CC Adi 1.54: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision(s)) |
(Vanibot #0054 edit - transform synonyms into clickable links, which search similar occurrences) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | [[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - Adi-lila Chapter 01|C054]] | ||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta]] - [[CC Adi|Ādi-līlā]] - [[CC Adi 1|Chapter 1: The Spiritual Masters]]'''</div> | |||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Adi 1.53|Ādi-līlā 1.53]] '''[[CC Adi 1.53|Ādi-līlā 1.53]] - [[CC Adi 1.55|Ādi-līlā 1.55]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Adi 1.55|Ādi-līlā 1.55]]</div> | |||
{{CompareVersions|CC|Adi 1.54|CC 1975|CC 1996}} | |||
{{RandomImage}} | |||
==== TEXT 54 ==== | ==== TEXT 54 ==== | ||
<div | <div class="verse"> | ||
ṛte ’rthaṁ yat pratīyeta | :ṛte ’rthaṁ yat pratīyeta | ||
na pratīyeta cātmani | :na pratīyeta cātmani | ||
tad vidyād ātmano māyāṁ | :tad vidyād ātmano māyāṁ | ||
yathābhāso yathā tamaḥ | :yathābhāso yathā tamaḥ | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 14: | Line 18: | ||
==== SYNONYMS ==== | ==== SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=ṛte&tab=syno_o&ds=1 ṛte] '' — without; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=artham&tab=syno_o&ds=1 artham]'' — value; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=yat&tab=syno_o&ds=1 yat]'' — that which; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=pratīyeta&tab=syno_o&ds=1 pratīyeta]'' — appears to be; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=na&tab=syno_o&ds=1 na]'' — not; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=pratīyeta&tab=syno_o&ds=1 pratīyeta]'' — appears to be; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=ca&tab=syno_o&ds=1 ca]'' — certainly; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=ātmani&tab=syno_o&ds=1 ātmani]'' — in relation to Me; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=tat&tab=syno_o&ds=1 tat]'' — that; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=vidyāt&tab=syno_o&ds=1 vidyāt]'' — you must know; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=ātmanaḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 ātmanaḥ]'' — My; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=māyām&tab=syno_o&ds=1 māyām]'' — illusory energy; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=yathā&tab=syno_o&ds=1 yathā]'' — just as; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=ābhāsaḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 ābhāsaḥ]'' — the reflection; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=yathā&tab=syno_o&ds=1 yathā]'' — just as; ''[//vanipedia.org/wiki/Special:VaniSearch?s=tamaḥ&tab=syno_o&ds=1 tamaḥ]'' — the darkness. | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 21: | Line 25: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div | <div class="translation"> | ||
“What appears to be truth without Me is certainly My illusory energy, for nothing can exist without Me. It is like a reflection of a real light in the shadows, for in the light there are neither shadows nor reflections. | “What appears to be truth without Me is certainly My illusory energy, for nothing can exist without Me. It is like a reflection of a real light in the shadows, for in the light there are neither shadows nor reflections. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 28: | Line 32: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div | <div class="purport"> | ||
In the previous verse the Absolute Truth and its nature have been explained. One must also understand the relative truth to actually know the Absolute. The relative truth, which is called māyā, or material nature, is explained here. Māyā has no independent existence. One who is less intelligent is captivated by the wonderful activities of māyā, but he does not understand that behind these activities is the direction of the Supreme Lord. In the Bhagavad-gītā ([[BG 9.10]]) it is said, mayādhyakṣeṇa prakrtiḥ sūyate sa-carācaram: the material nature is working and producing moving and nonmoving beings only by the supervision of Kṛṣṇa. | In the previous verse the Absolute Truth and its nature have been explained. One must also understand the relative truth to actually know the Absolute. The relative truth, which is called ''māyā'', or material nature, is explained here. ''Māyā'' has no independent existence. One who is less intelligent is captivated by the wonderful activities of ''māyā'', but he does not understand that behind these activities is the direction of the Supreme Lord. In the ''Bhagavad-gītā'' ([[BG 9.10 (1972)|BG 9.10]]) it is said, ''mayādhyakṣeṇa prakrtiḥ sūyate sa-carācaram'': the material nature is working and producing moving and nonmoving beings only by the supervision of Kṛṣṇa. | ||
The real nature of māyā, the illusory existence of the material manifestation, is clearly explained in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. The Absolute Truth is substance, and the relative truth depends upon its relationship with the Absolute for its existence. Māyā means energy; therefore the relative truth is explained to be the energy of the Absolute Truth. Since it is difficult to understand the distinction between the absolute and relative truths, an analogy can be given for clarification. The Absolute Truth can be compared to the sun, which is appreciated in terms of two relative truths: reflection and darkness. Darkness is the absence of sunshine, and a reflection is a projection of sunlight into darkness. Neither darkness nor reflection has an independent existence. Darkness comes when the sunshine is blocked. For example, if one stands facing the