CC Adi 2.73: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<div class="synonyms"> | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
''tāre'' | ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=tāre&tab=syno_o&ds=1 tāre]'' — to him; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kahe&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kahe]'' — one says; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kene&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kene]'' — why; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kara&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kara]'' — you make; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=ku&tab=syno_o&ds=1 ku]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=tarka&tab=syno_o&ds=1 tarka]'' — of a fallacious argument; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=anumāna&tab=syno_o&ds=1 anumāna]'' — conjecture; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=śāstra&tab=syno_o&ds=1 śāstra]-[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=viruddha&tab=syno_o&ds=1 viruddha]'' — contrary to scripture; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=artha&tab=syno_o&ds=1 artha]'' — a meaning; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=kabhu&tab=syno_o&ds=1 kabhu]'' — at any time; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=nā&tab=syno_o&ds=1 nā]'' — not; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=haya&tab=syno_o&ds=1 haya]'' — is; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=pramāṇa&tab=syno_o&ds=1 pramāṇa]'' — evidence. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Latest revision as of 18:49, 19 February 2024
Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta - Ādi-līlā - Chapter 2: Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu Is the Supreme Personality of Godhead
TEXT 73
- tāre kahe—kene kara kutarkānumāna
- śāstra-viruddhārtha kabhu nā haya pramāṇa
SYNONYMS
tāre — to him; kahe — one says; kene — why; kara — you make; ku-tarka — of a fallacious argument; anumāna — conjecture; śāstra-viruddha — contrary to scripture; artha — a meaning; kabhu — at any time; nā — not; haya — is; pramāṇa — evidence.
TRANSLATION
To such a misguided interpreter we may reply, “Why should you suggest such fallacious logic? An interpretation is never accepted as evidence if it opposes the principles of scripture.