Go to Vaniquotes | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia


Vanisource - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge


710708 - Lecture ISO - Los Angeles: Difference between revisions

m (1 revision(s))
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{SIL_Header|{{PAGENAME}}}}
[[Category:1971 - Lectures]]
<div class="lec_code">710708IP.LA</div>
[[Category:1971 - Lectures and Conversations]]
[[Category:1971 - Lectures, Conversations and Letters]]
[[Category:1971-07 - Lectures, Conversations and Letters]]
[[Category:Lectures - USA]]
[[Category:Lectures - USA, Los Angeles]]
[[Category:Lectures, Conversations and Letters - USA]]
[[Category:Lectures, Conversations and Letters - USA, Los Angeles]]
[[Category:Lectures - Isopanisad]]
[[Category:Audio Files 20.01 to 30.00 Minutes]]
[[Category:1971 - New Audio - Released in June 2016]]
<div style="float:left">[[File:Go-previous.png|link=Category:Lectures - by Date]]'''[[:Category:Lectures - by Date|Lectures by Date]], [[:Category:1971 - Lectures|1971]]'''</div>
{{RandomImage}}




Prabhupāda: ...spiritual. Otherwise, how he speaks of? These things are there in the Vedic literatures. Sa aikṣata: "He glanced over, and there was creation." In Bhagavad-gītā also it is said that mayādhyakṣena prakṛtiḥ sūyate sa-carācaram [[BG 9.10]] . So Kṛṣṇa's, or God's, position is always transcendental. Therefore those who are impersonalists, they are not attracted with the variegatedness of this material life. They want to make it void, because they have no information of the spiritual variegatedness. But this Śukadeva Gosvāmī, he became attracted with the pastimes of Kṛṣṇa because Kṛṣṇa's pastimes are not variegatedness of this material world. It is completely spiritual. And to discuss about Kṛṣṇa or to hear about Kṛṣṇa, to chant about Kṛṣṇa, to glorify about Kṛṣṇa—everything spiritual. So if you are engaged twenty-four hours in this business you are not in this material world. You are in the spiritual world.
<div class="code">710708IP-LOS_ANGELES - July 08, 1971 - 22:27 Minutes</div>


Thank you very much.


Devotees: Jaya. [break]
<mp3player>https://s3.amazonaws.com/vanipedia/full/1971/710708IP-LOS_ANGELES.mp3</mp3player>


Prabhupāda: Formerly the spiritual master, the disciplic succession, there are two ways. One is called śaukra and another is called sautra. Śaukra means succession from the seminal. Just like son. Son is born by the semina, and the disciple is born by Vedic knowledge. So the one familywise is called śaukra. Śukra means semina, coming from the śukra, and the other is sautra, by hearing. So spiritual master... In India still there are gotras. Gotras means coming from that great sage. Just like our family belongs to the Gautama gotra. Gautama Ṛṣi, from him the familywise gotra, and similarly disciplic succession is also gotra. There is no difference between putra and chatra. Putra means son, and chatra means disciple. Cāṇakya Paṇḍita said, putrāṁś ca śiṣyāṁś ca; they are equally treated. Both of them equally eligible for hereditary rites from the person, either he is son or disciple. So Brahmā distributed knowledge to some... Practically everyone was his son because he was the first living creature. So later on, disciples also, son's son. So in this way Brahmā distributed this Vedic knowledge, some to the sons, some to the... Vyāsadeva also, he distributed knowledge, some to his sons, some to his disciples. That is explained in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. So that is the process of disseminating Vedic knowledge. Then?


Karandhara: (reading:)"The Lord being pūrṇam, or all-perfect, there is no chance of His being subjected to the laws of material nature, while the living entities and the inanimate objects are all controlled by the laws of nature and thus ultimately by the potency of the Lord. The Īśopaniṣad is a part of the Yajur Veda. "
Prabhupāda:
:''oṁ pūrṇam adaḥ pūrṇam idaṁ''
:''pūrṇāt pūrṇam udacyate''
:''pūrṇasya pūrṇam ādāya''
:''pūrṇam evāvaśiṣyate''
:([[ISO Invocation]])


