CC Adi 15.14 (1975): Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 15:32, 26 January 2020

Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975) - Ādi-līlā - Chapter 15: The Lord's Paugaṇḍa-līlā

Ādi-līlā 15.13 - Ādi-līlā 15.15

Compare Versions: CC 1975 with CC 1996

His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada

TEXT 14

bhāla haila,--viśvarūpa sannyāsa karila

pitṛ-kula, mātṛ-kula,--dui uddhārila

SYNONYMS

bhāla haila—it is very good; viśvarūpa—of the name Viśvarūpa; sannyāsa—the renounced order of life; karila—has accepted; pitṛ-kula—father's family; mātṛ-kula—mother's family; dui—both of them; uddhārila—delivered.

TRANSLATION

"My dear mother and father," the Lord said, "it is very good that Viśvarūpa has accepted the sannyāsa order, for thus He has delivered both His father's family and His mother's family."

PURPORT

It is sometimes said that Lord Caitanya Mahāprabhu did not approve of the acceptance of the sannyāsa order in this Kali-yuga because in the śāstra it is said:

aśvamedhaṁ gavālambhaṁ

sannyāsaṁ pala-paitṛkam

devareṇa sutotpattiṁ

kalau pañca vivarjayet

"In this Kali-yuga the performance of the aśvamedha-yajña or gomedha-yajña, sacrifices in which a horse or cow is offered, should be avoided, as should the acceptance of sannyāsa, the renounced order of life." (Brahma-vaivarta Purāṇa, Kṛṣṇa-janma-khaṇḍa 185.180)

Nevertheless we see that Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu Himself accepted sannyāsa and approved of the sannyāsa of His elder brother, Viśvarūpa. It is clearly said here, bhāla haila,--viśvarūpa sannyāsa karila pitṛ-kula, mātṛ-kula,--dui uddhārila. Therefore, should it be thought that Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu made statements that are contradictory? No, actually He did not. It is recommended that one accept sannyāsa to dedicate his life for the service of the Lord, and everyone must take that kind of sannyāsa, for by accepting such sannyāsa one renders the best service to both his paternal and maternal families. But one should not accept the sannyāsa order of the Māyāvāda school, which has practically no meaning. We find many Māyāvādī sannyāsīs simply loitering in the street thinking themselves Brahman or Nārāyaṇa and spending all day and night begging so they can fill their hungry bellies. Māyāvādī sannyāsīs have become so degraded that there is a section of them who eat everything, just like hogs and dogs. It is such degraded sannyāsa that is prohibited in this age. Actually, Śrīla Śaṅkarācārya's principles for the acceptance of sannyāsa were very strict, but later the so-called Māyāvādī sannyāsīs became degraded because of their false philosophy, which propounds that by accepting sannyāsa one becomes Nārāyaṇa. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu rejected that kind of sannyāsa. But the acceptance of sannyāsa is one of the items of the varṇāśrama-dharma. How then can it be rejected?

