Go to Vaniquotes | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia


Vanisource - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge


770705 - Conversation B - Vrndavana: Difference between revisions

m (1 revision(s))
 
m (Text replacement - "#ff9933" to "#ec710e")
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{CV_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}
[[Category:1977 - Conversations]]
<div class="code">770705dc.vrn</div>
[[Category:1977 - Lectures and Conversations]]
[[Category:1977 - Lectures, Conversations and Letters]]
[[Category:1977-07 - Conversations and Letters]]
[[Category:Conversations - India]]
[[Category:Conversations - India, Vrndavana]]
[[Category:Lectures, Conversations and Letters - India]]
[[Category:Lectures, Conversations and Letters - India, Vrndavana]]
[[Category:Conversations and Lectures with Bengali Snippets]]
[[Category:Audio Files 60.01 to 90.00 Minutes]]
[[Category:1977 - New Audio - Released in July 2012]]
<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=Category:Conversations - by Date]]'''[[:Category:Conversations - by Date|Conversations by Date]], [[:Category:1977 - Conversations|1977]]'''</div>
{{RandomImage}}


Prabhupāda: Lotus is also round. Lotus, that petal is also round. Lotus petal is round. So within one lotus petal this round or that round, there is.


Śatadhanya: And within their own limited sphere they can go this way or that way. But they don't know the whole shape.
<div class="code">770705DC-VRNDAVAN - July 05, 1977 - 62:01 Minutes</div>


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: We have to draw the shape probably, because according to what we've drawn so far...


Prabhupāda: That you can do, but real thing is we can remain within the limit.
(Discussion about Bhu-mandala)


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: That we accept.


Prabhupāda: So within the limit...Suppose the lotus petal this way, that way, or this way...
<mp3player>https://s3.amazonaws.com/vanipedia/full/1977/770705DC-VRNDAVAN.mp3</mp3player>


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: You're asking us to draw the details and make a planetarium very exact.


Prabhupāda: Yes. Lotus petal, it is round. So in one lotus petal you are conditioned. You cannot go.
'''Prabhupāda:''' So what is the difficulty?


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: So far that hasn't been said, but that's... You can say that Bhārata-varṣa is a petal of the lotus. But I think if you look at the Bhāgavatam, it may... I'd have to see it, what it says. There's a statement that it may be the inner portion of the lotus. I don't know...[break] And what we do, it has to agree with the Bhāgavatam.  
'''Bhakti-prema:''' First we are interested to know . . .


Prabhupāda: Lotus petal... There are so many petals. You are conditioned with one petal.
'''Prabhupāda:''' (aside) Take from the middle. (break) It is something new?


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: That's... If that's the explanation, then it can be somehow adjusted.
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' No. This is the first drawing we did. This is Jambūdvīpa. This is Bhārata . . .


Prabhupāda: You do not know what is going on outside.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' This is ''Bhārata-varṣa'', Bhūrloka. Now, this is Himalayan mountain going from east to west. This is India.


Devotee: There's so many round parts of a lotus petal.
'''Prabhupāda:''' First thing is, these people, they cannot cross the Himalayan mountain. (aside) You can turn this light in this way, down. From my practical experience, I have seen Switzerland, it is so high that so many accidents have taken place. Little inattention. They have experience. The plane goes thirty-two thousand feet high. Is it not?


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Yes, that part...That could be adjusted. But there's a place within it, you know, the center part, there's no petals. In the middle of the lotus there's like a... I don't know what you call it, but a... It's a flattish area. They show Kṛṣṇa standing sometimes when they draw a picture of Kṛṣṇa on a lotus.
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' Yes. Thirty to forty thousand. Say forty thousand maximum.


Prabhupāda: That's all right. But your place is in.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Still they met with accident. But they are saying that Himalaya is twenty-eight thousand feet high.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: That we accept.
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' Maximum.


Prabhupāda: That we have to hear from authority.
'''Prabhupāda:''' What is this? First of all answer this. Their everything proposition is wrong. So how we can trust somebody? What is the answer?


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: We accept that. I'm just thinking...
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' We cannot trust them.


Prabhupāda: Unless you are obstinate, you have to accept if you are convinced.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Then? But if you cannot trust them, they're rejected immediately. This is one argument. Another argument, kūpa-maṇḍuka-nyāya. The frog in the well, he's estimating, "This is the limit of water." What he'll understand about Pacific Ocean, Atlantic Ocean? There is so many things. On the whole we are imperfect, and although imperfect, they want to be perfect. That is cheating. Now for argument's sake, if they put some argument, we have to reply. We have to prepare for them. Otherwise they're useless. We know they're useless, but sometimes they put some argument. We have to give answer. This is the position. And our duty is to present picture of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam correct. So what do you have to say? At least some answer you should give.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: We accept.
'''Yaśodā-nandana:''' The biggest problem we are discussing . . . we were thinking that the first question they will ask . . . this is their conception of the world.


Prabhupāda: There are so many millions of stars and moons that we cannot go.
'''Prabhupāda:''' We reject them.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: As we are conditioned, as everyone is conditioned, our planetarium will have to show the actual facts.
'''Yaśodā-nandana:''' Yes.


Prabhupāda: Yes. That fact we have learned from Bhāgavatam.  
'''Prabhupāda:''' "You are imperfect. So whatever you have written, that is nonsense. And everywhere problem. Why should we waste our time?" Now just try to settle from point of. He's showing this book; I am showing the ''Bhāgavatam''. So you are imperfect, that's a fact. What is the value of your book? If you are basically a rascal, then what is the value of your book? Why shall I waste my time? First of all I take it and I prove it that you are a rascal. You show your book; I show my book. But you have been proved that you are a rascal. Because practically you cannot cross Himalaya. You have no idea what is the Himalaya. You are giving some conflict.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: So, so far we have not drawn this fact correctly.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' This . . . we have to reply to this question. They say if we go, we start from Los Angeles and arrive Japan, according to ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'' . . .


Prabhupāda: That is your inability. That is another thing.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Japan and Los Angeles and India, that is not the whole thing.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Yeah, well that's why we're... That's the question that we've raised. This question that we've raised is due to that.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' Yeah, that is not the whole thing, but it is basic point.


Prabhupāda: That is you are unable to, but the fact is that you are conditioned. You cannot go beyond that conditioned
'''Prabhupāda:''' Huh . . . insignificant.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: That's accepted.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' According to ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'', if we start from Los Angeles . . .


Prabhupāda: So we are also conditioned. But as far as possible we take description from Bhāgavata, try to. That is our... Suppose here is India, here is Los Angeles. You start from India, Los Angeles..., or India, you'll come to Los Angeles. And again return to India. Similarly you start from this again going.
'''Prabhupāda:''' That argument also I have refuted. Just like animal, he is bound up. He is rotating around the log, and within that there may be Japan, there may be Calcutta, there may be Los Angeles. You can think this is there. But that is not all. Within that rounding circle, whatever is there, you may think this is all. But that is not all. He's limited condition. So within his limitation <span style="color:#ec710e">Gajar toiri hoyeche?</span> <span style="color:#128807">(Is the carrot dish ready?)</span>


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Yes. That's possible if you can fly this way, underneath.
'''Bhakti-caru:''' <span style="color:#ec710e">Hocche Srila Prabhupad.</span> <span style="color:#128807">(It is being prepared Srila Prabhupāda.)</span>


Prabhupāda: But where is the underneath?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Within that limitation he's speaking. But Himalaya and other things—far beyond their limitation. That I have already explained. He's speaking within his limitation. Our position should be, correctly represent what is described in the ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam''. But if there is some question, we should ask. Just like I am answering to the reasonable point, that if you are conditioned, within your condition you can see, you can experience, but beyond that you have no right to see. What is Los Angeles, Calcutta, Japan, this is very insignificant space. And they're talking of that. We are talking that Himalaya mountain, "We have crossed over that Himalaya, we conquered the outer space." How they can think of it?


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: See Prabhupāda, we weren't asking that issue. That's not the question we were asking.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' How to take them to Plakṣadvīpa?


Prabhupāda: What is that issue?
'''Prabhupāda:''' There is no question of take them. If you take, he's all right. If you don't take, we cannot change.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Well, you've explained, if it's a lotus petal, then you can fly around it. That's all right. Then the answer is there. But if there's no lotus petal and it's simply flat, then it's a problem. That a problem.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' As long as we cannot show them.


Prabhupāda: No, we don't say flat.
'''Prabhupāda:''' First of all you have to prove that you are imperfect.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: We've pictured it like that. There's some defect in our picture. If you recall, there's a picture we drew...
'''Bhakti-prema:''' That has already been proved.


Prabhupāda: So rectify it.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes. You're simply insisting on things by "probably." "Probably beyond the Himalaya there is something." That is one thing. We say "Definitely, here is. Beyond the Himalayas like this, that." That is the difference. You say "probably," I say "definitely." Father, mother said: "Here is your father." You can say "probably," and mother is saying "definitely." She knows perfectly. You may say probably he may be your father, but mother knows that definitely. Therefore we take ''Vedas'' as mother, ''Purāṇas'' as sister. Śukadeva Gosvāmī is explaining. Iti ''śuśruma''. But ''śuśruma'', why he should waste his valuable time? He knows it is definite. So unless you come to this standpoint that whatever is spoken in the Vedic literature, that is definite, you cannot be convinced by argument. ''Tarko 'pratiṣṭhaḥ śrutayo vibhinnā nāsāv ṛṣir yasya mataṁ na bhinnam, mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ'' ([[CC Madhya 17.186|CC Madhya 17.186]]). Śukadeva Gosvāmī said—that's all. ''Mahājano yena''. ''Vaiyāsakiḥ''.  


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Yeah, well how?
:''svayambhūr nāradaḥ śambhuḥ''
:''kumāraḥ kapilo manuḥ''
:''prahlādo janako bhīṣmo''
:''balir vaiyāsakir vayam''
:([[SB 6.3.20-21|SB 6.3.20]])


Prabhupāda: That is the explanation. Petal.
These ''mahājanas''. This is our argument. And for commonsense argument, the Himalaya is very, very high. Very, very broad. You have never crossed, and you have met with so many accidents. They avoid that portion, flying plane. And I have seen how high has it gone, then it is in the clouds. Still they say twenty-eight thousand. Huh? Twenty-eight thousand?