sun, his back will be in darkness. Since darkness stands in the absence of the sun, it is therefore relative to the sun. The spiritual world is compared to the real sunshine, and the material world is compared to the dark regions where the sun is not visible. | The real nature of ''māyā'', the illusory existence of the material manifestation, is clearly explained in ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam''. The Absolute Truth is substance, and the relative truth depends upon its relationship with the Absolute for its existence. ''Māyā'' means energy; therefore the relative truth is explained to be the energy of the Absolute Truth. Since it is difficult to understand the distinction between the absolute and relative truths, an analogy can be given for clarification. The Absolute Truth can be compared to the sun, which is appreciated in terms of two relative truths: reflection and darkness. Darkness is the absence of sunshine, and a reflection is a projection of sunlight into darkness. Neither darkness nor reflection has an independent existence. Darkness comes when the sunshine is blocked. For example, if one stands facing the sun, his back will be in darkness. Since darkness stands in the absence of the sun, it is therefore relative to the sun. The spiritual world is compared to the real sunshine, and the material world is compared to the dark regions where the sun is not visible. | ||
When the material manifestation appears very wonderful, this is due to a perverted reflection of the supreme sunshine, the Absolute Truth, as confirmed in the Vedānta-sūtra. Whatever one can see here has its substance in the Absolute. As darkness is situated far away from the sun, so the material world is also far away from the spiritual world. The Vedic literature directs us not to be captivated by the dark regions (tamaḥ) but to try to reach the shining regions of the Absolute (yogi-dhāma). | When the material manifestation appears very wonderful, this is due to a perverted reflection of the supreme sunshine, the Absolute Truth, as confirmed in the ''Vedānta-sūtra''. Whatever one can see here has its substance in the Absolute. As darkness is situated far away from the sun, so the material world is also far away from the spiritual world. The Vedic literature directs us not to be captivated by the dark regions (''tamaḥ'') but to try to reach the shining regions of the Absolute (''yogi-dhāma''). | ||
The spiritual world is brightly illuminated, but the material world is wrapped in darkness. In the material world, sunshine, moonshine or different kinds of artificial light are required to dispel darkness, especially at night, for by nature the material world is dark. Therefore the Supreme Lord has arranged for sunshine and moonshine. But in His abode, as described in the Bhagavad-gītā ([[BG 15.6]]), there is no necessity for lighting by sunshine, moonshine or electricity because everything is self-effulgent. | The spiritual world is brightly illuminated, but the material world is wrapped in darkness. In the material world, sunshine, moonshine or different kinds of artificial light are required to dispel darkness, especially at night, for by nature the material world is dark. Therefore the Supreme Lord has arranged for sunshine and moonshine. But in His abode, as described in the ''Bhagavad-gītā'' ([[BG 15.6 (1972)|BG 15.6]]), there is no necessity for lighting by sunshine, moonshine or electricity because everything is self-effulgent. | ||
That which is relative, temporary and far away from the Absolute Truth is called māyā, or ignorance. This illusion is exhibited in two ways, as explained in the Bhagavad-gītā. The inferior illusion is inert matter, and the superior illusion is the living entity. The living entities are called illusory in this context only because they are implicated in the illusory structures and activities of the material world. Actually the living entities are not illusory, for they are parts of the superior energy of the Supreme Lord and do not have to be covered by māyā if they do not want to be so. The actions of the living entities in the spiritual kingdom are not illusory; they are the actual, eternal activities of liberated souls. | That which is relative, temporary and far away from the Absolute Truth is called ''māyā'', or ignorance. This illusion is exhibited in two ways, as explained in the ''Bhagavad-gītā''. The inferior illusion is inert matter, and the superior illusion is the living entity. The living entities are called illusory in this context only because they are implicated in the illusory structures and activities of the material world. Actually the living entities are not illusory, for they are parts of the superior energy of the Supreme Lord and do not have to be covered by ''māyā'' if they do not want to be so. The actions of the living entities in the spiritual kingdom are not illusory; they are the actual, eternal activities of liberated souls. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Adi 1.53|Ādi-līlā 1.53]] '''[[CC Adi 1.53|Ādi-līlā 1.53]] - [[CC Adi 1.55|Ādi-līlā 1.55]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Adi 1.55|Ādi-līlā 1.55]]</div> | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
__NOEDITSECTION__ |
Latest revision as of 18:11, 19 February 2024
TEXT 54
- ṛte ’rthaṁ yat pratīyeta
- na pratīyeta cātmani
- tad vidyād ātmano māyāṁ
- yathābhāso yathā tamaḥ
SYNONYMS
ṛte — without; artham — value; yat — that which; pratīyeta — appears to be; na — not; pratīyeta — appears to be; ca — certainly; ātmani — in relation to Me; tat — that; vidyāt — you must know; ātmanaḥ — My; māyām — illusory energy; yathā — just as; ābhāsaḥ — the reflection; yathā — just as; tamaḥ — the darkness.