Prabhupāda: There are four Vedas—Sāma Veda, Yajur Veda, Ṛg Veda, and Atharva Veda. Originally there was one Veda, but later on, Vyāsadeva divided them into four. So Yajur Veda is one of the Vedas, and the Īśopaniṣad is stated there. All the Upaniṣads are stated in the different kinds of Vedas. Therefore Upaniṣad is accepted as Vedic study. Go on.
:''īśāvāsyam idam sarvaṁ''
:''yat kiñca jagatyāṁ jagat''
:''tena tyaktena bhuñjīthā''
:''mā gṛdhaḥ kasya svid dhanam''
:([[ISO 1|ISO 1]])
:''kurvann eveha karmāṇi''
:''jijīviṣec chataṁ samāḥ''
:''evaṁ tvayi nānyatheto 'sti''
:''na karma lipyate nare''
:([[ISO 2|ISO 2]])
:''asuryā nāma te lokā''
:''andhena tamasāvṛtāḥ''
:''tāṁs te pretyābhigacchanti''
:''ye ke cātma-hano janāḥ''
:([[ISO 3|ISO 3]])
:''anejad ekaṁ manaso javīyo''
:''nainad devā āpnuvan pūrvam arṣat''
:''tad dhāvato 'nyān atyeti tiṣṭhat''
:''tasminn apo mātariśvā dadhāti''
:([[ISO 4|ISO 4]])


Karandhara: "The Īśopaniṣad is a part of the Yajur Veda, and as such, it contains information as to the proprietorship of all things that exist within the universe."
:''tad ejati tan naijati''
:''tad dūre tad v antike''
:''tad antar asya sarvasya''
:''tad u sarvasyāsya bāhyataḥ''
:([[ISO 5|ISO 5]])


Prabhupāda: Just like evidence. Evidence... (aside:) Now you can sit down. Evidence, whenever we want to give evidence... Just like in law court, the evidence, you have to cite the section or the preamble of the laws. Similarly, in our human civilization this evidence is Vedas. If you find something stated in the Vedas, that you have to accept. That's all. Axiomatic truth. And because the Vedas were particularly studied by the brāhmaṇas, high-class qualified brāhmaṇas, therefore they are also accepted as authority. Just like Caitanya Mahāprabhu, when He was at Purī, the king of that place, Mahārāja Pratāparudra, he inquired from Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya, "Oh, what is your opinion about this Caitanya who has come here?" He said that "He is the Supreme Personality of Godhead." So the king immediately accepted it. King said, "Oh, He is Supreme Personality of Godhead?" So he accepted immediately, just like... There is no question of experimenting. Because an authority like Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya is stating, a brāhmaṇa and... He was very learned scholar. You know Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya's name. So because he said that "He is Supreme Personality..." He did not ask any storekeeper, but he asked a learned brāhmaṇa who knows things. So similarly, we have to accept in that way. In each and every case, if we want to research, it is not possible, because our senses are blunt senses. What you can do? Acintyāḥ khalu ye bhāvā na tāṁs tarkeṇa yojayet. The śāstra says that "Things which are beyond your conception, beyond your mental speculation"— avāṅ-manasā gocaraḥ —"neither you can express by words, neither you can think of." Avāṅ-manasā gocaraḥ.
:''yas tu sarvāṇi bhūtāny''
:''ātmany evānupaśyati''
:''sarva-bhūteṣu cātmānaṁ''
:''tato na vijugupsate''
:([[ISO 6|ISO 6]])


So such things it is useless, try to understand by arguments. That is simply nonsense. You can, of course, inquire, but that inquiry is not challenge. If you inquire from your spiritual master by challenge, then it is your misfortune. You have to inquire from the spiritual master—that is indicated- sevayā, by service, by making him satisfied. Tad viddhi praṇipātena paripraśnena sevayā [[BG 4.34]] . First of all you have to surrender, and then you have to please him by service. Yasya prasādād bhagavat-prasādaḥ ** . If you can please him, then naturally Kṛṣṇa is pleased upon you. That is the injunction. So this praśna... First of all you should find out somebody where you can surrender. If there is duplicity in surrender, that is useless. First of all see whether you can surrender there; then accept him spiritual master and then please him by your service and inquiry. That is Vedic principle.
:''yasmin sarvāṇi bhūtāny''
:''ātmaivābhūd vijānataḥ''
:''tatra ko mohaḥ kaḥ śoka''
:''ekatvam anupaśyataḥ''
:([[ISO 7|ISO 7]])


Thank you very much. (end)
:''sa paryagāc chukram akāyam avraṇam''
:''asnāviram śuddham apāpa-viddham''
:''kavir manīṣī paribhūḥ svayambhūr''
:''yāthātathyato 'rthān vyadadhāc chāśvatībhyaḥ samābhyaḥ''
:([[ISO 8|ISO 8]])
:''andhaṁ tamaḥ praviśanti''
:''ye 'vidyām upāsate''
:''tato bhūya iva te tamo''
:''ya u vidyāyām ratāḥ''
:([[ISO 9|ISO 9]])


