View source for SSR2a What Is a Guru?

[[Category:The Science of Self-Realization]]
<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=The Science of Self-Realization]] '''[[The Science of Self-Realization|INDEX]] - [[SSR2 Choosing a Spiritual Master|2. Choosing a Spiritual Master]]'''</div>
<div style="float:right">'''[[SSR2b Separating the Saints from the Swindlers|2b. Separating the Saints from the Swindlers]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SSR2b Separating the Saints from the Swindlers]]</div>
{{RandomImage}}


(reproduced from the article "What Is a Guru?" published in the [[1975 Back to Godhead Number 10-08|1975 Back to Godhead magazine number 10-08]] and '''heavily paraphrased''' from a [[730822 - Lecture - London|1973 lecture in London]])


==== What Is a Guru? ====


"In all the ''śāstras'' (scriptures) the ''guru'' is described to be as good as God, but the ''guru'' never says, 'I am God.' The disciple's duty is to offer respect to the ''guru'' just as he offers respect to God, but the ''guru'' never thinks, 'My disciples are offering me the same respect they offer to God; therefore I have become God.' As soon as he thinks like this, he becomes a dog."

:''oṁ ajñāna-timirāndhasya''
:''jñānāñjana-śalākayā''
:''cakṣur unmīlitaṁ yena''
:''tasmai śrī-gurave namaḥ''
"I was born in the darkest ignorance, and my ''guru'', my spiritual master, opened my eyes with the torch of knowledge. I offer my respectful obeisances unto him."

The word ''ajñāna'' means "ignorance" or "darkness." If all the lights in this room immediately went out, we would not be able to tell where we or others are sitting. Everything would become confused. Similarly, we are all in darkness in this material world, which is a world of ''tamas''. ''Tamas'' or ''timira'' means "darkness." This material world is dark, and therefore it needs sunlight or moonlight for illumination. However, there is another world, a spiritual world, that is beyond this darkness. That world is described by Śrī Kṛṣṇa in the [[Bhagavad-gita As It Is (1972)|''Bhagavad-gītā'']] ([[BG 15.6|15.6]]):

:''na tad bhāsayate sūryo''
:''na śaśāṅko na pāvakaḥ''
:''yad gatvā na nivartante''
:''tad dhāma paramaṁ mama''
"That abode of Mine is not illumined by the sun or moon, nor by electricity. One who reaches it never returns to this material world."

The ''guru's'' business is to bring his disciples from darkness to light. At present everyone is suffering due to ignorance, just as one contracts a disease out of ignorance. If one does not know hygienic principles, he will not know what will contaminate him. Therefore due to ignorance there is infection, and we suffer from disease. A criminal may say, "I did not know the law," but he will not be excused if he commits a crime. Ignorance is no excuse. Similarly, a child, not knowing that fire will burn, will touch the fire. The fire does not think, "This is a child, and he does not know I will burn." No, there is no excuse. Just as there are state laws, there are also stringent laws of nature, and these laws will act despite our ignorance of them. If we do something wrong out of ignorance, we must suffer. This is the law. Whether the law is a state law or a law of nature, we risk suffering if we break it.

The ''guru's'' business is to see that no human being suffers in this material world. No one can claim that he is not suffering. That is not possible. In this material world, there are three kinds of suffering: ''adhyātmika'', ''adhibhautika'', and ''adhidaivika''. These are miseries arising from the material body and mind, from other living entities, and from the forces of nature. We may suffer mental anguish, or we may suffer from other living entities - from ants or mosquitoes or flies - or we may suffer due to some superior power. There may be no rain, or there may be flood. There may be excessive heat or excessive cold. So many types of suffering are imposed by nature. Thus there are three types of miseries within the material world, and everyone is suffering from one, two, or three of them. No one can say that he is completely free from suffering.

We may then ask why the living entity is suffering. The answer is: out of ignorance. He does not think, "I am committing mistakes and am leading a sinful life; that is why I am suffering." Therefore the ''guru's'' first business is to rescue his disciple from this ignorance. We send our children to school to save them from suffering. If our children do not receive an education, we fear that they will suffer in the future. The ''guru'' sees that suffering is due to ignorance, which is compared to darkness. How can one in darkness be saved? By light. The ''guru'' takes the torchlight of knowledge and presents it before the living entity enveloped in darkness. That knowledge relieves him from the sufferings of the darkness of ignorance.

