Go to Vaniquotes | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia


Vanisource - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge


SB 1.7.45

Revision as of 11:55, 25 May 2020 by Vanibot (talk | contribs) (Vanibot #0020: VersionCompareLinker - added a link to the Version Compare feature)



His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada



TEXT 45

sa eṣa bhagavān droṇaḥ
prajā-rūpeṇa vartate
tasyātmano 'rdhaṁ patny āste
nānvagād vīrasūḥ kṛpī


SYNONYMS

saḥ—he; eṣaḥ—certainly; bhagavān—lord; droṇaḥ—Droṇācārya; prajā-rūpeṇa—in the form of his son Aśvatthāmā; vartate—is existing; tasya—his; ātmanaḥ—of the body; ardham—half; patnī—wife; āste—living; na—not; anvagāt—undertook; vīrasūḥ—having the son present; kṛpī—the sister of Kṛpācārya.


TRANSLATION

He [Droṇācārya] is certainly still existing, being represented by his son. His wife Kṛpī did not undergo a satī with him because she had a son.


PURPORT

The wife of Droṇācārya, Kṛpī, is the sister of Kṛpācārya. A devoted wife, who is according to revealed scripture the better half of her husband, is justified in embracing voluntary death along with her husband if she is without issue. But in the case of the wife of Droṇācārya, she did not undergo such a trial because she had her son, the representative of her husband. A widow is a widow only in name if there is a son of her husband existing. So in either case Aśvatthāmā was the representative of Droṇācārya, and therefore killing Aśvatthāmā would be like killing Droṇācārya. That was the argument of Draupadī against the killing of Aśvatthāmā.



... more about "SB 1.7.45"
Queen Draupadī +
Lord Kṛṣṇa the Supreme Personality of Godhead and Arjuna +