CC Madhya 25.97 (1975): Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 16:47, 27 January 2020

Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975) - Madhya-līlā - Chapter 25: How All the Residents of Vārāṇasī Became Vaiṣṇavas

Madhya-līlā 25.96 - Madhya-līlā 25.98

Compare Versions: CC 1975 with CC 1996

His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada

TEXT 97

"ei artha-āmāra sūtrera vyākhyānurūpa

'bhāgavata' kariba sūtrera bhāṣya-svarūpa"

SYNONYMS

ei artha—this explanation; āmāra—my; sūtrera—of Brahma-sūtra; vyākhyā-anurūpa—a suitable explanation; bhāgavata—Śrīmad-Bhāgavata Purāṇa; kariba—I shall make; sūtrera—of the Brahma-sūtra; bhāṣya-svarūpa—as the original commentary.

TRANSLATION

"Śrīla Vyāsadeva considered that whatever he had received from Nārada Muni as an explanation of oṁkāra he would elaborately explain in his book Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam as a commentary on Brahma-sūtra.

PURPORT

The sound vibration oṁkāra is the root of Vedic knowledge. This oṁkāra is known as mahā-vākya, or the supreme sound. Whatever meaning is in the supreme sound oṁkāra is further understood in the Gāyatrī mantra. Again, this same meaning is explained in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam in the four ślokas known as catuḥ-ślokī, which begin with the words ahaṁ evāsam evāgre. The Lord says, "Only I existed before the creation." From this verse, four ślokas have been composed, and these are known as the catuḥ-ślokī. In this way the Supreme Personality of Godhead informed Lord Brahmā about the purpose of the catuḥ-ślokī. Again, Lord Brahmā explained this to Nārada Muni, and Nārada Muni explained it to Śrīla Vyāsadeva. This is the paramparā system, the disciplic succession. The import of Vedic knowledge, the original word praṇava, has been explained in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. The conclusion is that the Brahma-sūtra is explained in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam.

Madhya-līlā 25.96 - Madhya-līlā 25.98

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 <div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Madhya (1975)|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 25 (1975)|Chapter 25: How All the Residents of Vārāṇasī Became Vaiṣṇavas]]'''</div>
 <div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 25.96 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 25.96]] '''[[CC Madhya 25.96 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 25.96]] - [[CC Madhya 25.98 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 25.98]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 25.98 (1975)|Madhya-līlā 25.98]]</div>
+{{CompareVersions|CC|Madhya 25.97|CC 1975|CC 1996}}
 {{RandomImage}}
-''Below is the 1996 edition text, ready to be substituted with the 1975 one using the compile form.''
 ==== TEXT 97 ====
 <div class="verse">
-:“ei artha-āmāra sūtrera vyākhyānurūpa
+:"ei artha-āmāra sūtrera vyākhyānurūpa
-:’bhāgavata’ kariba sūtrera bhāṣya-svarūpa“
+:'bhāgavata' kariba sūtrera bhāṣya-svarūpa"
 </div>
@@ Line 18: / Line 17: @@
 <div class="synonyms">
-ei artha—this explanation; āmāra—my; sūtrera—of the Brahma-sūtra; vyākhyā-anurūpa—a suitable explanation; bhāgavata—Śrīmad-Bhāgavata Purāṇa; kariba—I shall make; sūtrera—of the Brahma-sūtra; bhāṣya-svarūpa—as the original commentary.
+ei artha—this explanation; āmāra—my; sūtrera—of Brahma-sūtra; vyākhyā-anurūpa—a suitable explanation; bhāgavata—Śrīmad-Bhāgavata Purāṇa; kariba—I shall make; sūtrera—of the Brahma-sūtra; bhāṣya-svarūpa—as the original commentary.
 </div>
@@ Line 25: / Line 24: @@
 <div class="translation">
-“Śrīla Vyāsadeva considered that whatever he had received from Nārada Muni as an explanation of oṁkāra he would elaborately explain in his book Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam as a commentary on the Brahma-sūtra.
+"Śrīla Vyāsadeva considered that whatever he had received from Nārada Muni as an explanation of oṁkāra he would elaborately explain in his book Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam as a commentary on Brahma-sūtra.
 </div>
@@ Line 32: / Line 31: @@
 <div class="purport">
-The sound vibration oṁkāra is the root of Vedic knowledge. Oṁkāra is known as the mahā-vākya, or supreme sound. Whatever meaning is in the supreme sound oṁkāra is further understood in the Gāyatrī mantra. Again, this same meaning is explained in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam in the four ślokas known as the catuḥ-ślokī, which begin with the words ahaṁ evāsam evāgre. The Lord says, “Only I existed before the creation.” From this statement, four ślokas have been composed, and these are known as the catuḥ-ślokī ([[SB 2.9.33|SB 2.9.33/34/35/36]]). In this way the Supreme Personality of Godhead informed Lord Brahmā about the purport of the catuḥ-ślokī. Again, Lord Brahmā explained this to Nārada Muni, and Nārada Muni explained it to Śrīla Vyāsadeva. This is the paramparā system, the disciplic succession. The import of Vedic knowledge, the original word praṇava, has been explained in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. The conclusion is that the Brahma-sūtra is explained in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam.
+The sound vibration oṁkāra is the root of Vedic knowledge. This oṁkāra is known as mahā-vākya, or the supreme sound. Whatever meaning is in the supreme sound oṁkāra is further understood in the Gāyatrī mantra. Again, this same meaning is explained in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam in the four ślokas known as catuḥ-ślokī, which begin with the words ahaṁ evāsam evāgre. The Lord says, "Only I existed before the creation." From this verse, four ślokas have been composed, and these are known as the catuḥ-ślokī. In this way the Supreme Personality of Godhead informed Lord Brahmā about the purpose of the catuḥ-ślokī. Again, Lord Brahmā explained this to Nārada Muni, and Nārada Muni explained it to Śrīla Vyāsadeva. This is the paramparā system, the disciplic succession. The import of Vedic knowledge, the original word praṇava, has been explained in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. The conclusion is that the Brahma-sūtra is explained in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam.
 </div>