:''anyad evāhur vidyayā-''
:''nyad āhur avidyayā''
:''iti śuśruma dhīrāṇāṁ''
:''ye nas tad vicacakṣire''
:([[ISO 10|ISO 10]])


{{BSL_Footer|{{PAGENAME}}}}
:''vidyāṁ cāvidyāṁ c yas''
:''tad vedobhayaṁ saha''
:''avidyayā mṛtyuṁ tīrtvā''
:''vidyayāmṛtam aśnute''
:([[ISO 11|ISO 11]])
:''andhaṁ tamaḥ praviśanti''
:''ye 'sambhūtim upāsate''
:''tato bhūya iva te tamo''
:''ya u sambhūtyām ratāḥ''
:([[ISO 12|ISO 12]])
Page?
Karandhara: Page 14 in the middle, almost the middle of the first paragraph. "The ''Vedas'' are not known like that. The Vedic knowledge was originally imparted into the heart of Brahmā, the first created living being, and Brahmā in his turn disseminated the knowledge to his sons and disciples, who have continued the process down thorough history."
Prabhupāda: Formerly, the spiritual master, the disciplic succession, there are two ways. One is called ''śaukra'' and another is called ''sautra''. ''Śaukra'' means succession from the seminal. Just like son. Son is born by the semina, and the disciple is born by Vedic knowledge. So the one familywise is called ''śaukra''. ''Śukra'' means semina, coming from the ''śukra''. And the other is ''sautra'': by hearing.
The spiritual master . . . in India still there are ''gotras''. ''Gotras'' means coming from that great sage. Just like our family belongs to the ''Gautama'' ''gotra''. Gautama Ṛṣi, from him the familywise ''gotra'', and similarly disciplic succession is also ''gotra''. There is no difference between ''putra'' and ''chatra''. ''Putra'' means son, and ''chatra'' means disciple. Cāṇakya Paṇḍita said, ''putrāṁś ca śiṣyāṁś ca'': they are equally treated. Both of them equally eligible for hereditary rites from the person, either he is son or disciple.
So Brahmā distributed knowledge to some . . . practically everyone was his son, because he was the first living creature. So later on, disciples also, son's son. So in this way Brahmā distributed this Vedic knowledge, some to the sons, some to the . . . Vyāsadeva also, he distributed knowledge, some to his sons, some to his disciples. That is explained in the ''Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam''. So that is the process of disseminating Vedic knowledge.
Then?
Karandhara: (reading) "The Lord being ''pūrṇam'', or all-perfect, there is no chance of His being subjected to the laws of material nature, while the living entities and the inanimate objects are all controlled by the laws of nature and thus ultimately by the potency of the Lord. The ''Īśopaniṣad'' is a part of the ''Yajur Veda''."
Prabhupāda: There are four ''Vedas—Sāma Veda'', ''Yajur Veda'', ''Ṛg Veda'' and ''Atharva Veda''. Originally there was one ''Veda'', but later on, Vyāsadeva divided them into four. So ''Yajur Veda'' is one of the ''Vedas'', and the ''Īśopaniṣad'' is stated there. All the ''Upaniṣads'' are stated in the different kinds of ''Vedas''. Therefore ''Upaniṣad'' is accepted as Vedic study.
Go on.
Karandhara: "The ''Īśopaniṣad'' is a part of the ''Yajur Veda'', and as such, it contains information as to the proprietorship of all things that exist within the universe."
Prabhupāda: Just like evidence. Evidence . . .
(aside) Now you can sit down.
Evidence, whenever we want to give evidence . . . just like in law court, the evidence, you have to cite the section or the preamble of the laws. Similarly, in our human civilization this evidence is ''Veda''. If you find something stated in the ''Vedas'', that you have to accept. That's all. Axiomatic truth. And because the ''Vedas'' were particularly studied by the ''brāhmiṇs'', high-class qualified ''brāhmiṇs'', therefore they are also accepted as authority.
Just like Caitanya Mahāprabhu, when He was at Purī, the king of that place, Mahārāja Pratāparudra, he inquired from Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya, "Oh, what is your opinion about this Caitanya who has come here?" He said that, "He is the Supreme Personality of Godhead." So the king immediately accepted it. King said: "Oh, He is Supreme Personality of Godhead?"
So he accepted immediately. There is no question of experimenting. Because an authority like Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya is stating, a ''brāhmiṇ'', and . . . he was very learned scholar. You know Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya's name. So because he said that, "He is Supreme Personality . . ." He did not ask any storekeeper, but he asked a learned ''brāhmiṇ'' who knows things.
So similarly, we have to accept in that way. In each and every case, if we want to research, it is not possible, because our senses are blunt senses. What you can do? ''Acintyāḥ khalu ye bhāvā na tāṁs tarkeṇa yojayet'' (''Mahābhārata'', ''Bhīṣma parva'' 5.22). The ''śāstra'' says that, "Things which are beyond your conception, beyond your mental speculation"—''avāṅ-manasā gocaraḥ''—"neither you can express by words, neither you can think of." ''Avāṅ-manasā gocaraḥ.''
So such things it is useless, try to understand by arguments. That is simply nonsense. You can, of course, inquire, but that inquiry is not challenge. If you inquire from your spiritual master by challenge, then it is your misfortune. You have to inquire from the spiritual master—that is indicated—''sevayā'', by service, by making him satisfied.
''Tad viddhi praṇipātena paripraśnena sevayā'' ([[BG 4.34 (1972)|BG 4.34]]). First of all you have to surrender, and then you have to please him by service. ''Yasya prasādād bhagavat-prasādaḥ''. If you can please him, then naturally Kṛṣṇa is pleased upon you. That is the injunction.
So this ''praśna'' . . . first of all you should find out somebody where you can surrender. If there is duplicity in surrender, that is useless. First of all see whether you can surrender there; then accept him spiritual master, and then please him by your service and inquiry. That is Vedic principle.
Thank you very much.
(''kīrtana'') (Prabhupāda plays gong) (''prema-dhvani'')
Thank you very much.
(devotees offering obeisances) (end)

