CC Madhya 9.116: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision(s)) |
(Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | [[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - Madhya-lila Chapter 09|C116]] | ||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta]] - [[CC Madhya|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 9|Chapter 9: Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu's Travels to the Holy Places]]'''</div> | |||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 9.115|Madhya-līlā 9.115]] '''[[CC Madhya 9.115|Madhya-līlā 9.115]] - [[CC Madhya 9.117|Madhya-līlā 9.117]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 9.117|Madhya-līlā 9.117]]</div> | |||
{{CompareVersions|CC|Madhya 9.116|CC 1975|CC 1996}} | |||
{{RandomImage}} | |||
==== TEXT 116 ==== | ==== TEXT 116 ==== | ||
<div | <div class="verse"> | ||
tāra sparśe nāhi yāya pativratā-dharma | :tāra sparśe nāhi yāya pativratā-dharma | ||
kautuke lakṣmī cāhena kṛṣṇera saṅgama | :kautuke lakṣmī cāhena kṛṣṇera saṅgama | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 12: | Line 16: | ||
==== SYNONYMS ==== | ==== SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
tāra | ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=tāra&tab=syno_o&ds=1 tāra] [//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=sparśe&tab=syno_o&ds=1 sparśe]'' — by the touching of Kṛṣṇa by Lakṣmī; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=nāhi&tab=syno_o&ds=1 nāhi]'' — does not; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=yāya&tab=syno_o&ds=1 yāya]'' — disappear; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=pati&tab=syno_o&ds=1 pati]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=vratā&tab=syno_o&ds=1 vratā]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=dharma&tab=syno_o&ds=1 dharma]'' — the vow of chastity; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kautuke&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kautuke]'' — in great fun; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=lakṣmī&tab=syno_o&ds=1 lakṣmī]'' — the goddess of fortune; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=cāhena&tab=syno_o&ds=1 cāhena]'' — wants; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kṛṣṇera&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kṛṣṇera]'' — of Lord Kṛṣṇa; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=saṅgama&tab=syno_o&ds=1 saṅgama]'' — association. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 19: | Line 23: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div | <div class="translation"> | ||
“Since Kṛṣṇa and Nārāyaṇa are the same personality, Lakṣmī’s association with Kṛṣṇa does not break her vow of chastity. Rather, it was in great fun that the goddess of fortune wanted to associate with Lord Kṛṣṇa.” | “Since Kṛṣṇa and Nārāyaṇa are the same personality, Lakṣmī’s association with Kṛṣṇa does not break her vow of chastity. Rather, it was in great fun that the goddess of fortune wanted to associate with Lord Kṛṣṇa.” | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 26: | Line 30: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div | <div class="purport"> | ||
This is the answer to Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu’s question, and from this we can understand that Veṅkaṭa Bhaṭṭa knew the truth. He told Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu that Nārāyaṇa is a form of Kṛṣṇa associated with transcendental opulence. Although Kṛṣṇa is two-armed and Nārāyaṇa four-armed, there is no difference in the person. They are one and the same. Nārāyaṇa is as beautiful as Kṛṣṇa, but Kṛṣṇa’s pastimes are more sportive. It is not that the sportive pastimes of Kṛṣṇa make Him different from Nārāyaṇa. Lakṣmī’s desiring to associate with Kṛṣṇa was perfectly natural. In other words, it is understandable that a chaste woman wants to associate with her husband in all his different dresses. Therefore one should not criticize Lakṣmī for wanting to associate with Kṛṣṇa. | This is the answer to Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu’s question, and from this we can understand that Veṅkaṭa Bhaṭṭa knew the truth. He told Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu that Nārāyaṇa is a form of Kṛṣṇa associated with transcendental opulence. Although Kṛṣṇa is two-armed and Nārāyaṇa four-armed, there is no difference in the person. They are one and the same. Nārāyaṇa is as beautiful as Kṛṣṇa, but Kṛṣṇa’s pastimes are more sportive. It is not that the sportive pastimes of Kṛṣṇa make Him different from Nārāyaṇa. Lakṣmī’s desiring to associate with Kṛṣṇa was perfectly natural. In other words, it is understandable that a chaste woman wants to associate with her husband in all his different dresses. Therefore one should not criticize Lakṣmī for wanting to associate with Kṛṣṇa. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 9.115|Madhya-līlā 9.115]] '''[[CC Madhya 9.115|Madhya-līlā 9.115]] - [[CC Madhya 9.117|Madhya-līlā 9.117]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 9.117|Madhya-līlā 9.117]]</div> | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
__NOEDITSECTION__ |
Latest revision as of 00:01, 20 February 2024
TEXT 116
- tāra sparśe nāhi yāya pativratā-dharma
- kautuke lakṣmī cāhena kṛṣṇera saṅgama
SYNONYMS
tāra sparśe — by the touching of Kṛṣṇa by Lakṣmī; nāhi — does not; yāya — disappear; pati-vratā-dharma — the vow of chastity; kautuke — in great fun; lakṣmī — the goddess of fortune; cāhena — wants; kṛṣṇera — of Lord Kṛṣṇa; saṅgama — association.
TRANSLATION
“Since Kṛṣṇa and Nārāyaṇa are the same personality, Lakṣmī’s association with Kṛṣṇa does not break her vow of chastity. Rather, it was in great fun that the goddess of fortune wanted to associate with Lord Kṛṣṇa.”
PURPORT
This is the answer to Lord Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu’s question, and from this we can understand that Veṅkaṭa Bhaṭṭa knew the truth. He told Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu that Nārāyaṇa is a form of Kṛṣṇa associated with transcendental opulence. Although Kṛṣṇa is two-armed and Nārāyaṇa four-armed, there is no difference in the person. They are one and the same. Nārāyaṇa is as beautiful as Kṛṣṇa, but Kṛṣṇa’s pastimes are more sportive. It is not that the sportive pastimes of Kṛṣṇa make Him different from Nārāyaṇa. Lakṣmī’s desiring to associate with Kṛṣṇa was perfectly natural. In other words, it is understandable that a chaste woman wants to associate with her husband in all his different dresses. Therefore one should not criticize Lakṣmī for wanting to associate with Kṛṣṇa.