CC Madhya 9.154: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<div class="synonyms"> | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
''gopī-dvāre'' | ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=gopī&tab=syno_o&ds=1 gopī]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=dvāre&tab=syno_o&ds=1 dvāre]'' — through the ''gopīs''; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=lakṣmī&tab=syno_o&ds=1 lakṣmī]'' — the goddess of fortune; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kare&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kare]'' — does; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kṛṣṇa&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kṛṣṇa]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=saṅga&tab=syno_o&ds=1 saṅga]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=āsvāda&tab=syno_o&ds=1 āsvāda]'' — tasting the sweetness of the association of Lord Kṛṣṇa; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=īśvaratve&tab=syno_o&ds=1 īśvaratve]'' — in the Supreme Personality of Godhead; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=bheda&tab=syno_o&ds=1 bheda]'' — difference; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=mānile&tab=syno_o&ds=1 mānile]'' — if one considers; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=haya&tab=syno_o&ds=1 haya]'' — there is; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=aparādha&tab=syno_o&ds=1 aparādha]'' — offense. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 00:03, 20 February 2024
Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta - Madhya-līlā - Chapter 9: Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu's Travels to the Holy Places
TEXT 154
- gopī-dvāre lakṣmī kare kṛṣṇa-saṅgāsvāda
- īśvaratve bheda mānile haya aparādha
SYNONYMS
gopī-dvāre — through the gopīs; lakṣmī — the goddess of fortune; kare — does; kṛṣṇa-saṅga-āsvāda — tasting the sweetness of the association of Lord Kṛṣṇa; īśvaratve — in the Supreme Personality of Godhead; bheda — difference; mānile — if one considers; haya — there is; aparādha — offense.
TRANSLATION
“The goddess of fortune enjoys the association of Kṛṣṇa through the gopīs. One should not differentiate between the forms of the Lord, for such a conception is offensive.