Revision as of 01:13, 7 September 2020

His Divine Grace
A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada



710708IP-LOS_ANGELES - July 08, 1971 - 22:27 Minutes



Prabhupāda:

oṁ pūrṇam adaḥ pūrṇam idaṁ
pūrṇāt pūrṇam udacyate
pūrṇasya pūrṇam ādāya
pūrṇam evāvaśiṣyate
(ISO Invocation)
īśāvāsyam idam sarvaṁ
yat kiñca jagatyāṁ jagat
tena tyaktena bhuñjīthā
mā gṛdhaḥ kasya svid dhanam
(ISO 1)
kurvann eveha karmāṇi
jijīviṣec chataṁ samāḥ
evaṁ tvayi nānyatheto 'sti
na karma lipyate nare
(ISO 2)
asuryā nāma te lokā
andhena tamasāvṛtāḥ
tāṁs te pretyābhigacchanti
ye ke cātma-hano janāḥ
(ISO 3)
anejad ekaṁ manaso javīyo
nainad devā āpnuvan pūrvam arṣat
tad dhāvato 'nyān atyeti tiṣṭhat
tasminn apo mātariśvā dadhāti
(ISO 4)
tad ejati tan naijati
tad dūre tad v antike
tad antar asya sarvasya
tad u sarvasyāsya bāhyataḥ
(ISO 5)
yas tu sarvāṇi bhūtāny
ātmany evānupaśyati
sarva-bhūteṣu cātmānaṁ
tato na vijugupsate
(ISO 6)
yasmin sarvāṇi bhūtāny
ātmaivābhūd vijānataḥ
tatra ko mohaḥ kaḥ śoka
ekatvam anupaśyataḥ
(ISO 7)
sa paryagāc chukram akāyam avraṇam
asnāviram śuddham apāpa-viddham
kavir manīṣī paribhūḥ svayambhūr
yāthātathyato 'rthān vyadadhāc chāśvatībhyaḥ samābhyaḥ
(ISO 8)
andhaṁ tamaḥ praviśanti
ye 'vidyām upāsate
tato bhūya iva te tamo
ya u vidyāyām ratāḥ
(ISO 9)
anyad evāhur vidyayā-
nyad āhur avidyayā
iti śuśruma dhīrāṇāṁ
ye nas tad vicacakṣire
(ISO 10)
vidyāṁ cāvidyāṁ c yas
tad vedobhayaṁ saha
avidyayā mṛtyuṁ tīrtvā
vidyayāmṛtam aśnute
(ISO 11)
andhaṁ tamaḥ praviśanti
ye 'sambhūtim upāsate
tato bhūya iva te tamo
ya u sambhūtyām ratāḥ
(ISO 12)

Page?

Karandhara: Page 14 in the middle, almost the middle of the first paragraph. "The Vedas are not known like that. The Vedic knowledge was originally imparted into the heart of Brahmā, the first created living being, and Brahmā in his turn disseminated the knowledge to his sons and disciples, who have continued the process down thorough history."