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: See it doesn't say petal anywhere in the Bhāgavatam. It doesn't say Bhārata-varṣa is a lotus petal.
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' Twenty-nine thousand. Twenty-nine thousand.


Upendra: Neither does it say it's flat, though.
'''Prabhupāda:''' So I conclude like that. When you show this book, accept this authority.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Well I can get the Bhāgavatam right now if you allow me to. It doesn't say... I believe it says Jambūdvīpa is the second part of the lotus, and there aren't petals in the center.
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' When we show this book it means we're accepting the authority?


Upendra: It's a transcendental lotus flower.
'''Yaśodā-nandana:''' Not accepting the authority. The problem is that the Pacific Ocean, according to Jambūdvīpa, for us it is the salt ocean. So the first question that Mahārāja was raising, that they will ask, how do we go between the west coast of America, which is very tiny, and Japan, as they say according to their calculation we go west and we arrive around. And you keep still going further and you arrive back in America. The point about the Himalayas, that we did not raise, because that we could well understood. The Himalayas is much broader and much bigger than they think. We can fully understand it. But that point, from commonsense point of view we couldn't exactly understand. We thought of it all afternoon, and we came up with a few ideas, but we wanted to hear what Your Divine Grace . . .


Prabhupāda: You are prejudiced. That's all. If I can understand, why don't you understand? You are prejudiced.
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' Our question was mostly coming out of how to draw what the ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'' is saying. We're not supporting any kind of mundane argument, nor do we have any doubt in ''Bhāgavatam''. We're simply trying to understand the ''Bhāgavatam''.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Well I can understand if I accept it as... I'm only trying to think as the persons who are going to make this planetarium.
'''Prabhupāda:''' And that is your credit.


Prabhupāda: You are Western. You are prejudiced. That is reason. If I can understand why you...
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' That's why we were meeting.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: I can understand blindly, but I don't want to do that.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Where is the difficulty?


Prabhupāda: I do not understand blindly.
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' Well, I think that one of the difficulties arose from my seeing this map originally, because in this map it shows the continents that we today speak of as various continents. So when we all looked at this map, our immediate question was, as I said the other day, how do we go from one place to the next? It's not such an unreasonable question. So we're just trying to answer it from the ''Bhāgavatam''—not to give our own speculations, because they're imperfect.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: No.
'''Prabhupāda:''' That is already answered. You are limited within certain area. So you can conclude in so many ways. ''Sara bhuri kara'', ''kara bhuri sara''. There is a vegetable prepared, the following vegetables are taken: ''sara'', ''bhuri'', and ''kara''. And again you say ''kara bhuri sara''. This way or that way. ''Sara bhuri kara'', ''kara bhuri sara''. That three things, either you take this way consecutively or that way consecutively. But you have got only that ''kara bhuri sara''. You have no experience. There is potato, there is . . . (indistinct) . . . there is . . . (indistinct) . . . you know these three things. ''Sara bhuri kara''. ''Kara bhuri sara''.  ''Bās''. Just like they are making arrangement in the laboratory. Companies are there. They present in such a way, that he was flying in the sky, and big sputnik and very small town. Do you know that man came?


Prabhupāda: Then.
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' Man came and said he could do anything. Make any trick or illusion appear real. You won't have any idea . . .


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: But I don't want to...
'''Prabhupāda:''' And they have done so in the matter of moon planet. They've never gone there by laboratory arrangement. The Arizona?


Prabhupāda: Still we differ. That means one of us is prejudiced.
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' Arizona.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Well it's not Your Divine Grace. (laughter) I mean I'm sorry I have to take this thankless task to ask all these questions.
'''Prabhupāda:''' That's all. That is their business. They might have presented such devices in a book, a different color. Just like medical science. The preparation is nothing, but they'll employ big, big medical students to write in such a way that it will be presented as very important. They are doing this. We have done in Dr. Bose's laboratory. They employ. (speaks garbled words to sound like big words) Go on speaking. (laughter) It sounds very nice. What is the meaning of? (more garbled phrases) So I have got my own common sense. I understand. Everything become . . . (indistinct) . . . in the Vedic literatures.  


Prabhupāda: You are also prejudiced. It is written in the śāstra. In that sense we are also prejudiced.
(indistinct comments by devotees)


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Yeah, but we're correctly prejudiced.
'''Prabhupāda:''' That I already told. Prejudiced.


Prabhupāda: Just like I take Kṛṣṇa's word. Bas, fact. You can say that you are prejudiced, you see. This is the book.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' . . . (indistinct)


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: That is a nice explanation, the petals.
'''Yaśodā-nandana:''' I'm not prejudiced. I'm just trying to understand. I'm trying to understand what is the facts according to Bhāgavatam.


Prabhupāda: Everyone is prejudiced. But who is rightly prejudiced who is wrongly prejudiced. That is everywhere. Just like materialistic person will think, "Brainwash. These rascals, they have given all up material enjoyment, and after some phantasmagoria they sacrifice everything. Brainwash." And we are thinking, "Oh, these rascals, got this human form of body, he did not understand what is spiritual life." Both of them—he is rascal and he is rascal. This is going on. Yā niśā sarva-bhūtānāṁ tasyāṁ jāgarti saṁyamī. Is it not? They say, "Brainwash. Unnecessarily they've sacrificed everything." And we say that he got the human form and unnecessarily he is working like cats and...
'''Prabhupāda:''' How you can understand which is beyond your understanding?


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Both are saying the same thing. Obvious.
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' He is saying he wants to understand according to the ''Bhāgavatam''.


Prabhupāda: Yes. Now who is correct? Who will decide? I accuse you, you accuse me. But who is correct? Who will decide? That is śāstra. There is no question of argument. That is called pratiṣṭhā. You will never come to any conclusion by arguing. I think you are wrong, you think I am wrong. Somebody must decide. Judge. And that is śāstra.  
'''Yaśodā-nandana:''' Not we're challenging.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Supposing they say...
'''Prabhupāda:''' That you can describe.


Prabhupāda: They say, we are saying so many things. In the court there are two parties. I say something, another party says. The judge is there. He has now decision.
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' That is what we're having trouble with. We're not trying to do our own thing. We're trying to understand ''Bhāgavatam''. That we're a little stuck on some point.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Then they'll ask for the verse to prove it, and we must quote the correct śloka to substantiate our claim.
'''Prabhupāda:''' ''Bhāgavata'' is there. You try to understand.


Prabhupāda: Yes. That the judge gives. Judges according to lawbook. Tad-vijñānārthaṁ sa gurum evābhigacchet [MU 1.2.12] . So we have to approach the right person who can give the judgment. What is their answer about this, that by chemical combination they cannot produce life? Still why they are insisting?
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' We're not siding with the preconceptions that we had before. We'll throw them away. We're trying to accept the ''Bhāgavatam''. We have to do a model, a planetarium. So everything has to be according to the ''Bhāgavatam''.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: They are rascals.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Make it nice. We are going to spend so much money, people may not reject it. (break)


Prabhupāda: Then what is the value of rascal's statement?
'''Bhakti-prema:''' Demons and the demigods . . . (indistinct) . . . churn this ocean, and we are saying we can indicate . . .


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: No value. Lunatic asylum.
'''Prabhupāda:''' So who has gone to see the churning . . . (indistinct) . . .?


Prabhupāda: Why if one is settled up that he's a rascal, we should not hear anything. And why not? He has not gone to the moon. They are insisting, "Yes, we have gone," by false propaganda. Why the one who makes false propaganda and one who says nonsense, we have to believe? Immediately, whatever he says, reject. There's no argument. You have proved yourself rascal so we don't accept any statement. What do you think?
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' Just like as we're talking, we're a little . . . sometimes it's difficult to understand the ''Bhāgavatam''.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Well I'm just trying to think of the description of Jambūdvīpa.
'''Prabhupāda:''' But I take it simply—that there is ocean, and it was churned. So there is no difficulty.


Prabhupāda: Whatever you say. But be aware you are rascal.
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' No. Mostly we have understood. Only in one place we are a little . . .


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: But we have the practical task of...
'''Prabhupāda:''' But nobody has seen that ocean. And nobody can believe that ocean can be churned. Would you believe it? Because it is like that. And the Vāsuki was taken as rope.


Prabhupāda: No test.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' And this Mandara mountain, fifty thousand miles high, was taken there, carried by.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: No-task.
'''Prabhupāda:''' And it was born by tortoise incarnation.


Prabhupāda: No test. Mother says here is your father. That's all. Finish. You cannot test. Then you are rascal.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' This is combined with description.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Not test. I said...
'''Prabhupāda:''' ''Acintyāḥ khalu ye bhāvā na tāṁs tarkeṇa yojayet'' (Mahābhārata, Bhīṣma-parva 5.22). What is beyond your conception, don't try to . . . so that is Vedic civilization. They were satisfied with information received from the ''Vedas''.


Prabhupāda: No, these things cannot be tested.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' The first and last thing we have to prove logically is this: the earth . . .


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: No, I'm not saying...
'''Prabhupāda:''' No, no. Logically you cannot. ''Acintya''. Logic comes when it is conceivable; but it is inconceivable. Where is your logic?


Prabhupāda: Mother says, "Here is your father." That's all. Finish. No test. No question. That is foolishness.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' But first to prove them in right understanding we have to bring them.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: I was using the word "task." That to... I'll have to bring in Bhakti-prema Swami. Maybe he can speak better. I'm not able to explain. But according to the description in the Bhāgavatam, everything that we've read, it is not petals. So let's... I don't know. On one hand you are asking us to follow the...
'''Prabhupāda:''' It is very difficult. ''Acintya''.