One may ask whether the ''guru'' is absolutely necessary. The ''Vedas'' inform us that he is:

:''tad-vijñānārthaṁ sa gurum evābhigacchet''
:''samit-pāṇiḥ śrotriyaṁ brahma-niṣṭham''
:(MU 1.2.12)
The ''Vedas'' enjoin us to seek out a ''guru''; actually, they say to seek out the ''guru'', not just a ''guru''. The ''guru'' is one because he comes in disciplic succession. What Vyāsadeva and Kṛṣṇa taught five thousand years ago is also being taught now. There is no difference between the two instructions. Although hundreds and thousands of ''ācāryas'' have come and gone, the message is one. The real ''guru'' cannot be two, for the real ''guru'' does not speak differently from his predecessors. Some spiritual teachers say, "In my opinion you should do this," but this is not a ''guru''. Such so-called ''gurus'' are simply rascals. The genuine ''guru'' has only one opinion, and that is the opinion expressed by Kṛṣṇa, Vyāsadeva, Nārada, Arjuna, Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, and the Gosvāmīs. Five thousand years ago Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa spoke the [[Bhagavad-gita As It Is (1972)|''Bhagavad-gītā'']], and Vyāsadeva recorded it. Śrīla Vyāsadeva did not say, "This is my opinion." Rather, he wrote, ''śrī-bhagavān uvāca'', that is, "The Supreme Personality of Godhead says." Whatever Vyāsadeva wrote was originally spoken by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Śrīla Vyāsadeva did not give his own opinion.

Consequently, Śrīla Vyāsadeva is a ''guru''. He does not misinterpret the words of Kṛṣṇa, but transmits them exactly as they were spoken. If we send a telegram, the person who delivers the telegram does not have to correct it, edit it, or add to it. He simply presents it. That is the ''guru's'' business. The ''guru'' may be this person or that, but the message is the same; therefore it is said that ''guru'' is one.

In the disciplic succession we simply find repetition of the same subject. In the [[Bhagavad-gita As It Is (1972)|''Bhagavad-gītā'']] ([[BG 9.34|9.34]]) Śrī Kṛṣṇa says:

:''man-manā bhava mad-bhakto''
:''mad-yājī māṁ namaskuru''
:''mām evaiṣyasi yuktvaivam''
:''ātmānaṁ mat-parāyaṇaḥ''
"Engage your mind always in thinking of Me, become My devotee, offer obeisances to Me, and worship Me. Being completely absorbed in Me, surely you will come to Me." These very instructions were reiterated by all the ''ācāryas'', such as Rāmānujācārya, Madhvācārya, and Caitanya Mahāprabhu. The Six Gosvāmīs also transmitted the same message, and we are simply following in their footsteps. There is no difference. We do not interpret the words of Kṛṣṇa by saying, "In my opinion, the Battlefield of Kurukṣetra represents the human body." Such interpretations are set forth by rascals. In the world there are many rascal gurus who give their own opinion, but we can challenge any rascal. A rascal ''guru'' may say, "I am God," or, "We are all God." That is all right, but we should find out from the dictionary what the meaning of ''God'' is. Generally, a dictionary will tell us that the word ''God'' indicates the Supreme Being. Thus we may ask such a ''guru'', "Are you the Supreme Being?" If he cannot understand this, then we should give the meaning of ''supreme''. Any dictionary will inform us that ''supreme'' means "the greatest authority." We may then ask, "Are you the greatest authority?" Such a rascal ''guru'', even though proclaiming himself to be God, cannot answer such a question. God is the Supreme Being and the highest authority. No one is equal to Him or greater than Him. Yet there are many ''guru''-gods, many rascals who claim to be the Supreme. Such rascals cannot help us escape the darkness of material existence. They cannot illumine our darkness with the torchlight of spiritual knowledge.

The bona fide ''guru'' will simply present what the supreme ''guru'', God, says in bona fide scripture. A ''guru'' cannot change the message of the disciplic succession.

