Go to Vaniquotes | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia


Vanisource - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge


CC Antya 6.198: Difference between revisions

m (1 revision(s))
 
(Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{CC_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - Antya-lila Chapter 06]]
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta]] - [[CC Antya|Antya-līlā]] - [[CC Antya 6|Chapter 6: The Meeting of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu and Raghunatha dasa Gosvāmī]]'''</div>
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Antya 6.197|Antya-līlā 6.197]] '''[[CC Antya 6.197|Antya-līlā 6.197]] - [[CC Antya 6.199|Antya-līlā 6.199]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Antya 6.199|Antya-līlā 6.199]]</div>
{{CompareVersions|CC|Antya 6.198|CC 1975|CC 1996}}
{{RandomImage}}




==== TEXT 198 ====
==== TEXT 198 ====


<div id="text">
<div class="verse">
yadyadi brahmaṇya kare brāhmaṇera sahāya<br>
:yadyadi brahmaṇya kare brāhmaṇera sahāya
’śuddha-vaiṣṇava’ nahe, haye ‘vaiṣṇavera prāya’<br>
:’śuddha-vaiṣṇava’ nahe, haye ‘vaiṣṇavera prāya’
</div>
</div>


Line 12: Line 16:
==== SYNONYMS ====
==== SYNONYMS ====


<div id="synonyms">
<div class="synonyms">
yadyapi—although; brahmaṇya kare—give charity to the brāhmaṇas; brāhmaṇera sahāya—great helpers to the brāhmaṇas; śuddha-vaiṣṇava—pure Vaiṣṇavas; nahe—not; haye—they are; vaiṣṇavera prāya—almost like Vaiṣṇavas.
''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=yadyapi&tab=syno_o&ds=1 yadyapi]'' — although; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=brahmaṇya&tab=syno_o&ds=1 brahmaṇya] [//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kare&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kare]'' — give charity to the ''brāhmaṇas''; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=brāhmaṇera&tab=syno_o&ds=1 brāhmaṇera] [//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=sahāya&tab=syno_o&ds=1 sahāya]'' — great helpers to the ''brāhmaṇas''; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=śuddha&tab=syno_o&ds=1 śuddha]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=vaiṣṇava&tab=syno_o&ds=1 vaiṣṇava]'' — pure Vaiṣṇavas; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=nahe&tab=syno_o&ds=1 nahe]'' — not; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=haye&tab=syno_o&ds=1 haye]'' — they are; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=vaiṣṇavera&tab=syno_o&ds=1 vaiṣṇavera] [//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=prāya&tab=syno_o&ds=1 prāya]'' — almost like Vaiṣṇavas.
</div>
</div>


Line 19: Line 23:
==== TRANSLATION ====
==== TRANSLATION ====


<div id="translation">
<div class="translation">
“Although your father and uncle are charitable to brāhmaṇas and greatly help them, they are nevertheless not pure Vaiṣṇavas. However, they are almost like Vaiṣṇavas.
“Although your father and uncle are charitable to brāhmaṇas and greatly help them, they are nevertheless not pure Vaiṣṇavas. However, they are almost like Vaiṣṇavas.
</div>
</div>
Line 26: Line 30:
==== PURPORT ====
==== PURPORT ====