Ādi-līlā 15.13 - Ādi-līlā 15.15

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 <div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta (1975)|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta (1975)]] - [[CC Adi (1975)|Ādi-līlā]] - [[CC Adi 15 (1975)|Chapter 15: The Lord's Paugaṇḍa-līlā]]'''</div>
 <div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Adi 15.13 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 15.13]] '''[[CC Adi 15.13 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 15.13]] - [[CC Adi 15.15 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 15.15]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Adi 15.15 (1975)|Ādi-līlā 15.15]]</div>
+{{CompareVersions|CC|Adi 15.14|CC 1975|CC 1996}}
 {{RandomImage}}
-''Below is the 1996 edition text, ready to be substituted with the 1975 one using the compile form.''
 ==== TEXT 14 ====
 <div class="verse">
-:bhāla haila,—viśvarūpa sannyāsa karila
+:bhāla haila,--viśvarūpa sannyāsa karila
-:pitṛ-kula, mātṛ-kula,—dui uddhārila
+:pitṛ-kula, mātṛ-kula,--dui uddhārila
 </div>
@@ Line 18: / Line 17: @@
 <div class="synonyms">
-bhāla haila—it is very good; viśvarūpa—Viśvarūpa; sannyāsa—the renounced order of life; karila—has accepted; pitṛ-kula—father’s family; mātṛ-kula—mother’s family; dui—both of them; uddhārila—delivered.
+bhāla haila—it is very good; viśvarūpa—of the name Viśvarūpa; sannyāsa—the renounced order of life; karila—has accepted; pitṛ-kula—father's family; mātṛ-kula—mother's family; dui—both of them; uddhārila—delivered.
 </div>
@@ Line 25: / Line 24: @@
 <div class="translation">
-“My dear mother and father,” the Lord said, “it is very good that Viśvarūpa has accepted the sannyāsa order, for thus He has delivered both His father’s family and His mother’s family.”
+"My dear mother and father," the Lord said, "it is very good that Viśvarūpa has accepted the sannyāsa order, for thus He has delivered both His father's family and His mother's family."
 </div>
@@ Line 32: / Line 31: @@
 <div class="purport">
-It is sometimes said that Lord Caitanya Mahāprabhu disapproved of the acceptance of the sannyāsa order in this Kali-yuga because in the śāstra it is said:
+It is sometimes said that Lord Caitanya Mahāprabhu did not approve of the acceptance of the sannyāsa order in this Kali-yuga because in the śāstra it is said:
+:aśvamedhaṁ gavālambhaṁ
+:sannyāsaṁ pala-paitṛkam
+:devareṇa sutotpattiṁ
+:kalau pañca vivarjayet
-:aśvamedhaṁ gavālambhaṁ sannyāsaṁ pala-paitṛkam
+"In this Kali-yuga the performance of the aśvamedha-yajña or gomedha-yajña, sacrifices in which a horse or cow is offered, should be avoided, as should the acceptance of sannyāsa, the renounced order of life." (Brahma-vaivarta Purāṇa, Kṛṣṇa-janma-khaṇḍa 185.180)
-:devareṇa sutotpattiṁ kalau pañca vivarjayet
-([[CC Adi 17.164 (1975)]])
-“In this Age of Kali, five acts are forbidden: the offering of a horse in sacrifice, the offering of a cow in sacrifice, the acceptance of the order of sannyāsa, the offering of oblations of flesh to the forefathers, and a man’s begetting children in his brother’s wife.” (Brahma-vaivarta Purāṇa, Kṛṣṇa-janma-khaṇḍa 185.180)
+Nevertheless we see that Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu Himself accepted sannyāsa and approved of the sannyāsa of His elder brother, Viśvarūpa. It is clearly said here, bhāla haila,--viśvarūpa sannyāsa karila pitṛ-kula, mātṛ-kula,--dui uddhārila. Therefore, should it be thought that Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu made statements that are contradictory? No, actually He did not. It is recommended that one accept sannyāsa to dedicate his life for the service of the Lord, and everyone must take that kind of sannyāsa, for by accepting such sannyāsa one renders the best service to both his paternal and maternal families. But one should not accept the sannyāsa order of the Māyāvāda school, which has practically no meaning. We find many Māyāvādī sannyāsīs simply loitering in the street thinking themselves Brahman or Nārāyaṇa and spending all day and night begging so they can fill their hungry bellies. Māyāvādī sannyāsīs have become so degraded that there is a section of them who eat everything, just like hogs and dogs. It is such degraded sannyāsa that is prohibited in this age. Actually, Śrīla Śaṅkarācārya's principles for the acceptance of sannyāsa were very strict, but later the so-called Māyāvādī sannyāsīs became degraded because of their false philosophy, which propounds that by accepting sannyāsa one becomes Nārāyaṇa. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu rejected that kind of sannyāsa. But the acceptance of sannyāsa is one of the items of the varṇāśrama-dharma. How then can it be rejected?
-Nevertheless, we see that Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu Himself accepted sannyāsa and approved of the sannyāsa of His elder brother, Viśvarūpa. It is clearly said here, bhāla haila,—viśvarūpa sannyāsa karila pitṛ-kula, mātṛ-kula,—dui uddhārila. Therefore, should it be thought that Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu made statements that are contradictory? No, actually He did not. It is recommended that one accept sannyāsa to dedicate his life for the service of the Lord, and everyone must take that kind of sannyāsa, for by accepting such sannyāsa one renders the best service to both his paternal and maternal families. But one should not accept the sannyāsa order of the Māyāvāda school, which has practically no meaning. We find many Māyāvādī sannyāsīs simply loitering in the street thinking themselves Brahman or Nārāyaṇa and spending all day and night begging so they can fill their hungry bellies. Māyāvādī sannyāsīs have become so degraded that there is a section of them who eat everything, just like hogs and dogs. It is such degraded sannyāsa that is prohibited in this age. Actually, Śrīla Śaṅkarācārya’s principles for the acceptance of sannyāsa were very strict, but later the so-called Māyāvādī sannyāsīs became degraded because of their false philosophy, which propounds that by accepting sannyāsa one becomes Nārāyaṇa. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu rejected that kind of sannyāsa. But the acceptance of sannyāsa is one of the items of the varṇāśrama-dharma. How then can it be rejected?
 </div>