We must understand that we cannot carry out research to find the Absolute Truth. Caitanya Mahāprabhu Himself said, "My Guru Mahārāja, My spiritual master, considered Me a great fool ([[CC Adi 7.71|CC ''Adi'' 7.71]])." He who remains a great fool before his ''guru'' is a ''guru'' himself. However, if one says, "I am so advanced that I can speak better than my ''guru''," he is simply a rascal. In the [[Bhagavad-gita As It Is (1972)|''Bhagavad-gītā'']] ([[BG 4.2|4.2]]) Śrī Kṛṣṇa says:

:''evaṁ paramparā-prāptam''
:''imaṁ rājarṣayo viduḥ''
:''sa kāleneha mahatā''
:''yogo naṣṭaḥ parantapa''
"This supreme science was thus received through the chain of disciplic succession, and the saintly kings understood it in that way. But in course of time the succession was broken, and therefore the science as it is appears to be lost."

Taking on a ''guru'' is not simply a fashion. One who is serious about understanding spiritual life requires a ''guru''. A ''guru'' is a question of necessity, for one must be very serious to understand spiritual life, God, proper action, and one's relationship with God. When we are very serious about understanding these subjects, we need a ''guru''. We shouldn't go to a ''guru'' simply because a ''guru'' may be fashionable at the moment. Surrender must be there, for without surrender we cannot learn anything. If we go to a ''guru'' simply to challenge him, we will learn nothing. We must accept the ''guru'' just as Arjuna accepted his ''guru'', Śrī Kṛṣṇa Himself:

:''kārpaṇya-doṣopahata-svabhāvaḥ''
:''pṛcchāmi tvāṁ dharma-sammūḍha-cetāḥ''
:''yac chreyaḥ syān niścitaṁ brūhi tan me''
:''śiṣyas te 'haṁ śādhi māṁ tvāṁ prapannam''
"Now I am confused about my duty and have lost all composure because of miserly weakness. In this condition I am asking You to tell me clearly what is best for me. Now I am Your disciple and a soul surrendered unto You. Please instruct me." ([[BG 2.7|Bhagavad-gītā 2.7]])

This is the process for accepting a ''guru''. The ''guru'' is Kṛṣṇa's representative, the former ''ācāryas' '' representative. Kṛṣṇa says that all ''ācāryas'' are His representatives; therefore the ''guru'' should be offered the same respect one would offer to God. As Viśvanātha Cakravartī Ṭhākura says in his prayers to the spiritual master, ''yasya prasādād bhagavat-prasādaḥ'': " By the mercy of the spiritual master, one receives the benediction of Kṛṣṇa." Thus, if we surrender to the bona fide ''guru'', we surrender to God. God accepts our surrender to the ''guru''.

In the [[Bhagavad-gita As It Is (1972)|''Bhagavad-gītā'']] ([[BG 18.66|18.66]]) Kṛṣṇa instructs:

:''sarva-dharmān parityajya''
:''mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja''
:''ahaṁ tvāṁ sarva-pāpebhyo''
:''mokṣayiṣyāmi mā śucaḥ''
"Abandon all varieties of religion and just surrender unto Me. I shall deliver you from all sinful reactions. Do not fear." Someone may argue, "Where is Kṛṣṇa? I shall surrender to Him." But no, the process is that we first surrender to Kṛṣṇa's representative; then we surrender to Kṛṣṇa. Therefore it is said, ''sākṣād-dharitvena samasta-śāstraiḥ'': the ''guru'' is as good as God. When we offer respects to the ''guru'', we are offering respects to God. Because we are trying to be God conscious, it is required that we learn how to offer respects to God through God's representative. In all the ''śāstras'' the ''guru'' is described to be as good as God, but the ''guru'' never says, "I am God." The disciple's duty is to offer respect to the ''guru'' just as he offers respect to God, but the ''guru'' never thinks, "My disciples are offering me the same respect they offer to God; therefore I have become God." As soon as he thinks like this, he becomes a dog instead of God. Therefore Viśvanātha Cakravartī says, ''kintu prabhor yaḥ priya eva tasya''. Because he is the most confidential servitor of God, the ''guru'' is offered the same respect that we offer God. God is always God, ''guru'' is always ''guru''. As a matter of etiquette, God is the worshipable God, and ''guru'' is the worshiper God (''sevaka-bhagavān''). Therefore the ''guru'' is addressed as ''prabhupāda''. The word ''prabhu'' means "lord," and ''pāda'' means "position." Thus ''prabhupāda'' means "he who has taken the position of the Lord." This is the same as ''sākṣād-dharitvena samasta-śāstraiḥ''.