Prabhupāda: Bhāgavatam, one portion may not be exactly like... Just like if you are in the midst of the petal, you cannot understand it is petal. You see it is flat. You have shown in the map, there is a point so many miles. So that petal, middle portion, you can take it flat. It is not flat. It is curved. Whatever conception you make, that is defective. Rascals. First of all you have to understand this. So don't make it like this, like this, like this, like... Whatever it is said, that is all right. Therefore Kṛṣṇa said aśraddadhānāḥ. No faith. Faithless. We have challenged, by chemical combination make a small egg, sparrow's egg, and produce.
'''Yaśodā-nandana:''' But such a thing as going from one place to the other on earth, they'll say this is ''cintya'', this is conceivable.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: They can't do anything.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Argument is there when it is conceivable. It is inconceivable. Kṛṣṇa lifted Govardhana, seven years old, six years old. How it is conceivable? But devotees, they are crying, "Oh, Giri-vara-dhārī." And the Māyāvādīs, they say kalpanāyā. The Akhandānanda said. And Śukadeva Gosvāmī is narrating something kalpanāyā and wasting his time?


Prabhupāda: Then what is the value of your experiment? And still they are saying. This one point will kill them. Why do they not take this challenge? Huh?
'''Bhakti-prema:''' . . . (indistinct)


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: They're rascals. There's no other answer. Only a rascal will go on maintaining that we can create life and they never have.
'''Prabhupāda:''' This is acintya for the Māyāvādīs. They say ''kalpanāyā''. These Akhandānanda and other Māyāvādīs, they explain ''Bhāgavata—kalpanāyā''. They are making some imagination that, "I am God," but they are alleging us that, "You are in illusion." God, as soon as there is some toothache, he goes to the doctor. He's such a rascal hypocrite. There was some heart attack going on, so Akhandānanda, immediately he called one of his chief disciples, that Mishra, Jasri, and he was taken to Bombay hospital. And he's God.


Prabhupāda: And they are getting Nobel Prize. Just see. Such rascals. And we say on the authority of Bhagavad-gītā, apareyam. This is inferior and that is superior. So how you can make superior with inferior ingredients?
'''Bhakti-prema:''' He's expired?


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Impossible. Without the superior touch the inferior cannot have any life.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Expired? No, no. He's living. But talking all nonsense, reading ''Bhāgavatam'', and hundreds of people go to the ''āśrama''.


Prabhupāda: That's a fact. They're seeing every moment.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' Today we were discussing . . .


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Everything has movement... If it's matter it only moves because of some superior force, living force, pushing it or entering it or something.
'''Prabhupāda:''' That difference of opinion will continue. You cannot stop.


Prabhupāda: The superior energy is utilizing inferior energy for His purpose. You are utilizing this inferior, the lump of matter, for serving my purpose. That is superior energy. It cannot use me for its purpose.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' What we were discussing, this Pacific Ocean is saltwater . . .


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: It has no purpose.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Why you are trying to adjust Pacific Ocean? Pacific Ocean, any ocean, it is just like ''kūpa-maṇḍūka''. It is very big for you, because you are a very teeny identity. But take the universe—what is the Pacific? Is it not a drop. There are so many Pacific Oceans floating in the sky. Everything is ''acintya''. ''Yasyaika-niśvasita-kālam athāvalambya jīvanti loma-vilajā jagad-aṇḍa-nāthāḥ'' (BS 5.48). This is ''acintya''. So ''acintyāḥ khalu ye bhāvā na tāṁs tarkeṇa yojayet'' (Mahābhārata, Bhīṣma-parva 5.22). You cannot make an experiment or see it. But take some information from the authority and be satisfied. With your limited knowledge, if you want to bring it to experiment, that is not possible. That is not possible.


Prabhupāda: No. I can use it for my purpose. Therefore I am superior. (aside:) Come on.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' If this is the background I can give a lot of material. But they want logics.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Śrīla Prabhupāda, it's about three o'clock now.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Where is the logic?


Prabhupāda: Shall we go?
'''Yaśodā-nandana:''' I don't want any logic. The scientists will come to the planetarium and ask . . .


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: I may have to go for that... I told Bhakti-prema Mahārāja I would meet him at three.
'''Prabhupāda:''' How they can? Scientist is rascal. That is proved. They are insisting that chemical can produce life. He's a rascal. They have gone to moon planet. That's a rascal. So what is the value of so-called scientist. Why should we give any importance? I'm not giving any importance. If you become scientist, that so much ''ghee'' and so much ''āṭā makes purī'', and we can eat very nicely, all right, you are a scientist. But so much chemicals, make it life—prove that. The confectioner is also scientist. He knows very well how to do his business. A carpenter is also scientist. Here is some work nice done by the carpenter. I cannot do it. You may be a great scientist, but me? It is not possible for me to do a carpentry work. In this way it is going on. <span style="color:#ec710e">Yar kaj tare saje, anya loke lathi baje.</span> <span style="color:#128807">(Let the one who is suitable do this, others will ruin it. (Bengali proverb))</span> You have learned something, you can do it very nicely. But I cannot do it. For me it will be beating by the rod if I am given this work. I can translate, my work. That's all right. So everyone is scientist, his own field of activities, to some extent. You cannot make everyone agree. That is not . . . vox populi you cannot. That is not possible. What is that vox populi?


Prabhupāda: Go on. [break] So what is the difficulty?
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' General population.


Bhakti-prema: First we are interested to know...
'''Prabhupāda:''' ''Mohitaṁ nābhijānāti mām ebhyaḥ param avyayam'' ([[BG 7.13 (1972)|BG 7.13]]). So what is the value of vox populi? I concluded. ''Munayāḥ sādhu pṛṣṭo 'ham''. Huh? What is that? ''Munayāḥ sādhu pṛṣṭo 'ham'' ([[SB 1.2.5|SB 1.2.5]]). ''Loka-maṅgalam''. ''Yenātmā suprasīdati''. So Kṛṣṇa's childhood pastime, enjoyed by Mother Yaśodā, others will think, "What is this nonsense? Kṛṣṇa is breaking the butter pot and it is taken as sublime?" They'll think like that.


Prabhupāda: (aside:) Take from the middle. [break] It is something new?
'''Bhakti-prema:''' Kṛṣṇa opened His mouth, His Mother Yaśodā saw all this universe . . . (indistinct)


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: No. This is the first drawing we did. This is Jambūdvīpa. This is Bhārata ... .
'''Prabhupāda:''' And first of all she became surprised. And next moment, "Whatever it is, my dear Kṛṣṇa, You come on my lap." That's all. So it is not for all.


Bhakti-prema: This is Bhārata-varṣa, Bhūrloka. Now, this is Himalayan mountain going from east to west. This is India.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' Therefore we should name it Esoteric Geography.


Prabhupāda: First thing is, these people cannot cross the Himalayan mountain. (aside:) You can turn this light in this way, down. From my practical experience, I have seen Switzerland. It is so high, that so many accidents have taken place. Little inattention. They have experience. The plane goes thirty-two thousand feet high. Is it not?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Hmm?


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Yes. Thirty to forty thousand. Say forty thousand maximum.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' We can name it Esoteric Geography


Prabhupāda: Still they met with accident. But they are saying that Himalaya is twenty-eight thousand feet high.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Journal?


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Maximum.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' Esoteric.


Prabhupāda: What is this? First of all answer this. Everything proposition is wrong. So how we can trust? What is the answer?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes, esoteric I know. Journal?


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: We cannot trust them.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' Geography . . . (indistinct) . . . qualification.


Prabhupāda: Then? But if you cannot trust them, they're rejected immediately. This is one argument. Another argument, (Bengali). The frog in the well, he's estimating, "This is the limit of water." What he'll understand about Pacific Ocean, Atlantic Ocean? There is so many things. On the whole we are imperfect, and although imperfect, they want to be perfect. That is cheating. Now for argument's sake, if they put some argument, we have to reply. We have to prepare for them. Otherwise they're useless. We know they're useless, but sometimes they put some argument. We have to give answer. This is the position. And our duty is to present picture of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam correct. So what do you have to say? At least some answer you should give.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes. Esoteric and exoteric. But one thing is that it is folly to be wise where ignorance is bliss. If you think that ignorance is bliss, then why should we waste our time and money?


Yaśodā-nandana: The biggest problem we are discussing... We were thinking that the first question they will ask, this is their conception of the world.
'''Yaśodā-nandana:''' Prabhupāda, what is the shape of this tiny portion of earth or whatever place we are on? What is the shape of this, whatever you call . . .


Prabhupāda: We reject them.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Ask them. Why don't you ask them? Sometimes they say flat, sometimes they say it is round. Why don't you ask them, the scientists?


Yaśodā-nandana: Yes.
'''Yaśodā-nandana:''' We don't accept what they say.


Prabhupāda: "You are imperfect. So whatever you have written, that is nonsense. And everywhere problem. Why should we waste our time?" Now just try to settle from point of. He's showing this book, I am showing the Bhāgavatam. So you are imperfect, that's a fact. What is the value of your book? If you are basically a rascal, then what is the value of your book? Why shall I waste my time? First of all I take it and I prove it that you are a rascal. You show your book, I show my book. But you have been proved that you are a rascal. Because practically you cannot cross Himalaya. You have no idea what is the Himalaya. You are giving some conflict.
'''Prabhupāda:''' No, no. Formerly they were under the impression the world is flat. And now they are saying round. So what they'll say after few years?


Bhakti-prema: This..., we have to reply to this question. They say if we go, we start from Los Angeles and arrive Japan, according to Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam...  
'''Yaśodā-nandana:''' They are not consistent. That's a fact. They're very inconsistent in their theories.


Prabhupāda: Japan and Los Angeles and India, that is not the whole thing.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Ask them which is correct. "Probably" this is correct. Yes.


Bhakti-prema: Yeah, that is not the whole thing, but it is basic point.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' When someone asks this question, first one would reply.


Prabhupāda: Huh... Insignificant.
'''Prabhupāda:''' I answered it. You people say like that, so which is correct? Flat or round?


Bhakti-prema: According to Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, if we start from London...
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' They will say, "What does the ''Bhāgavatam'' say?"