TRANSLATION
“What appears to be truth without Me is certainly My illusory energy, for nothing can exist without Me. It is like a reflection of a real light in the shadows, for in the light there are neither shadows nor reflections.
PURPORT
In the previous verse the Absolute Truth and its nature have been explained. One must also understand the relative truth to actually know the Absolute. The relative truth, which is called māyā, or material nature, is explained here. Māyā has no independent existence. One who is less intelligent is captivated by the wonderful activities of māyā, but he does not understand that behind these activities is the direction of the Supreme Lord. In the Bhagavad-gītā (BG 9.10) it is said, mayādhyakṣeṇa prakrtiḥ sūyate sa-carācaram: the material nature is working and producing moving and nonmoving beings only by the supervision of Kṛṣṇa.
The real nature of māyā, the illusory existence of the material manifestation, is clearly explained in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. The Absolute Truth is substance, and the relative truth depends upon its relationship with the Absolute for its existence. Māyā means energy; therefore the relative truth is explained to be the energy of the Absolute Truth. Since it is difficult to understand the distinction between the absolute and relative truths, an analogy can be given for clarification. The Absolute Truth can be compared to the sun, which is appreciated in terms of two relative truths: reflection and darkness. Darkness is the absence of sunshine, and a reflection is a projection of sunlight into darkness. Neither darkness nor reflection has an independent existence. Darkness comes when the sunshine is blocked. For example, if one stands facing the sun, his back will be in darkness. Since darkness stands in the absence of the sun, it is therefore relative to the sun. The spiritual world is compared to the real sunshine, and the material world is compared to the dark regions where the sun is not visible.
When the material manifestation appears very wonderful, this is due to a perverted reflection of the supreme sunshine, the Absolute Truth, as confirmed in the Vedānta-sūtra. Whatever one can see here has its substance in the Absolute. As darkness is situated far away from the sun, so the material world is also far away from the spiritual world. The Vedic literature directs us not to be captivated by the dark regions (tamaḥ) but to try to reach the shining regions of the Absolute (yogi-dhāma).
The spiritual world is brightly illuminated, but the material world is wrapped in darkness. In the material world, sunshine, moonshine or different kinds of artificial light are required to dispel darkness, especially at night, for by nature the material world is dark. Therefore the Supreme Lord has arranged for sunshine and moonshine. But in His abode, as described in the Bhagavad-gītā (BG 15.6), there is no necessity for lighting by sunshine, moonshine or electricity because everything is self-effulgent.
That which is relative, temporary and far away from the Absolute Truth is called māyā, or ignorance. This illusion is exhibited in two ways, as explained in the Bhagavad-gītā. The inferior illusion is inert matter, and the superior illusion is the living entity. The living entities are called illusory in this context only because they are implicated in the illusory structures and activities of the material world. Actually the living entities are not illusory, for they are parts of the superior energy of the Supreme Lord and do not have to be covered by māyā if they do not want to be so. The actions of the living entities in the spiritual kingdom are not illusory; they are the actual, eternal activities of liberated souls.