CC Madhya 6.80: Difference between revisions
m (1 revision(s)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | [[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - Madhya-lila Chapter 06|C080]] | ||
<div style="float:left">'''[[Sri Caitanya-caritamrta|Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta]] - [[CC Madhya|Madhya-līlā]] - [[CC Madhya 6|Chapter 6: The Liberation of Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya]]'''</div> | |||
<div style="float:right">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 6.79|Madhya-līlā 6.79]] '''[[CC Madhya 6.79|Madhya-līlā 6.79]] - [[CC Madhya 6.81|Madhya-līlā 6.81]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 6.81|Madhya-līlā 6.81]]</div> | |||
{{CompareVersions|CC|Madhya 6.80|CC 1975|CC 1996}} | |||
{{RandomImage}} | |||
==== TEXT 80 ==== | ==== TEXT 80 ==== | ||
<div | <div class="verse"> | ||
śiṣya-gaṇa kahe,—‘īśvara kaha kon pramāṇe’ | :śiṣya-gaṇa kahe,—‘īśvara kaha kon pramāṇe’ | ||
ācārya kahe,—‘vijña-mata īśvara-lakṣaṇe’ | :ācārya kahe,—‘vijña-mata īśvara-lakṣaṇe’ | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 12: | Line 16: | ||
==== SYNONYMS ==== | ==== SYNONYMS ==== | ||
<div | <div class="synonyms"> | ||
śiṣya-gaṇa | ''śiṣya-gaṇa kahe''—the disciples of Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya said; ''īśvara kaha''—you say the Supreme Personality of Godhead; ''kon pramāṇe''—by what evidence; ''ācārya kahe''—Gopīnātha Ācārya replied; ''vijña-mata''—statements of authorized persons; ''īśvara-lakṣaṇe''—in understanding the Supreme Personality of Godhead. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 19: | Line 23: | ||
==== TRANSLATION ==== | ==== TRANSLATION ==== | ||
<div | <div class="translation"> | ||
The disciples of Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya retaliated, “By what evidence do you conclude that Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu is the Supreme Lord?” | The disciples of Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya retaliated, “By what evidence do you conclude that Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu is the Supreme Lord?” | ||
Gopīnātha Ācārya replied, “The statements of authorized ācāryas who understand the Supreme Personality of Godhead are proof.” | Gopīnātha Ācārya replied, “The statements of authorized ācāryas who understand the Supreme Personality of Godhead are proof.” | ||
| Line 27: | Line 31: | ||
==== PURPORT ==== | ==== PURPORT ==== | ||
<div | <div class="purport"> | ||
Since the appearance of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, there have been many pseudo incarnations in India who do not present authorized evidence. Five hundred years ago the disciples of Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya, being very learned scholars, were certainly right in asking Gopīnātha Ācārya for evidence. If a person proposes that he himself is God or that someone else is an incarnation of God or God Himself, he must cite evidence from śāstra to prove his claim. Thus the request of the Bhaṭṭācārya’s disciples is quite bona fide. Unfortunately, at the present moment it has become fashionable to present someone as an incarnation of God without referring to the śāstras. Before an intelligent person accepts someone as an incarnation of God, however, he must ask about the evidence. When the disciples of Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya challenged Gopīnātha Ācārya, he immediately replied correctly: “We must hear the statements of great personalities in order to understand the Supreme Personality of Godhead.” Lord Kṛṣṇa is established as the Supreme Personality of Godhead by statements from many authorized persons, such as Brahmā, Nārada, Vyāsadeva, Asita and Arjuna. Similarly, Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu is also established as the Supreme Personality of Godhead by evidence from the same personalities. This will be explained later. | Since the appearance of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, there have been many pseudo incarnations in India who do not present authorized evidence. Five hundred years ago the disciples of Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya, being very learned scholars, were certainly right in asking Gopīnātha Ācārya for evidence. If a person proposes that he himself is God or that someone else is an incarnation of God or God Himself, he must cite evidence from ''śāstra'' to prove his claim. Thus the request of the Bhaṭṭācārya’s disciples is quite bona fide. Unfortunately, at the present moment it has become fashionable to present someone as an incarnation of God without referring to the ''śāstras''. Before an intelligent person accepts someone as an incarnation of God, however, he must ask about the evidence. When the disciples of Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya challenged Gopīnātha Ācārya, he immediately replied correctly: “We must hear the statements of great personalities in order to understand the Supreme Personality of Godhead.” Lord Kṛṣṇa is established as the Supreme Personality of Godhead by statements from many authorized persons, such as Brahmā, Nārada, Vyāsadeva, Asita and Arjuna. Similarly, Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu is also established as the Supreme Personality of Godhead by evidence from the same personalities. This will be explained later. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
<div style="float:right; clear:both;">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=CC Madhya 6.79|Madhya-līlā 6.79]] '''[[CC Madhya 6.79|Madhya-līlā 6.79]] - [[CC Madhya 6.81|Madhya-līlā 6.81]]''' [[File:Go-next.png|link=CC Madhya 6.81|Madhya-līlā 6.81]]</div> | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
__NOEDITSECTION__ | |||
Revision as of 03:31, 29 July 2021
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada
TEXT 80
- śiṣya-gaṇa kahe,—‘īśvara kaha kon pramāṇe’
- ācārya kahe,—‘vijña-mata īśvara-lakṣaṇe’
SYNONYMS
śiṣya-gaṇa kahe—the disciples of Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya said; īśvara kaha—you say the Supreme Personality of Godhead; kon pramāṇe—by what evidence; ācārya kahe—Gopīnātha Ācārya replied; vijña-mata—statements of authorized persons; īśvara-lakṣaṇe—in understanding the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
TRANSLATION
The disciples of Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya retaliated, “By what evidence do you conclude that Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu is the Supreme Lord?” Gopīnātha Ācārya replied, “The statements of authorized ācāryas who understand the Supreme Personality of Godhead are proof.”
PURPORT
Since the appearance of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, there have been many pseudo incarnations in India who do not present authorized evidence. Five hundred years ago the disciples of Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya, being very learned scholars, were certainly right in asking Gopīnātha Ācārya for evidence. If a person proposes that he himself is God or that someone else is an incarnation of God or God Himself, he must cite evidence from śāstra to prove his claim. Thus the request of the Bhaṭṭācārya’s disciples is quite bona fide. Unfortunately, at the present moment it has become fashionable to present someone as an incarnation of God without referring to the śāstras. Before an intelligent person accepts someone as an incarnation of God, however, he must ask about the evidence. When the disciples of Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya challenged Gopīnātha Ācārya, he immediately replied correctly: “We must hear the statements of great personalities in order to understand the Supreme Personality of Godhead.” Lord Kṛṣṇa is established as the Supreme Personality of Godhead by statements from many authorized persons, such as Brahmā, Nārada, Vyāsadeva, Asita and Arjuna. Similarly, Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu is also established as the Supreme Personality of Godhead by evidence from the same personalities. This will be explained later.