Sloka of the day/August 16, 2008: Difference between revisions
(New page: '''SB 10.1.8''' rohiṇyās tanayaḥ prokto<br/> rāmaḥ saṅkarṣaṇas tvayā<br/> devakyā garbha-sambandhaḥ<br/> kuto dehāntaraṁ vinā<br/> '''My dear Śukadeva Gosvām...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
rāmaḥ saṅkarṣaṇas tvayā<br/> | rāmaḥ saṅkarṣaṇas tvayā<br/> | ||
devakyā garbha-sambandhaḥ<br/> | devakyā garbha-sambandhaḥ<br/> | ||
kuto dehāntaraṁ vinā | kuto dehāntaraṁ vinā | ||
'''My dear Śukadeva Gosvāmī, you have already explained that Saṅkarṣaṇa, who belongs to the second quadruple, appeared as the son of Rohiṇī named Balarāma. If Balarāma was not transferred from one body to another, how is it possible that He was first in the womb of Devakī and then in the womb of Rohiṇī? Kindly explain this to me.''' | '''My dear Śukadeva Gosvāmī, you have already explained that Saṅkarṣaṇa, who belongs to the second quadruple, appeared as the son of Rohiṇī named Balarāma. If Balarāma was not transferred from one body to another, how is it possible that He was first in the womb of Devakī and then in the womb of Rohiṇī? Kindly explain this to me.''' | ||
Latest revision as of 12:10, 7 January 2014
rohiṇyās tanayaḥ prokto
rāmaḥ saṅkarṣaṇas tvayā
devakyā garbha-sambandhaḥ
kuto dehāntaraṁ vinā
My dear Śukadeva Gosvāmī, you have already explained that Saṅkarṣaṇa, who belongs to the second quadruple, appeared as the son of Rohiṇī named Balarāma. If Balarāma was not transferred from one body to another, how is it possible that He was first in the womb of Devakī and then in the womb of Rohiṇī? Kindly explain this to me.