CC Madhya 8.194: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision(s)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | [[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - Madhya-lila Chapter 08|C194]] | ||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta]] - [[CC Madhya|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 8|Chapter 8: Talks Between Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu and Rāmānanda Rāya]]'''</div> | |||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 8.193|Madhya-līlā 8.193]] '''[[CC Madhya 8.193|Madhya-līlā 8.193]] - [[CC Madhya 8.195|Madhya-līlā 8.195]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 8.195|Madhya-līlā 8.195]]</div> | |||
{{CompareVersions|CC|Madhya 8.194|CC 1975|CC 1996}} | |||
{{RandomImage}} | |||
==== TEXT 194 ==== | ==== TEXT 194 ==== | ||
<div | <div class="verse"> | ||
pahilehi rāga nayana-bhaṅge bhela | :pahilehi rāga nayana-bhaṅge bhela | ||
anudina bāḍhala, avadhi nā gela | :anudina bāḍhala, avadhi nā gela | ||
nā so ramaṇa, nā hāma ramaṇī | :nā so ramaṇa, nā hāma ramaṇī | ||
duṅhu-mana manobhava peṣala jāni’ | :duṅhu-mana manobhava peṣala jāni’ | ||
e sakhi, se-saba prema-kāhinī | :e sakhi, se-saba prema-kāhinī | ||
kānu-ṭhāme kahabi vichurala jāni’ | :kānu-ṭhāme kahabi vichurala jāni’ | ||
nā khoṅjaluṅ dūtī, nā khoṅjaluṅ ān | :nā khoṅjaluṅ dūtī, nā khoṅjaluṅ ān | ||
duṅhukeri milane madhya ta pāṅca-bāṇa | :duṅhukeri milane madhya ta pāṅca-bāṇa | ||
ab sohi virāga, tuṅhu bheli dūtī | :ab sohi virāga, tuṅhu bheli dūtī | ||
su-purukha-premaki aichana rīti | :su-purukha-premaki aichana rīti | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 20: | Line 24: | ||
==== SYNONYMS ==== | ==== SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
''pahilehi''—in the beginning; ''rāga''—attraction; ''nayana-bhaṅge''—by activities of the eyes; ''bhela''—there was; ''anu-dina''—gradually, day after day; ''bāḍhala''—increased; ''avadhi''—limit; ''nā''—not; ''gela''—reached; ''nā''—not; ''so''—He; ''ramaṇa''—the enjoyer; ''nā''—not; ''hāma''—I; ''ramaṇī''—the enjoyed; ''duṅhu-mana''—both the minds; ''manaḥ-bhava''—the mental situation; ''peṣala''—pressed together; ''jāni’''—knowing; ''e''—this; ''sakhi''—My dear friend; ''se-saba''—all those; ''prema-kāhinī''—affairs of love; ''kānu-ṭhāme''—before Kṛṣṇa; ''kahabi''—you will say; ''vichurala''—He has forgotten; ''jāni’''—knowing; ''nā''—not; ''khoṅjaluṅ''—searched out; ''dūtī''—a messenger; ''nā''—not; ''khoṅjaluṅ''—searched out; ''ān''—anyone else; ''duṅhukeri''—of both of Us; ''milane''—by the meeting; ''madhya''—in the middle; ''ta''—indeed; ''pāṅca-bāṇa''—five arrows of Cupid; ''ab''—now; ''sohi''—that; ''virāga''—separation; ''tuṅhu''—you; ''bheli''—became; ''dūtī''—the messenger; ''su-purukha''—of a beautiful person; ''premaki''—of loving affairs; ''aichana''—such; ''rīti''—the consequence. | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 27: | Line 31: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div | <div class="translation"> | ||
“‘Alas, before We met there was an initial attachment between Us brought about by an exchange of glances. In this way attachment evolved. That attachment has gradually grown, and there is no limit to it. Now that attachment has become a natural sequence between Ourselves. It is not that it is due to Kṛṣṇa, the enjoyer, nor is it due to Me, for I am the enjoyed. It is not like that. This attachment was made possible by mutual meeting. This mutual exchange of attraction is known as manobhava, or Cupid. Kṛṣṇa’s mind and My mind have merged together. Now, during this time of separation, it is very difficult to explain these loving affairs. My dear friend, though Kṛṣṇa might have forgotten all these things, you can understand and bring this message to Him. But during Our first meeting there was no messenger between Us, nor did I request anyone to see Him. Indeed, Cupid’s five arrows were Our via media. Now, during this separation, that attraction has increased to another ecstatic state. My dear friend, please act as a messenger on My behalf, because if one is in love with a beautiful person, this is the consequence.’ | “‘Alas, before We met there was an initial attachment between Us brought about by an exchange of glances. In this way attachment evolved. That attachment has gradually grown, and there is no limit to it. Now that attachment has become a natural sequence between Ourselves. It is not that it is due to Kṛṣṇa, the enjoyer, nor is it due to Me, for I am the enjoyed. It is not like that. This attachment was made possible by mutual meeting. This mutual exchange of attraction is known as manobhava, or Cupid. Kṛṣṇa’s mind and My mind have merged together. Now, during this time of separation, it is very difficult to explain these loving affairs. My dear friend, though Kṛṣṇa might have forgotten all these things, you can understand and bring this message to Him. But during Our first meeting there was no messenger between Us, nor did I request anyone to see Him. Indeed, Cupid’s five arrows were Our via media. Now, during this separation, that attraction has increased to another ecstatic state. My dear friend, please act as a messenger on My behalf, because if one is in love with a beautiful person, this is the consequence.’ | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 34: | Line 38: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div | <div class="purport"> | ||
