmī's hair with His sword. Śrī Balarāma did not like this, and so to please Rukmiṇī, Balarāma rebuked Kṛṣṇa.
</div>
</div>



Latest revision as of 18:12, 27 January 2020



His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada



TEXT 28

bhīṣmakera icchā,--kṛṣṇe kanyā samarpite
putrera virodhe kanyā nārila arpite"


SYNONYMS

bhīṣmakera—of King Bhīṣmaka; icchā—the desire; kṛṣṇe—unto Kṛṣṇa; kanyā—daughter; samarpite—to give; putrera—of his son; virodhe—by the objection; kanyā—daughter; nārila—was unable; arpite—to offer.


TRANSLATION

"King Bhīṣmaka wanted to give his daughter, Rukmiṇī, in charity to Kṛṣṇa, but Rukmī, his eldest son, objected. Therefore he could not carry out his decision."


PURPORT

As stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (10.52.25):

bandhūnām icchatāṁ dātuṁ
kṛṣṇāya bhaginīṁ nṛpa
tato nivārya kṛṣṇa-dviḍ
rukmī caidyam amanyata

King Bhīṣmaka of Vidarbha wanted to offer Kṛṣṇa his daughter, Rukmiṇī, but Rukmī, the eldest of his five sons, objected. Therefore he withdrew his decision and decided to offer Rukmiṇī to the King of Cedi, Śiśupāla, who was a cousin of Kṛṣṇa's. However, Rukmiṇī conceived of a trick: she sent a letter to Kṛṣṇa asking Him to kidnap her. Thus in order to please Rukmiṇī, who was His great devotee, Kṛṣṇa kidnapped her. There ensued a great fight between Kṛṣṇa and the opposing party, headed by Rukmiṇī's brother Rukmī. Rukmī was defeated and, because of his harsh words against Kṛṣṇa, was about to be killed, but he was saved at the request of Rukmiṇī. However, Kṛṣṇa shaved off all of Rukmī's hair with His sword. Śrī Balarāma did not like this, and so to please Rukmiṇī, Balarāma rebuked Kṛṣṇa.