SB 1.5.17: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision(s)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{info | {{info | ||
|speaker= | |speaker=Nārada Muni | ||
|listener= | |listener=Śrīla Vyāsadeva | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam - Canto 01 Chapter 05]] | |||
[[Category:Bhagavatam Verses Spoken by Narada Muni - Vanisource|010517]] | |||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Srimad-Bhagavatam]] - [[SB 1|First Canto]] - [[SB 1.5: Narada's Instructions on Srimad-Bhagavatam for Vyasadeva|Chapter 5: Nārada's Instructions on Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam for Vyāsadeva]]'''</div> | |||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.5.16]] '''[[SB 1.5.16]] - [[SB 1.5.18]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.5.18]]</div> | |||
{{CompareVersions|SB|1.5.17|SB 1962|SB 1972-77}} | |||
{{RandomImage}} | |||
==== TEXT 17 ==== | ==== TEXT 17 ==== | ||
<div | <div class="verse"> | ||
tyaktvā sva-dharmaṁ caraṇāmbujaṁ harer | :tyaktvā sva-dharmaṁ caraṇāmbujaṁ harer | ||
bhajann apakvo 'tha patet tato yadi | :bhajann apakvo 'tha patet tato yadi | ||
yatra kva vābhadram abhūd amuṣya kiṁ | :yatra kva vābhadram abhūd amuṣya kiṁ | ||
ko vārtha āpto 'bhajatāṁ sva-dharmataḥ | :ko vārtha āpto 'bhajatāṁ sva-dharmataḥ | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 23: | ||
==== SYNONYMS ==== | ==== SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
''tyaktvā''—having forsaken; ''sva-dharmam''—one's own occupational engagement; ''caraṇa-ambujam''—the lotus feet; ''hareḥ''—of Hari (the Lord); ''bhajan''—in the course of devotional service; ''apakvaḥ''—immature; ''atha''—for the matter of; ''patet''—falls down; ''tataḥ''—from that place; ''yadi''—if; ''yatra''—whereupon; ''kva''—what sort of; ''vā''—or (used sarcastically); ''abhadram''—unfavorable; ''abhūt''—shall happen; ''amuṣya''—of him; ''kim''—nothing; ''kaḥ vā arthaḥ''—what interest; ''āptaḥ''—obtained; ''abhajatām''—of the nondevotee; ''sva-dharmataḥ''—being engaged in occupational service. | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 24: | Line 30: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div | <div class="translation"> | ||
One who has forsaken his material occupations to engage in the devotional service of the Lord may sometimes fall down while in an immature stage, yet there is no danger of his being unsuccessful. On the other hand, a nondevotee, though fully engaged in occupational duties, does not gain anything. | One who has forsaken his material occupations to engage in the devotional service of the Lord may sometimes fall down while in an immature stage, yet there is no danger of his being unsuccessful. On the other hand, a nondevotee, though fully engaged in occupational duties, does not gain anything. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 37: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div | <div class="purport"> | ||
As far as the duties of mankind are concerned, there are innumerable duties. Every man is duty-bound not only to his parents, family members, society, country, humanity, other living beings, the demigods, etc., but also to the great philosophers, poets, scientists, etc. It is enjoined in the scriptures that one can relinquish all such duties and surrender unto the service of the Lord. So if one does so and becomes successful in the discharge of his devotional service unto the Lord, it is well and good. But it so happens sometimes that one surrenders himself unto the service of the Lord by some temporary sentiment, and in the long run, due to so many other reasons, he falls down from the path of service by undesirable association. There are so many instances of this in the histories. Bharata Mahārāja was obliged to take his birth as a stag due to his intimate attachment to a stag. He thought of this stag when he died. As such, in the next birth he became a stag, although he did not forget the incident of his previous birth. Similarly, Citraketu also fell down due to his offenses at the feet of Śiva. But in spite of all this, the stress is given here to surrendering unto the lotus feet of the Lord, even if there is a chance of falling down, because even though one falls down from the prescribed duties of devotional service, he will never forget the lotus feet of the Lord. Once engaged in the devotional service of the Lord, one will continue the service in all circumstances. In the Bhagavad-gītā it is said that even a small quantity of devotional service can save one from the most dangerous position. There are many instances of such examples in history. Ajāmila is one of them. Ajāmila in his early life was a devotee, but in his youth he fell down. Still he was saved by the Lord at the end. | As far as the duties of mankind are concerned, there are innumerable duties. Every man is