Only if we are very serious about understanding the science of God is a ''guru'' required. We should not try to keep a ''guru'' as a matter of fashion. One who has accepted a guru speaks intelligently. He never speaks nonsense. That is the sign of having accepted a bona fide ''guru''. We should certainly offer all respect to the spiritual master, but we should also remember how to carry out his orders. In the [[Bhagavad-gita As It Is (1972)|''Bhagavad-gītā'']] ([[BG 4.34|4.34]]) Śrī Kṛṣṇa Himself tells us the method of seeking out and approaching the ''guru'':

:''tad viddhi praṇipātena''
:''paripraśnena sevayā''
:''upadekṣyanti te jñānaṁ''
:''jñāninas tattva-darśinaḥ''
"Just try to learn the truth by approaching a spiritual master. Inquire from him submissively and render service unto him. The self-realized soul can impart knowledge unto you because he has seen the truth." The first process is that of surrender. We have to find an exalted person and willingly surrender before him. The ''śāstras'' enjoin that before we take a ''guru'' we study him carefully to find out whether we can surrender to him. We should not accept a ''guru'' suddenly, out of fanaticism. That is very dangerous. The ''guru'' should also study the person who wants to become a disciple to see if he is fit. That is the way a relationship is established between the ''guru'' and disciple. Everything is provided, but we must take up the process seriously. Then we can be trained to become a bona fide disciple. First we must find a bona fide ''guru'', establish our relationship with him, and act accordingly. Then our life will be successful, for the ''guru'' can enlighten the sincere disciple who is in darkness.

Everyone is born a rascal and a fool. If we are born learned, why do we need to go to school? If we do not cultivate knowledge, we are no better than animals. An animal may say that there is no need of books and that he has become a ''guru'', but how can anyone obtain knowledge without the study of authoritative books on science and philosophy? Rascal ''gurus'' try to avoid these things. We must understand that we are all born rascals and fools and that we have to be enlightened. We have to receive knowledge to make our lives perfect. If we do not perfect our lives, we are defeated. What is this defeat? The struggle for existence. We are trying to obtain a better life, to attain a superior position, and for this we are struggling very hard. But we do not know what a superior position actually is.

Whatever position we have in this material world must be given up. We may have a good position or a bad position; in any case, we cannot remain here. We may earn millions of dollars and think, "Now I am in a good position," but a little dysentery or cholera will finish our position. If the bank fails, our position is gone. So actually there is no good position in this material world. It is a farce. Those who try to attain a better position in the material world are ultimately defeated, because there is no better position. The [[Bhagavad-gita As It Is (1972)|''Bhagavad-gītā'']] ([[BG 14.26|14.26]]) says what the better position is:

:''māṁ ca yo 'vyabhicāreṇa''
:''bhakti-yogena sevate''
:''sa guṇān samatītyaitān''
:''brahma-bhūyāya kalpate''
"One who engages in the spiritual activities of unalloyed devotional service at once transcends the modes of material nature and is elevated to the spiritual platform."

Is there any science that gives us the knowledge by which we may become immortal? Yes, we may become immortal, but not in the material sense. We cannot receive this knowledge in so-called universities. However, there is knowledge contained in the Vedic scriptures by which we may become immortal. That immortality is our better position. No more birth, no more death, no more old age, no more disease. Thus the ''guru'' takes on a very great responsibility. He must guide his disciple and enable him to become an eligible candidate for the perfect position - immortality. The ''guru'' must be competent to lead his disciple back home, back to Godhead.



<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=The Science of Self-Realization]] '''[[The Science of Self-Realization|INDEX]] - [[SSR2 Choosing a Spiritual Master|2. Choosing a Spiritual Master]]'''</div>
<div style="float:right">'''[[SSR2b Separating the Saints from the Swindlers|2b. Separating the Saints from the Swindlers]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SSR2b Separating the Saints from the Swindlers]]</div>