CC Adi 2.84 (1975): Difference between revisions
(Vanibot #0027: CCMirror - Mirror CC's 1996 edition to form a basis for 1975) |
(Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Adi (1975)|Ādi-līlā]] - [[CC Adi 2 (1975)|Chapter 2: Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu Is the Supreme Personality of Godhead]]'''</div> | <div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Adi (1975)|Ādi-līlā]] - [[CC Adi 2 (1975)|Chapter 2: Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu Is the Supreme Personality of Godhead]]'''</div> | ||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Adi 2.83 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 2.83]] '''[[CC Adi 2.83 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 2.83]] - [[CC Adi 2.85 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 2.85]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Adi 2.85 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 2.85]]</div> | <div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Adi 2.83 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 2.83]] '''[[CC Adi 2.83 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 2.83]] - [[CC Adi 2.85 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 2.85]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Adi 2.85 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 2.85]]</div> | ||
{{CompareVersions|CC|Adi 2.84|CC 1975|CC 1996}} | |||
{{RandomImage}} | {{RandomImage}} | ||
==== TEXT 84 ==== | ==== TEXT 84 ==== | ||
Line 25: | Line 24: | ||
<div class="translation"> | <div class="translation"> | ||
"Had Kṛṣṇa been the plenary portion and Nārāyaṇa the primeval Lord, the statement of Sūta Gosvāmī would have been reversed. | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 17:07, 26 January 2020
Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975) - Ādi-līlā - Chapter 2: Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu Is the Supreme Personality of Godhead
TEXT 84
- kṛṣṇa yadi aṁśa haita, aṁśī nārāyaṇa
- tabe viparīta haita sūtera vacana
SYNONYMS
kṛṣṇa—Lord Kṛṣṇa; yadi—if; aṁśa—plenary portion; haita—were; aṁśī—the source of all expansions; nārāyaṇa—Lord Nārāyaṇa; tabe—then; viparīta—the reverse; haita—would have been; sūtera—of Sūta Gosvāmī; vacana—the statement.
TRANSLATION
"Had Kṛṣṇa been the plenary portion and Nārāyaṇa the primeval Lord, the statement of Sūta Gosvāmī would have been reversed.