These verses were originally composed and sung by Rāmānanda Rāya himself. Śrīla Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura suggests that during the time of conjugal enjoyment, the attachment might be compared to Cupid himself. However, during the period of separation, Cupid becomes a messenger of highly elevated love. This is called prema-vilāsa-vivarta. When there is separation, conjugal enjoyment itself acts like a messenger, and that messenger was addressed by Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī as a friend. The essence of this transaction is that transcendental loving affairs are as relishable during separation as during conjugal enjoyment. When Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī was fully absorbed in love of Kṛṣṇa, She mistook a black tamāla tree for Kṛṣṇa and embraced it. Such a mistake is called prema-vilāsa-vivarta. | These verses were originally composed and sung by Rāmānanda Rāya himself. Śrīla Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura suggests that during the time of conjugal enjoyment, the attachment might be compared to Cupid himself. However, during the period of separation, Cupid becomes a messenger of highly elevated love. This is called ''prema-vilāsa-vivarta''. When there is separation, conjugal enjoyment itself acts like a messenger, and that messenger was addressed by Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī as a friend. The essence of this transaction is that transcendental loving affairs are as relishable during separation as during conjugal enjoyment. When Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī was fully absorbed in love of Kṛṣṇa, She mistook a black ''tamāla'' tree for Kṛṣṇa and embraced it. Such a mistake is called ''prema-vilāsa-vivarta''. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 8.193|Madhya-līlā 8.193]] '''[[CC Madhya 8.193|Madhya-līlā 8.193]] - [[CC Madhya 8.195|Madhya-līlā 8.195]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 8.195|Madhya-līlā 8.195]]</div> | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | |||
Revision as of 10:04, 19 August 2021
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
TEXT 194
- pahilehi rāga nayana-bhaṅge bhela
- anudina bāḍhala, avadhi nā gela
- nā so ramaṇa, nā hāma ramaṇī
- duṅhu-mana manobhava peṣala jāni’
- e sakhi, se-saba prema-kāhinī
- kānu-ṭhāme kahabi vichurala jāni’
- nā khoṅjaluṅ dūtī, nā khoṅjaluṅ ān
- duṅhukeri milane madhya ta pāṅca-bāṇa
- ab sohi virāga, tuṅhu bheli dūtī
- su-purukha-premaki aichana rīti
SYNONYMS
pahilehi—in the beginning; rāga—attraction; nayana-bhaṅge—by activities of the eyes; bhela—there was; anu-dina—gradually, day after day; bāḍhala—increased; avadhi—limit; nā—not; gela—reached; nā—not; so—He; ramaṇa—the enjoyer; nā—not; hāma—I; ramaṇī—the enjoyed; duṅhu-mana—both the minds; manaḥ-bhava—the mental situation; peṣala—pressed together; jāni’—knowing; e—this; sakhi—My dear friend; se-saba—all those; prema-kāhinī—affairs of love; kānu-ṭhāme—before Kṛṣṇa; kahabi—you will say; vichurala—He has forgotten; jāni’—knowing; nā—not; khoṅjaluṅ—searched out; dūtī—a messenger; nā—not; khoṅjaluṅ—searched out; ān—anyone else; duṅhukeri—of both of Us; milane—by the meeting; madhya—in the middle; ta—indeed; pāṅca-bāṇa—five arrows of Cupid; ab—now; sohi—that; virāga—separation; tuṅhu—you; bheli—became; dūtī—the messenger; su-purukha—of a beautiful person; premaki—of loving affairs; aichana—such; rīti—the consequence.
TRANSLATION
“‘Alas, before We met there was an initial attachment between Us brought about by an exchange of glances. In this way attachment evolved. That attachment has gradually grown, and there is no limit to it. Now that attachment has become a natural sequence between Ourselves. It is not that it is due to Kṛṣṇa, the enjoyer, nor is it due to Me, for I am the enjoyed. It is not like that. This attachment was made possible by mutual meeting. This mutual exchange of attraction is known as manobhava, or Cupid. Kṛṣṇa’s mind and My mind have merged together. Now, during this time of separation, it is very difficult to explain these loving affairs. My dear friend, though Kṛṣṇa might have forgotten all these things, you can understand and bring this message to Him. But during Our first meeting there was no messenger between Us, nor did I request anyone to see Him. Indeed, Cupid’s five arrows were Our via media. Now, during this separation, that attraction has increased to another ecstatic state. My dear friend, please act as a messenger on My behalf, because if one is in love with a beautiful person, this is the consequence.’
PURPORT
These verses were originally composed and sung by Rāmānanda Rāya himself. Śrīla Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura suggests that during the time of conjugal enjoyment, the attachment might be compared to Cupid himself. However, during the period of separation, Cupid becomes a messenger of highly elevated love. This is called prema-vilāsa-vivarta. When there is separation, conjugal enjoyment itself acts like a messenger, and that messenger was addressed by Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī as a friend. The essence of this transaction is that transcendental loving affairs are as relishable during separation as during conjugal enjoyment. When Śrīmatī Rādhārāṇī was fully absorbed in love of Kṛṣṇa, She mistook a black tamāla tree for Kṛṣṇa and embraced it. Such a mistake is called prema-vilāsa-vivarta.