Prabhupāda: That argument also I have refuted. Just like animal, he is bound up. He is rotating around the log, and within that there may be Japan, there may be Calcutta, there may be Los Angeles. You can think this is there. But that is not all. Within that rounding circle, whatever is there, you may think this is all. But that is not all. He's limited condition. So within his limitation (Bengali). Within that limitation he's speaking. But Himalaya and other things, far beyond their limitation. That I have already explained. He's speaking within his limitation. Our position should be, correctly represent what is described in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. But if there is some question, we should ask. Just like I am answering to the reasonable point. That if you are conditioned, within your condition you can see, you can experience, but beyond that you have no right to see. What is Los Angeles, Calcutta, Japan, this is very insignificant space. And they're talking of that. We are talking that Himalaya mountain, we have crossed over Himalaya, we conquered the outer space. How they can think of it?
'''Prabhupāda:''' Huh?


Bhakti-prema: How to take them to (indistinct).
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' They may reply to us, "All right, we are rascals. So please tell us what is the fact."


Prabhupāda: There is no question of take them. If you take, he's all right. If you don't take, we cannot change.
'''Prabhupāda:''' That is, we are . . .


Bhakti-prema: As long as we cannot show them.
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' That's what he's asking. What should be shown? Actually we're a little stumped by . . . I mean . . .


Prabhupāda: First of all you have to prove that you are imperfect.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes, you must have proper answer as far as possible.


Bhakti-prema: That has already been proved.
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' We just read . . . we got a version from South India, and we've even found that there are different conceptions of what the ''Bhāgavatam'' is saying. But the ''Purāṇas'', they give some Purāṇic references.


Prabhupāda: Yes. You're simply insisting on things by "probably." "Probably beyond the Himalaya there is something." That is one thing. We say "Definitely, here is. Beyond the Himalayas like this, that." That is the difference. You say "probably," I say "definitely." Father, mother said, "Here is your father." You can say "probably," and mother is saying "definitely." She knows perfectly. You may say probably he may be your father, but mother knows that definitely. Therefore we take Vedas as mother, Purāṇas as sister. Śukadeva Gosvāmī is explaining it. Iti śuśruma. But śuśruma, why he should waste his valuable time? He knows it is definite. So unless you come to this standpoint that whatever is spoken in the Vedic literature, that is definite, you cannot be convinced by argument. Tarko 'pratiṣṭhaḥ śrutayo vibhinnā nāsāv ṛṣir yasya mataṁ na bhinnam, mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ [[CC Madhya 17.186]] . Śukadeva Gosvāmī said—that's all. Mahājano yena. Vaiyāsakiḥ.  
'''Bhakti-prema:''' It is written the world . . . the earth is round and flat.


<div class="conv_verse">
'''Prabhupāda:''' Hmm?
svayambhūr nāradaḥ śambhuḥ<br />
kumāraḥ kapilo manuḥ<br />
prahlādo janako bhīṣmo<br />
balir vaiyāsakir vayam<br />
[[SB 6.3.20]]
</div>


These mahājanas. This is our argument. And for common-sense argument, the Himalaya is very, very high. Very, very broad. You have never crossed and you have met with so many accidents. They avoid that portion, flying plane. And I have seen how high has it gone, then it will be in the clouds. Still they say twenty-eight thousand. Huh? Twenty-eight thousand?
'''Bhakti-prema:''' Earth is round and flat both, together.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Twenty-nine thousand.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes.


Prabhupāda: So I conclude like that. When you show this book, accept this authority.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' First we should . . . we can reply it is acintya. This should be the reply. "Inconceivable."


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: When we show this book it means we're accepting the authority?
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' Then why are we showing them . . .


Yaśodā-nandana: Not accepting the authority. The problem is the Pacific Ocean, according to Jambūdvīpa, for us it is the salt ocean. So the first question that Mahārāja was raising, that they will ask, how do we go between the west coast of America, which is very tiny, and Japan, as this according to their calculation we go west and we arrive around. And you keep still going further and you arrive back in America. The point about the Himalayas, that we did not raise, because that we could well understood. The Himalayas is much broader and much bigger than they think. We can fully understand it. But that point, from common-sense point of view we couldn't exactly understand. We thought of it all afternoon, and we came up with a few ideas, but we wanted to hear what Your Divine Grace...
'''Yaśodā-nandana:''' If it is inconceivable, then they will say: "How we can conceive it?"


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Our question was mostly coming out of how to draw what the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is saying. We're not supporting any kind of mundane argument, nor do we have any doubt in Bhāgavatam. We're simply trying to understand the Bhāgavatam.  
'''Prabhupāda:''' Take the version of ''Bhāgavatam''.


Prabhupāda: And that is your credit.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' Everything we conceived, that is wrong?


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: That's why we were meeting.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Everything you conceived, that is wrong.  


Prabhupāda: Where is the difficulty?
'''Bhakti-prema:''' Yes. Very good point.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Well, I think that one of the difficulties arose from my seeing this map originally, because in this map it shows the continents that we today speak of as various continents. So when we all looked at this map, our immediate question was, as I said the other day, how do we go from one place to the next? It's not such an unreasonable question. So we're just trying to answer it from the Bhāgavatam —not to give our own speculations, because they're imperfect.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes. Therefore inconceivable.


Prabhupāda: That is already answered. You are limited within certain area. So you can conclude in so many ways. Sara bhuri kara, kara bhuri sara.(?) There is a vegetable prepared, the following vegetables are taken: sara, bhuri, and kara. And again you say kara bhuri sara. This way or that way. Sara bhuri kara, kara bhuri sara. That three things, either you take this way consecutively or that way consecutively. But you have got only that kara bhuri sara. You have no experience. There is potato, there is (indistinct), there is (indistinct-Sanskrit). You know these three things. Sara bhuri kara. Kara bhuri sara. J ust like they are making arrangement in the laboratory. Companies are there. They present in such a way, that he was flying in the sky, and big sputnik and very small town. Do you know that man came?
'''Bhakti-prema:''' The Lord is inconceivable always and any . . . (indistinct) . . . it is inconceivable.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Man came and said he could do anything. Make any trick or illusion. (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' But we have to accept ''śāstra''.


Prabhupāda: And they have done so in the matter of moon planet. They've never gone there by laboratory arrangement. Arizona?
'''Bhakti-prema:''' This outer structure of the Lord is one with the Lord. It is inconceivable, it is not conceivable. Very good. It is human . . . (indistinct)


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Arizona.
'''Prabhupāda:''' ''Acintya-guṇa-svarūpam''. ''Acintya-guṇa-svarūpam''. ''Yaṁ śyāmasundaram acintya-guṇa''. ''Acintya''. ''Govindam ādi-puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi'' (Brahma-saṁhitā  5.38). ''Acintya''.


Prabhupāda: That's all. That is their business. They might have presented such devices in a book, a different color. Just like medical science. The preparation is nothing, but they'll employ big, big medical students to write in such a way that it will be presented as very important. They are doing this. We have done in Dr. Bose's laboratory. They employ. (speaks garbled words to sound like big words) Go on speaking. (laughter) It sounds very nice. What is the meaning of? (more garbled phrases) So I have got my own common sense. I understand. (indistinct) in the Vedic literatures. (indistinct comments by devotees)
'''Bhakti-prema:''' (indistinct conversation with devotees)


Prabhupāda: That I already told. Prejudiced.
'''Prabhupāda:''' Give me that pineapple juice.  


Yaśodā-nandana: I'm not prejudiced. I'm just trying to understand. I'm trying to understand what is the facts according to Bhāgavatam.
'''Bhakti-caru:''' (indistinct Bengali) . . . <span style="color:#ec710e">theke namabe kise?</span> <span style="color:#128807">(where should I keep it?)</span>


Prabhupāda: How you can understand which is beyond your understanding?
'''Prabhupāda:''' <span style="color:#ec710e">Ekta khelei pet bhore yabe.</span> <span style="color:#128807">(Eating one is sufficient to fill the stomach.)</span> (break)


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: He is saying he wants to understand according to the Bhāgavatam.  
'''Bhakti-prema:''' If it is inconceivable, then don't try to . . .


Yaśodā-nandana: Not we're challenging.
'''Prabhupāda:''' We are not lying to you.


Prabhupāda: That you can describe.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' . . . draw.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: That is what we're having trouble with. We're not trying to do our own thing. We're trying to understand Bhāgavatam. That we're a little stuck on some point.
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' We're drawing according to the ''Bhāgavatam''.


Prabhupāda: Bhāgavata is there. You try to understand.
'''Prabhupāda:''' We're not conceiving it. It is already there.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: We're not siding with the preconceptions that we had before. We'll throw them away. We're trying to accept the Bhāgavatam. Everything has to be according to the Bhāgavatam.  
'''Bhakti-prema:''' Then it is conceived, he says.


Prabhupāda: Make it nice. We are going to spend so much money, people may not reject it. [break]
'''Prabhupāda:''' Conceived not by me.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Just like as we're talking, we're a little... Sometimes it's difficult to understand the Bhāgavatam.  
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' But not by us. By the Unlimited.


Prabhupāda: But I take it simply—that there is ocean, and it was churned. So there is no difficulty.
'''Prabhupāda:''' I am imperfect. That is the difference.


Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: No. Mostly we have understood. Only in one place we are a little...
'''Bhakti-prema:''' Yes. It is conceivable by you.


Prabhupāda: But nobody has seen that ocean. And nobody can believe that ocean can be churned. Would you believe it? Because it is. And the Vāsuki was taken as rope.
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' By Kṛṣṇa.


Bhakti-prema: And this Mandara mountain, fifty thousand miles high, was taken there, carried by.
'''Prabhupāda:''' By Śukadeva . . . not even Śukadeva Gosvāmī. He says śuśruma.


Prabhupāda: And it was born by tortoise incarnation.
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' "I heard."


Bhakti-prema: This is combined with description.
'''Prabhupāda:''' ''Janmādy asya yataḥ anvayād itarataś cārtheṣu abhijñaḥ svarāṭ tene brahma hṛdā'' ([[SB 1.1.1|SB 1.1.1]]). ''Brahma hṛdā''. This is Brahmā. ''Ādi-kavaye''. The Brahmā is very significant. ''Ādi-kavaye''. So it is coming that way.