duty-bound not only to his parents, family members, society, country, humanity, other living beings, the demigods, etc., but also to the great philosophers, poets, scientists, etc. It is enjoined in the scriptures that one can relinquish all such duties and surrender unto the service of the Lord. So if one does so and becomes successful in the discharge of his devotional service unto the Lord, it is well and good. But it so happens sometimes that one surrenders himself unto the service of the Lord by some temporary sentiment, and in the long run, due to so many other reasons, he falls down from the path of service by undesirable association. There are so many instances of this in the histories. Bharata Mahārāja was obliged to take his birth as a stag due to his intimate attachment to a stag. He thought of this stag when he died. As such, in the next birth he became a stag, although he did not forget the incident of his previous birth. Similarly, Citraketu also fell down due to his offenses at the feet of Śiva. But in spite of all this, the stress is given here to surrendering unto the lotus feet of the Lord, even if there is a chance of falling down, because even though one falls down from the prescribed duties of devotional service, he will never forget the lotus feet of the Lord. Once engaged in the devotional service of the Lord, one will continue the service in all circumstances. In the ''Bhagavad-gītā'' it is said that even a small quantity of devotional service can save one from the most dangerous position. There are many instances of such examples in history. Ajāmila is one of them. Ajāmila in his early life was a devotee, but in his youth he fell down. Still he was saved by the Lord at the end. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=SB 1.5.16]] '''[[SB 1.5.16]] - [[SB 1.5.18]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=SB 1.5.18]]</div> | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | |||
Revision as of 04:24, 30 April 2021
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
TEXT 17
- tyaktvā sva-dharmaṁ caraṇāmbujaṁ harer
- bhajann apakvo 'tha patet tato yadi
- yatra kva vābhadram abhūd amuṣya kiṁ
- ko vārtha āpto 'bhajatāṁ sva-dharmataḥ
SYNONYMS
tyaktvā—having forsaken; sva-dharmam—one's own occupational engagement; caraṇa-ambujam—the lotus feet; hareḥ—of Hari (the Lord); bhajan—in the course of devotional service; apakvaḥ—immature; atha—for the matter of; patet—falls down; tataḥ—from that place; yadi—if; yatra—whereupon; kva—what sort of; vā—or (used sarcastically); abhadram—unfavorable; abhūt—shall happen; amuṣya—of him; kim—nothing; kaḥ vā arthaḥ—what interest; āptaḥ—obtained; abhajatām—of the nondevotee; sva-dharmataḥ—being engaged in occupational service.
TRANSLATION
One who has forsaken his material occupations to engage in the devotional service of the Lord may sometimes fall down while in an immature stage, yet there is no danger of his being unsuccessful. On the other hand, a nondevotee, though fully engaged in occupational duties, does not gain anything.
PURPORT
As far as the duties of mankind are concerned, there are innumerable duties. Every man is duty-bound not only to his parents, family members, society, country, humanity, other living beings, the demigods, etc., but also to the great philosophers, poets, scientists, etc. It is enjoined in the scriptures that one can relinquish all such duties and surrender unto the service of the Lord. So if one does so and becomes successful in the discharge of his devotional service unto the Lord, it is well and good. But it so happens sometimes that one surrenders himself unto the service of the Lord by some temporary sentiment, and in the long run, due to so many other reasons, he falls down from the path of service by undesirable association. There are so many instances of this in the histories. Bharata Mahārāja was obliged to take his birth as a stag due to his intimate attachment to a stag. He thought of this stag when he died. As such, in the next birth he became a stag, although he did not forget the incident of his previous birth. Similarly, Citraketu also fell down due to his offenses at the feet of Śiva. But in spite of all this, the stress is given here to surrendering unto the lotus feet of the Lord, even if there is a chance of falling down, because even though one falls down from the prescribed duties of devotional service, he will never forget the lotus feet of the Lord. Once engaged in the devotional service of the Lord, one will continue the service in all circumstances. In the Bhagavad-gītā it is said that even a small quantity of devotional service can save one from the most dangerous position. There are many instances of such examples in history. Ajāmila is one of them. Ajāmila in his early life was a devotee, but in his youth he fell down. Still he was saved by the Lord at the end.