<div id="purport">
<div class="purport">
As stated by Śrīla Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura in his Amṛta-pravāha-bhāṣya, some people, usually very rich men, dress like Vaiṣṇavas and give charity to brāhmaṇas. They are also attached to Deity worship, but because of their attachment to material enjoyment, they cannot be pure Vaiṣṇavas. Anyābhilāṣitā-śūnyaṁ jñāna-karmādy-anāvṛtam [Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu 1.1.11]. The pure Vaiṣṇava has no desire for material enjoyment. That is the basic qualification of a pure Vaiṣṇava. There are men, especially rich men, who regularly worship the Deity, give charity to brāhmaṇas and are pious in every respect, but they cannot be pure Vaiṣṇavas. Despite their outward show of Vaiṣṇavism and charity, their inner desire is to enjoy a higher standard of material life. Raghunātha dāsa’s father, Govardhana, and uncle, Hiraṇya dāsa, were both very charitable to brāhmaṇas. Indeed, the brāhmaṇas from the Gauḍīya district were practically dependent upon them. Thus they were accepted as very pious gentlemen. However, they presented themselves as Vaiṣṇavas to the eyes of people in general, although from a purely spiritual point of view they were ordinary human beings, not pure Vaiṣṇavas. Actual Vaiṣṇavas considered them almost Vaiṣṇavas, not pure Vaiṣṇavas. In other words, they were kaniṣṭha-adhikārīs, for they were ignorant of higher Vaiṣṇava regulative principles. Nevertheless, they could not be called viṣayīs, or blind materialistic enjoyers.
As stated by Śrīla Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura in his ''Amṛta-pravāha-bhāṣya'', some people, usually very rich men, dress like Vaiṣṇavas and give charity to ''brāhmaṇas''. They are also attached to Deity worship, but because of their attachment to material enjoyment, they cannot be pure Vaiṣṇavas. ''Anyābhilāṣitā-śūnyaṁ jñāna-karmādy-anāvṛtam'' [Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu 1.1.11]. The pure Vaiṣṇava has no desire for material enjoyment. That is the basic qualification of a pure Vaiṣṇava. There are men, especially rich men, who regularly worship the Deity, give charity to ''brāhmaṇas'' and are pious in every respect, but they cannot be pure Vaiṣṇavas. Despite their outward show of Vaiṣṇavism and charity, their inner desire is to enjoy a higher standard of material life. Raghunātha dāsa’s father, Govardhana, and uncle, Hiraṇya dāsa, were both very charitable to ''brāhmaṇas''. Indeed, the ''brāhmaṇas'' from the Gauḍīya district were practically dependent upon them. Thus they were accepted as very pious gentlemen. However, they presented themselves as Vaiṣṇavas to the eyes of people in general, although from a purely spiritual point of view they were ordinary human beings, not pure Vaiṣṇavas. Actual Vaiṣṇavas considered them almost Vaiṣṇavas, not pure Vaiṣṇavas. In other words, they were ''kaniṣṭha-adhikārīs'', for they were ignorant of higher Vaiṣṇava regulative principles. Nevertheless, they could not be called ''viṣayīs'', or blind materialistic enjoyers.
</div>
</div>
__NOTOC__{{CC_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}
 
 
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Antya 6.197|Antya-līlā 6.197]] '''[[CC Antya 6.197|Antya-līlā 6.197]] - [[CC Antya 6.199|Antya-līlā 6.199]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Antya 6.199|Antya-līlā 6.199]]</div>
__NOTOC__
__NOEDITSECTION__

Latest revision as of 20:47, 19 February 2024



His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada



TEXT 198

yadyadi brahmaṇya kare brāhmaṇera sahāya
’śuddha-vaiṣṇava’ nahe, haye ‘vaiṣṇavera prāya’


SYNONYMS

yadyapi — although; brahmaṇya kare — give charity to the brāhmaṇas; brāhmaṇera sahāya — great helpers to the brāhmaṇas; śuddha-vaiṣṇava — pure Vaiṣṇavas; nahe — not; haye — they are; vaiṣṇavera prāya — almost like Vaiṣṇavas.


TRANSLATION

“Although your father and uncle are charitable to brāhmaṇas and greatly help them, they are nevertheless not pure Vaiṣṇavas. However, they are almost like Vaiṣṇavas.


PURPORT

As stated by Śrīla Bhaktivinoda Ṭhākura in his Amṛta-pravāha-bhāṣya, some people, usually very rich men, dress like Vaiṣṇavas and give charity to brāhmaṇas. They are also attached to Deity worship, but because of their attachment to material enjoyment, they cannot be pure Vaiṣṇavas. Anyābhilāṣitā-śūnyaṁ jñāna-karmādy-anāvṛtam [Bhakti-rasāmṛta-sindhu 1.1.11]. The pure Vaiṣṇava has no desire for material enjoyment. That is the basic qualification of a pure Vaiṣṇava. There are men, especially rich men, who regularly worship the Deity, give charity to brāhmaṇas and are pious in every respect, but they cannot be pure Vaiṣṇavas. Despite their outward show of Vaiṣṇavism and charity, their inner desire is to enjoy a higher standard of material life. Raghunātha dāsa’s father, Govardhana, and uncle, Hiraṇya dāsa, were both very charitable to brāhmaṇas. Indeed, the brāhmaṇas from the Gauḍīya district were practically dependent upon them. Thus they were accepted as very pious gentlemen. However, they presented themselves as Vaiṣṇavas to the eyes of people in general, although from a purely spiritual point of view they were ordinary human beings, not pure Vaiṣṇavas. Actual Vaiṣṇavas considered them almost Vaiṣṇavas, not pure Vaiṣṇavas. In other words, they were kaniṣṭha-adhikārīs, for they were ignorant of higher Vaiṣṇava regulative principles. Nevertheless, they could not be called viṣayīs, or blind materialistic enjoyers.