Prabhupāda: Acintyāḥ khalu ye bhāvā na tāṁs tarkeṇa yojayet. What is beyond your conception, don't try to. So that is Vedic civilization. They were satisfied with information received from the Vedas.  
'''Bhakti-prema:''' . . . (indistinct)


Bhakti-prema: The first and last thing we have to prove logically that this is...
'''Prabhupāda:''' Yes.


Prabhupāda: No, no. Logically you cannot. Acintya. Logic comes when it is conceivable; but it is inconceivable. Where is your logic?
'''Bhakti-prema:''' Scholars.


Bhakti-prema: But first to prove them right understanding we have to bring them.
'''Prabhupāda:''' This is their . . . ''apauruṣeyam''. Actually India's culture is going on that way. Mass of people, they are going to ''Prayāga'' for taking bath. What do they know? They have received it from authorities that if you take bath in such and such place . . . ah, ''lakhs'' of people will go. That is Indian culture. Without any advertisement, without any means, walking hundreds of miles they are coming. Yes, that is their culture. And the government is perturbed that people are so prejudiced. So how to make them forget? This is going on. But they don't listen. They just, "If I take bath I'll . . ." That is the difference between Western and Eastern. And as soon as there is interpretation, it is Māyāvāda. And Caitanya Mahāprabhu has rejected—''māyāvādi-bhāṣya śunile haya sarva-nāśa'' ([[CC Madhya 6.169|CC Madhya 6.169]]). You see in the Kumbha-''melā'' how peacefully they are sitting. They are accepting Vedic culture. So nice atmosphere. Simply by going there you'll be satisfied. That is the difference between East and West.


Prabhupāda: It is very difficult. Acintya.  
:''manuṣyāṇāṁ sahasreṣu''
:''kaścid yatati siddhaye''
:''yatatām api siddhānāṁ''
:''kaścin vetti māṁ . . .''
:([[BG 7.3 (1972)|BG 7.3]])


Yaśodā-nandana: If such a thing as going from one place to the other on earth, this is cintya, this is conceivable.
Therefore ''tad viddhi praṇipātena paripraśnena sevayā'' ([[BG 4.34 (1972)|BG 4.34]]). There is no other. Submissive. (break) . . . ''guru''. ''Tasyaite kathitā hy arthāḥ prakāśante''. The authority is revealed to him. ''Yasya deve parā bhaktir yathā deve'' (ŚU 6.23). Otherwise not. So do it as far as possible to your capacities. But things are inconceivable. You cannot adjust within the limitation of your understanding. That is not . . .


Prabhupāda: Argument is there when it is conceivable. It is inconceivable. Kṛṣṇa lifted Govardhana. Seven years old, six years old. How it is conceivable? But devotees, they are crying, "Oh, Giri-vara-dhārī." And the Māyāvādīs they say kalpanāyā. The Akhandananda was saying. And Śukadeva Gosvāmī is narrating something kalpanāyā and wasting his time?
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' Yeah, that's the . . . we're trying to impose some preconceived idea onto this. As soon as that happens, this knowledge is blocked. Because the whole attitude shouldn't be like that. One should come out of service and devotion, not with some mental, materialistic speculations.


Bhakti-prema: (indistinct)
'''Prabhupāda:''' Did you know that story, the Nārada was going to Vaikuṇṭha? Nārada came back and replied to a cobbler . . . cobbler asked him what Nārāyaṇa is doing. "He has taken one elephant and He's drawing through the hole of a needle like this and again taking." The learned brāhmaṇa, he began to laugh, "These are all stories." And the cobbler began to cry, "Oh, Nārāyaṇa, Kṛṣṇa, can do anything." Nārada inquired, "How do you believe that elephant is being drawn through the hole of needle?" "No, why not? I'm daily seeing by sitting under this tree, banyan tree, and within a fruit there are thousands of seeds. And each seed contains the big tree." Can the scientists make such small seed contain a big banyan tree? So it is acintya. That's a fact. (break) . . . thing is inconceivable. And these rascals want to bring them as conceivable. He's conditioned, and he's trying to bring inconceivable thing to his conception. Useless, futile attempt. How the scientist will answer? We take a fruit. There are hundreds of seeds, and each seed contains a big tree. How you can explain? Is it not inconceivable?


Prabhupāda: This is acintya for the Māyāvādīs. They say kalpanāyā. These Akhandananda and other Māyāvādīs, they explain Bhāgavata-kalpanāyā. They are making some imagination that "I am God," but they are alleging us, that "You are in illusion." God, as soon as there is some toothache, he goes to the doctor. He's such a rascal hypocrite. There was some heart attack going on, so Akhandananda, immediately he called one of his chief disciples, that Mishra, Jasri, and he was taken to Bombay hospital. And he's God.
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' Yes.


Bhakti-prema: He's expired?
'''Prabhupāda:''' So what is the use of arguing?


Prabhupāda: Expired? No, no. He's living. But talking all nonsense, reading Bhāgavatam, and hundreds of people go to the...
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' It's better to take the fruit and offer it to Kṛṣṇa.


Bhakti-prema: Today we were discussing...
'''Prabhupāda:''' That's right.  


Prabhupāda: That difference of opinion will continue. You cannot stop.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' (indistinct conversation with Tamāla Kṛṣṇa)


Bhakti-prema: This Pacific Ocean is saltwater...
'''Prabhupāda:''' So we take it as accepted, ''mahā-muni kṛte''. ''Dharmaḥ projjhita-kaitavo 'tra paramo nirmatsarāṇāṁ satām'' ([[SB 1.1.2|SB 1.1.2]]).


Prabhupāda: Why you are trying to adjust Pacific Ocean? Pacific Ocean, any ocean, it is just like kūpa-maṇḍūka. It is very big for you, but you are a very teeny identity. Take the universe. What is the Pacific? Is it not a drop. There are so many Pacific Oceans floating in the sky. Everything is acintya. Yasyaika-niśvasita-kālam athāvalambya jīvanti loma-vilajā jagad-aṇḍa-nāthāḥ [Bs. 5.48] . This is acintya. So acintyāḥ khalu ye bhāvā na tāṁs tarkeṇa yojayet. You cannot make an experiment or see it. Take some information from the authority and be satisfied. With your limited knowledge, if you want to bring it to experiment, that is not possible. That is not possible.
'''Bhakti-prema:''' ''Vedyaṁ vāstavam atra vastu śivadaṁ tāpa-trayonmūlanam, śrīmad-bhāgavate mahā-muni-kṛte kiṁ vā parair īśvaraḥ sadyo hṛdy avarudhyate 'tra kṛtibhiḥ śuśrūṣubhis tat-kṣaṇāt'' ([[SB 1.1.2|SB 1.1.2]]).


Bhakti-prema: If this is the background I can give a lot of material. But they want logic.
'''Prabhupāda:''' ''Śuśrūṣubhis tat-kṣaṇāt''. There is no other way.


Prabhupāda: Where is the logic?
'''Tamāla Kṛṣṇa:''' This is a very good lesson, Śrīla Prabhupāda.


Yaśodā-nandana: I don't want any logic. The scientists will come to the planetarium and ask...
'''Prabhupāda:''' You do not require to be puffed up with your so-called education. It has no value. (pause) Hmm. Is that all right?


Prabhupāda: How they can? Scientist is rascal. That is proved. They are insisting that chemical can produce life. He's a rascal. They have gone to moon planet. That's a rascal. So what is the value of so-called scientist. Why should we give any importance? I'm not giving any importance. If you become scientist, that so much ghee and so much āṭā makes puri, and we can eat very nicely, all right, you are a scientist. But so much chemicals, make it life—prove that. The confectioner is also scientist. He knows very well how to do his business. A carpenter is also scientist. Here is some work nice done by the carpenter. I cannot do it. You may be a great scientist, but me? It is not possible for me to do a carpentry work. In this way it is going on. (Bengali) You have learned something, you can do it very nicely. But I cannot do it. For me it will be beating by the rod if I am given this work. I can translate, my work. So everyone is scientist, his own field of activities, to some extent. You cannot make everyone agree. That is not... Vox populi you cannot. That is not possible. What is that vox populi ?
'''Devotees:''' Yes, Śrīla Prabhupāda. (end)
 
Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: General population.
 
Prabhupāda: Mohitaṁ nābhijānāti mām ebhyaḥ param avyayam [[BG 7.13]] . So what is the value of vox populi? I concluded. Munayāḥ sādhu te 'ham. Huh? What is that? Munayāḥ sādhu pṛṣṭo 'ham [[BG 7.13]] . Loka-maṅgalam. Yenātmā suprasīdati. So Kṛṣṇa's childhood pastime, enjoyed by mother Yaśodā, others will think, "What is this nonsense? Kṛṣṇa is breaking the butterpot and it is taken as sublime?" They'll think like that.
 
Bhakti-prema: Kṛṣṇa opened His mouth, His mother Yaśodā saw all this universe.
 
Prabhupāda: And first of all she became surprised. And next moment, "Whatever it is, my dear Kṛṣṇa, You come on my lap." So it is not for all.
 
Bhakti-prema: Therefore we should name it Esoteric Geography.
 
Prabhupāda: Journal?
 
Bhakti-prema: Esoteric.
 
Prabhupāda: Yes, esoteric I know. Journal?
 
Bhakti-prema: Geography.
 
Prabhupāda: Yes. Esoteric and exoteric. But one thing is that it is folly to be wise where ignorance is bliss. If you think that ignorance is bliss, then why should we waste our time and money?
 
Yaśodā-nandana: Prabhupāda, what is the shape of this tiny portion of earth or whatever place we are on? What is the shape of this, whatever you call...
 
Prabhupāda: Ask them. Why don't you ask them? Sometimes they say flat, sometimes they say it is round. Why don't you ask them, the scientists?
 
Yaśodā-nandana: We don't accept what they say.
 
Prabhupāda: No, no. Formerly they were under the impression the world is flat. And now they are saying round. So what they'll say after few years?
 
Yaśodā-nandana: They are not consistent. That's a fact. They're very inconsistent in their theories.
 
Prabhupāda: Ask them which is correct. "Probably" this is correct.
 
Bhakti-prema: When someone asks this question, first one would reply.
 
