CC Madhya 24.325: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision(s)) |
(Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | [[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - Madhya-lila Chapter 24|C325]] | ||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta]] - [[CC Madhya|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 24|Chapter 24: The Sixty-One Explanations of the Atmārāma Verse]]'''</div> | |||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 24.324|Madhya-līlā 24.324]] '''[[CC Madhya 24.324|Madhya-līlā 24.324]] - [[CC Madhya 24.326|Madhya-līlā 24.326]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 24.326|Madhya-līlā 24.326]]</div> | |||
{{CompareVersions|CC|Madhya 24.325|CC 1975|CC 1996}} | |||
{{RandomImage}} | |||
==== TEXT 325 ==== | ==== TEXT 325 ==== | ||
<div | <div class="verse"> | ||
muñi—nīca-jāti, kichu nā jānoṅ ācāra | :muñi—nīca-jāti, kichu nā jānoṅ ācāra | ||
mo-haite kaiche haya smṛti-paracāra | :mo-haite kaiche haya smṛti-paracāra | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 12: | Line 16: | ||
==== SYNONYMS ==== | ==== SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=muñi&tab=syno_o&ds=1 muñi]'' — I; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=nīca&tab=syno_o&ds=1 nīca]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=jāti&tab=syno_o&ds=1 jāti]'' — belong to a lower caste; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kichu&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kichu]'' — anything; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=nā&tab=syno_o&ds=1 nā]'' — not; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=jānoṅ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 jānoṅ]'' — I know; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=ācāra&tab=syno_o&ds=1 ācāra]'' — about proper behavior; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=mo&tab=syno_o&ds=1 mo]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=haite&tab=syno_o&ds=1 haite]'' — from me; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kaiche&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kaiche]'' — how; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=haya&tab=syno_o&ds=1 haya]'' — there is; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=smṛti&tab=syno_o&ds=1 smṛti]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=paracāra&tab=syno_o&ds=1 paracāra]'' — propagation of the directions of Vaiṣṇava behavior. | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 19: | Line 23: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div | <div class="translation"> | ||
"I am a most lowborn person. I have no knowledge of good behavior. How is it possible for me to write authorized directions about Vaiṣṇava activities?" | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 26: | Line 30: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div | <div class="purport"> | ||
Actually Sanātana Gosvāmī belonged to a very respectable brāhmaṇa family. Nonetheless, he submitted himself as a fallen, lowborn person because he had served in the Muslim government. A brāhmaṇa is never supposed to engage in | Actually Sanātana Gosvāmī belonged to a very respectable ''brāhmaṇa'' family. Nonetheless, he submitted himself as a fallen, lowborn person because he had served in the Muslim government. A ''brāhmaṇa'' is never supposed to engage in anyone's service. Serving others for a livelihood (''paricaryātmakaṁ karma'' ([[BG 18.44 (1972)|BG 18.44]])) is the business of ''śūdras''. The ''brāhmaṇa'' is always independent and busy studying ''śāstra'' and preaching ''śāstra'' to subordinate social members such as ''kṣatriyas'' and ''vaiśyas''. Sanātana Gosvāmī felt unfit to write Vaiṣṇava ''smṛti'' about the behavior of Vaiṣṇavas because he had fallen from the brahminical position. Thus Sanātana Gosvāmī clearly admits that the brahminical culture should be standardized. Presently in India, so-called ''brāhmaṇas'' are almost all engaged in some mundane service, and they do not understand the import of the Vedic ''śāstras''. Nonetheless, they are passing themselves off as ''brāhmaṇas'' on the basis of birth. In this connection, Sanātana Gosvāmī declares that a ''brāhmaṇa'' cannot be engaged in anyone's service if he wants to take a leading part in society. In [[Srimad-Bhagavatam|''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam'']] Nārada Muni states that even if a ''brāhmaṇa'' is in a difficult position, he should not accept the occupation of a ''śūdra''. This means that he should not be engaged in service for another, for this is the business of dogs. Under the circumstances, Sanātana Gosvāmī felt very low because he had accepted a position of service in the Muslim government. The conclusion is that no one should claim to be a ''brāhmaṇa'' simply by birthright while engaging in someone else's service. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 24.324|Madhya-līlā 24.324]] '''[[CC Madhya 24.324|Madhya-līlā 24.324]] - [[CC Madhya 24.326|Madhya-līlā 24.326]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 24.326|Madhya-līlā 24.326]]</div> | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | |||
Latest revision as of 23:08, 19 February 2024
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
TEXT 325
- muñi—nīca-jāti, kichu nā jānoṅ ācāra
- mo-haite kaiche haya smṛti-paracāra
SYNONYMS
muñi — I; nīca-jāti — belong to a lower caste; kichu — anything; nā — not; jānoṅ — I know; ācāra — about proper behavior; mo-haite — from me; kaiche — how; haya — there is; smṛti-paracāra — propagation of the directions of Vaiṣṇava behavior.
TRANSLATION
"I am a most lowborn person. I have no knowledge of good behavior. How is it possible for me to write authorized directions about Vaiṣṇava activities?"
PURPORT
Actually Sanātana Gosvāmī belonged to a very respectable brāhmaṇa family. Nonetheless, he submitted himself as a fallen, lowborn person because he had served in the Muslim government. A brāhmaṇa is never supposed to engage in anyone's service. Serving others for a livelihood (paricaryātmakaṁ karma (BG 18.44)) is the business of śūdras. The brāhmaṇa is always independent and busy studying śāstra and preaching śāstra to subordinate social members such as kṣatriyas and vaiśyas. Sanātana Gosvāmī felt unfit to write Vaiṣṇava smṛti about the behavior of Vaiṣṇavas because he had fallen from the brahminical position. Thus Sanātana Gosvāmī clearly admits that the brahminical culture should be standardized. Presently in India, so-called brāhmaṇas are almost all engaged in some mundane service, and they do not understand the import of the Vedic śāstras. Nonetheless, they are passing themselves off as brāhmaṇas on the basis of birth. In this connection, Sanātana Gosvāmī declares that a brāhmaṇa cannot be engaged in anyone's service if he wants to take a leading part in society. In Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam Nārada Muni states that even if a brāhmaṇa is in a difficult position, he should not accept the occupation of a śūdra. This means that he should not be engaged in service for another, for this is the business of dogs. Under the circumstances, Sanātana Gosvāmī felt very low because he had accepted a position of service in the Muslim government. The conclusion is that no one should claim to be a brāhmaṇa simply by birthright while engaging in someone else's service.