CC Madhya 17.116: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision(s)) |
(Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | [[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - Madhya-lila Chapter 17|C116]] | ||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta]] - [[CC Madhya|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 17|Chapter 17: The Lord Travels to Vṛndāvana]]'''</div> | |||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 17.115|Madhya-līlā 17.115]] '''[[CC Madhya 17.115|Madhya-līlā 17.115]] - [[CC Madhya 17.117|Madhya-līlā 17.117]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 17.117|Madhya-līlā 17.117]]</div> | |||
{{CompareVersions|CC|Madhya 17.116|CC 1975|CC 1996}} | |||
{{RandomImage}} | |||
==== TEXT 116 ==== | ==== TEXT 116 ==== | ||
<div | <div class="verse"> | ||
“śuniyāchi gauḍa-deśera sannyāsī—‘bhāvuka’ | :“śuniyāchi gauḍa-deśera sannyāsī—‘bhāvuka’ | ||
keśava-bhāratī-śiṣya, loka-pratāraka | :keśava-bhāratī-śiṣya, loka-pratāraka | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 12: | Line 16: | ||
==== SYNONYMS ==== | ==== SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=śuniyāchi&tab=syno_o&ds=1 śuniyāchi]'' — I have heard; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=gauḍa&tab=syno_o&ds=1 gauḍa]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=deśera&tab=syno_o&ds=1 deśera] [//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=sannyāsī&tab=syno_o&ds=1 sannyāsī]'' — the ''sannyāsī'' from Bengal; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=bhāvuka&tab=syno_o&ds=1 bhāvuka]'' — sentimental; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=keśava&tab=syno_o&ds=1 keśava]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=bhāratī&tab=syno_o&ds=1 bhāratī]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=śiṣya&tab=syno_o&ds=1 śiṣya]'' — disciple of Keśava Bhāratī; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=loka&tab=syno_o&ds=1 loka]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=pratāraka&tab=syno_o&ds=1 pratāraka]'' — a first-class pretender. | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 19: | Line 23: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div | <div class="translation"> | ||
Prakāśānanda Sarasvatī said, “Yes, I have heard about Him. He is a sannyāsī from Bengal, and He is very sentimental. I have also heard that He belongs to the Bhāratī-sampradāya, for He is a disciple of Keśava Bhāratī. However, He is only a pretender.” | Prakāśānanda Sarasvatī said, “Yes, I have heard about Him. He is a sannyāsī from Bengal, and He is very sentimental. I have also heard that He belongs to the Bhāratī-sampradāya, for He is a disciple of Keśava Bhāratī. However, He is only a pretender.” | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 26: | Line 30: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div | <div class="purport"> | ||
Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu was considered bhāvuka (sentimental) because He was always seen in the bhāva stage. That is, He always exhibited ecstatic love for Kṛṣṇa. However, foolish people considered Him sentimental. In the material world, so-called devotees sometimes exhibit emotional symptoms. Caitanya Mahāprabhu’s ecstatic love cannot be compared to the imitative emotional exhibitions of pretenders. Such exhibitions do not continue for very long. They are temporary. We actually see that some emotional imitators exhibit certain symptoms, but immediately after their exhibition, they are attracted to smoking and other things. In the beginning, when Prakāśānanda Sarasvatī heard of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu’s activities, he considered them to be those of a pretender. Consequently he called Him a loka-pratāraka, a pretender. Māyāvādīs cannot understand the transcendental symptoms exhibited by a devotee; therefore when such symptoms are manifest, the Māyāvādīs equate them with temporary emotional feelings. However, Prakāśānanda Sarasvatī’s statement is offensive, and consequently he should be considered an atheist (pāṣaṇḍī). According to Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī, since Prakāśānanda Sarasvatī was not engaged in the Lord’s devotional service, his sannyāsa is to be considered phalgu-vairāgya. This means that since he did not know how to use things for the Lord’s service, his renunciation of the world was artificial. | Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu was considered ''bhāvuka'' (sentimental) because He was always seen in the ''bhāva'' stage. That is, He always exhibited ecstatic love for Kṛṣṇa. However, foolish people considered Him sentimental. In the material world, so-called devotees sometimes exhibit emotional symptoms. Caitanya Mahāprabhu’s ecstatic love cannot be compared to the imitative emotional exhibitions of pretenders. Such exhibitions do not continue for very long. They are temporary. We actually see that some emotional imitators exhibit certain symptoms, but immediately after their exhibition, they are attracted to smoking and other things. In the beginning, when Prakāśānanda Sarasvatī heard of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu’s activities, he considered them to be those of a pretender. Consequently he called Him a ''loka-pratāraka'', a pretender. Māyāvādīs cannot understand the transcendental symptoms exhibited by a devotee; therefore when such symptoms are manifest, the Māyāvādīs equate them with temporary emotional feelings. However, Prakāśānanda Sarasvatī’s statement is offensive, and consequently he should be considered an atheist (''pāṣaṇḍī''). According to Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī, since Prakāśānanda Sarasvatī was not engaged in the Lord’s devotional service, his ''sannyāsa'' is to be considered ''phalgu-vairāgya''. This means that since he did not know how to use things for the Lord’s service, his renunciation of the world was artificial. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 17.115|Madhya-līlā 17.115]] '''[[CC Madhya 17.115|Madhya-līlā 17.115]] - [[CC Madhya 17.117|Madhya-līlā 17.117]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 17.117|Madhya-līlā 17.117]]</div> | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | |||
Latest revision as of 22:10, 19 February 2024
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
TEXT 116
- “śuniyāchi gauḍa-deśera sannyāsī—‘bhāvuka’
- keśava-bhāratī-śiṣya, loka-pratāraka
SYNONYMS
śuniyāchi — I have heard; gauḍa-deśera sannyāsī — the sannyāsī from Bengal; bhāvuka — sentimental; keśava-bhāratī-śiṣya — disciple of Keśava Bhāratī; loka-pratāraka — a first-class pretender.
TRANSLATION
Prakāśānanda Sarasvatī said, “Yes, I have heard about Him. He is a sannyāsī from Bengal, and He is very sentimental. I have also heard that He belongs to the Bhāratī-sampradāya, for He is a disciple of Keśava Bhāratī. However, He is only a pretender.”
PURPORT
Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu was considered bhāvuka (sentimental) because He was always seen in the bhāva stage. That is, He always exhibited ecstatic love for Kṛṣṇa. However, foolish people considered Him sentimental. In the material world, so-called devotees sometimes exhibit emotional symptoms. Caitanya Mahāprabhu’s ecstatic love cannot be compared to the imitative emotional exhibitions of pretenders. Such exhibitions do not continue for very long. They are temporary. We actually see that some emotional imitators exhibit certain symptoms, but immediately after their exhibition, they are attracted to smoking and other things. In the beginning, when Prakāśānanda Sarasvatī heard of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu’s activities, he considered them to be those of a pretender. Consequently he called Him a loka-pratāraka, a pretender. Māyāvādīs cannot understand the transcendental symptoms exhibited by a devotee; therefore when such symptoms are manifest, the Māyāvādīs equate them with temporary emotional feelings. However, Prakāśānanda Sarasvatī’s statement is offensive, and consequently he should be considered an atheist (pāṣaṇḍī). According to Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī, since Prakāśānanda Sarasvatī was not engaged in the Lord’s devotional service, his sannyāsa is to be considered phalgu-vairāgya. This means that since he did not know how to use things for the Lord’s service, his renunciation of the world was artificial.