Prabhupāda: I answered it. You people say like that, so which is correct? Flat or round?
 
Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: They will say "What does the Bhāgavatam say?"
 
Prabhupāda: Huh?
 
Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: They may reply to us, "All right, we are rascals. So please tell us what is the fact."
 
Prabhupāda: That is, we are...
 
Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: That's what he's asking. What should be shown? Actually we're a little stumped by... I mean...
 
Prabhupāda: Yes, you must have proper answer as far as possible.
 
Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: We just read... We got a version from South India, and we've even found that there are different conceptions of what the Bhāgavata is saying. But the Purāṇas, they give some Puranic references.
 
Bhakti-prema: It is written the world... The earth is round and flat.
 
Prabhupāda: Hm?
 
Bhakti-prema: Earth is round and flat both, together.
 
Prabhupāda: Yes.
 
Bhakti-prema: First we should reply it is acintya. This should be the reply. "Inconceivable."
 
Yaśodā-nandana: If it is inconceivable, then they will say how we can conceive it?
 
Prabhupāda: Take the version of Bhāgavatam.
 
Bhakti-prema: Everything we conceived, that is wrong?
 
Prabhupāda: Everything you conceived, that is wrong. Yes. Therefore inconceivable.
 
Bhakti-prema: The Lord is inconceivable always and any (indistinct), it is inconceivable.
 
Prabhupāda: But we have to accept śāstra.
 
Bhakti-prema: This outer structure of the Lord is one with the Lord. It is inconceivable; it is not conceivable.
 
Prabhupāda: Acintya-guṇa-svarūpam. Acintya-guṇa-svarūpam. Yaṁ śyāmasundaram acintya-guṇa. Acintya. Govindam ādi-puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi. Acintya.
 
Bhakti-prema: (indistinct)
 
Prabhupāda: Give me that pineapple juice. [break]
 
Bhakti-prema: If it is inconceivable, then don't try to...
 
Prabhupāda: We are not lying to you.
 
Bhakti-prema: ...draw.
 
Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: We're drawing according to the Bhāgavatam.
 
Prabhupāda: We're not conceiving it. It is already there.
 
Bhakti-prema: Then it is conceived, he says.
 
Prabhupāda: Conceived not by me.
 
Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: But not by us. By the Unlimited.
 
Prabhupāda: I am imperfect. That is the difference.
 
Bhakti-prema: Yes. It is conceivable by you.
 
Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: By Kṛṣṇa.
 
Prabhupāda: By Śukadeva... Not even Śukadeva Gosvāmī. He says śuśruma.
 
Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: "I heard."
 
Prabhupāda: Janmādy asya yataḥ anvayād itarataś cārtheṣu abhijñaḥ svarāṭ tene brahma hṛdā [[SB 1.1.1]] . Brahma hṛdā. This is Brahmā. Ādi-kavaye. The Brahmā is very significant. Ādi-kavaye. So it is coming that way.
 
Bhakti-prema: (indistinct)
 
Prabhupāda: Yes.
 
Bhakti-prema: Scholars
 
Prabhupāda: This is their... Apauruṣeyam. Actually India's culture is going on that way. Mass of people, they are going to Prayāga for taking bath. What do they know? They have received it from authorities that if you take bath in such and such place... Ah, lakhs of people will go. That is India's culture. Without any advertisement, without any means, walking hundreds of miles they are coming, yes, that is their culture. And the government is perturbed that people are so prejudiced. So how to make them forget? This is going on. But they don't listen. They just, "If I take bath I'll..." That is the difference between Western and Eastern. And as soon as there is interpretation, it is Māyāvāda. And Caitanya Mahāprabhu has rejected- māyāvādi-bhāṣya śunile haya sarva-nāśa [[CC Madhya 6.169]] . You see in the Kumbhamela how peacefully they are sitting. They are accepting Vedic culture. So nice atmosphere. Simply by going there you'll be satisfied. That is the difference between East and West.
 
<div class="conv_verse">
manuṣyāṇāṁ sahasreṣu<br />
kaścid yatati siddhaye<br />
yatatām api siddhānāṁ<br />
kaścin māṁ vetti...<br />
[[BG 7.3]]
</div>
 
Therefore tad viddhi praṇipātena paripraśnena sevayā [[BG 4.34]] . There is no other. Submissive. [break] Guru. Tasyaite kathitā hy arthāḥ prakāśante. The author is revealed to him. Yasya deve parā bhaktir yathā deve [ŚU 6.23] . Otherwise not. So do it as far as possible to your capacity. But things are inconceivable. You cannot adjust within the limitation of your understanding. That is not...
 
Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: That's... We're trying to impose some preconceived idea onto this. As soon as that happens, this knowledge is blocked. Because the whole attitude shouldn't be like that. One should come out of service and devotion, not with some mental, materialistic speculations.
 
Prabhupāda: Did you know that story, the Nārada was going to Vaikuṇṭha? Nārada came back and replied to a cobbler... Cobbler asked him what Nārāyaṇa is doing. "He has taken one elephant and He's drawing through the hole of a needle like this and again taking." The learned brāhmaṇa, he began to laugh. "These are all stories." And the cobbler began to cry, "Oh, Nārāyaṇa, Kṛṣṇa, can..." Nārada inquired, "How do you believe that elephant is being drawn through the hole of needle?" "No, why not? I'm daily seeing by sitting under this banyan tree, and within a fruit there are thousands of seeds. And each seed contains the big tree." Can the scientists make such small seed contain a big banyan tree? So it is acintya. That's a fact. [break] ...thing is inconceivable. And these rascals want to bring them as conceivable. He's conditioned, and he's trying to bring inconceivable thing to his conception. Useless, futile attempt. How the scientist will answer? We take a fruit. There are hundreds of seeds, and each seed contains a big tree. How you can explain? Is it not inconceivable?
 
Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Yes.
 
Prabhupāda: So what is the use of arguing?
 
Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: It's better to take the fruit and offer it to Kṛṣṇa.
 
Prabhupāda: That's right. We take it as accepted, mahā-muni kṛte. Dharmaḥ projjhita-kaitavo 'tra paramo nirmatsarāṇāṁ satām [[SB 1.1.2]] .
 
Bhakti-prema: Vedyaṁ vāstavam atra vastu śivadaṁ tāpa-trayonmūlanam, śrīmad-bhāgavate mahā-muni-kṛte kiṁ vā parair īśvaraḥ sadyo hṛdy avarudhyate 'tra kṛtibhiḥ śuśrūṣubhis tat-kṣaṇāt.
 
Prabhupāda: Śuśrūṣubhis tat-kṣaṇāt. There is no other way.
 
Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: This is a very good lesson, Śrīla Prabhupāda.
 
Prabhupāda: You do not require to be puffed-up with your so-called education. It has no value. (end)
 
{{CV_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}

Latest revision as of 04:54, 7 February 2024

His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada



770705DC-VRNDAVAN - July 05, 1977 - 62:01 Minutes


(Discussion about Bhu-mandala)



Prabhupāda: So what is the difficulty?

Bhakti-prema: First we are interested to know . . .

Prabhupāda: (aside) Take from the middle. (break) It is something new?

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: No. This is the first drawing we did. This is Jambūdvīpa. This is Bhārata . . .

Bhakti-prema: This is Bhārata-varṣa, Bhūrloka. Now, this is Himalayan mountain going from east to west. This is India.

Prabhupāda: First thing is, these people, they cannot cross the Himalayan mountain. (aside) You can turn this light in this way, down. From my practical experience, I have seen Switzerland, it is so high that so many accidents have taken place. Little inattention. They have experience. The plane goes thirty-two thousand feet high. Is it not?

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Yes. Thirty to forty thousand. Say forty thousand maximum.

Prabhupāda: Still they met with accident. But they are saying that Himalaya is twenty-eight thousand feet high.

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Maximum.

Prabhupāda: What is this? First of all answer this. Their everything proposition is wrong. So how we can trust somebody? What is the answer?

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: We cannot trust them.

Prabhupāda: Then? But if you cannot trust them, they're rejected immediately. This is one argument. Another argument, kūpa-maṇḍuka-nyāya. The frog in the well, he's estimating, "This is the limit of water." What he'll understand about Pacific Ocean, Atlantic Ocean? There is so many things. On the whole we are imperfect, and although imperfect, they want to be perfect. That is cheating. Now for argument's sake, if they put some argument, we have to reply. We have to prepare for them. Otherwise they're useless. We know they're useless, but sometimes they put some argument. We have to give answer. This is the position. And our duty is to present picture of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam correct. So what do you have to say? At least some answer you should give.

Yaśodā-nandana: The biggest problem we are discussing . . . we were thinking that the first question they will ask . . . this is their conception of the world.

Prabhupāda: We reject them.

Yaśodā-nandana: Yes.

Prabhupāda: "You are imperfect. So whatever you have written, that is nonsense. And everywhere problem. Why should we waste our time?" Now just try to settle from point of. He's showing this book; I am showing the Bhāgavatam. So you are imperfect, that's a fact. What is the value of your book? If you are basically a rascal, then what is the value of your book? Why shall I waste my time? First of all I take it and I prove it that you are a rascal. You show your book; I show my book. But you have been proved that you are a rascal. Because practically you cannot cross Himalaya. You have no idea what is the Himalaya. You are giving some conflict.

Bhakti-prema: This . . . we have to reply to this question. They say if we go, we start from Los Angeles and arrive Japan, according to Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam . . .

Prabhupāda: Japan and Los Angeles and India, that is not the whole thing.

Bhakti-prema: Yeah, that is not the whole thing, but it is basic point.

Prabhupāda: Huh . . . insignificant.

Bhakti-prema: According to Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, if we start from Los Angeles . . .

Prabhupāda: That argument also I have refuted. Just like animal, he is bound up. He is rotating around the log, and within that there may be Japan, there may be Calcutta, there may be Los Angeles. You can think this is there. But that is not all. Within that rounding circle, whatever is there, you may think this is all. But that is not all. He's limited condition. So within his limitation Gajar toiri hoyeche? (Is the carrot dish ready?)

Bhakti-caru: Hocche Srila Prabhupad. (It is being prepared Srila Prabhupāda.)