Prabhupāda: Formerly, the spiritual master, the disciplic succession, there are two ways. One is called śaukra and another is called sautra. Śaukra means succession from the seminal. Just like son. Son is born by the semina, and the disciple is born by Vedic knowledge. So the one familywise is called śaukra. Śukra means semina, coming from the śukra. And the other is sautra: by hearing.

The spiritual master . . . in India still there are gotras. Gotras means coming from that great sage. Just like our family belongs to the Gautama gotra. Gautama Ṛṣi, from him the familywise gotra, and similarly disciplic succession is also gotra. There is no difference between putra and chatra. Putra means son, and chatra means disciple. Cāṇakya Paṇḍita said, putrāṁś ca śiṣyāṁś ca: they are equally treated. Both of them equally eligible for hereditary rites from the person, either he is son or disciple.

So Brahmā distributed knowledge to some . . . practically everyone was his son, because he was the first living creature. So later on, disciples also, son's son. So in this way Brahmā distributed this Vedic knowledge, some to the sons, some to the . . . Vyāsadeva also, he distributed knowledge, some to his sons, some to his disciples. That is explained in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. So that is the process of disseminating Vedic knowledge.

Then?

Karandhara: (reading) "The Lord being pūrṇam, or all-perfect, there is no chance of His being subjected to the laws of material nature, while the living entities and the inanimate objects are all controlled by the laws of nature and thus ultimately by the potency of the Lord. The Īśopaniṣad is a part of the Yajur Veda."

Prabhupāda: There are four Vedas—Sāma Veda, Yajur Veda, Ṛg Veda and Atharva Veda. Originally there was one Veda, but later on, Vyāsadeva divided them into four. So Yajur Veda is one of the Vedas, and the Īśopaniṣad is stated there. All the Upaniṣads are stated in the different kinds of Vedas. Therefore Upaniṣad is accepted as Vedic study.

Go on.

Karandhara: "The Īśopaniṣad is a part of the Yajur Veda, and as such, it contains information as to the proprietorship of all things that exist within the universe."

Prabhupāda: Just like evidence. Evidence . . .

(aside) Now you can sit down.

Evidence, whenever we want to give evidence . . . just like in law court, the evidence, you have to cite the section or the preamble of the laws. Similarly, in our human civilization this evidence is Veda. If you find something stated in the Vedas, that you have to accept. That's all. Axiomatic truth. And because the Vedas were particularly studied by the brāhmiṇs, high-class qualified brāhmiṇs, therefore they are also accepted as authority.

Just like Caitanya Mahāprabhu, when He was at Purī, the king of that place, Mahārāja Pratāparudra, he inquired from Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya, "Oh, what is your opinion about this Caitanya who has come here?" He said that, "He is the Supreme Personality of Godhead." So the king immediately accepted it. King said: "Oh, He is Supreme Personality of Godhead?"

So he accepted immediately. There is no question of experimenting. Because an authority like Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya is stating, a brāhmiṇ, and . . . he was very learned scholar. You know Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya's name. So because he said that, "He is Supreme Personality . . ." He did not ask any storekeeper, but he asked a learned brāhmiṇ who knows things.

So similarly, we have to accept in that way. In each and every case, if we want to research, it is not possible, because our senses are blunt senses. What you can do? Acintyāḥ khalu ye bhāvā na tāṁs tarkeṇa yojayet (Mahābhārata, Bhīṣma parva 5.22). The śāstra says that, "Things which are beyond your conception, beyond your mental speculation"—avāṅ-manasā gocaraḥ—"neither you can express by words, neither you can think of." Avāṅ-manasā gocaraḥ.

So such things it is useless, try to understand by arguments. That is simply nonsense. You can, of course, inquire, but that inquiry is not challenge. If you inquire from your spiritual master by challenge, then it is your misfortune. You have to inquire from the spiritual master—that is indicated—sevayā, by service, by making him satisfied.

Tad viddhi praṇipātena paripraśnena sevayā (BG 4.34). First of all you have to surrender, and then you have to please him by service. Yasya prasādād bhagavat-prasādaḥ. If you can please him, then naturally Kṛṣṇa is pleased upon you. That is the injunction.

So this praśna . . . first of all you should find out somebody where you can surrender. If there is duplicity in surrender, that is useless. First of all see whether you can surrender there; then accept him spiritual master, and then please him by your service and inquiry. That is Vedic principle.

Thank you very much.

(kīrtana) (Prabhupāda plays gong) (prema-dhvani)

Thank you very much.

(devotees offering obeisances) (end)