Prabhupāda: Within that limitation he's speaking. But Himalaya and other things—far beyond their limitation. That I have already explained. He's speaking within his limitation. Our position should be, correctly represent what is described in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. But if there is some question, we should ask. Just like I am answering to the reasonable point, that if you are conditioned, within your condition you can see, you can experience, but beyond that you have no right to see. What is Los Angeles, Calcutta, Japan, this is very insignificant space. And they're talking of that. We are talking that Himalaya mountain, "We have crossed over that Himalaya, we conquered the outer space." How they can think of it?

Bhakti-prema: How to take them to Plakṣadvīpa?

Prabhupāda: There is no question of take them. If you take, he's all right. If you don't take, we cannot change.

Bhakti-prema: As long as we cannot show them.

Prabhupāda: First of all you have to prove that you are imperfect.

Bhakti-prema: That has already been proved.

Prabhupāda: Yes. You're simply insisting on things by "probably." "Probably beyond the Himalaya there is something." That is one thing. We say "Definitely, here is. Beyond the Himalayas like this, that." That is the difference. You say "probably," I say "definitely." Father, mother said: "Here is your father." You can say "probably," and mother is saying "definitely." She knows perfectly. You may say probably he may be your father, but mother knows that definitely. Therefore we take Vedas as mother, Purāṇas as sister. Śukadeva Gosvāmī is explaining. Iti śuśruma. But śuśruma, why he should waste his valuable time? He knows it is definite. So unless you come to this standpoint that whatever is spoken in the Vedic literature, that is definite, you cannot be convinced by argument. Tarko 'pratiṣṭhaḥ śrutayo vibhinnā nāsāv ṛṣir yasya mataṁ na bhinnam, mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ (CC Madhya 17.186). Śukadeva Gosvāmī said—that's all. Mahājano yena. Vaiyāsakiḥ.

svayambhūr nāradaḥ śambhuḥ
kumāraḥ kapilo manuḥ
prahlādo janako bhīṣmo
balir vaiyāsakir vayam
(SB 6.3.20)

These mahājanas. This is our argument. And for commonsense argument, the Himalaya is very, very high. Very, very broad. You have never crossed, and you have met with so many accidents. They avoid that portion, flying plane. And I have seen how high has it gone, then it is in the clouds. Still they say twenty-eight thousand. Huh? Twenty-eight thousand?

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Twenty-nine thousand. Twenty-nine thousand.

Prabhupāda: So I conclude like that. When you show this book, accept this authority.

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: When we show this book it means we're accepting the authority?

Yaśodā-nandana: Not accepting the authority. The problem is that the Pacific Ocean, according to Jambūdvīpa, for us it is the salt ocean. So the first question that Mahārāja was raising, that they will ask, how do we go between the west coast of America, which is very tiny, and Japan, as they say according to their calculation we go west and we arrive around. And you keep still going further and you arrive back in America. The point about the Himalayas, that we did not raise, because that we could well understood. The Himalayas is much broader and much bigger than they think. We can fully understand it. But that point, from commonsense point of view we couldn't exactly understand. We thought of it all afternoon, and we came up with a few ideas, but we wanted to hear what Your Divine Grace . . .

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Our question was mostly coming out of how to draw what the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam is saying. We're not supporting any kind of mundane argument, nor do we have any doubt in Bhāgavatam. We're simply trying to understand the Bhāgavatam.

Prabhupāda: And that is your credit.

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: That's why we were meeting.

Prabhupāda: Where is the difficulty?

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Well, I think that one of the difficulties arose from my seeing this map originally, because in this map it shows the continents that we today speak of as various continents. So when we all looked at this map, our immediate question was, as I said the other day, how do we go from one place to the next? It's not such an unreasonable question. So we're just trying to answer it from the Bhāgavatam—not to give our own speculations, because they're imperfect.

Prabhupāda: That is already answered. You are limited within certain area. So you can conclude in so many ways. Sara bhuri kara, kara bhuri sara. There is a vegetable prepared, the following vegetables are taken: sara, bhuri, and kara. And again you say kara bhuri sara. This way or that way. Sara bhuri kara, kara bhuri sara. That three things, either you take this way consecutively or that way consecutively. But you have got only that kara bhuri sara. You have no experience. There is potato, there is . . . (indistinct) . . . there is . . . (indistinct) . . . you know these three things. Sara bhuri kara. Kara bhuri sara. Bās. Just like they are making arrangement in the laboratory. Companies are there. They present in such a way, that he was flying in the sky, and big sputnik and very small town. Do you know that man came?

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Man came and said he could do anything. Make any trick or illusion appear real. You won't have any idea . . .

Prabhupāda: And they have done so in the matter of moon planet. They've never gone there by laboratory arrangement. The Arizona?

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Arizona.

Prabhupāda: That's all. That is their business. They might have presented such devices in a book, a different color. Just like medical science. The preparation is nothing, but they'll employ big, big medical students to write in such a way that it will be presented as very important. They are doing this. We have done in Dr. Bose's laboratory. They employ. (speaks garbled words to sound like big words) Go on speaking. (laughter) It sounds very nice. What is the meaning of? (more garbled phrases) So I have got my own common sense. I understand. Everything become . . . (indistinct) . . . in the Vedic literatures.

(indistinct comments by devotees)

Prabhupāda: That I already told. Prejudiced.

Bhakti-prema: . . . (indistinct)

Yaśodā-nandana: I'm not prejudiced. I'm just trying to understand. I'm trying to understand what is the facts according to Bhāgavatam.

Prabhupāda: How you can understand which is beyond your understanding?

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: He is saying he wants to understand according to the Bhāgavatam.

Yaśodā-nandana: Not we're challenging.

Prabhupāda: That you can describe.

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: That is what we're having trouble with. We're not trying to do our own thing. We're trying to understand Bhāgavatam. That we're a little stuck on some point.

Prabhupāda: Bhāgavata is there. You try to understand.

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: We're not siding with the preconceptions that we had before. We'll throw them away. We're trying to accept the Bhāgavatam. We have to do a model, a planetarium. So everything has to be according to the Bhāgavatam.

Prabhupāda: Make it nice. We are going to spend so much money, people may not reject it. (break)

Bhakti-prema: Demons and the demigods . . . (indistinct) . . . churn this ocean, and we are saying we can indicate . . .

Prabhupāda: So who has gone to see the churning . . . (indistinct) . . .?

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Just like as we're talking, we're a little . . . sometimes it's difficult to understand the Bhāgavatam.

Prabhupāda: But I take it simply—that there is ocean, and it was churned. So there is no difficulty.

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: No. Mostly we have understood. Only in one place we are a little . . .

Prabhupāda: But nobody has seen that ocean. And nobody can believe that ocean can be churned. Would you believe it? Because it is like that. And the Vāsuki was taken as rope.

Bhakti-prema: And this Mandara mountain, fifty thousand miles high, was taken there, carried by.

Prabhupāda: And it was born by tortoise incarnation.

Bhakti-prema: This is combined with description.

Prabhupāda: Acintyāḥ khalu ye bhāvā na tāṁs tarkeṇa yojayet (Mahābhārata, Bhīṣma-parva 5.22). What is beyond your conception, don't try to . . . so that is Vedic civilization. They were satisfied with information received from the Vedas.

Bhakti-prema: The first and last thing we have to prove logically is this: the earth . . .

Prabhupāda: No, no. Logically you cannot. Acintya. Logic comes when it is conceivable; but it is inconceivable. Where is your logic?

Bhakti-prema: But first to prove them in right understanding we have to bring them.

Prabhupāda: It is very difficult. Acintya.

Yaśodā-nandana: But such a thing as going from one place to the other on earth, they'll say this is cintya, this is conceivable.

Prabhupāda: Argument is there when it is conceivable. It is inconceivable. Kṛṣṇa lifted Govardhana, seven years old, six years old. How it is conceivable? But devotees, they are crying, "Oh, Giri-vara-dhārī." And the Māyāvādīs, they say kalpanāyā. The Akhandānanda said. And Śukadeva Gosvāmī is narrating something kalpanāyā and wasting his time?

Bhakti-prema: . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: This is acintya for the Māyāvādīs. They say kalpanāyā. These Akhandānanda and other Māyāvādīs, they explain Bhāgavata—kalpanāyā. They are making some imagination that, "I am God," but they are alleging us that, "You are in illusion." God, as soon as there is some toothache, he goes to the doctor. He's such a rascal hypocrite. There was some heart attack going on, so Akhandānanda, immediately he called one of his chief disciples, that Mishra, Jasri, and he was taken to Bombay hospital. And he's God.

Bhakti-prema: He's expired?

Prabhupāda: Expired? No, no. He's living. But talking all nonsense, reading Bhāgavatam, and hundreds of people go to the āśrama.

Bhakti-prema: Today we were discussing . . .

Prabhupāda: That difference of opinion will continue. You cannot stop.

Bhakti-prema: What we were discussing, this Pacific Ocean is saltwater . . .

Prabhupāda: Why you are trying to adjust Pacific Ocean? Pacific Ocean, any ocean, it is just like kūpa-maṇḍūka. It is very big for you, because you are a very teeny identity. But take the universe—what is the Pacific? Is it not a drop. There are so many Pacific Oceans floating in the sky. Everything is acintya. Yasyaika-niśvasita-kālam athāvalambya jīvanti loma-vilajā jagad-aṇḍa-nāthāḥ (BS 5.48). This is acintya. So acintyāḥ khalu ye bhāvā na tāṁs tarkeṇa yojayet (Mahābhārata, Bhīṣma-parva 5.22). You cannot make an experiment or see it. But take some information from the authority and be satisfied. With your limited knowledge, if you want to bring it to experiment, that is not possible. That is not possible.

Bhakti-prema: If this is the background I can give a lot of material. But they want logics.

Prabhupāda: Where is the logic?

Yaśodā-nandana: I don't want any logic. The scientists will come to the planetarium and ask . . .

Prabhupāda: How they can? Scientist is rascal. That is proved. They are insisting that chemical can produce life. He's a rascal. They have gone to moon planet. That's a rascal. So what is the value of so-called scientist. Why should we give any importance? I'm not giving any importance. If you become scientist, that so much ghee and so much āṭā makes purī, and we can eat very nicely, all right, you are a scientist. But so much chemicals, make it life—prove that. The confectioner is also scientist. He knows very well how to do his business. A carpenter is also scientist. Here is some work nice done by the carpenter. I cannot do it. You may be a great scientist, but me? It is not possible for me to do a carpentry work. In this way it is going on. Yar kaj tare saje, anya loke lathi baje. (Let the one who is suitable do this, others will ruin it. (Bengali proverb)) You have learned something, you can do it very nicely. But I cannot do it. For me it will be beating by the rod if I am given this work. I can translate, my work. That's all right. So everyone is scientist, his own field of activities, to some extent. You cannot make everyone agree. That is not . . . vox populi you cannot. That is not possible. What is that vox populi?

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: General population.

Prabhupāda: Mohitaṁ nābhijānāti mām ebhyaḥ param avyayam (BG 7.13). So what is the value of vox populi? I concluded. Munayāḥ sādhu pṛṣṭo 'ham. Huh? What is that? Munayāḥ sādhu pṛṣṭo 'ham (SB 1.2.5). Loka-maṅgalam. Yenātmā suprasīdati. So Kṛṣṇa's childhood pastime, enjoyed by Mother Yaśodā, others will think, "What is this nonsense? Kṛṣṇa is breaking the butter pot and it is taken as sublime?" They'll think like that.

Bhakti-prema: Kṛṣṇa opened His mouth, His Mother Yaśodā saw all this universe . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: And first of all she became surprised. And next moment, "Whatever it is, my dear Kṛṣṇa, You come on my lap." That's all. So it is not for all.

Bhakti-prema: Therefore we should name it Esoteric Geography.

Prabhupāda: Hmm?

Bhakti-prema: We can name it Esoteric Geography

Prabhupāda: Journal?

Bhakti-prema: Esoteric.

Prabhupāda: Yes, esoteric I know. Journal?

Bhakti-prema: Geography . . . (indistinct) . . . qualification.

Prabhupāda: Yes. Esoteric and exoteric. But one thing is that it is folly to be wise where ignorance is bliss. If you think that ignorance is bliss, then why should we waste our time and money?

Yaśodā-nandana: Prabhupāda, what is the shape of this tiny portion of earth or whatever place we are on? What is the shape of this, whatever you call . . .

Prabhupāda: Ask them. Why don't you ask them? Sometimes they say flat, sometimes they say it is round. Why don't you ask them, the scientists?

Yaśodā-nandana: We don't accept what they say.

Prabhupāda: No, no. Formerly they were under the impression the world is flat. And now they are saying round. So what they'll say after few years?

Yaśodā-nandana: They are not consistent. That's a fact. They're very inconsistent in their theories.

Prabhupāda: Ask them which is correct. "Probably" this is correct. Yes.

Bhakti-prema: When someone asks this question, first one would reply.

Prabhupāda: I answered it. You people say like that, so which is correct? Flat or round?

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: They will say, "What does the Bhāgavatam say?"

Prabhupāda: Huh?

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: They may reply to us, "All right, we are rascals. So please tell us what is the fact."

Prabhupāda: That is, we are . . .

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: That's what he's asking. What should be shown? Actually we're a little stumped by . . . I mean . . .

Prabhupāda: Yes, you must have proper answer as far as possible.

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: We just read . . . we got a version from South India, and we've even found that there are different conceptions of what the Bhāgavatam is saying. But the Purāṇas, they give some Purāṇic references.

Bhakti-prema: It is written the world . . . the earth is round and flat.

Prabhupāda: Hmm?

Bhakti-prema: Earth is round and flat both, together.

Prabhupāda: Yes.

Bhakti-prema: First we should . . . we can reply it is acintya. This should be the reply. "Inconceivable."

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Then why are we showing them . . .

Yaśodā-nandana: If it is inconceivable, then they will say: "How we can conceive it?"

Prabhupāda: Take the version of Bhāgavatam.

Bhakti-prema: Everything we conceived, that is wrong?

Prabhupāda: Everything you conceived, that is wrong.

Bhakti-prema: Yes. Very good point.

Prabhupāda: Yes. Therefore inconceivable.

Bhakti-prema: The Lord is inconceivable always and any . . . (indistinct) . . . it is inconceivable.

Prabhupāda: But we have to accept śāstra.

Bhakti-prema: This outer structure of the Lord is one with the Lord. It is inconceivable, it is not conceivable. Very good. It is human . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Acintya-guṇa-svarūpam. Acintya-guṇa-svarūpam. Yaṁ śyāmasundaram acintya-guṇa. Acintya. Govindam ādi-puruṣaṁ tam ahaṁ bhajāmi (Brahma-saṁhitā 5.38). Acintya.

Bhakti-prema: (indistinct conversation with devotees)

Prabhupāda: Give me that pineapple juice.

Bhakti-caru: (indistinct Bengali) . . . theke namabe kise? (where should I keep it?)

Prabhupāda: Ekta khelei pet bhore yabe. (Eating one is sufficient to fill the stomach.) (break)

Bhakti-prema: If it is inconceivable, then don't try to . . .

Prabhupāda: We are not lying to you.

Bhakti-prema: . . . draw.

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: We're drawing according to the Bhāgavatam.

Prabhupāda: We're not conceiving it. It is already there.

Bhakti-prema: Then it is conceived, he says.

Prabhupāda: Conceived not by me.

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: But not by us. By the Unlimited.

Prabhupāda: I am imperfect. That is the difference.

Bhakti-prema: Yes. It is conceivable by you.

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: By Kṛṣṇa.

Prabhupāda: By Śukadeva . . . not even Śukadeva Gosvāmī. He says śuśruma.

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: "I heard."

Prabhupāda: Janmādy asya yataḥ anvayād itarataś cārtheṣu abhijñaḥ svarāṭ tene brahma hṛdā (SB 1.1.1). Brahma hṛdā. This is Brahmā. Ādi-kavaye. The Brahmā is very significant. Ādi-kavaye. So it is coming that way.

Bhakti-prema: . . . (indistinct)

Prabhupāda: Yes.

Bhakti-prema: Scholars.

Prabhupāda: This is their . . . apauruṣeyam. Actually India's culture is going on that way. Mass of people, they are going to Prayāga for taking bath. What do they know? They have received it from authorities that if you take bath in such and such place . . . ah, lakhs of people will go. That is Indian culture. Without any advertisement, without any means, walking hundreds of miles they are coming. Yes, that is their culture. And the government is perturbed that people are so prejudiced. So how to make them forget? This is going on. But they don't listen. They just, "If I take bath I'll . . ." That is the difference between Western and Eastern. And as soon as there is interpretation, it is Māyāvāda. And Caitanya Mahāprabhu has rejected—māyāvādi-bhāṣya śunile haya sarva-nāśa (CC Madhya 6.169). You see in the Kumbha-melā how peacefully they are sitting. They are accepting Vedic culture. So nice atmosphere. Simply by going there you'll be satisfied. That is the difference between East and West.

manuṣyāṇāṁ sahasreṣu
kaścid yatati siddhaye
yatatām api siddhānāṁ
kaścin vetti māṁ . . .
(BG 7.3)

Therefore tad viddhi praṇipātena paripraśnena sevayā (BG 4.34). There is no other. Submissive. (break) . . . guru. Tasyaite kathitā hy arthāḥ prakāśante. The authority is revealed to him. Yasya deve parā bhaktir yathā deve (ŚU 6.23). Otherwise not. So do it as far as possible to your capacities. But things are inconceivable. You cannot adjust within the limitation of your understanding. That is not . . .

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Yeah, that's the . . . we're trying to impose some preconceived idea onto this. As soon as that happens, this knowledge is blocked. Because the whole attitude shouldn't be like that. One should come out of service and devotion, not with some mental, materialistic speculations.

Prabhupāda: Did you know that story, the Nārada was going to Vaikuṇṭha? Nārada came back and replied to a cobbler . . . cobbler asked him what Nārāyaṇa is doing. "He has taken one elephant and He's drawing through the hole of a needle like this and again taking." The learned brāhmaṇa, he began to laugh, "These are all stories." And the cobbler began to cry, "Oh, Nārāyaṇa, Kṛṣṇa, can do anything." Nārada inquired, "How do you believe that elephant is being drawn through the hole of needle?" "No, why not? I'm daily seeing by sitting under this tree, banyan tree, and within a fruit there are thousands of seeds. And each seed contains the big tree." Can the scientists make such small seed contain a big banyan tree? So it is acintya. That's a fact. (break) . . . thing is inconceivable. And these rascals want to bring them as conceivable. He's conditioned, and he's trying to bring inconceivable thing to his conception. Useless, futile attempt. How the scientist will answer? We take a fruit. There are hundreds of seeds, and each seed contains a big tree. How you can explain? Is it not inconceivable?

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: Yes.

Prabhupāda: So what is the use of arguing?

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: It's better to take the fruit and offer it to Kṛṣṇa.

Prabhupāda: That's right.

Bhakti-prema: (indistinct conversation with Tamāla Kṛṣṇa)

Prabhupāda: So we take it as accepted, mahā-muni kṛte. Dharmaḥ projjhita-kaitavo 'tra paramo nirmatsarāṇāṁ satām (SB 1.1.2).

Bhakti-prema: Vedyaṁ vāstavam atra vastu śivadaṁ tāpa-trayonmūlanam, śrīmad-bhāgavate mahā-muni-kṛte kiṁ vā parair īśvaraḥ sadyo hṛdy avarudhyate 'tra kṛtibhiḥ śuśrūṣubhis tat-kṣaṇāt (SB 1.1.2).

Prabhupāda: Śuśrūṣubhis tat-kṣaṇāt. There is no other way.

Tamāla Kṛṣṇa: This is a very good lesson, Śrīla Prabhupāda.

Prabhupāda: You do not require to be puffed up with your so-called education. It has no value. (pause) Hmm. Is that all right?

Devotees: Yes, Śrīla Prabhupāda. (end)